Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

unit-test-caching(单元测试缓存)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

unit-test-caching 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 8,660。

总安装 15,876周安装 675GitHub Stars 229下载 5,562核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:unit-test-caching(单元测试缓存)
来源仓库:https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit
仓库路径:skills/unit-test-caching
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-caching
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-caching

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

使用内存缓存管理器在没有外部基础设施的情况下测试 Spring Cache 注释。

Covers testing @Cacheable ,@CacheEvict, and @CachePut 具有用于验证缓存命中、未命中和失效的模式的注释 Uses ConcurrentMapCacheManager 用于快速、隔离的单元测试,而不是 Redis 或其他外部缓存 包括通过模拟调用计数、条件缓存除非 and condition 参数,以及使用 SpEL 表达式自定义缓存键生成 Provides setup examples for Maven and Gradle, plus complete test patterns for cache behavior, eviction, updates, and edge cases like null result handling

来源仓库内路径:skills/unit-test-caching

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill un…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

unit-test-caching 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill unit-test-ca…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

unit-test-caching 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

unit-test-caching 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

unit-test-caching 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

unit-test-caching 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 15,876 次,近一周安装 675 次,下载 5,562 次,GitHub 229 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

unit-test-caching 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
unit-test-caching

单元测试缓存 · 本页

15,876229只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Unit Testing Spring Caching

Overview

This skill provides patterns for unit testing Spring caching annotations (@Cacheable, @CacheEvict, @CachePut) without full Spring context. It covers cache hits/misses, invalidation, key generation, and conditional caching using in-memory ConcurrentMapCacheManager.

When to Use

  • Writing unit tests for @Cacheable method behavior
  • Verifying @CacheEvict cache invalidation works correctly
  • Testing @CachePut cache updates
  • Validating cache key generation from SpEL expressions
  • Testing conditional caching with unless/condition parameters
  • Mocking cache managers in fast unit tests without Redis

Instructions

  1. Configure in-memory CacheManager: Use ConcurrentMapCacheManager for tests
  2. Set up test fixtures: Mock repository and create service instance in @BeforeEach
  3. Verify repository call counts: Use times(n) assertions to confirm cache behavior
  4. Test cache hit: Call method twice, verify repository called once
  5. Test cache miss: Verify repository called on each invocation
  6. Test eviction: After @CacheEvict, verify repository called again on next read
  7. Test key generation: Verify compound keys from SpEL expressions
  8. Validate conditional caching: Test unless (null results) and condition (parameter-based)

Validation checkpoints:

  • Run test → If cache not working: verify @EnableCaching annotation present
  • If proxy issues: ensure method calls go through Spring proxy (no direct this calls)
  • If key mismatches: log actual cache key and compare with @Cacheable(key="...") expression

Examples

Maven

<dependency>
  <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-cache</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
  <groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
  <artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
  <scope>test</scope>
</dependency>

Gradle

dependencies {
  implementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-cache")
  testImplementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-test")
}

Testing @Cacheable (Cache Hit/Miss)

// Service
@Service
public class UserService {
  private final UserRepository userRepository;

  public UserService(UserRepository userRepository) {
    this.userRepository = userRepository;
  }

  @Cacheable("users")
  public User getUserById(Long id) {
    return userRepository.findById(id).orElse(null);
  }
}

// Test
class UserServiceCachingTest {

  private UserRepository userRepository;
  private UserService userService;

  @BeforeEach
  void setUp() {
    userRepository = mock(UserRepository.class);
    userService = new UserService(userRepository);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldCacheUserAfterFirstCall() {
    User user = new User(1L, "Alice");
    when(userRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(user));

    // First call - hits database
    User firstCall = userService.getUserById(1L);
    // Second call - hits cache
    User secondCall = userService.getUserById(1L);

    assertThat(firstCall).isEqualTo(secondCall);
    verify(userRepository, times(1)).findById(1L); // Only once due to cache
  }

  @Test
  void shouldInvokeRepositoryOnCacheMiss() {
    when(userRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(new User(1L, "Bob")));

    userService.getUserById(1L);
    userService.getUserById(1L);

    verify(userRepository, times(2)).findById(1L); // No caching occurred
  }
}

Testing @CacheEvict

// Service
@Service
public class ProductService {
  private final ProductRepository productRepository;

  public ProductService(ProductRepository productRepository) {
    this.productRepository = productRepository;
  }

  @Cacheable("products")
  public Product getProductById(Long id) {
    return productRepository.findById(id).orElse(null);
  }

  @CacheEvict("products")
  public void deleteProduct(Long id) {
    productRepository.deleteById(id);
  }
}

// Test
class ProductCacheEvictTest {

  private ProductRepository productRepository;
  private ProductService productService;

  @BeforeEach
  void setUp() {
    productRepository = mock(ProductRepository.class);
    productService = new ProductService(productRepository);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldEvictProductFromCacheWhenDeleted() {
    Product product = new Product(1L, "Laptop", 999.99);
    when(productRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(product));

    productService.getProductById(1L); // Cache the product
    productService.deleteProduct(1L); // Evict from cache

    // Repository called again after eviction
    productService.getProductById(1L);
    verify(productRepository, times(2)).findById(1L);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldClearAllEntriesWithAllEntriesTrue() {
    Product product1 = new Product(1L, "Laptop", 999.99);
    Product product2 = new Product(2L, "Mouse", 29.99);
    when(productRepository.findById(anyLong())).thenAnswer(i ->
      Optional.of(new Product(i.getArgument(0), "Product", 10.0)));

    productService.getProductById(1L);
    productService.getProductById(2L);

    // Use reflection or clear() on ConcurrentMapCache
    productService.clearAllProducts();

    productService.getProductById(1L);
    productService.getProductById(2L);

    verify(productRepository, times(4)).findById(anyLong());
  }
}

Testing @CachePut

@Service
public class OrderService {
  private final OrderRepository orderRepository;

  public OrderService(OrderRepository orderRepository) {
    this.orderRepository = orderRepository;
  }

  @Cacheable("orders")
  public Order getOrder(Long id) {
    return orderRepository.findById(id).orElse(null);
  }

  @CachePut(value = "orders", key = "#order.id")
  public Order updateOrder(Order order) {
    return orderRepository.save(order);
  }
}

class OrderCachePutTest {

  private OrderRepository orderRepository;
  private OrderService orderService;

  @BeforeEach
  void setUp() {
    orderRepository = mock(OrderRepository.class);
    orderService = new OrderService(orderRepository);
  }

  @Test
  void shouldUpdateCacheWhenOrderIsUpdated() {
    Order original = new Order(1L, "Pending", 100.0);
    Order updated = new Order(1L, "Shipped", 100.0);

    when(orderRepository.findById(1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(original));
    when(orderRepository.save(updated)).thenReturn(updated);

    orderService.getOrder(1L);
    orderService.updateOrder(updated);

    // Next call returns updated version from cache
    Order cachedOrder = orderService.getOrder(1L);
    assertThat(cachedOrder.getStatus()).isEqualTo("Shipped");
  }
}

Testing Conditional Caching

@Service
public class DataService {
  private final DataRepository dataRepository;

  public DataService(DataRepository dataRepository) {
    this.dataRepository = dataRepository;
  }

  // Don't cache null results
  @Cacheable(value = "data", unless = "#result == null")
  public Data getData(Long id) {
    return dataRepository.findById(id).orElse(null);
  }

  // Only cache when id > 0
  @Cacheable(value = "users", condition = "#id > 0")
  public User getUser(Long id) {
    return dataRepository.findById(id).map(u -> new User(u.getId(), u.getName())).orElse(null);
  }
}

class ConditionalCachingTest {

  @Test
  void shouldNotCacheNullResults() {
    DataRepository dataRepository = mock(DataRepository.class);
    when(dataRepository.findById(999L)).thenReturn(Optional.empty());
    DataService service = new DataService(dataRepository);

    service.getData(999L);
    service.getData(999L);

    verify(dataRepository, times(2)).findById(999L); // Called twice - no caching
  }

  @Test
  void shouldNotCacheWhenConditionIsFalse() {
    DataRepository dataRepository = mock(DataRepository.class);
    when(dataRepository.findById(-1L)).thenReturn(Optional.of(new Data(-1L, "Test")));

    DataService service = new DataService(dataRepository);

    service.getUser(-1L);
    service.getUser(-1L);

    verify(dataRepository, times(2)).findById(-1L); // Condition "#id > 0" = false
  }
}

Testing Cache Keys with SpEL

@Service
public class InventoryService {
  private final InventoryRepository inventoryRepository;

  public InventoryService(InventoryRepository inventoryRepository) {
    this.inventoryRepository = inventoryRepository;
  }

  // Compound key: productId-warehouseId
  @Cacheable(value = "inventory", key = "#productId + '-' + #warehouseId")
  public InventoryItem getInventory(Long productId, Long warehouseId) {
    return inventoryRepository.findByProductAndWarehouse(productId, warehouseId);
  }
}

class CacheKeyTest {

  @Test
  void shouldUseCorrectCacheKeyForDifferentCombinations() {
    InventoryRepository repository = mock(InventoryRepository.class);
    InventoryItem item = new InventoryItem(1L, 1L, 100);
    when(repository.findByProductAndWarehouse(1L, 1L)).thenReturn(item);

    InventoryService service = new InventoryService(repository);

    // Same key: "1-1" - should cache
    service.getInventory(1L, 1L);
    service.getInventory(1L, 1L); // Cache hit
    verify(repository, times(1)).findByProductAndWarehouse(1L, 1L);

    // Different key: "2-1" - cache miss
    service.getInventory(2L, 1L); // Cache miss
    verify(repository, times(2)).findByProductAndWarehouse(any(), any());
  }
}

Best Practices

  • Mock repository calls: Use verify(mock, times(n)) to assert cache behavior
  • Test both hit and miss scenarios: Don't just test the happy path
  • Clear cache state: Reset between tests to avoid flaky results
  • Use ConcurrentMapCacheManager: Fast, no external dependencies
  • Verify eviction: Always test that @CacheEvict actually invalidates cached data

Constraints and Warnings

  • @Cacheable requires proxy: Direct method calls (this.method()) bypass caching - use dependency injection
  • Cache key collisions: Compound keys from SpEL must be unique per dataset
  • Null caching: Null results are cached by default - use unless = "#result == null" to exclude
  • @CachePut always executes: Unlike @Cacheable, it always runs the method
  • Memory usage: In-memory caches grow unbounded - consider TTL for long-running tests
  • Thread safety: ConcurrentMapCacheManager is thread-safe; distributed caches may require additional config

Troubleshooting

IssueSolution
Cache not workingVerify @EnableCaching on test config
Proxy bypassUse autowired/constructor injection, not direct this calls
Key mismatchLog cache key with cache.getNativeKey() to debug SpEL
Flaky testsClear cache in @BeforeEach before each test

References

平台分布

Codex

33.52%
按下载量换算1,864

Claude

28.48%
按下载量换算1,584

Cursor

18.1%
按下载量换算1,007

Gemini CLI

10.23%
按下载量换算569

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills