Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

triage-issue分类问题

Agent Skill

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

总安装

150,288

周安装

6,239

GitHub Stars

46,167

下载量

49,104
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:triage-issue(分类问题)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mattpocock/skills
仓库路径:skills/triage-issue
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill triage-issue
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mattpocock/skills --skill triage-issue

简介

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 等协作流程提供辅助。

  • 适合查询项目状态、整理变更或辅助创建协作事项。
  • 可将仓库信息转化为可执行的操作建议或下一步计划。
  • 区分只读查询与写入操作,涉及私有仓库时需确认授权范围。
  • triage-issue 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Triage Issue

Investigate a reported problem, find its root cause, and create a GitHub issue with a TDD fix plan. This is a mostly hands-off workflow - minimize questions to the user.

Process

1. Capture the problem

Get a brief description of the issue from the user. If they haven't provided one, ask ONE question: "What's the problem you're seeing?"

Do NOT ask follow-up questions yet. Start investigating immediately.

2. Explore and diagnose

Use the Agent tool with subagent_type=Explore to deeply investigate the codebase. Your goal is to find:

  • Where the bug manifests (entry points, UI, API responses)
  • What code path is involved (trace the flow)
  • Why it fails (the root cause, not just the symptom)
  • What related code exists (similar patterns, tests, adjacent modules)

Look at:

  • Related source files and their dependencies
  • Existing tests (what's tested, what's missing)
  • Recent changes to affected files (git log on relevant files)
  • Error handling in the code path
  • Similar patterns elsewhere in the codebase that work correctly

3. Identify the fix approach

Based on your investigation, determine:

  • The minimal change needed to fix the root cause
  • Which modules/interfaces are affected
  • What behaviors need to be verified via tests
  • Whether this is a regression, missing feature, or design flaw

4. Design TDD fix plan

Create a concrete, ordered list of RED-GREEN cycles. Each cycle is one vertical slice:

  • RED: Describe a specific test that captures the broken/missing behavior
  • GREEN: Describe the minimal code change to make that test pass

Rules:

  • Tests verify behavior through public interfaces, not implementation details
  • One test at a time, vertical slices (NOT all tests first, then all code)
  • Each test should survive internal refactors
  • Include a final refactor step if needed
  • Durability: Only suggest fixes that would survive radical codebase changes. Describe behaviors and contracts, not internal structure. Tests assert on observable outcomes (API responses, UI state, user-visible effects), not internal state. A good suggestion reads like a spec; a bad one reads like a diff.

5. Create the GitHub issue

Create a GitHub issue using gh issue create with the template below. Do NOT ask the user to review before creating - just create it and share the URL.

Problem

A clear description of the bug or issue, including:

  • What happens (actual behavior)
  • What should happen (expected behavior)
  • How to reproduce (if applicable)

Root Cause Analysis

Describe what you found during investigation:

  • The code path involved
  • Why the current code fails
  • Any contributing factors

Do NOT include specific file paths, line numbers, or implementation details that couple to current code layout. Describe modules, behaviors, and contracts instead. The issue should remain useful even after major refactors.

TDD Fix Plan

A numbered list of RED-GREEN cycles:

  1. RED: Write a test that [describes expected behavior] GREEN: [Minimal change to make it pass]
  2. RED: Write a test that [describes next behavior] GREEN: [Minimal change to make it pass]

...

REFACTOR: [Any cleanup needed after all tests pass]

Acceptance Criteria

  • Criterion 1
  • Criterion 2
  • All new tests pass
  • Existing tests still pass

After creating the issue, print the issue URL and a one-line summary of the root cause.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.19%
按下载量换算17,280

Claude

29.61%
按下载量换算14,540

Cursor

19.25%
按下载量换算9,453

Gemini CLI

10.37%
按下载量换算5,092

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills