Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

unslop(unslop 搜索)

unslop 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

unslop 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 14,018。

总安装 774周安装 31GitHub Stars 21下载 250核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:unslop(unslop 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/theclaymethod/unslop
仓库路径:skills/unslop
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/theclaymethod/unslop --skill unslop
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/theclaymethod/unslop --skill unslop

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。unslop 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/unslop

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/theclaymethod/unslop --skill unslop;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

unslop 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/theclaymethod/unslop --skill unslop。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

unslop 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

unslop 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

unslop 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

unslop 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 774 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 250 次,GitHub 21 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

unslop 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
unslop

unslop 搜索 · 本页

77421只读未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Unslop

Humanize AI-generated prose. Audit it first. Rewrite only when the user wants a rewrite.

When to Use

  • User asks to "humanize", "de-slop", or "make it sound human"
  • Editing AI-generated drafts, emails, articles, social posts
  • Text contains AI patterns (throat-clearing, binary contrasts, em-dash abuse, emphasis crutches)
  • User says text "sounds like AI" or "sounds robotic"
  • Reviewing content before publishing
  • User pastes text and asks to "clean it up" or "make it natural"

Arguments

ArgumentDescriptionDefault
--presetVoice style: crisp, warm, expert, storycrisp
--strictFail if rubric score < 32/40false
--audit-onlyFlag AI patterns without rewritingfalse
InputText to transform (argument, file path, or stdin)required

Modes

This skill has two modes:

  • rewrite (default) — diagnose, rewrite, then validate the rewrite
  • audit-only — diagnose and assess the text without rewriting it

Trigger audit-only mode when the user says "audit only," "flag only," "scan this," "just detect," "don't rewrite," or passes --audit-only.

Voice Presets

PresetStyleBest For
crispShort, direct, no fluffTechnical writing, documentation
warmFriendly, conversationalEmails, blog posts
expertAuthoritative, confidentThought leadership, articles
storyNarrative flow, show don't tellCase studies, personal posts

Read the selected preset file from presets/ (e.g., presets/crisp-human.md) before writing. Each preset has specific voice rules, structural patterns, and a quality checklist.

Workflow

Pass 1: Diagnosis

Before rewriting anything, understand what's wrong. This prevents blind rewriting that loses meaning.

  1. Read the relevant references based on what you see in the input:

- references/taboo-phrases.md — the complete catalog of banned phrases and newer structural families, with regex patterns for detection. This is the authoritative list; read it on first use and refer back for edge cases. - references/rubric.md — 8 scoring criteria (directness, rhythm, verbs, trust, authenticity, density, fact preservation, template avoidance), 5 points each. - references/fact-preservation.md — rules for what must survive transformation unchanged (numbers, names, dates, URLs, quotes, technical terms).

  1. Extract constraints from the input — facts that must survive if you rewrite: python3 scripts/extract_constraints.py <<< "$INPUT" This outputs JSON with every number, date, name, URL, and quote that must appear in your output.
  2. Scan for AI patterns: python3 scripts/banned_phrase_scan.py <<< "$INPUT" This returns violations grouped by category and severity (hard = always an AI tell, soft = context-dependent). Quoted examples, markdown blockquotes, and code snippets are ignored by default so you don't flag illustrative bad writing in docs. If you explicitly need to audit quoted examples too, run: python3 scripts/banned_phrase_scan.py --include-quoted <<< "$INPUT"
  3. Read the selected preset from presets/ and note its voice rules.
  4. Identify: audience, content type, tone target. A LinkedIn post needs different treatment than a technical doc.

Pass 2: Reconstruction

Skip this pass in --audit-only mode.

Rewrite the text. The references you read in Pass 1 are your guide — don't duplicate their rules here, just apply them.

Core principles (the why behind the rules):

  • Em-dashes are the #1 AI punctuation tell. Default to zero. Use periods, commas, or parentheses instead. If one is absolutely necessary, max one per several paragraphs.
  • AI text delays the point. Cut everything before the actual claim. "Here's the thing:" is throat-clearing. "Let that sink in." is an emphasis crutch. Just state the thing.
  • AI inflates significance. "Stands as a testament to" means "is". "Pivotal moment" is almost never pivotal. Replace inflation with the specific fact.
  • AI avoids commitment. "It's worth noting that" hedges. "Some experts argue" hides behind unnamed sources. Make claims directly or cite specifically.
  • Facts are sacred. Every number, name, date, and URL from the original must appear in your output unchanged. Style is negotiable; accuracy is not.
  • Shorter is almost always better. If cutting a sentence doesn't change the meaning, cut it. AI pads; humans compress.

Follow the preset voice characteristics for sentence length, paragraph structure, and tone. Refer to references/edit-library.md for 24 before/after transformation examples if you need guidance on specific pattern types.

For guidance on adding genuine human voice (not just removing AI tells), read references/personality-guide.md. Clean text that's still anonymous and voiceless scores a 3/5 on authenticity — aim for 4+.

Validation

Only run this section when you rewrote the text.

After rewriting, verify your work:

  1. Fact preservation — confirm all constraints survived: python3 scripts/validate_preservation.py original.txt transformed.txt
  2. Remaining AI patterns — check your output is clean: python3 scripts/banned_phrase_scan.py <<< "$OUTPUT"
  3. Readability metrics — check rhythm and variance: python3 scripts/readability_metrics.py <<< "$OUTPUT"
  4. Change percentage — flag if >40% changed (may indicate over-editing): python3 scripts/diff_check.py original.txt transformed.txt
  5. Score against rubric — 8 criteria x 5 points = 40 max. Passing: 32/40 (80%). See references/rubric.md for detailed scoring.

Output Format

Adapt output to the context. For a quick fix, just return the cleaned text. For a thorough review, include validation:

Audit Only (--audit-only or user asks for flag-only scan):

## Issues Found

- [Quoted issue, category, why it reads as AI]

## Assessment

- [Which issues are clear problems]
- [Which issues are judgment calls or context-dependent]

Minimal (default for short text / quick fixes):

[The humanized text]

Detailed (for --strict mode or when user asks for analysis):

## Transformed Text

[The humanized version]

## Validation

- Constraints: [X]/[Y] preserved
- AI patterns: [N] remaining (was [M])
- Readability: Grade [X], sentence variance [Y]
- Change: [X]% from original
- Score: [X]/40

## Changes Made

- [List of major transformations applied]

Quick Examples

Input:

Here's the thing: building products is hard. Not because the technology is complex. Because people are complex. Let that sink in.

Output (crisp):

Building products is hard. Not the technology. The people.

Input:

In today's fast-paced business environment, it's becoming increasingly important for organizations to leverage their core competencies while navigating the complex landscape of digital transformation.

Output (crisp):

Companies need to use their strengths while going digital.

Reference Files

Located in this skill's directory. Read them as needed — don't front-load everything into context.

FileWhen to Read
references/taboo-phrases.mdFirst use, then for edge cases. Expanded pattern catalog with detection regex, newer structural families, and quote-exemption rules.
references/rubric.mdWhen scoring output or in --strict mode. 8 criteria, detailed rubrics.
references/edit-library.mdWhen unsure how to transform a specific pattern. 24 before/after examples.
references/fact-preservation.mdWhen input has lots of data, names, or quotes. Constraint rules.
references/personality-guide.mdWhen output is clean but soulless. How to add genuine voice.
presets/*.mdAfter preset selection. Voice-specific rules, patterns, checklists.
assets/examples/*.mdFor extended before/after examples by content type (article, LinkedIn, sales).

Scripts

All scripts accept stdin or file path arguments and output JSON. Run from the skill directory.

ScriptPurposeWhen to Run
scripts/extract_constraints.pyExtract must-preserve factsBefore rewriting
scripts/banned_phrase_scan.pyDetect AI patterns with severityBefore and after rewriting
scripts/validate_preservation.pyVerify facts survivedAfter rewriting
scripts/readability_metrics.pySentence variance, grade levelAfter rewriting
scripts/diff_check.pyChange percentageAfter rewriting
scripts/wiki_sync.pySync with Wikipedia AI patternsOn /unslop --wiki-sync

Maintenance Commands

CommandAction
/unslop --add-phrase "phrase"Add banned phrase
`/unslop --add-structure "pattern\fix"`Add structural pattern
/unslop --list-phrasesList all banned phrases
/unslop --list-structuresList structural patterns
/unslop --wiki-syncSync with Wikipedia for new AI patterns

Wiki Sync (/unslop --wiki-sync)

Syncs pattern rules with Wikipedia's Signs of AI writing page. Run periodically to pick up new patterns.

Steps:

  1. Check for updates: python3 scripts/wiki_sync.py check (exit 0 = no updates)
  2. Get structured diff: python3 scripts/wiki_sync.py diff (JSON output with change type, section, words)
  3. For each new word/phrase: add to references/taboo-phrases.md in the matching section, and add to scripts/banned_phrase_scan.py BANNED_PHRASES dict with category, severity, and suggestion.
  4. Verify: python3 scripts/banned_phrase_scan.py < /dev/null (confirm no syntax errors)

Only add phrases that are genuine AI writing tells for general prose. Skip Wikipedia-specific patterns (broken wikitext, DOI issues, etc.).

Key Principles

  1. Diagnosis before writing — understand what's wrong before fixing
  2. Facts are sacred — never sacrifice accuracy for style
  3. Presets guide, don't constrain — adapt to content type
  4. When in doubt, cut — shorter is almost always better
  5. Quoted examples are exempt by default — don't flag illustrative bad writing unless the user explicitly wants that
  6. Validation is mandatory — run the scripts, especially fact preservation

平台分布

Codex

37.02%
按下载量换算93

Claude

31.95%
按下载量换算80

Cursor

17.77%
按下载量换算44

Gemini CLI

10.32%
按下载量换算26

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills