Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

product-analytics(产品分析)

用于辅助数据整理、表格处理、CSV/Excel 分析、指标计算和图表准备。它适合让 Agent 清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常、生成统计口径或把分析结果转成可读说明。使用时需要确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免把样本数据当全量事实;涉及敏感数据、导出文件或批量写回时,应先确认权限和脱敏边界。

product-analytics 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 2,723。

总安装 1,420周安装 61GitHub Stars 48下载 498核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:product-analytics(产品分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude
仓库路径:skills/product-analytics
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill product-analytics
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill product-analytics

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

product-analytics 用于辅助数据整理、表格处理和指标计算。适合清洗字段、汇总数据、发现异常或生成统计口径说明。使用时需确认数据来源、字段含义和时间范围,避免误用样本当全量。涉及敏感数据或导出文件时应先确认脱敏和权限边界。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定仓库安装并使用。

来源仓库内路径:skills/product-analytics

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill product-analytic…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

product-analytics 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill product-analytics。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

product-analytics 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

product-analytics 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

product-analytics 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

product-analytics 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,420 次,近一周安装 61 次,下载 498 次,GitHub 48 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

product-analytics 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
product-analytics

产品分析 · 本页

1,42048权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
product-analytics
description
Event tracking architecture, funnels, cohorts, A/B testing, PostHog/Amplitude

Product Analytics

Overview

This skill covers designing and implementing product analytics systems that provide actionable insights into user behavior. It addresses event taxonomy design, analytics SDK integration with major platforms (PostHog, Amplitude, Mixpanel, Segment), funnel and cohort analysis, A/B testing and feature flags, user journey mapping, GDPR-compliant consent management, and custom metric definitions.

Use this skill when adding analytics to a new product, redesigning an event tracking system, setting up A/B testing infrastructure, implementing consent management, or building custom dashboards for product teams.


Core Principles

  1. Design the taxonomy before writing code - A well-designed event naming convention and property schema prevents the #1 analytics failure: inconsistent, unqueryable data. Agree on naming conventions first.
  2. Track actions, not pages - Page views tell you where users went. Events with context tell you what users did and why. Focus on user actions: project_created, file_uploaded, subscription_upgraded.
  3. Identify before you track - Every event needs a user identity. Anonymous events before signup should be linked to the authenticated identity once the user logs in (alias/merge).
  4. Consent is mandatory - GDPR and CCPA require explicit user consent before tracking. Build consent management into the analytics layer, not as an afterthought.
  5. Less is more - Tracking everything creates noise. Track the events that answer specific product questions. You can always add events later; removing noise from existing data is much harder.

Key Patterns

Pattern 1: Event Taxonomy Design

When to use: Before implementing any analytics tracking. This is the foundation everything else builds on.

Implementation:

// Event taxonomy schema
// Convention: object_action (noun_verb in past tense)

// Core event types
type AnalyticsEvent =
  // Authentication
  | { event: "user_signed_up"; properties: { method: "email" | "google" | "github"; referralSource?: string } }
  | { event: "user_logged_in"; properties: { method: "email" | "google" | "github" } }
  | { event: "user_logged_out"; properties: Record<string, never> }

  // Onboarding
  | { event: "onboarding_started"; properties: { variant?: string } }
  | { event: "onboarding_step_completed"; properties: { step: number; stepName: string } }
  | { event: "onboarding_completed"; properties: { durationSeconds: number } }
  | { event: "onboarding_skipped"; properties: { lastStep: number } }

  // Core product actions
  | { event: "project_created"; properties: { template?: string; source: "dashboard" | "onboarding" | "api" } }
  | { event: "project_deleted"; properties: { projectAge: number; itemCount: number } }
  | { event: "file_uploaded"; properties: { fileType: string; fileSizeBytes: number; source: "drag_drop" | "file_picker" | "api" } }

  // Subscription
  | { event: "subscription_started"; properties: { plan: string; billingCycle: "monthly" | "annual"; amount: number } }
  | { event: "subscription_upgraded"; properties: { fromPlan: string; toPlan: string } }
  | { event: "subscription_cancelled"; properties: { reason?: string; plan: string; tenureDays: number } }

  // Feature engagement
  | { event: "feature_used"; properties: { feature: string; context: string } }
  | { event: "search_performed"; properties: { query: string; resultCount: number; source: string } }
  | { event: "export_completed"; properties: { format: "csv" | "pdf" | "json"; itemCount: number } };

// Type-safe tracking function
function track<T extends AnalyticsEvent>(
  event: T["event"],
  properties: T["properties"]
): void {
  // Implementation below
}

// Usage - fully typed, autocomplete works
track("project_created", {
  template: "blank",
  source: "dashboard",
});

Why: A typed event taxonomy prevents typos (user_signedup vs user_signed_up), ensures required properties are always present, and makes the tracking plan self-documenting. The object_action convention groups related events together in analytics dashboards.


Pattern 2: Analytics Client with Consent Management

When to use: Every product that tracks user behavior, which is every product.

Implementation:

// analytics.ts - Unified analytics client
import posthog from "posthog-js";

type ConsentStatus = "granted" | "denied" | "pending";

interface AnalyticsConfig {
  posthogKey: string;
  posthogHost?: string;
}

class Analytics {
  private initialized = false;
  private consent: ConsentStatus = "pending";
  private queuedEvents: Array<{ event: string; properties: Record<string, unknown> }> = [];

  init(config: AnalyticsConfig) {
    posthog.init(config.posthogKey, {
      api_host: config.posthogHost ?? "https://us.i.posthog.com",
      persistence: "localStorage+cookie",
      autocapture: false, // Explicit tracking only
      capture_pageview: false, // Manual pageview tracking
      capture_pageleave: true,
      // Respect Do Not Track
      respect_dnt: true,
      // Cookie-less mode until consent
      persistence: this.consent === "granted" ? "localStorage+cookie" : "memory",
    });
    this.initialized = true;
  }

  setConsent(status: ConsentStatus) {
    this.consent = status;

    if (status === "granted") {
      posthog.opt_in_capturing();
      // Flush queued events
      for (const event of this.queuedEvents) {
        this.trackInternal(event.event, event.properties);
      }
      this.queuedEvents = [];
    } else if (status === "denied") {
      posthog.opt_out_capturing();
      this.queuedEvents = [];
    }
  }

  identify(userId: string, traits?: Record<string, unknown>) {
    if (this.consent !== "granted") return;
    posthog.identify(userId, traits);
  }

  // Alias anonymous ID to authenticated ID (for signup flow)
  alias(newId: string) {
    if (this.consent !== "granted") return;
    posthog.alias(newId);
  }

  track(event: string, properties?: Record<string, unknown>) {
    if (this.consent === "denied") return;

    const enrichedProperties = {
      ...properties,
      timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
      url: typeof window !== "undefined" ? window.location.href : undefined,
      referrer: typeof document !== "undefined" ? document.referrer : undefined,
    };

    if (this.consent === "pending") {
      this.queuedEvents.push({ event, properties: enrichedProperties });
      return;
    }

    this.trackInternal(event, enrichedProperties);
  }

  private trackInternal(event: string, properties: Record<string, unknown>) {
    if (!this.initialized) return;
    posthog.capture(event, properties);
  }

  page(name?: string, properties?: Record<string, unknown>) {
    this.track("$pageview", { pageName: name, ...properties });
  }

  reset() {
    posthog.reset();
  }
}

export const analytics = new Analytics();
// React consent banner component
function ConsentBanner() {
  const [showBanner, setShowBanner] = useState(() => {
    return localStorage.getItem("analytics_consent") === null;
  });

  const handleConsent = (granted: boolean) => {
    const status = granted ? "granted" : "denied";
    localStorage.setItem("analytics_consent", status);
    analytics.setConsent(status);
    setShowBanner(false);
  };

  if (!showBanner) return null;

  return (
    <div role="dialog" aria-label="Cookie consent" className="consent-banner">
      <p>We use analytics to improve our product. No personal data is sold.</p>
      <div className="consent-actions">
        <button onClick={() => handleConsent(false)}>Decline</button>
        <button onClick={() => handleConsent(true)}>Accept</button>
      </div>
    </div>
  );
}

Why: Consent-first analytics is legally required (GDPR, CCPA) and builds user trust. The queue pattern ensures no events are lost if the user grants consent after performing actions. Explicit tracking (no autocapture) keeps data clean and intentional.


Pattern 3: Funnel Analysis Implementation

When to use: Measuring conversion through multi-step flows (signup, onboarding, checkout).

Implementation:

// Track each funnel step explicitly
const ONBOARDING_FUNNEL = [
  "onboarding_started",
  "onboarding_step_completed:profile",
  "onboarding_step_completed:workspace",
  "onboarding_step_completed:invite",
  "onboarding_completed",
] as const;

// Instrument each step
function OnboardingFlow() {
  const [currentStep, setCurrentStep] = useState(0);

  useEffect(() => {
    analytics.track("onboarding_started", { variant: "v2" });
  }, []);

  const completeStep = (stepName: string) => {
    analytics.track("onboarding_step_completed", {
      step: currentStep,
      stepName,
      timeOnStepSeconds: getTimeOnStep(),
    });
    setCurrentStep((prev) => prev + 1);
  };

  const skip = () => {
    analytics.track("onboarding_skipped", {
      lastStep: currentStep,
      lastStepName: steps[currentStep].name,
    });
    router.push("/dashboard");
  };

  const complete = () => {
    analytics.track("onboarding_completed", {
      durationSeconds: getTotalDuration(),
      stepsCompleted: currentStep + 1,
      stepsSkipped: steps.length - currentStep - 1,
    });
    router.push("/dashboard");
  };

  // ...render steps
}

// Checkout funnel tracking
function useCheckoutFunnel() {
  const trackStep = (step: string, properties?: Record<string, unknown>) => {
    analytics.track(`checkout_${step}`, {
      ...properties,
      cartValue: getCartTotal(),
      itemCount: getCartItemCount(),
      timestamp: Date.now(),
    });
  };

  return {
    viewCart: () => trackStep("cart_viewed"),
    startCheckout: () => trackStep("started"),
    addShipping: (method: string) => trackStep("shipping_added", { method }),
    addPayment: (type: string) => trackStep("payment_added", { type }),
    complete: (orderId: string) => trackStep("completed", { orderId }),
    abandon: (step: string) => trackStep("abandoned", { lastStep: step }),
  };
}

Why: Funnel analysis reveals where users drop off. Tracking each step with context (time spent, variant, cart value) enables segmented analysis: "Users from Google Ads drop off at the shipping step 3x more than organic users." This insight drives targeted optimization.


Pattern 4: Feature Flag-Driven A/B Testing

When to use: Testing product changes with statistical rigor before rolling out to all users.

Implementation:

// PostHog feature flags for A/B testing
import posthog from "posthog-js";

// Check feature flag with typed variants
function useExperiment<T extends string>(
  flagKey: string,
  variants: T[]
): T | "control" | undefined {
  const [variant, setVariant] = useState<T | "control" | undefined>();

  useEffect(() => {
    posthog.onFeatureFlags(() => {
      const value = posthog.getFeatureFlag(flagKey);

      if (value === false || value === undefined) {
        setVariant("control");
      } else if (typeof value === "string" && variants.includes(value as T)) {
        setVariant(value as T);
      } else {
        setVariant("control");
      }

      // Track experiment exposure (for accurate analysis)
      analytics.track("$experiment_started", {
        experiment: flagKey,
        variant: value ?? "control",
      });
    });
  }, [flagKey]);

  return variant;
}

// Usage in component
function PricingPage() {
  const variant = useExperiment("pricing-page-redesign", ["new-layout", "social-proof"]);

  if (!variant) return <LoadingSkeleton />;

  switch (variant) {
    case "new-layout":
      return <PricingNewLayout />;
    case "social-proof":
      return <PricingSocialProof />;
    case "control":
    default:
      return <PricingControl />;
  }
}

Why: A/B testing removes opinion from product decisions. Feature flags enable gradual rollout, instant rollback, and segment-specific targeting. Tracking exposure events separately from conversion events ensures accurate statistical analysis (intent-to-treat analysis).


Event Naming Convention Reference

ConventionExampleWhen to Use
object_actionproject_created, file_uploadedStandard product events
$system_event$pageview, $identifySystem/platform events
experiment_*$experiment_startedA/B test tracking
feature_usedfeature_used { feature: "export" }Generic feature engagement

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It's BadBetter Approach
Autocapture everythingNoisy data, hard to query, privacy riskExplicit event tracking with defined taxonomy
Inconsistent event namesuserSignedUp vs user_signed_up vs signupEnforce naming convention with TypeScript types
Tracking without consentGDPR/CCPA violation, fines up to 4% revenueConsent banner with queue pattern
No user identificationCannot do cohort analysis or retentionIdentify users on login, alias on signup
Tracking PII in event propertiesPrivacy violation, data retention issuesUse user IDs, not emails/names in event properties
One massive "user_action" eventCannot create meaningful funnelsSpecific event per meaningful action
Not tracking negative outcomesOnly see what works, not what failsTrack errors, abandonment, rage clicks

Checklist

  • [ ] Event taxonomy documented and typed (TypeScript interface)
  • [ ] Naming convention enforced (object_action pattern)
  • [ ] Analytics client initialized with consent management
  • [ ] User identification on login, alias on signup
  • [ ] Funnel steps tracked with contextual properties
  • [ ] Feature flags set up for A/B testing
  • [ ] Experiment exposure events tracked separately from conversions
  • [ ] GDPR consent banner implemented with queue pattern
  • [ ] No PII in event properties (emails, full names, IPs)
  • [ ] Key funnels visualized in analytics dashboard
  • [ ] Retention cohorts configured (Day 1, Day 7, Day 30)
  • [ ] Analytics events validated in development (debug mode)

Related Resources

  • Skills: growth-engineering (A/B testing infrastructure), authentication-patterns (identify/alias flow)
  • Skills: accessibility-a11y (accessible consent banners)
  • Rules: docs/reference/stacks/react-typescript.md (React hooks for analytics)

平台分布

Codex

32.44%
按下载量换算162

Claude

31.07%
按下载量换算155

Cursor

18.18%
按下载量换算91

Gemini CLI

9.83%
按下载量换算49

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills