Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

use-case-2.0(用例 2 0)

use-case-2.0 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

use-case-2.0 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,068。

总安装 306周安装 13GitHub Stars 61下载 107核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:use-case-2.0(用例 2 0)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/use-case-2.0
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill use-case-2.0
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill use-case-2.0

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

该技能用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适用于需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果的场景。可在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 等宿主环境中使用。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装。使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件操作。

来源仓库内路径:skills/use-case-2.0

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill u…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

use-case-2.0 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill use-case-2.…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

use-case-2.0 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

use-case-2.0 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

use-case-2.0 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

use-case-2.0 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 306 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 107 次,GitHub 61 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

use-case-2.0 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
use-case-2.0

用例 2 0 · 本页

30661需要联网未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Use Case 2.0

A modern, lightweight approach to use case modeling that integrates with agile practices while preserving the benefits of structured requirements.

When to Use This Skill

Keywords: use case, use case 2.0, Ivar Jacobson, use case slice, narrative, basic flow, alternate flow, exception, actor, goal, scenario, precondition, postcondition, trigger, user story from use case

Use this skill when:

  • Modeling system behavior from user perspective
  • Deriving user stories from use cases
  • Planning releases using use case slices
  • Documenting complex interactions with multiple paths
  • Understanding actor goals and system responses
  • Creating testable requirements from narratives

What is Use Case 2.0?

Use Case 2.0 modernizes classic use cases for agile contexts while retaining their power for:

  • Capturing functional requirements comprehensively
  • Understanding system boundaries and actors
  • Identifying all paths through a scenario (happy path + alternatives + exceptions)
  • Creating traceable, testable specifications

Key Principles

PrincipleDescription
Slice-basedUse cases are implemented in slices, not all at once
LightweightStart simple, add detail only when needed
Story-compatibleUser stories can be derived from use case slices
Test-firstEach slice is testable before implementation
Value-drivenSlices prioritized by business value

Use Case 2.0 Lifecycle

┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐
│   FIND       │ →  │   SLICE      │ →  │   PREPARE    │
│ Use Cases    │    │ Use Cases    │    │ Use Case     │
│              │    │              │    │ Slices       │
└──────────────┘    └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘
                                               │
                    ┌──────────────┐    ┌──────┴───────┐
                    │   INSPECT    │ ←  │   ANALYZE    │
                    │   & ADAPT    │    │   Slices     │
                    └──────────────┘    └──────────────┘

Phase Details

use_case_lifecycle:
  find:
    purpose: "Identify use cases from goals and actors"
    activities:
      - "Identify actors (primary, supporting, offstage)"
      - "Capture actor goals"
      - "Name use cases (verb-noun)"
      - "Create use case diagram"
    output: "Use case model (diagram + brief descriptions)"

  slice:
    purpose: "Break use cases into implementable slices"
    activities:
      - "Identify basic flow (happy path)"
      - "Identify alternative flows"
      - "Identify exception flows"
      - "Group flows into slices"
    output: "Sliced use cases with prioritization"

  prepare:
    purpose: "Detail slices for implementation"
    activities:
      - "Write narrative for selected slice"
      - "Define test cases"
      - "Identify special requirements"
    output: "Ready-for-development slice"

  analyze:
    purpose: "Verify slice is implementable"
    activities:
      - "Review with stakeholders"
      - "Validate test cases"
      - "Confirm acceptance criteria"
    output: "Validated slice"

  inspect_adapt:
    purpose: "Learn and improve"
    activities:
      - "Review implemented slices"
      - "Update use case model"
      - "Refine remaining slices"
    output: "Updated backlog"

Use Case Elements

Actor Types

actor_types:
  primary_actor:
    definition: "Actor whose goal the use case satisfies"
    examples:
      - "Customer placing an order"
      - "Administrator managing users"
    notation: "Stick figure connected to use case"

  supporting_actor:
    definition: "Actor that provides a service to the system"
    examples:
      - "Payment Gateway processing payment"
      - "Email Service sending notifications"
    notation: "Stick figure connected to use case (labeled)"

  offstage_actor:
    definition: "Actor with interest but no direct interaction"
    examples:
      - "Auditor requiring transaction logs"
      - "Regulator requiring compliance"
    notation: "Listed in stakeholders section"

Use Case Brief

Lightweight initial documentation:

use_case_brief:
  template:
    id: "UC-{domain}-{number}"
    name: "{Verb} {Noun}"
    primary_actor: "{Actor name}"
    goal: "{What the actor wants to achieve}"
    brief_description: "{1-2 sentences}"

  example:
    id: "UC-ORD-001"
    name: "Place Order"
    primary_actor: "Customer"
    goal: "Purchase products from the catalog"
    brief_description: "Customer selects products, provides shipping and payment information, and submits order for processing."

Use Case Narrative

Full documentation format:

## Use Case: {Name}

**ID:** UC-{XXX}-{NNN}
**Version:** {N.N}

### Overview

| Element | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| **Primary Actor** | {Actor name} |
| **Goal** | {What the actor wants to achieve} |
| **Scope** | {System boundary} |
| **Level** | {User goal / Subfunction / Summary} |
| **Trigger** | {What starts the use case} |

### Stakeholders and Interests

- **{Stakeholder 1}**: {Interest/concern}
- **{Stakeholder 2}**: {Interest/concern}

### Preconditions

- {Condition that must be true before use case can start}
- {Another precondition}

### Success Guarantee (Postconditions)

- {Condition guaranteed to be true after successful completion}
- {Another postcondition}

### Basic Flow (Main Success Scenario)

1. {Actor} {action}
2. System {response}
3. {Actor} {action}
4. System {response}
5. ...
6. System {final response indicating success}

### Alternative Flows

#### {Alternative Name} (at step {N})

**Condition:** {When this alternative applies}

{N}a. {Alternative action}
{N}b. System {alternative response}
{N}c. Return to step {M} / Use case ends

#### {Another Alternative} (at step {N})

...

### Exception Flows

#### {Exception Name} (at step {N})

**Condition:** {When this exception occurs}

{N}a. System {error detection}
{N}b. System {error handling}
{N}c. Use case ends in failure / Return to step {M}

### Special Requirements

- {Non-functional requirement affecting this use case}
- {Performance, security, usability requirement}

### Technology and Data Variations

- {Step N}: {Variation in technology or data format}

### Related Information

- **Frequency:** {How often this use case occurs}
- **Related Use Cases:** {Links to included/extended use cases}
- **Business Rules:** {BR-xxx, BR-yyy}

Use Case Slicing

What is a Slice?

use_case_slice:
  definition: "A subset of a use case that delivers value and is independently testable"

  characteristics:
    - "Implements part of use case flows"
    - "Can be developed in one iteration"
    - "Has clear acceptance criteria"
    - "Delivers incremental value"

  slice_types:
    basic_flow_slice:
      description: "Happy path only (simplest implementation)"
      example: "Place Order - basic checkout with existing customer"

    flow_variation_slice:
      description: "Basic flow + one alternative"
      example: "Place Order - with new customer registration"

    exception_slice:
      description: "Basic flow + exception handling"
      example: "Place Order - payment declined handling"

    complete_slice:
      description: "Full use case with all paths"
      example: "Place Order - complete implementation"

Slicing Strategies

slicing_strategies:
  by_actor:
    description: "Different slices for different actors"
    example: "Customer checkout vs. Admin override checkout"

  by_data_variation:
    description: "Different data types or volumes"
    example: "Single item order vs. bulk order"

  by_business_rule:
    description: "Different rules applied"
    example: "Standard pricing vs. promotional pricing"

  by_interface:
    description: "Different UI or integration points"
    example: "Web checkout vs. API checkout"

  by_quality:
    description: "Different quality attributes"
    example: "Basic validation vs. full validation"

Slice Template

use_case_slice:
  id: "UC-{XXX}-{NNN}-S{NN}"
  use_case: "UC-{XXX}-{NNN}"
  name: "{Use Case Name} - {Slice Description}"

  scope:
    flows_included:
      - "Basic flow steps 1-6"
      - "Alternative 3a (guest checkout)"
    flows_excluded:
      - "Alternative 2a (saved addresses)"
      - "Exception 5a (payment failure)"

  value_statement: "{What this slice enables for the user}"

  acceptance_criteria:
    - given: "{Precondition}"
      when: "{Action}"
      then: "{Expected outcome}"

  test_scenarios:
    - "Happy path with valid data"
    - "Guest checkout without account"

  estimate: "{Story points or ideal days}"
  priority: "{Value/Risk ranking}"

User Story Derivation

Convert use case slices to user stories:

slice_to_story:
  pattern: "Each slice becomes one or more user stories"

  mapping:
    use_case_name: "Epic name"
    slice: "User story"
    acceptance_criteria: "Acceptance criteria"
    test_scenarios: "Test cases"

  example:
    use_case: "Place Order"
    slices:
      - slice: "Basic checkout"
        story: |
          As a Customer
          I want to place an order with items in my cart
          So that I can receive my purchased products

      - slice: "Guest checkout"
        story: |
          As a Guest
          I want to checkout without creating an account
          So that I can complete my purchase quickly

      - slice: "Payment retry"
        story: |
          As a Customer
          I want to retry payment if it fails
          So that I can complete my order without starting over

Story Mapping from Use Cases

Use Case Model              →    Story Map
─────────────────                ─────────────────
UC: Place Order                  Epic: Order Placement
├── Basic Flow               →   ├── Basic Checkout
├── Alt: Guest Checkout      →   ├── Guest Checkout
├── Alt: Saved Address       →   ├── Address Management
├── Alt: Gift Wrapping       →   ├── Gift Options
├── Exc: Payment Failed      →   ├── Payment Error Handling
└── Exc: Out of Stock        →   └── Inventory Handling

Use Case Diagram

UML Notation

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Order Management System                       │
│  ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│  │                                                            │ │
│  │  ╭──────────────╮       ╭─────────────────╮               │ │
│  │  │ Place Order  │───────│ Process Payment │               │ │
│  │  ╰──────────────╯       ╰─────────────────╯               │ │
│  │         │                        │                         │ │
│  │         │ «include»              │ «include»               │ │
│  │         ▼                        ▼                         │ │
│  │  ╭──────────────╮       ╭─────────────────╮               │ │
│  │  │ Select Items │       │ Validate Card   │               │ │
│  │  ╰──────────────╯       ╰─────────────────╯               │ │
│  │                                                            │ │
│  │  ╭──────────────╮                                         │ │
│  │  │ Cancel Order │                                         │ │
│  │  ╰──────────────╯                                         │ │
│  │         ▲                                                  │ │
│  │         │ «extend»                                         │ │
│  │         │ [within cancellation window]                     │ │
│  │  ╭──────────────╮                                         │ │
│  │  │ View Order   │                                         │ │
│  │  ╰──────────────╯                                         │ │
│  │                                                            │ │
│  └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

     ○                                               ○
    /|\  ────────── Place Order                     /|\  ────────── Process Payment
    / \                                             / \
  Customer                                    Payment Gateway

Relationships

use_case_relationships:
  include:
    notation: "«include»"
    meaning: "Base use case ALWAYS includes the behavior"
    example: "Place Order «include» Process Payment"
    arrow: "Dashed arrow from base to included"

  extend:
    notation: "«extend»"
    meaning: "Extension use case MAY add behavior under conditions"
    example: "View Order «extend» Cancel Order [within window]"
    arrow: "Dashed arrow from extension to base"

  generalization:
    notation: "Triangle arrow"
    meaning: "Child use case inherits from parent"
    example: "Pay by Credit Card inherits from Make Payment"

.NET/C# Implementation

Use Case Model

// Domain model for Use Case 2.0
namespace Requirements.UseCases;

public record UseCase
{
    public required string Id { get; init; }
    public required string Name { get; init; }
    public required Actor PrimaryActor { get; init; }
    public required string Goal { get; init; }
    public required UseCaseLevel Level { get; init; }
    public string? Trigger { get; init; }
    public string? Scope { get; init; }

    public List<Stakeholder> Stakeholders { get; init; } = [];
    public List<string> Preconditions { get; init; } = [];
    public List<string> Postconditions { get; init; } = [];
    public List<FlowStep> BasicFlow { get; init; } = [];
    public List<AlternativeFlow> AlternativeFlows { get; init; } = [];
    public List<ExceptionFlow> ExceptionFlows { get; init; } = [];
    public List<string> SpecialRequirements { get; init; } = [];
    public List<UseCaseSlice> Slices { get; init; } = [];
}

public enum UseCaseLevel
{
    Summary,      // High-level business process
    UserGoal,     // Primary level - user achieves goal
    Subfunction   // Supporting functionality
}

public record Actor(
    string Name,
    ActorType Type,
    string? Description = null
);

public enum ActorType
{
    Primary,
    Supporting,
    Offstage
}

public record FlowStep(
    int StepNumber,
    string ActorOrSystem,
    string Action
);

public record AlternativeFlow(
    string Name,
    int BranchAtStep,
    string Condition,
    List<FlowStep> Steps,
    FlowReturn Return
);

public record ExceptionFlow(
    string Name,
    int OccursAtStep,
    string Condition,
    List<FlowStep> Steps,
    bool EndsInFailure
);

public record FlowReturn(
    FlowReturnType Type,
    int? ReturnToStep = null
);

public enum FlowReturnType
{
    ReturnToBasicFlow,
    EndUseCase,
    EndInFailure
}

Use Case Slice Model

public record UseCaseSlice
{
    public required string Id { get; init; }
    public required string UseCaseId { get; init; }
    public required string Name { get; init; }
    public required string ValueStatement { get; init; }

    public List<string> IncludedFlows { get; init; } = [];
    public List<string> ExcludedFlows { get; init; } = [];
    public List<AcceptanceCriterion> AcceptanceCriteria { get; init; } = [];
    public List<string> TestScenarios { get; init; } = [];

    public int? StoryPoints { get; init; }
    public SlicePriority Priority { get; init; }
    public SliceStatus Status { get; init; }
}

public record AcceptanceCriterion(
    string Given,
    string When,
    string Then
);

public enum SlicePriority
{
    MustHave,
    ShouldHave,
    CouldHave,
    WontHave
}

public enum SliceStatus
{
    Identified,
    Prepared,
    Analyzed,
    Implementing,
    Done
}

Slice to User Story Converter

public class SliceToStoryConverter
{
    public UserStory Convert(UseCaseSlice slice, UseCase useCase)
    {
        return new UserStory
        {
            Id = $"US-{slice.Id}",
            Title = slice.Name,
            Narrative = GenerateNarrative(slice, useCase),
            AcceptanceCriteria = slice.AcceptanceCriteria
                .Select(ac => $"Given {ac.Given}, When {ac.When}, Then {ac.Then}")
                .ToList(),
            Epic = useCase.Name,
            StoryPoints = slice.StoryPoints,
            Priority = MapPriority(slice.Priority)
        };
    }

    private string GenerateNarrative(UseCaseSlice slice, UseCase useCase)
    {
        return $"""
            As a {useCase.PrimaryActor.Name}
            I want to {ExtractAction(slice, useCase)}
            So that {useCase.Goal}
            """;
    }

    private string ExtractAction(UseCaseSlice slice, UseCase useCase)
    {
        // Extract the main action from included flows
        var mainFlow = slice.IncludedFlows.FirstOrDefault() ?? useCase.Name.ToLowerInvariant();
        return mainFlow.Replace("Basic flow", useCase.Name.ToLowerInvariant());
    }

    private UserStoryPriority MapPriority(SlicePriority priority) =>
        priority switch
        {
            SlicePriority.MustHave => UserStoryPriority.Critical,
            SlicePriority.ShouldHave => UserStoryPriority.High,
            SlicePriority.CouldHave => UserStoryPriority.Medium,
            SlicePriority.WontHave => UserStoryPriority.Low,
            _ => UserStoryPriority.Medium
        };
}

public record UserStory
{
    public required string Id { get; init; }
    public required string Title { get; init; }
    public required string Narrative { get; init; }
    public List<string> AcceptanceCriteria { get; init; } = [];
    public string? Epic { get; init; }
    public int? StoryPoints { get; init; }
    public UserStoryPriority Priority { get; init; }
}

public enum UserStoryPriority
{
    Critical,
    High,
    Medium,
    Low
}

Best Practices

Writing Good Use Cases

naming:
  pattern: "Verb + Noun"
  good_examples:
    - "Place Order"
    - "Register Customer"
    - "Generate Report"
  bad_examples:
    - "Order" # No verb
    - "Customer Registration System" # System, not goal
    - "Handle Click" # Too low-level

flow_writing:
  guidelines:
    - "Write in active voice"
    - "Actor or System starts each step"
    - "One observable action per step"
    - "Number steps sequentially"
    - "Keep steps at same abstraction level"

  good_steps:
    - "1. Customer enters shipping address"
    - "2. System validates address format"
    - "3. System calculates shipping options"
    - "4. Customer selects shipping method"

  bad_steps:
    - "1. Click submit button" # Too detailed
    - "2. Stuff happens" # Too vague
    - "3. The system processes" # No outcome

level_selection:
  user_goal: "Primary level - use most often"
  summary: "For business process overview"
  subfunction: "For shared functionality (include targets)"

Slicing Guidelines

slice_sizing:
  ideal: "1-5 story points per slice"
  too_big: "Cannot complete in one iteration"
  too_small: "No incremental value delivered"

prioritization:
  value_first: "Basic flow slice before alternatives"
  risk_reduction: "Risky slices early for learning"
  dependency_aware: "Prerequisites before dependents"

coverage:
  minimal_viable: "Basic flow slice = MVP"
  enhanced: "Add high-value alternatives"
  complete: "All flows including exceptions"

Integration with Other Skills

Upstream

  • stakeholder-simulation - Identify actors and goals
  • interview-conducting - Elicit use case details
  • gap-analysis - Find missing use cases

Downstream

  • user-story-mapping - Derive stories from slices
  • prioritization-methods - Prioritize slices
  • business-rules-analysis - Extract rules from flows

Related Skills

  • ears-authoring (spec-driven-development) - Convert to EARS format
  • gherkin-authoring (spec-driven-development) - Convert to Gherkin scenarios

Output Format

Use Case Catalog

use_case_catalog:
  project: "{Project Name}"
  version: "1.0"
  last_updated: "{ISO-8601}"

  actors:
    - name: "Customer"
      type: "primary"
      description: "End user purchasing products"

    - name: "Payment Gateway"
      type: "supporting"
      description: "External payment processor"

  use_cases:
    - id: "UC-ORD-001"
      name: "Place Order"
      actor: "Customer"
      goal: "Purchase products from catalog"
      level: "UserGoal"
      slices:
        - id: "UC-ORD-001-S01"
          name: "Basic Checkout"
          status: "Done"
          priority: "MustHave"

        - id: "UC-ORD-001-S02"
          name: "Guest Checkout"
          status: "Implementing"
          priority: "ShouldHave"

  coverage:
    total_use_cases: 12
    total_slices: 34
    slices_done: 18
    slices_remaining: 16

References

For additional guidance:

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release - Use Case 2.0 skill

Last Updated: 2025-12-26

平台分布

Codex

36.08%
按下载量换算39

Claude

30.37%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

18.63%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

9.51%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills