Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

upi-payment-integration(UPI 支付集成)

upi-payment-integration 用于补充开发相关能力,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要让 Agent 承接开发相关任务时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

upi-payment-integration 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 6,336。

总安装 4,824周安装 199GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,576核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:upi-payment-integration(UPI 支付集成)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anugotta/upi-payment-integration
安装命令:
openclaw skills install upi-payment-integration
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install upi-payment-integration

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

设计和实施印度 UPI 支付系统的完整集成方案。upi-payment-integration 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。支持收款、意向支付、QR 码生成及自动扣款等核心功能。包含生产级 Webhook 处理、幂等性和事务协调机制。

安装前需提供 UPI ID 和商户凭证,并配置 HTTPS 回调端点。注意遵守 NPCI 规范,避免高频调用触发风控拦截。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install upi-payment-integration;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

upi-payment-integration 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install upi-payment-integration。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

upi-payment-integration 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

upi-payment-integration 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

upi-payment-integration 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

upi-payment-integration 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,824 次,近一周安装 199 次,下载 1,576 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

upi-payment-integration 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
upi-payment-integration

UPI 支付集成 · 本页

4,824—接触敏感数据MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
upi-payment-integration
description
Design and implement robust UPI payment integrations (collect, intent, QR, and autopay mandates) with production-grade webhook handling, idempotency, reconciliation, and RBI-aligned authentication/compliance guardrails. Use when building or debugging UPI payment flows, payment status issues, recurring mandates, settlement mismatches, or gateway timeout edge cases.
metadata
{"openclaw":{"homepage":"https://www.npci.org.in/what-we-do/upi/product-overview","emoji":"💸","requires":{"env":["UPI_PROVIDER_KEY_ID","UPI_PROVIDER_KEY_SECRET","UPI_WEBHOOK_SECRET","UPI_MERCHANT_ID"],"bins":["curl","jq"]}}}

UPI Payment Integration

What this skill does

Use this skill to help users build, review, or troubleshoot UPI integrations that are safe for production.

Covered flows:

  • UPI collect requests
  • UPI intent payments
  • UPI QR payments (static/dynamic)
  • UPI autopay / e-mandate recurring payments

Disclaimer

This skill provides implementation and operational guidance only. It does not execute payments, move funds, or replace legal/compliance review. Payment regulations, provider APIs, limits, and policies may change; always verify against the latest official PSP, RBI, and NPCI documentation before production use.

Use at your own risk. The skill author/publisher/developer is not liable for direct or indirect loss, fraud, chargebacks, penalties, downtime, or other damages arising from use or misuse of this guidance.

Always validate in sandbox/staging before production and never share secrets or private keys in chat.

Setup

On first use, read setup.md and confirm:

  • provider and environment (sandbox vs production)
  • credentials availability in secret manager
  • webhook endpoint and verification strategy
  • database/reconciliation ownership

Source freshness

  • Last verified date: 2026-03-19
  • Before production changes, re-check provider docs and current RBI/NPCI circulars.

Source validation checklist

  • [ ] Confirm chosen PSP's latest webhook event semantics and retry policy.
  • [ ] Confirm latest UPI transaction limits and mandate policy for your use case.
  • [ ] Confirm current signature verification/auth requirements from provider docs.
  • [ ] Confirm current settlement and reconciliation report fields from provider dashboard.
  • [ ] Confirm any newly introduced compliance/legal requirements with your legal/compliance team.

Core operating principles

  1. Treat payment lifecycle as asynchronous

- API response is not final truth. - Webhook + reconciliation determine final status.

  1. Make every write idempotent

- De-duplicate by event ID / provider payment ID / merchant request ID. - Reprocessing the same webhook must be safe.

  1. Persist before processing

- Store raw webhook payload and headers first. - Process in a retriable job/queue.

  1. Reconcile continuously

- Poll or fetch status for PENDING, timed-out, or disputed records. - Close state gaps between app DB, PSP dashboard, and settlement reports.

  1. Keep compliance explicit

- Follow RBI authentication and risk controls. - Keep consent and cancellation paths clear for recurring mandates.

Mandatory implementation checklist

Use this checklist in every implementation/review:

  • [ ] Payment state machine exists (CREATED, PENDING, SUCCESS, FAILED, EXPIRED, REFUNDED as applicable).
  • [ ] Unique merchant-side request ID/correlation ID is generated and stored.
  • [ ] Webhook signature verification is implemented.
  • [ ] Raw webhook body is stored before business logic.
  • [ ] Duplicate webhook delivery is handled safely.
  • [ ] Out-of-order events are handled safely.
  • [ ] Retry policy exists for provider/network failures.
  • [ ] Reconciliation job exists for stale PENDING records.
  • [ ] Refund and reversal flows are explicit.
  • [ ] Alerting exists for failure spikes and webhook downtime.
  • [ ] Mandate create/pause/cancel paths are implemented and visible to users.

Standard workflow (for the agent)

When user asks for UPI help, do this:

  1. Identify integration mode

- Collect vs intent vs QR vs mandate.

  1. Map current architecture

- Client request path - Backend order/payment records - Provider API call - Webhook receiver - Reconciliation worker

  1. Enforce reliability controls

- Idempotency keys - Signature validation - Event dedupe - Retries and dead-letter handling

  1. Validate business correctness

- No shipment/service unlock before durable success - Correct handling of late success after apparent failure - Correct handling of duplicate attempts

  1. Validate compliance and customer UX

- Authentication and risk controls - Consent and cancellation clarity for mandates - Clear customer-visible status and support trace IDs

Webhook handling rules

  • Always verify signature using provider secret.
  • Use raw request body for signature validation; do not mutate/parse first.
  • Acknowledge quickly (2xx) after durable receipt.
  • Process asynchronously.
  • Never assume strict event ordering.
  • Build handlers as idempotent upserts, not one-time inserts.

Error handling and reconciliation rules

  • On timeout, mark local payment as PENDING_RECON (or equivalent), not immediate failure.
  • Reconcile by provider payment ID and merchant request ID.
  • If provider says success after client saw failure, trust reconciled final state and repair downstream records.
  • Log every status transition with source (api, webhook, recon).

Recurring mandate (Autopay) rules

  • Treat mandate creation as a first-class object with lifecycle states.
  • Store mandate ID, start/end dates, frequency, max amount, and status.
  • Support pause/cancel from product UI and backend admin.
  • Send pre-debit reminders where required by provider/framework.
  • On recurring debit failures, retry only within allowed policy; avoid silent repeated debits.

Compliance and policy guardrails

  • Follow RBI authentication expectations (minimum two factors, with dynamic factor requirements where applicable).
  • Keep evidence logs for user consent and mandate actions.
  • Protect personal/payment data with least-privilege access and retention policy.
  • Keep customer grievance paths clear (transaction reference IDs, support response playbook).

Output format

When responding to a user request, return:

  1. Architecture or fix plan
  2. Concrete code/database changes
  3. Failure-mode checks
  4. Test plan (happy path + retries + duplicates + out-of-order events + reconciliation)

References

Related skills

  • upi-go-live-checklist for phase tracking and launch gates
  • upi-payment-ux-ops for customer messaging and support operations

平台分布

OpenClaw

82.64%
按下载量换算1,302

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills