Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis(toolweb hipaa 差距分析)

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查和凭据风险排查,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要复核安全边界、认证流程或敏感配置时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 是运维类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在运维类的 954 个 Skill 里排第 516。

总安装 6,720周安装 280GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 2,240核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis(toolweb hipaa 差距分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd/toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis
安装命令:
openclaw skills install toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

评估 HIPAA 合规性并生成优先补救计划。适用于医疗、健康类项目安全审计与合规检查。toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 属于运维类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。输入组织配置和规则领域,输出差距分析与审计报告。安装前需确认权限范围及是否触发联网或文件读写操作。

建议结合原始 README 核验具体用法和维护状态。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 6,720 次,近一周安装 280 次,下载 2,240 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
docker-essentials

Docker 基础 · OpenClaw

1,005,15130接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
playwright-scraper-skill

Playwright scraper 技能 · OpenClaw

923,55754接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
moltguard

moltguard 搜索 · OpenClaw

825,096110接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
finance-news

财经新闻 · OpenClaw

275,51210需要联网MIT-0有提醒
security-monitor

安全监视器 · OpenClaw

224,1695需要联网MIT-0有提醒
toolweb-hipaa-gap-analysis

toolweb hipaa 差距分析 · 本页

6,720—接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

HIPAA Gap Analysis

Assess your organization's HIPAA compliance posture across all five rule areas — Administrative Safeguards, Physical Safeguards, Technical Safeguards, Privacy Rule, and Breach Notification Rule. Covers all 32 control areas required for covered entities and business associates. Produces a gap report with compliance score, identified deficiencies, and a prioritized remediation roadmap.


Usage

{
  "tool": "hipaa_gap_analysis",
  "input": {
    "organization_name": "Sunrise Health Clinic",
    "organization_type": "Covered Entity",
    "entity_size": "Small",
    "services_provided": ["Primary Care", "Telehealth", "Lab Services"],
    "phi_volume": "Medium",
    "phi_types": ["Medical Records", "Billing Information", "Lab Results"],
    "workforce_size": 45,
    "locations_count": 3,
    "cloud_services": true,
    "third_party_vendors": true,
    "mobile_devices": true,
    "security_officer_assigned": true,
    "workforce_training": false,
    "access_management": true,
    "contingency_plan": false,
    "incident_response": false,
    "risk_assessment_conducted": true,
    "business_associate_agreements": true,
    "facility_access_controls": true,
    "workstation_use_controls": false,
    "device_media_controls": false,
    "access_control_systems": true,
    "audit_controls": false,
    "integrity_controls": false,
    "transmission_security": true,
    "privacy_officer_assigned": true,
    "notice_of_privacy_practices": true,
    "patient_rights_procedures": true,
    "minimum_necessary_procedures": false,
    "complaints_process": true,
    "breach_notification_procedures": false,
    "breach_risk_assessment": false
  }
}

Parameters

All fields are required.

Organization Profile

FieldTypeDescription
organization_namestringName of the organization being assessed
organization_typestringe.g., Covered Entity, Business Associate, Hybrid Entity
entity_sizestringSmall, Medium, Large
services_providedarray of stringsList of healthcare services offered
phi_volumestringVolume of PHI handled: Low, Medium, High
phi_typesarray of stringsTypes of PHI: e.g., Medical Records, Billing Information, Lab Results, Mental Health Records
workforce_sizeintegerTotal number of employees/contractors
locations_countintegerNumber of physical locations
cloud_servicesbooleanWhether cloud services are used to store/process PHI
third_party_vendorsbooleanWhether third-party vendors have access to PHI
mobile_devicesbooleanWhether mobile devices are used to access PHI

Administrative Safeguards

FieldTypeDescription
security_officer_assignedbooleanDesignated Security Officer in place
workforce_trainingbooleanRegular HIPAA workforce training conducted
access_managementbooleanFormal access management procedures exist
contingency_planbooleanData backup and disaster recovery plan exists
incident_responsebooleanSecurity incident response procedures in place
risk_assessment_conductedbooleanFormal risk assessment has been conducted
business_associate_agreementsbooleanBAAs executed with all relevant vendors

Physical Safeguards

FieldTypeDescription
facility_access_controlsbooleanPhysical access controls for facilities with PHI
workstation_use_controlsbooleanWorkstation use and security policies in place
device_media_controlsbooleanControls for hardware/media containing PHI

Technical Safeguards

FieldTypeDescription
access_control_systemsbooleanTechnical access controls (unique user IDs, auto-logoff, etc.)
audit_controlsbooleanAudit logs for PHI access and activity
integrity_controlsbooleanControls to ensure PHI is not improperly altered or destroyed
transmission_securitybooleanEncryption/security for PHI in transit

Privacy Rule

FieldTypeDescription
privacy_officer_assignedbooleanDesignated Privacy Officer in place
notice_of_privacy_practicesbooleanNPP distributed and acknowledged
patient_rights_proceduresbooleanProcedures for patient access, amendment, and accounting
minimum_necessary_proceduresbooleanMinimum necessary standard applied to PHI use/disclosure
complaints_processbooleanProcess for receiving and handling privacy complaints

Breach Notification Rule

FieldTypeDescription
breach_notification_proceduresbooleanBreach notification procedures documented
breach_risk_assessmentbooleanProcess for conducting breach risk assessment in place

What You Get

  • Overall HIPAA compliance score — percentage and maturity rating
  • Rule-by-rule gap breakdown — Administrative, Physical, Technical, Privacy, Breach Notification
  • Control deficiency list — exactly which of the 32 controls are gaps
  • Risk-prioritized remediation plan — Immediate (0–30 days), Short-term (30–90 days), Long-term (90+ days)
  • Regulatory exposure summary — potential penalty tiers based on identified gaps (Tier 1–4)
  • Audit readiness rating — how prepared the organization is for an OCR audit

Example Output

{
  "organization": "Sunrise Health Clinic",
  "overall_score": 62,
  "compliance_rating": "Partial Compliance",
  "audit_readiness": "Moderate Risk",
  "rule_scores": {
    "administrative_safeguards": { "score": 71, "gaps": 2 },
    "physical_safeguards": { "score": 33, "gaps": 2 },
    "technical_safeguards": { "score": 50, "gaps": 2 },
    "privacy_rule": { "score": 80, "gaps": 1 },
    "breach_notification": { "score": 0, "gaps": 2 }
  },
  "critical_gaps": [
    "No breach notification procedures — OCR Tier 3/4 penalty exposure",
    "No breach risk assessment process — required for all incidents",
    "Workstation use controls absent — PHI exposure risk at endpoints",
    "No audit controls — inability to detect or prove unauthorized access"
  ],
  "immediate_actions": [
    "Document and implement breach notification procedures (7 days)",
    "Deploy workstation lock/encryption policy (14 days)",
    "Enable audit logging on all systems accessing PHI (7 days)"
  ],
  "penalty_exposure": "Tier 3 — Willful Neglect (up to $50,000 per violation)"
}

API Reference

Base URL: https://portal.toolweb.in/apis/compliance/hipaa-gap-analysis

EndpointMethodDescription
/hipaa-analysisPOSTRun full HIPAA gap assessment

Authentication: Pass your API key as X-API-Key header or mcp_api_key argument via MCP.


Pricing

PlanDaily LimitMonthly LimitPrice
Free5 / day50 / month$0
Developer20 / day500 / month$39
Professional200 / day5,000 / month$99
Enterprise100,000 / day1,000,000 / month$299

About

ToolWeb.in — 200+ security APIs, CISSP & CISM certified, built for enterprise compliance practitioners.

Platforms: Pay-per-run · API Gateway · MCP Server · OpenClaw · RapidAPI · YouTube

平台分布

OpenClaw

82.25%
按下载量换算1,842

安全审计

VirusTotal

可疑

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills