Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

customer-success(客户成功)

customer-success 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

customer-success 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 2,763。

总安装 1,402周安装 59GitHub Stars 48下载 491核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:customer-success(客户成功)
来源仓库:https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude
仓库路径:skills/customer-success
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill customer-success
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill customer-success

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

customer-success 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态进行整理。适用于需要围绕代码变更或协作事项进行信息整理的场景。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/customer-success

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill customer-success;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

customer-success 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claude --skill customer-success。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

customer-success 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

customer-success 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

customer-success 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

customer-success 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,402 次,近一周安装 59 次,下载 491 次,GitHub 48 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

customer-success 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
customer-success

客户成功 · 本页

1,40248权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
customer-success
description
>-

Customer Success Engineering

Overview

This skill covers building technical systems that power customer support and success operations. It addresses support ticket system integration (Zendesk, Intercom, Freshdesk), knowledge base architecture, conversational AI chatbot design, customer feedback collection and routing, SLA management and enforcement, escalation workflow automation, self-service portal implementation, and customer health scoring models.

Use this skill when building or integrating support systems, designing chatbot flows, creating self-service documentation portals, implementing SLA tracking, building customer health dashboards, or automating support workflows.


Core Principles

  1. Self-service first - The best support interaction is the one that never happens. Invest in searchable knowledge bases, in-app help, and contextual guidance before scaling human support.
  2. Automate triage, not resolution - AI can classify, prioritize, and route tickets effectively. Let humans handle resolution for complex issues. Over-automating resolution creates frustrated customers.
  3. Measure time-to-resolution, not ticket count - Closing tickets quickly means nothing if the customer's problem isn't solved. Track first-contact resolution rate, customer effort score, and reopen rate.
  4. Context travels with the ticket - Every handoff (bot to human, L1 to L2) must include full conversation history, user account data, and attempted solutions. Repeating information is the #1 customer complaint.
  5. Feedback is a product signal - Support tickets are unstructured product feedback. Tag, categorize, and surface trends to product teams. The most common support topic should become the next product improvement.

Key Patterns

Pattern 1: Knowledge Base Architecture

When to use: Building searchable documentation that serves both customers (self-service) and support agents (internal reference).

Implementation:

// Knowledge base article schema
interface Article {
  id: string;
  slug: string;
  title: string;
  content: string;          // Markdown
  excerpt: string;          // For search results
  category: string;
  subcategory: string;
  tags: string[];
  audience: "customer" | "internal" | "both";
  visibility: "public" | "authenticated" | "internal";
  relatedArticles: string[];
  metadata: {
    createdAt: Date;
    updatedAt: Date;
    author: string;
    reviewedAt: Date | null;
    helpfulVotes: number;
    notHelpfulVotes: number;
    viewCount: number;
  };
}

// Search implementation with vector + full-text hybrid
async function searchKnowledgeBase(
  query: string,
  options?: { category?: string; audience?: string; limit?: number }
): Promise<SearchResult[]> {
  const limit = options?.limit ?? 10;

  // 1. Semantic search (catches paraphrased queries)
  const embedding = await getEmbedding(query);
  const semanticResults = await vectorDb.search({
    vector: embedding,
    filter: {
      audience: options?.audience ?? "customer",
      ...(options?.category && { category: options.category }),
    },
    limit,
  });

  // 2. Full-text search (catches exact terminology)
  const textResults = await db.$queryRaw`
    SELECT id, title, excerpt,
           ts_rank(search_vector, plainto_tsquery('english', ${query})) AS rank
    FROM articles
    WHERE search_vector @@ plainto_tsquery('english', ${query})
      AND audience IN ('customer', 'both')
      ${options?.category ? Prisma.sql`AND category = ${options.category}` : Prisma.empty}
    ORDER BY rank DESC
    LIMIT ${limit}
  `;

  // 3. Merge and deduplicate results
  const merged = mergeSearchResults(semanticResults, textResults);

  // 4. Track search for analytics
  await trackSearch(query, merged.length);

  return merged;
}

// Feedback loop - track article helpfulness
async function rateArticle(
  articleId: string,
  helpful: boolean,
  feedback?: string
): Promise<void> {
  await db.articleFeedback.create({
    data: {
      articleId,
      helpful,
      feedback,
      createdAt: new Date(),
    },
  });

  // Update aggregate counts
  await db.article.update({
    where: { id: articleId },
    data: helpful
      ? { helpfulVotes: { increment: 1 } }
      : { notHelpfulVotes: { increment: 1 } },
  });

  // Flag articles with low helpfulness for review
  const article = await db.article.findUnique({ where: { id: articleId } });
  if (article) {
    const total = article.helpfulVotes + article.notHelpfulVotes;
    const helpfulRate = total > 10 ? article.helpfulVotes / total : 1;

    if (helpfulRate < 0.5 && total > 10) {
      await createReviewTask(articleId, "Low helpfulness score");
    }
  }
}
// In-app contextual help widget
function HelpWidget({ context }: { context: string }) {
  const [articles, setArticles] = useState<Article[]>([]);
  const [isOpen, setIsOpen] = useState(false);

  useEffect(() => {
    // Fetch relevant articles based on current page/feature context
    if (isOpen) {
      searchKnowledgeBase("", { category: context, limit: 5 })
        .then(setArticles);
    }
  }, [isOpen, context]);

  return (
    <div className="help-widget">
      <button
        onClick={() => setIsOpen(!isOpen)}
        aria-label="Help"
        aria-expanded={isOpen}
      >
        ?
      </button>
      {isOpen && (
        <div role="dialog" aria-label="Help articles">
          <SearchInput onSearch={(q) => searchKnowledgeBase(q, { category: context }).then(setArticles)} />
          <ArticleList articles={articles} />
          <a href="/support">Contact support</a>
        </div>
      )}
    </div>
  );
}

Why: Hybrid search (semantic + full-text) covers both conceptual queries ("how do I share my project?") and exact terminology queries ("SSO SAML configuration"). The feedback loop ensures low-quality articles are flagged for improvement. Contextual help surfaces relevant articles without the user needing to search.


Pattern 2: Support Ticket Integration

When to use: Connecting your application to a ticketing system for structured support workflows.

Implementation:

// Unified support ticket interface (abstracts provider)
interface SupportTicket {
  id: string;
  externalId: string;       // Provider's ticket ID
  subject: string;
  description: string;
  status: "open" | "pending" | "in_progress" | "resolved" | "closed";
  priority: "low" | "normal" | "high" | "urgent";
  category: string;
  tags: string[];
  requester: {
    id: string;
    email: string;
    name: string;
  };
  assignee?: {
    id: string;
    name: string;
    group: string;
  };
  metadata: {
    plan: string;
    accountAge: number;
    mrr: number;            // Monthly recurring revenue
    previousTickets: number;
  };
  createdAt: Date;
  updatedAt: Date;
  firstResponseAt?: Date;
  resolvedAt?: Date;
}

// Auto-triage new tickets with AI classification
async function triageTicket(ticket: SupportTicket): Promise<TriageResult> {
  const classification = await classifyTicket(ticket.subject, ticket.description);

  // Priority escalation rules
  let adjustedPriority = classification.priority;

  // Enterprise customers get elevated priority
  if (ticket.metadata.mrr >= 5000) {
    adjustedPriority = elevate(adjustedPriority);
  }

  // Revenue at risk detection
  if (containsCancellationIntent(ticket.description)) {
    adjustedPriority = "urgent";
    classification.tags.push("churn-risk");
  }

  // Route to appropriate team
  const team = determineTeam(classification.category, adjustedPriority);

  return {
    category: classification.category,
    priority: adjustedPriority,
    team,
    tags: classification.tags,
    suggestedArticles: await findRelatedArticles(ticket.subject),
    autoResponse: classification.confidence > 0.9
      ? generateAutoResponse(classification, ticket)
      : null,
  };
}

// SLA enforcement
interface SLAPolicy {
  priority: string;
  firstResponseMinutes: number;
  resolutionMinutes: number;
}

const SLA_POLICIES: SLAPolicy[] = [
  { priority: "urgent", firstResponseMinutes: 30, resolutionMinutes: 240 },
  { priority: "high", firstResponseMinutes: 120, resolutionMinutes: 480 },
  { priority: "normal", firstResponseMinutes: 480, resolutionMinutes: 1440 },
  { priority: "low", firstResponseMinutes: 1440, resolutionMinutes: 4320 },
];

async function checkSLABreaches(): Promise<SLABreach[]> {
  const openTickets = await getOpenTickets();
  const breaches: SLABreach[] = [];

  for (const ticket of openTickets) {
    const policy = SLA_POLICIES.find((p) => p.priority === ticket.priority);
    if (!policy) continue;

    const now = new Date();
    const age = (now.getTime() - ticket.createdAt.getTime()) / 60000;

    // First response SLA
    if (!ticket.firstResponseAt && age > policy.firstResponseMinutes) {
      breaches.push({
        ticketId: ticket.id,
        type: "first_response",
        minutesOverdue: Math.round(age - policy.firstResponseMinutes),
      });
    }

    // Resolution SLA
    if (!ticket.resolvedAt && age > policy.resolutionMinutes) {
      breaches.push({
        ticketId: ticket.id,
        type: "resolution",
        minutesOverdue: Math.round(age - policy.resolutionMinutes),
      });
    }
  }

  return breaches;
}

Why: AI-powered triage routes tickets to the right team faster, reducing first-response time. Revenue-based priority escalation ensures high-value customers get appropriate attention. SLA monitoring provides accountability and surfaces systemic issues (if a category consistently breaches SLA, it signals a product or documentation gap).


Pattern 3: Customer Health Scoring

When to use: Proactively identifying at-risk customers before they churn.

Implementation:

// Health score calculation
interface HealthSignal {
  name: string;
  weight: number;
  score: (customer: Customer) => number; // 0-100
}

const healthSignals: HealthSignal[] = [
  {
    name: "product_usage",
    weight: 0.3,
    score: (c) => {
      const weeklyActive = c.loginDaysLast30 / 30 * 100;
      return Math.min(100, weeklyActive * 1.5);
    },
  },
  {
    name: "feature_adoption",
    weight: 0.2,
    score: (c) => {
      const total = CORE_FEATURES.length;
      const adopted = c.featuresUsed.filter((f) => CORE_FEATURES.includes(f)).length;
      return (adopted / total) * 100;
    },
  },
  {
    name: "support_sentiment",
    weight: 0.15,
    score: (c) => {
      if (c.ticketsLast90Days === 0) return 70; // Neutral
      const resolved = c.resolvedTicketsLast90Days / c.ticketsLast90Days;
      return resolved * 100;
    },
  },
  {
    name: "expansion_signals",
    weight: 0.15,
    score: (c) => {
      const usageGrowth = c.currentMonthUsage / (c.previousMonthUsage || 1);
      if (usageGrowth > 1.2) return 100;
      if (usageGrowth > 1.0) return 70;
      if (usageGrowth > 0.8) return 40;
      return 10;
    },
  },
  {
    name: "payment_health",
    weight: 0.2,
    score: (c) => {
      if (c.failedPaymentsLast90Days > 2) return 20;
      if (c.failedPaymentsLast90Days > 0) return 60;
      return 100;
    },
  },
];

function calculateHealthScore(customer: Customer): {
  score: number;
  status: "healthy" | "at-risk" | "critical";
  signals: Array<{ name: string; score: number; weight: number }>;
} {
  const signals = healthSignals.map((signal) => ({
    name: signal.name,
    score: signal.score(customer),
    weight: signal.weight,
  }));

  const weightedScore = signals.reduce(
    (total, s) => total + s.score * s.weight,
    0
  );

  return {
    score: Math.round(weightedScore),
    status: weightedScore >= 70 ? "healthy" : weightedScore >= 40 ? "at-risk" : "critical",
    signals,
  };
}

// Scheduled job: calculate health scores and alert CSMs
async function updateHealthScores(): Promise<void> {
  const customers = await db.customer.findMany({
    where: { subscriptionStatus: "active" },
    include: { usage: true, tickets: true, payments: true },
  });

  for (const customer of customers) {
    const health = calculateHealthScore(customer);

    await db.customerHealth.upsert({
      where: { customerId: customer.id },
      create: { customerId: customer.id, ...health },
      update: health,
    });

    // Alert CSM for critical customers
    if (health.status === "critical" && customer.mrr >= 1000) {
      await notifyCSM(customer.csmId, {
        customer: customer.name,
        score: health.score,
        signals: health.signals.filter((s) => s.score < 40),
      });
    }
  }
}

Why: Health scoring transforms reactive support (wait for churn) into proactive customer success (intervene before churn). Composite scores combining usage, support sentiment, feature adoption, and payment health give a holistic view. Automated alerts for critical accounts ensure high-value customers get timely CSM attention.


Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It's BadBetter Approach
Bot-only support with no human escalationFrustrated customers, churnBot for triage + knowledge, human for resolution
No context passed on escalationCustomer repeats everythingPass full conversation history + account data
Measuring success by tickets closedIncentivizes premature closureMeasure first-contact resolution + customer effort
Knowledge base with no feedback loopStale, unhelpful articles persistTrack helpfulness votes, flag low performers
Same SLA for all customersEnterprise customers get same priority as freeTiered SLAs based on plan and revenue
Support separate from product feedbackMiss patterns that could prevent ticketsTag tickets as product feedback, surface trends

Checklist

  • [ ] Knowledge base searchable via hybrid search (semantic + full-text)
  • [ ] In-app contextual help widget on key pages
  • [ ] Support tickets auto-triaged with AI classification
  • [ ] SLA policies defined per priority level
  • [ ] SLA breach monitoring with escalation alerts
  • [ ] Customer health scores calculated on schedule
  • [ ] High-value at-risk customers trigger CSM alerts
  • [ ] Full context (conversation + account data) on every escalation
  • [ ] Article helpfulness tracked with feedback loop
  • [ ] Support trends surfaced to product team monthly

Related Resources

  • Skills: llm-app-development (chatbot RAG), product-analytics (support funnel analysis)
  • Skills: email-systems (support notification emails), accessibility-a11y (accessible help widgets)
  • Rules: docs/reference/stacks/react-typescript.md (help widget components)

平台分布

Codex

33.91%
按下载量换算166

Claude

32.33%
按下载量换算159

Cursor

20.02%
按下载量换算98

Gemini CLI

9.63%
按下载量换算47

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills