Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

traction-eos(牵引 EOS)

traction-eos 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

traction-eos 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 4,972。

总安装 28,512周安装 1,209GitHub Stars 779下载 9,984核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:traction-eos(牵引 EOS)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wondelai/skills
仓库路径:skills/traction-eos
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wondelai/skills --skill traction-eos
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wondelai/skills --skill traction-eos

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于检索与牵引力优化或 EOS 生态相关的信息与解决方案。适用于区块链、智能合约或去中心化应用开发中的性能调优场景。提供基于关键词的搜索能力,协助识别技术方案或最佳实践。使用前请检查是否涉及网络请求或敏感操作,确保符合安全策略。建议查阅源码仓库以确认实际功能范围和调用方式。

traction-eos 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/traction-eos

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wondelai/skills --skill traction-eos;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

traction-eos 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wondelai/skills --skill traction-eos。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

traction-eos 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

traction-eos 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

traction-eos 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

traction-eos 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 28,512 次,近一周安装 1,209 次,下载 9,984 次,GitHub 779 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

traction-eos 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
traction-eos

牵引 EOS · 本页

28,512779只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS)

A complete system for running a business with six key components. Designed for entrepreneurial companies ($2M-$50M revenue, 10-250 employees) that want to align vision and execution.

Core Principle

Most businesses suffer from the same core issues: people, vision, traction. EOS provides a simple, complete operating system that strengthens the Six Key Components of any organization.

The foundation: Great vision without traction is hallucination. Traction without vision is aimless. EOS connects the two through a practical, weekly operating rhythm.

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. When evaluating or implementing business processes, rate 0-10 based on EOS component strength. A 10/10 means all six components are strong, meetings are productive, and quarterly rocks are consistently achieved; lower scores indicate gaps. Always provide current score and improvements to reach 10/10.

The Six Key Components

Vision → People → Data → Issues → Process → Traction

Every business is built on these six components. EOS strengthens all six.

1. Vision Component

Question: Does everyone in the organization know where you're going and how you plan to get there?

Tool: Vision/Traction Organizer (V/TO)

The V/TO answers eight questions on two pages:

QuestionWhat It DefinesExample
Core Values3-7 non-negotiable beliefs"Own it", "Do the right thing", "Grow or die"
Core FocusPurpose/cause/passion + niche"Simplify small business" + "Cloud accounting"
10-Year TargetBig, hairy, audacious goal"$100M revenue" or "10,000 customers"
Marketing StrategyTarget market, 3 uniques, proven process, guaranteeWho you serve, why you're different
3-Year PictureWhat company looks like in 3 yearsRevenue, profit, headcount, key metrics
1-Year PlanRevenue, profit, measurables, goalsSpecific targets for this year
Quarterly Rocks3-7 priorities for this quarterThe most important things to accomplish in 90 days
Issues ListAll unresolved obstaclesProblems, ideas, opportunities to discuss

Process:

  1. Leadership team completes V/TO together (2-day off-site)
  2. Share with entire organization
  3. Review quarterly
  4. Update annually

Key insight: If leadership team can't agree on V/TO, you have a bigger problem. Alignment comes first.

See: references/vto.md for V/TO templates and exercises.

2. People Component

Question: Do you have the right people in the right seats?

Tool: Accountability Chart

Not an org chart—an accountability chart. Defines the structure and who owns what.

Structure:

Visionary ←→ Integrator
              ├── Sales/Marketing
              ├── Operations
              └── Finance

Two key roles:

  • Visionary: Big ideas, culture, key relationships, creative problem solving
  • Integrator: Runs business day-to-day, manages team, executes vision, resolves conflicts

Rule: One person per seat. No shared accountability.

Tool: People Analyzer

Evaluate every person on two dimensions:

1. Right Person (core values fit)

Core Value+ (most of the time)+/- (sometimes)- (rarely)
Own it+
Do the right thing+/-
Grow or die+

Standard: Must be "+" on all core values. One "+/-" is a conversation. Any "-" is wrong person.

2. Right Seat (GWC)

  • Get it: Understands the role
  • Want it: Genuinely wants the role
  • Capacity: Has the mental, physical, emotional capacity

Must be "yes" on all three. If missing any one, wrong seat.

The formula: Right People + Right Seats = A-players

People decisions:

  • Right person, right seat → Keep and invest in
  • Right person, wrong seat → Move to right seat
  • Wrong person, right seat → Coaching/exit (hardest call)
  • Wrong person, wrong seat → Exit immediately

See: references/people.md for accountability chart and people analyzer templates.

3. Data Component

Question: Are you managing based on objective data, or subjective opinions?

Tool: Scorecard

A weekly report card of 5-15 numbers that tell you how the business is doing.

Scorecard rules:

  • Activity-based metrics (leading indicators), not results (lagging)
  • Weekly numbers (monthly is too slow)
  • Every number has an owner
  • Every number has a goal
  • Red/green: on track or off track

Example Scorecard:

MetricOwnerGoalW1W2W3W4
RevenueSales Lead$50K/wk✓✓✗✓
New LeadsMarketing100/wk✓✗✓✓
Demos CompletedSales20/wk✗✓✓✓
Customer NPSSupport>50✓✓✓✓
Cash BalanceFinance>$200K✓✓✓✓

Benefits:

  • Spot problems 2-4 weeks earlier
  • Reduce "gut feeling" management
  • Create accountability without micromanagement
  • Everyone knows the score

Metric selection: If you had to go on vacation for 4 weeks, what 5-15 numbers would tell you how the business is doing?

See: references/data.md for scorecard templates and metric selection.

4. Issues Component

Question: Are you identifying, discussing, and solving issues quickly?

Tool: Issues Solving Track (IDS)

Identify → Discuss → Solve

Step 1: Identify

  • What's the real issue? (Not the symptom)
  • Ask "Why?" until you reach root cause
  • State the issue in one sentence

Step 2: Discuss

  • Everyone gets input (not equal time)
  • Tangents are stopped
  • Focus on the ONE issue
  • Time-boxed (usually 5-15 minutes)

Step 3: Solve

  • Decision is made
  • Action items are assigned (who + what + when)
  • Move to next issue

Three types of issues:

TypeExamplesAction
ProblemsCustomer churn, team conflict, system outageIDS → solve
IdeasNew feature, process change, market opportunityIDS → decide (yes/no/later)
ObstaclesBlocking a rock, resource constraint, dependencyIDS → remove or escalate

Issues list rules:

  • Everyone can add issues
  • Prioritize: most important first
  • Not all issues get solved every meeting
  • Unsolved issues carry forward

Common IDS mistakes:

  • Discussing symptoms, not root cause
  • Rehashing same issue every week
  • No clear action items
  • Too much discussion, not enough solving

See: references/issues.md for IDS facilitation guides.

5. Process Component

Question: Have you documented and consistently followed your core processes?

Tool: Core Process Documentation

The 20/80 rule: Document 20% of your processes to get 80% consistency.

Identify core processes:

  • HR process (hiring, onboarding, reviews)
  • Sales process (lead → close)
  • Operations process (delivery, fulfillment)
  • Customer service process (support → resolution)
  • Finance process (invoicing, collections)

Documentation format:

  1. Name the process
  2. List 5-20 major steps
  3. Add just enough detail (not a 50-page manual)
  4. Make it visual where possible

Example: Sales Process "The Closer"

  1. Qualify lead (BANT: Budget, Authority, Need, Timeline)
  2. Discovery call (30 min, use question guide)
  3. Demo (customize to their pain points)
  4. Proposal (send within 24 hours)
  5. Follow up (3 touches in 7 days)
  6. Close or disqualify

Followed By All (FBA):

  • Document it
  • Train on it
  • Measure compliance
  • Update quarterly

See: references/process.md for process documentation templates.

6. Traction Component

Question: Are you executing on your vision every day?

Two tools: Rocks and Level 10 Meetings

Rocks (Quarterly Priorities)

Definition: The 3-7 most important things to accomplish in the next 90 days.

Why 90 days?

  • Long enough to accomplish something meaningful
  • Short enough to maintain urgency
  • Natural human rhythm for focus

Rock-setting process:

  1. Review V/TO (vision, 3-year, 1-year)
  2. Brainstorm: "What must get done this quarter to stay on track?"
  3. Narrow to 3-7 company rocks
  4. Assign each rock to one owner
  5. Each leadership member also has 3-7 individual rocks
  6. Share with entire organization
  7. Track weekly

SMART rocks:

  • Specific: "Launch new pricing page" not "improve pricing"
  • Measurable: Clear completion criteria
  • Achievable: Can be done in 90 days
  • Realistic: Given current resources
  • Time-bound: Due end of quarter

Rock scoring:

  • Done = checked off (no partial credit)
  • Not done = carried forward or dropped
  • Goal: 80%+ completion rate

Anti-patterns:

  • Too many rocks (>7) → Focus is diluted
  • Rocks too vague → Can't tell if done
  • No owner → Nobody accountable
  • All rocks are "business as usual" → Not moving the needle

See: references/rocks.md for rock-setting exercises.

Level 10 Meeting (Weekly Leadership Meeting)

The most important meeting in EOS. Runs every week, same day, same time, same agenda.

Duration: 90 minutes, never longer.

Agenda:

TimeSectionPurpose
5 minSegueGood news (personal and professional)
5 minScorecardReview weekly numbers
5 minRock ReviewOn track / Off track for each rock
5 minCustomer/Employee HeadlinesQuick updates
5 minTo-Do ListReview last week's to-dos (done or not done)
60 minIDSIdentify, Discuss, Solve issues
5 minConcludeRecap to-dos, rate meeting 1-10

Level 10 meeting rules:

  • Starts on time, ends on time (non-negotiable)
  • Same day, same time every week
  • No phones/laptops (except for agenda)
  • IDS gets 60 of 90 minutes (most important part)
  • Rate meeting 1-10 at end (target: 8+)
  • If below 8, discuss what to improve

Why "Level 10"?

  • Every meeting is rated 1-10 by participants
  • Goal is to consistently achieve 10/10

To-Do rules:

  • 7-day action items only
  • Each has owner and due date
  • Done = 100% complete
  • 90%+ completion rate is target

See: references/level-10.md for meeting facilitation guides.

EOS Implementation Timeline

Typical rollout: 2 years to full implementation

PhaseTimelineFocus
Focus DayDay 1 (8 hours)Accountability chart, rocks, scorecard, Level 10
Vision Building Day 1Month 1V/TO: core values, core focus, 10-year target
Vision Building Day 2Month 2V/TO: marketing strategy, 3-year, 1-year, rocks
Quarterly SessionsEvery 90 daysReview rocks, set new rocks, IDS major issues
Annual PlanningYearlyFull V/TO review, set 1-year plan, Q1 rocks

Self-implementation vs. EOS Implementer:

  • Self: Read the book, follow the tools (free, slower)
  • EOS Implementer: Certified facilitator guides the process (faster, expensive)

Organizational Checkup

Rate your company 1-5 on each statement:

ComponentStatementScore (1-5)
VisionLeadership team is on the same page with where we're going and how to get there
PeopleWe have the right people in the right seats
DataWe manage from a weekly scorecard of 5-15 numbers
IssuesWe solve issues quickly and permanently
ProcessCore processes are documented and followed by all
TractionWe set and achieve 90-day priorities (rocks)

Scoring:

  • 25-30: Strong (maintain and fine-tune)
  • 20-24: Good (close gaps)
  • 15-19: Average (significant work needed)
  • Below 15: Weak (consider EOS implementer)

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It FailsFix
Skipping Level 10sLose weekly rhythm, issues pile upProtect meeting, never cancel
Too many rocksNo focus, nothing gets doneMax 7 company rocks, 3-7 per person
Vague rocksCan't tell if doneWrite SMART rocks with clear criteria
No scorecardManaging by gut, surprisesChoose 5-15 weekly numbers
Wrong people keptDrags entire team downUse People Analyzer, make tough calls
V/TO not sharedTeam doesn't know the visionShare with entire company

Quick Diagnostic

Audit any business:

QuestionIf NoAction
Does leadership agree on vision?MisalignmentComplete V/TO together
Right people in right seats?Performance issuesPeople Analyzer on all seats
Managing from data weekly?Reactive managementBuild weekly scorecard
Issues solved permanently?Same problems repeatImplement IDS in Level 10s
Core processes documented?InconsistencyDocument top 5 processes
90-day priorities set and tracked?No tractionSet quarterly rocks

Reference Files

  • vto.md: Vision/Traction Organizer templates, eight questions
  • people.md: Accountability chart, People Analyzer, GWC
  • data.md: Scorecard templates, metric selection
  • issues.md: IDS process, facilitation, issue types
  • process.md: Core process documentation templates
  • rocks.md: Rock-setting exercises, SMART rocks
  • level-10.md: Meeting agenda, facilitation, rating
  • implementation.md: EOS rollout timeline, self-implementation guide
  • case-studies.md: Companies that implemented EOS successfully

Further Reading

This skill is based on the Entrepreneurial Operating System developed by Gino Wickman. For the complete system:

About the Author

Gino Wickman is the creator of EOS (Entrepreneurial Operating System) and founder of EOS Worldwide, a community of certified EOS Implementers who help companies implement the system. Wickman has worked with thousands of entrepreneurial leadership teams and has helped them get real traction. *Traction* has sold over 2 million copies and EOS is used by over 250,000 companies worldwide. His work focuses on the practical tools needed to run an entrepreneurial company.

平台分布

Codex

37.43%
按下载量换算3,737

Claude

26.6%
按下载量换算2,656

Cursor

19.63%
按下载量换算1,960

Gemini CLI

9.89%
按下载量换算987

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills