Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

uplo-food-safety(食品安全)

uplo-food-safety 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

uplo-food-safety 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,922。

总安装 3,306周安装 142GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,159核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:uplo-food-safety(食品安全)
来源仓库:https://github.com/roojenkins/uplo-food-safety
安装命令:
openclaw skills install uplo-food-safety
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install uplo-food-safety

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于食品安全与质量管控的信息检索。适合HACCP计划、FDA合规记录和追溯文档查询。支持质量控制数据的结构化提取。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。需确保符合食品行业监管要求。uplo-food-safety 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

建议核对最新法规标准更新情况。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install uplo-food-safety;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

uplo-food-safety 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install uplo-food-safety。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

uplo-food-safety 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

uplo-food-safety 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

uplo-food-safety 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

uplo-food-safety 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,306 次,近一周安装 142 次,下载 1,159 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

uplo-food-safety 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
uplo-food-safety

食品安全 · 本页

3,306—只读MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
uplo-food-safety
description
AI-powered food safety knowledge management. Search HACCP plans, FDA compliance records, traceability documentation, and quality control data with structured extraction.

UPLO Food Safety — HACCP, Traceability & Regulatory Compliance Intelligence

From farm to fork, food safety depends on meticulous documentation: HACCP plans with critical control points, Preventive Controls for Human Food records, supplier verification audits, allergen control programs, sanitation SOPs, lot traceability matrices, and FDA/USDA correspondence. UPLO transforms these records from static compliance files into a living, searchable knowledge system that helps your food safety team respond faster to audits, recalls, and continuous improvement initiatives.

Session Start

Food safety documentation often contains confidential supplier audit results, proprietary formulations, and pre-decisional recall assessments. Verify your access level before querying.

get_identity_context

Load active directives — these may include recall response protocols, supplier qualification deadlines, or FSMA compliance milestones that should shape your recommendations.

get_directives

When to Use

  • A QA technician asks what the critical limit is for the thermal processing CCP on the chicken broth line and what corrective action to take when it deviates
  • The food safety team lead needs all supplier audit scores for co-packers that handle tree nut ingredients to assess allergen cross-contact risk
  • An FDA inspector is on-site and asks for the Preventive Controls Qualified Individual (PCQI) documentation and the most recent hazard analysis
  • Production needs to trace all lots of incoming flour received between March 1-15 to determine scope of a potential mycotoxin contamination
  • The plant manager asks whether the new oat milk product requires a new HACCP plan or can be covered under an existing one
  • Someone needs the environmental monitoring results for Listeria indicator organisms in Zone 2 and Zone 3 areas from the past 6 months
  • The quality director wants to compare sanitation verification swab results across all three production facilities

Example Workflows

Mock Recall Traceability Exercise

The organization runs a quarterly mock recall. This time: trace forward and backward on a specific lot of pasteurized eggs.

search_knowledge query="receiving records and supplier COA for pasteurized egg lot PE-2026-0847"
search_with_context query="production batches and finished goods lots that used pasteurized egg lot PE-2026-0847 including distribution records"
search_knowledge query="mock recall exercise procedures and acceptable completion time benchmarks"

Measure the time from query to complete trace. The FDA expectation under FSMA 204 is full traceability within 24 hours.

Audit Nonconformance Follow-Up

A third-party GFSI audit identified a major nonconformance related to the allergen control program. The corrective action deadline is in 30 days.

search_knowledge query="allergen control program and cross-contact prevention procedures for shared production lines"
search_with_context query="allergen cleaning validation studies and swab test results for lines running both peanut and peanut-free products"
search_knowledge query="previous allergen-related audit findings and corrective actions taken in the past 24 months"

Key Tools for Food Safety

search_knowledge — Direct access to specific food safety records. Essential during audits when an inspector asks for something concrete: query="water activity and pH monitoring logs for the beef jerky production line May 2026". Speed matters when regulators are watching.

search_with_context — Critical for traceability and root cause analysis. A contamination investigation requires connecting suppliers, lots, production runs, distribution, and customer complaints: query="all products and distribution channels affected by the Salmonella-positive environmental swab in Processing Room 3 on June 12".

get_directives — Food safety priorities shift with regulatory changes, customer requirements, and incident history. A directive mandating "zero tolerance for environmental Listeria positives in RTE areas" changes how you interpret borderline monitoring results.

report_knowledge_gap — Missing food safety documentation is a regulatory violation, not just an inconvenience. Report gaps aggressively: topic="foreign material control program for Plant B" description="No documented metal detection calibration records found for the newest production line despite FDA requirement under 21 CFR 117"

log_conversation — Food safety consultations may involve recall decisions, regulatory interpretations, or deviation assessments. Log these sessions with specific topics for audit trail purposes: summary="Evaluated scope of potential allergen mislabeling on SKU 4492" topics='["allergen", "recall-assessment", "labeling"]'

Tips

  • Food safety queries are often time-critical. During a regulatory inspection or active recall, use search_knowledge for speed. Save search_with_context for when you need the full traceability chain.
  • Lot codes, batch numbers, and supplier codes are the primary keys of food safety. Include them in your queries whenever possible. Searching for "flour contamination" is far less useful than searching for "flour lot FL-2026-03-127 supplier Mill Creek Foods".
  • Environmental monitoring data follows a zone-based hierarchy (Zone 1 = food contact, Zone 2 = adjacent, Zone 3 = environment, Zone 4 = remote). Always clarify which zone is relevant when interpreting results — a Listeria positive in Zone 1 triggers a very different response than one in Zone 4.
  • HACCP and Preventive Controls documentation must reflect current operations. If you surface a HACCP plan that references equipment or processes that have since changed, flag it immediately — an outdated HACCP plan is worse than no plan at all during an audit.

平台分布

OpenClaw

83.75%
按下载量换算971

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills