Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

startup-launch(启动启动)

startup-launch 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

startup-launch 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 1,944。

总安装 2,049周安装 88GitHub Stars 48下载 718核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:startup-launch(启动启动)
来源仓库:https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude
仓库路径:skills/startup-launch
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill startup-launch
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill startup-launch

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

startup-launch 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。

安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意是否触发联网或文件操作。建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/startup-launch

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill startup-launch;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

startup-launch 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill startup-launch。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

startup-launch 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

startup-launch 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

startup-launch 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

startup-launch 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,049 次,近一周安装 88 次,下载 718 次,GitHub 48 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

startup-launch 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
startup-launch

启动启动 · 本页

2,04948权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
startup-launch
description
Complete startup launch guidance from idea validation to market entry. Use when planning a new business, validating product ideas, or preparing for launch.

Startup Launch

Comprehensive guide for launching a successful startup from idea to market.

The Startup Journey

Phase Overview

PHASE 1: IDEATION (1-2 weeks)
└─→ Problem identification, market research

PHASE 2: VALIDATION (2-4 weeks)
└─→ Customer discovery, problem-solution fit

PHASE 3: MVP DEVELOPMENT (4-12 weeks)
└─→ Minimum viable product, iteration

PHASE 4: LAUNCH PREPARATION (2-4 weeks)
└─→ Go-to-market strategy, pre-launch

PHASE 5: LAUNCH & ITERATE (Ongoing)
└─→ Public release, growth, optimization

Phase 1: Ideation

Problem Discovery

Ask yourself:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. What problem am I solving?           │
│ 2. Who has this problem?                │
│ 3. How painful is this problem?         │
│ 4. How are people solving it today?     │
│ 5. Why hasn't this been solved yet?     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Problem Evaluation Matrix

CriteriaScore (1-5)Notes
FrequencyHow often does problem occur?Daily = 5
IntensityHow painful is it?Critical = 5
Willingness to PayWill people pay to solve?Yes = 5
Market SizeHow many have this problem?Large = 5
AccessibilityCan you reach these people?Easy = 5

Minimum viable score: 20/25

Idea Sources

HIGH-SIGNAL sources:
✓ Problems you personally experience
✓ Inefficiencies in your industry
✓ Complaints from friends/colleagues
✓ Existing solutions that frustrate users
✓ Emerging technology applications

LOW-SIGNAL sources:
✗ "Wouldn't it be cool if..."
✗ Building for imaginary users
✗ Copying without understanding
✗ Solutions looking for problems

Phase 2: Validation

Customer Discovery

The Mom Test Questions:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ✓ "Tell me about the last time you..."  │
│ ✓ "What have you tried to solve this?"  │
│ ✓ "How much does this cost you?"        │
│ ✓ "Who else should I talk to?"          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ✗ "Would you use this product?"         │
│ ✗ "Do you think this is a good idea?"   │
│ ✗ "How much would you pay?"             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Rule: Ask about their life, not your idea.

Interview Framework

Structure (30-45 minutes):
1. Context (5 min)
   - Their role, situation
   - Relevant background

2. Problem Exploration (15 min)
   - Specific recent examples
   - Current workflow
   - Pain points and workarounds

3. Current Solutions (10 min)
   - Tools they use now
   - Satisfaction level
   - What's missing

4. Value (5 min)
   - Impact of solving this
   - Who else is affected
   - Budget/authority

5. Wrap-up (5 min)
   - Referrals
   - Follow-up permission

Validation Metrics

SignalIndicatorStrength
Time commitmentAgree to interviewLow
ReferralsIntroduce to othersMedium
Money commitmentPre-order/depositHigh
Work commitmentUse early prototypeHigh
Social commitmentPublic endorsementHigh

Problem-Solution Fit

You have problem-solution fit when:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ✓ 10+ interviews with consistent pain   │
│ ✓ People are actively seeking solutions │
│ ✓ Current solutions are inadequate      │
│ ✓ Your solution resonates emotionally   │
│ ✓ People offer to pay or pre-order      │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase 3: MVP Development

What is MVP?

MVP = Minimum VIABLE Product

Minimum: Smallest possible scope
Viable: Actually solves the core problem

MVP is NOT:
✗ Prototype (doesn't need to work)
✗ Beta (feature-complete)
✗ v1.0 (polished)

MVP IS:
✓ Core value proposition only
✓ Works well enough to learn from
✓ Gets real user feedback fast

MVP Types

TypeDescriptionBest For
ConciergeManual service disguised as productService businesses
Wizard of OzHuman behind automated facadeComplex systems
Landing PageDescribe + capture interestDemand validation
Video DemoShow concept in actionComplex products
PiecemealCombine existing toolsQuick market test
Single FeatureOne core feature, done wellSoftware products

MVP Scoping

Feature Prioritization Matrix:
                   HIGH IMPACT
                       │
                       │
    "NICE TO HAVE"     │     "MUST HAVE"
    (Maybe Later)      │     (MVP Core)
                       │
    ───────────────────┼───────────────────
                       │
    "DON'T DO"         │     "LOW-HANGING"
    (Never)            │     (If Time Permits)
                       │
                       │
                   LOW IMPACT
    HIGH EFFORT ───────────────── LOW EFFORT

Development Approach

Build in iterations:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Week 1-2: Core flow (ugly but works)    │
│ Week 3-4: User feedback, fixes          │
│ Week 5-6: Polish critical path          │
│ Week 7-8: Prepare for launch            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘

Principles:
- Ship ugly, learn fast
- Manual before automated
- Fake it till you make it (but don't lie)
- Measure what matters

Phase 4: Launch Preparation

Pre-Launch Checklist

PRODUCT:
□ Core functionality works reliably
□ Critical bugs fixed
□ Basic analytics in place
□ Error handling and recovery
□ Onboarding flow tested

MARKETING:
□ Landing page live
□ Value proposition clear
□ Social proof (if available)
□ Email capture working
□ Launch announcement ready

OPERATIONS:
□ Customer support system
□ Payment processing tested
□ Legal basics (ToS, Privacy)
□ Monitoring/alerting set up
□ Rollback plan ready

COMMUNITY:
□ Early access list built
□ Social media accounts ready
□ Launch partners confirmed
□ Press/influencer outreach done
□ Community channels set up

Launch Strategy Options

StrategyDescriptionBest For
Big BangPublic launch with PR pushStrong network
Soft LaunchQuiet release, iterateUncertain product
WaitlistBuild anticipationHigh demand
Beta ProgramLimited early accessComplex products
Platform LaunchProduct Hunt, etc.Consumer products

Platform Launches

PRODUCT HUNT:
- Launch Tuesday-Thursday
- Ship 12:01 AM PST
- Prepare assets in advance
- Engage all day with comments
- Activate your network

HACKER NEWS:
- Show HN format
- Technical angle works best
- Timing matters less
- Be prepared for criticism
- Engage authentically

REDDIT:
- Find relevant subreddits
- Follow community rules
- Don't be promotional
- Add genuine value
- Use for feedback, not sales

Phase 5: Launch & Growth

Launch Day Checklist

MORNING:
□ Verify all systems operational
□ Team on standby for issues
□ Launch announcement posted
□ Monitor analytics dashboard

THROUGHOUT DAY:
□ Respond to all comments/questions
□ Fix critical issues immediately
□ Thank early users personally
□ Capture feedback systematically

EVENING:
□ Compile day's metrics
□ Document learnings
□ Plan next day's activities
□ Celebrate (briefly!)

Key Metrics (Early Stage)

MetricWhat It MeasuresTarget
ActivationComplete key action40%+ of signups
RetentionReturn after day 1/7/30Varies by type
NPSWould recommend50+
Time to ValueFirst "aha" moment< 5 minutes
Support VolumeIssues per userDecreasing

Growth Loops

USER-GENERATED:
User creates → Content ranks → New users find
(SEO, community content)

VIRAL:
User invites → Friend joins → Friend invites
(Referrals, sharing)

PAID:
Spend on ads → New users → Revenue → More ads
(Performance marketing)

SALES:
Outreach → Demo → Close → Reference
(B2B enterprise)

Business Model Canvas

┌───────────────┬───────────────┬───────────────┐
│ Key Partners  │ Key Activities│ Value Props   │
│               │               │               │
│ Who helps us? │ What we do?   │ Why choose us?│
├───────────────┼───────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Key Resources │               │ Customer      │
│               │               │ Relationships │
│ What we need? │               │               │
│               │               │ How we engage?│
├───────────────┼───────────────┼───────────────┤
│ Cost Structure                │ Revenue Streams│
│                               │                │
│ What we spend?                │ How we earn?   │
└───────────────────────────────┴────────────────┘
         │                              │
         ▼                              ▼
┌───────────────┐              ┌───────────────┐
│ Channels      │              │ Customer      │
│               │              │ Segments      │
│ How we reach? │              │ Who we serve? │
└───────────────┘              └───────────────┘

Common Mistakes

Avoid These

VALIDATION MISTAKES:
✗ Building before talking to customers
✗ Asking leading questions
✗ Only talking to friends/family
✗ Ignoring negative feedback
✗ "If we build it, they will come"

PRODUCT MISTAKES:
✗ Too many features in MVP
✗ Perfectionism before launch
✗ Solving your problem, not theirs
✗ Ignoring user behavior data
✗ Building in stealth too long

BUSINESS MISTAKES:
✗ No clear business model
✗ Underpricing drastically
✗ Ignoring unit economics
✗ Scaling before product-market fit
✗ Running out of runway

Warning Signs

SignalWhat It Means
No organic growthValue proposition unclear
High churnProduct doesn't deliver value
Support overloadProduct/onboarding issues
Feature requests onlyMissing core value
Price complaintsWrong positioning or audience

Funding Considerations

Bootstrapping vs. Raising

BOOTSTRAP when:
✓ Can reach profitability quickly
✓ Want full control
✓ Slow growth is acceptable
✓ Capital requirements are low

RAISE when:
✓ Need to move fast (competitive market)
✓ High upfront capital required
✓ Network/credibility from investors helps
✓ Winner-take-all market

Funding Stages

StageAmountPurpose
Pre-seed$50K-$500KValidate and build MVP
Seed$500K-$2MFind product-market fit
Series A$2M-$15MScale proven model
Series B+$15M+Accelerate growth

Legal Basics

Day 1 Essentials

MUST HAVE:
□ Business entity formed (LLC or C-Corp)
□ Co-founder agreement (if applicable)
□ Terms of Service
□ Privacy Policy
□ Clear IP ownership

SOON AFTER:
□ Trademark search/filing
□ Employment agreements
□ Contractor agreements
□ Data protection compliance

Entity Types (US)

TypeBest ForNotes
LLCBootstrapped, simpleTax flexibility
C-Corp (Delaware)Raising VCRequired for VC
S-CorpProfitable, smallTax advantages

Best Practices

DO:

  • Talk to users constantly (even after launch)
  • Ship fast, learn faster
  • Focus on one metric at a time
  • Build relationships with early users
  • Document your learnings
  • Take care of yourself
  • Know your runway

DON'T:

  • Build in secret for too long
  • Assume you know what users want
  • Scale before product-market fit
  • Ignore unit economics
  • Compete on features alone
  • Give up too early (or too late)
  • Neglect your health

Launch Readiness Checklist

Product

  • [ ] Core value proposition works
  • [ ] Onboarding tested with real users
  • [ ] Critical paths error-free
  • [ ] Analytics tracking key events
  • [ ] Support/feedback mechanism ready

Go-to-Market

  • [ ] Target customer clearly defined
  • [ ] Positioning statement finalized
  • [ ] Pricing determined and tested
  • [ ] Launch channels identified
  • [ ] Early users lined up

Operations

  • [ ] Team roles clear
  • [ ] Communication channels set up
  • [ ] Monitoring and alerting live
  • [ ] Legal basics in place
  • [ ] Financial tracking ready

平台分布

Codex

34.9%
按下载量换算251

Claude

32.98%
按下载量换算237

Cursor

18.52%
按下载量换算133

Gemini CLI

9.83%
按下载量换算71

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills