Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk(在 splunk 中对安全警报进行分类)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,843。

总安装 494周安装 20GitHub Stars 5,917下载 155核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk(在 splunk 中对安全警报进行分类)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和常见漏洞排查。适合梳理敏感配置、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。不能将工具输出直接当作最终结论,需人工复核。涉及密钥、用户数据时应确认最小权限和脱敏方式。triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill triaging…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 494 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 155 次,GitHub 5,917 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 5,917 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
triaging-security-alerts-in-splunk

在 splunk 中对安全警报进行分类 · 本页

4945,917需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Triaging Security Alerts in Splunk

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • SOC Tier 1 analysts need to process the Incident Review queue in Splunk Enterprise Security (ES)
  • Notable events require rapid severity classification and initial investigation before escalation
  • Alert volume exceeds capacity and analysts need a systematic triage methodology
  • Management requests metrics on alert disposition (true positive, false positive, benign)

Do not use for deep forensic investigation — escalate to Tier 2/3 after initial triage confirms malicious activity.

Prerequisites

  • Splunk Enterprise Security 7.x+ with Incident Review dashboard configured
  • CIM-normalized data sources (Windows Event Logs, firewall, proxy, endpoint)
  • Role with ess_analyst capability for notable event status updates
  • Familiarity with SPL (Search Processing Language)

Workflow

Step 1: Access Incident Review and Prioritize Queue

Open the Incident Review dashboard in Splunk ES. Sort notable events by urgency (calculated from severity x priority). Apply filters to focus on unassigned events:

| `notable`
| search status="new" OR status="unassigned"
| sort - urgency
| table _time, rule_name, src, dest, user, urgency, status
| head 50

Focus on Critical and High urgency events first. Group related alerts by src or dest to identify attack chains rather than treating each alert independently.

Step 2: Investigate the Notable Event Context

For each notable event, pivot to raw events. Example for a brute force alert:

index=wineventlog sourcetype="WinEventLog:Security" EventCode=4625
src_ip="192.168.1.105"
earliest=-1h latest=now
| stats count by src_ip, dest, user, status
| where count > 10
| sort - count

Check if the source IP is internal (lateral movement) or external (perimeter attack). Cross-reference with asset and identity lookups:

| `notable`
| search rule_name="Brute Force Access Behavior Detected"
| lookup asset_lookup_by_cidr ip AS src OUTPUT category, owner, priority
| lookup identity_lookup_expanded identity AS user OUTPUT department, managedBy
| table _time, src, dest, user, category, owner, department

Step 3: Correlate Across Data Sources

Check if the same source appears in other telemetry:

index=proxy OR index=firewall src="192.168.1.105" earliest=-24h
| stats count by index, sourcetype, action, dest_port
| sort - count

Look for corroborating evidence: Did the same IP also trigger DNS anomalies, proxy blocks, or endpoint detection alerts?

index=main sourcetype="cisco:asa" src="192.168.1.105" action=blocked earliest=-24h
| timechart span=1h count by dest_port

Step 4: Check Threat Intelligence Enrichment

Query the threat intelligence framework for known IOCs:

| `notable`
| search search_name="Threat - Threat Intelligence Match - Rule"
| lookup threat_intel_by_ip ip AS src OUTPUT threat_collection, threat_description, threat_key
| table _time, src, dest, threat_collection, threat_description, weight
| where weight >= 3

For domains, check against threat lists:

| tstats count from datamodel=Web where Web.url="*evil-domain.com*" by Web.src, Web.url, Web.status
| rename Web.* AS *

Step 5: Classify and Disposition the Alert

Update the notable event status in Incident Review:

DispositionCriteriaAction
True PositiveCorroborating evidence confirms malicious activityEscalate to Tier 2, create incident ticket
Benign True PositiveAlert fired correctly but activity is authorized (e.g., pen test)Close with comment, add suppression if recurring
False PositiveAlert logic matched benign behaviorClose, tune correlation search, document pattern
UndeterminedInsufficient data to classifyAssign to Tier 2 with investigation notes

Update via Splunk ES UI or REST API:

| sendalert update_notable_event param.status="2" param.urgency="critical"
  param.comment="Confirmed brute force from compromised workstation. Escalated to IR-2024-0431."
  param.owner="analyst_jdoe"

Step 6: Document Triage Findings

Record in the notable event comment field:

  • Source/destination involved
  • Data sources examined
  • Correlation findings (related alerts, TI matches)
  • Disposition rationale
  • Next steps for escalation
| `notable`
| search rule_name="Brute Force*" status="closed"
| stats count by status_label, disposition
| addtotal

Step 7: Track Triage Metrics

Monitor triage performance over time:

| `notable`
| where status_end > 0
| eval triage_time = status_end - _time
| stats avg(triage_time) AS avg_triage_sec, median(triage_time) AS med_triage_sec,
        count by rule_name, status_label
| eval avg_triage_min = round(avg_triage_sec/60, 1)
| sort - count
| table rule_name, status_label, count, avg_triage_min

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Notable EventSplunk ES alert generated by a correlation search that meets defined risk or threshold criteria
UrgencyCalculated field combining event severity with asset/identity priority (Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational)
Correlation SearchScheduled SPL query that detects threat patterns and generates notable events when conditions match
CIMCommon Information Model — Splunk's normalized field naming convention enabling cross-source queries
DispositionFinal classification of an alert: true positive, false positive, benign true positive, or undetermined
MTTD/MTTRMean Time to Detect / Mean Time to Respond — key SOC metrics measuring detection and resolution speed

Tools & Systems

  • Splunk Enterprise Security: SIEM platform providing Incident Review dashboard, correlation searches, and risk-based alerting
  • Splunk SOAR (Phantom): Orchestration platform for automating triage playbooks and enrichment actions
  • Asset & Identity Framework: Splunk ES lookup tables mapping IPs to asset owners and users to departments for context enrichment
  • Threat Intelligence Framework: Splunk ES module ingesting STIX/TAXII feeds and matching IOCs against notable events

Common Scenarios

  • Brute Force Alerts: Correlate EventCode 4625 (failed logon) with 4624 (successful logon) from same source to determine if attack succeeded
  • Malware Detection: Cross-reference endpoint AV alert with proxy logs for C2 callback confirmation
  • Data Exfiltration Alert: Check outbound data volume from DLP and proxy logs against user baseline
  • Privilege Escalation: Correlate EventCode 4672 (special privileges assigned) with 4720 (account created) from non-admin users
  • Lateral Movement: Map EventCode 4648 (explicit credential logon) across multiple destinations from single source

Output Format

TRIAGE REPORT — Notable Event #NE-2024-08921
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Alert:        Brute Force Access Behavior Detected
Time:         2024-03-15 14:23:07 UTC
Source:       192.168.1.105 (WORKSTATION-042, Finance Dept)
Destination:  10.0.5.20 (DC-PRIMARY, Domain Controller)
User:         jsmith (Finance Analyst)

Investigation:
  - 847 failed logons (4625) in 12 minutes from src
  - Successful logon (4624) at 14:35:02 after brute force
  - No proxy/DNS anomalies from src in prior 24h
  - Source not on threat intel lists

Disposition:  TRUE POSITIVE — Compromised credential
Action:       Escalated to Tier 2, ticket IR-2024-0431 created
              Account jsmith disabled pending password reset

平台分布

Codex

35.43%
按下载量换算55

Claude

31.27%
按下载量换算48

Cursor

17.18%
按下载量换算27

Gemini CLI

10.34%
按下载量换算16

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills