Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-serviceclawhub未标认证来源可访问clear审计提醒

toolweb-ai-governance-security-ethics-readiness-assessmentToolweb AI 治理安全道德准备度评估

Agent Skill

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

总安装

3,103

周安装

128

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

1,014
OpenClaw

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

MIT-0

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:toolweb-ai-governance-security-ethics-readiness-assessment(Toolweb AI 治理安全道德准备度评估)
来源仓库:https://github.com/krishnakumarmahadevan-cmd/toolweb-ai-governance-security-ethics-readiness-assessment
安装命令:
openclaw skills install toolweb-ai-governance-security-ethics-readiness-assessment
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install toolweb-ai-governance-security-ethics-readiness-assessment

简介

用于评估人工智能治理、安全及道德合规的组织成熟度水平。

  • 适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。
  • 使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。
  • 建议配合人工审核,尤其在关键系统中应用时需严格遵循安全策略。
  • toolweb-ai-governance-security-ethics-readiness-assessment 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

name
AI Governance, Security & Ethics Readiness Assessment
description
Assess organizational maturity across AI Governance, Security, and Ethics & Compliance domains.

Overview

The AI Governance, Security & Ethics Readiness Assessment tool evaluates your organization's preparedness across three critical pillars: AI Governance frameworks, Security posture, and Ethics & Compliance standards. This assessment provides a structured methodology to identify maturity levels, gaps, and actionable recommendations for building trustworthy AI systems.

Organizations deploying AI solutions face increasing regulatory scrutiny and operational risks. This tool enables security teams, compliance officers, and AI leaders to benchmark their current state against industry best practices and establish a roadmap for improvement. The assessment captures evidence-based data across governance structures, security controls, and ethical safeguards to generate comprehensive readiness reports.

Ideal users include CISOs, Chief Data Officers, AI/ML leads, compliance teams, and enterprise architects seeking to align AI initiatives with security and regulatory requirements.

Usage

Example Assessment Request:

{
  "assessmentData": {
    "ai_governance": {
      "policy_framework": "documented",
      "risk_assessment_process": "implemented",
      "approval_workflows": "in_place",
      "audit_trail": "enabled"
    },
    "ai_security": {
      "model_validation": "automated",
      "data_encryption": "aes256",
      "access_controls": "rbac",
      "threat_monitoring": "active"
    },
    "ai_ethics_compliance": {
      "bias_testing": "ongoing",
      "transparency_documentation": "complete",
      "regulatory_alignment": "gdpr_compliant",
      "stakeholder_review": "quarterly"
    },
    "sessionId": "sess_12345abcde",
    "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
  },
  "sessionId": "sess_12345abcde",
  "userId": 1001,
  "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
}

Example Response:

{
  "status": "success",
  "sessionId": "sess_12345abcde",
  "assessment_results": {
    "ai_governance": {
      "maturity_level": "level_3",
      "score": 78,
      "status": "strong",
      "findings": [
        {
          "category": "policy_framework",
          "rating": "compliant",
          "evidence": "documented and reviewed annually"
        }
      ]
    },
    "ai_security": {
      "maturity_level": "level_3",
      "score": 81,
      "status": "strong",
      "findings": [
        {
          "category": "model_validation",
          "rating": "compliant",
          "evidence": "automated testing in CI/CD pipeline"
        }
      ]
    },
    "ai_ethics_compliance": {
      "maturity_level": "level_2",
      "score": 65,
      "status": "developing",
      "findings": [
        {
          "category": "bias_testing",
          "rating": "partial",
          "evidence": "testing in progress, needs expansion"
        }
      ]
    },
    "overall_maturity": "level_3",
    "overall_score": 75,
    "recommendations": [
      "Enhance bias detection frameworks across all model families",
      "Implement continuous ethics monitoring",
      "Establish stakeholder review cadence for high-impact models"
    ],
    "timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:15Z"
  }
}

Endpoints

GET /

Summary: Root endpoint Description: Returns service status and basic API information.

Parameters: None

Response:

{
  "service": "AI Governance, Security & Ethics Assessment",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "status": "operational"
}

POST /api/ai-gse/assess

Summary: Assess GSE Description: Submit organizational assessment data across AI Governance, Security, and Ethics domains. Returns detailed maturity scores, findings, and recommendations.

Parameters:

NameTypeRequiredDescription
assessmentDataAssessmentDataYesAssessment responses containing ai_governance, ai_security, and ai_ethics_compliance objects; each with domain-specific attributes. sessionId and timestamp required.
sessionIdstringYesUnique identifier for this assessment session.
userIdinteger or nullNoOptional identifier for the user conducting the assessment.
timestampstringYesISO 8601 timestamp when assessment was submitted.

Request Body Schema (AssessmentData):

FieldTypeRequiredDescription
ai_governanceobjectNoGovernance framework data (policy_framework, risk_assessment_process, approval_workflows, audit_trail, etc.).
ai_securityobjectNoSecurity posture data (model_validation, data_encryption, access_controls, threat_monitoring, etc.).
ai_ethics_complianceobjectNoEthics and compliance data (bias_testing, transparency_documentation, regulatory_alignment, stakeholder_review, etc.).
sessionIdstringYesSession identifier matching parent request.
timestampstringYesTimestamp of assessment data.

Response (200 OK):

{
  "status": "success",
  "sessionId": "string",
  "assessment_results": {
    "ai_governance": {
      "maturity_level": "level_1|level_2|level_3|level_4|level_5",
      "score": 0-100,
      "status": "string",
      "findings": []
    },
    "ai_security": {
      "maturity_level": "string",
      "score": 0-100,
      "status": "string",
      "findings": []
    },
    "ai_ethics_compliance": {
      "maturity_level": "string",
      "score": 0-100,
      "status": "string",
      "findings": []
    },
    "overall_maturity": "string",
    "overall_score": 0-100,
    "recommendations": [],
    "timestamp": "string"
  }
}

Response (422 Validation Error):

{
  "detail": [
    {
      "loc": ["body", "field_name"],
      "msg": "error description",
      "type": "error_type"
    }
  ]
}

GET /api/ai-gse/pillars

Summary: Get Pillars Description: Retrieve framework structure and available assessment categories for all three pillars (Governance, Security, Ethics & Compliance).

Parameters: None

Response (200 OK):

{
  "pillars": [
    {
      "name": "AI Governance",
      "description": "Organizational frameworks and policies",
      "categories": [
        "policy_framework",
        "risk_assessment_process",
        "approval_workflows",
        "audit_trail"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "AI Security",
      "description": "Security controls and threat management",
      "categories": [
        "model_validation",
        "data_encryption",
        "access_controls",
        "threat_monitoring"
      ]
    },
    {
      "name": "AI Ethics & Compliance",
      "description": "Ethical safeguards and regulatory alignment",
      "categories": [
        "bias_testing",
        "transparency_documentation",
        "regulatory_alignment",
        "stakeholder_review"
      ]
    }
  ]
}

Pricing

PlanCalls/DayCalls/MonthPrice
Free550Free
Developer20500$39/mo
Professional2005,000$99/mo
Enterprise100,0001,000,000$299/mo

About

ToolWeb.in - 200+ security APIs, CISSP & CISM, platforms: Pay-per-run, API Gateway, MCP Server, OpenClaw, RapidAPI, YouTube.

References

  • Kong Route: https://api.toolweb.in/compliance/ai-governance-security-ethics
  • API Docs: https://api.toolweb.in:8172/docs

适合场景

01

OpenClaw 用户查找和安装 Skill 时

02

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

03

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

04

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

OpenClaw

78.82%
按下载量换算799

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

可疑

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills