Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网clawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

trust-decay-monitor信任衰减监视器

Agent Skill

trust-decay-monitor 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

16,216

周安装

656

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

5,091
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:trust-decay-monitor(信任衰减监视器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/andyxinweiminicloud/trust-decay-monitor
安装命令:
openclaw skills install trust-decay-monitor
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install trust-decay-monitor

简介

监测 AI 技能验证状态随时间推移的有效性衰减趋势。

  • 适用于长期维护代理能力可信度的运维场景。
  • 结合依赖变更与行为偏移计算信任度下降速率。
  • 需定期手动触发验证以保持状态准确性。trust-decay-monitor 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。
  • 不主动修复失效技能,仅提供预警参考作用。

SKILL.md

name
trust-decay-monitor
description
>
version
1.0.0
metadata
openclaw
requires
bins
[curl, python3]
env
[]
emoji

That "Verified" Badge Is From 2024. Is the Skill Still Safe?

Helps track the freshness of skill verification results, flagging certifications that have decayed past their useful trust window.

Problem

A skill passes a security audit in March 2025. It gets a "verified" badge. Developers see the badge and trust it. Eighteen months later, the badge is still there — but:

  • The skill's 4 dependencies have had 47 combined updates since the audit
  • Two new CVEs affect the runtime version the skill targets
  • The skill's API endpoint now points to a domain that changed ownership
  • The marketplace added 3 new permission types that didn't exist during the original audit

The verification was real. The trust it implies is not. Security certifications have a half-life, and most agent marketplaces display them as if they're permanent.

This is trust decay: the gradual erosion of verification validity as the surrounding context changes. It's not that the audit was wrong — it's that the audit's conclusions no longer apply to the current reality.

What This Tracks

This monitor computes a trust freshness score for verified skills:

  1. Time since verification — Simple age of the last audit. Older = less trustworthy, with configurable decay curves
  2. Dependency churn — How many of the skill's dependencies have updated since the audit? Each update is a potential invalidation of audit assumptions
  3. Ecosystem context changes — New CVEs, new permission types, new attack patterns discovered since the audit date. The threat landscape the audit evaluated against may have shifted
  4. Domain and endpoint stability — Have any external URLs, API endpoints, or resource references in the skill changed destination since verification?
  5. Re-verification gap — How long since anyone (not just the original auditor) ran any form of security check on this skill?

How to Use

Input: Provide one of:

  • A skill slug or identifier with its verification date
  • A marketplace profile URL showing verified skills
  • A batch of skill identifiers for portfolio-level trust assessment

Output: A trust freshness report containing:

  • Trust freshness score per skill (0-100, where 100 = just verified)
  • Decay factors breakdown (time, dependencies, context, endpoints)
  • Re-verification urgency: LOW / MODERATE / HIGH / CRITICAL
  • Portfolio-level summary if checking multiple skills

Example

Input: Check trust freshness for verified skill api-auth-helper (verified 2025-01-10)

⏳ TRUST DECAY REPORT — RE-VERIFICATION RECOMMENDED

Skill: api-auth-helper
Verified: 2025-01-10 (408 days ago)
Verifier: @seclab-audits

Trust freshness score: 31/100 (STALE)

Decay factors:
  Time decay:           -25 points (>12 months since audit)
  Dependency churn:     -22 points
    - jsonwebtoken: 3 major updates (9.0.0 → 12.1.2)
    - node-fetch: 2 updates including security patch
    - crypto-utils: 1 update with API breaking changes
  Ecosystem changes:    -15 points
    - 2 new JWT-related CVEs published since audit
    - Marketplace added "credential-store" permission type
      (not evaluated in original audit)
  Endpoint stability:   -7 points
    - skill references api.authprovider.example/v2
    - endpoint now redirects to v3 with different response schema

Re-verification urgency: HIGH
  Primary driver: 3 major dependency updates + 2 relevant CVEs
  since last audit. The JWT library alone has had breaking changes
  that could affect how this skill handles token validation.

Recommendation:
  - Priority re-audit focusing on JWT handling (CVE-affected)
  - Test against current dependency versions
  - Verify endpoint redirect doesn't break auth flow
  - Check if new "credential-store" permission is relevant

Related Tools

  • evolution-drift-detector — tracks content-based drift across skill inheritance; trust-decay-monitor tracks time-based decay of verification validity
  • hollow-validation-checker — checks if validation tests are substantive; stale validations are even more problematic if the tests were hollow to begin with
  • blast-radius-estimator — when trust has decayed on a widely-adopted skill, blast-radius shows the downstream exposure
  • protocol-doc-auditor — audits protocol documents for hidden risks; trust-decay-monitor tracks whether those audits are still current

Limitations

Trust freshness scoring uses heuristic decay models — the actual security impact of time passing depends on factors that can't be fully quantified (e.g., whether dependency updates are security-relevant or just feature additions). Dependency churn counts updates but cannot always determine if an update invalidates the original audit's conclusions. Ecosystem context tracking relies on public CVE databases and marketplace changelogs, which may lag behind actual threats. This tool helps prioritize which verifications need refreshing — it does not replace the actual re-verification process. A low trust score means the audit is stale, not that the skill is compromised.

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

73.23%
按下载量换算3,728

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

未展示

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills