Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索需要联网github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

tooluniverse-toxicology工具宇宙毒理学

Agent Skill

tooluniverse-toxicology 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

1,123

周安装

45

GitHub Stars

1,299

下载量

364
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tooluniverse-toxicology(工具宇宙毒理学)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse
仓库路径:skills/tooluniverse-toxicology
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-toxicology
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mims-harvard/tooluniverse --skill tooluniverse-toxicology

简介

用于查找、检索和筛选毒理学相关信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据来源线索定位候选结果。
  • 通过 npx 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。
  • 安装前需确认权限范围和维护状态,注意可能触发联网或文件操作。
  • tooluniverse-toxicology 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Toxicology Assessment via Adverse Outcome Pathways & Signal Detection

Systematic toxicology analysis that links molecular initiating events (MIEs) through adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) to apical adverse outcomes, then triangulates with real-world FAERS signals, FDA label data, and toxicogenomic associations.

Domain Reasoning

Toxicity has many mechanisms, and the first interpretive question is temporal: is this acute toxicity (immediate effect from a high dose) or chronic toxicity (cumulative damage from long-term low-dose exposure)? Acute and chronic toxicity operate through different mechanisms — acute hepatotoxicity may reflect direct mitochondrial damage, while chronic hepatotoxicity may involve fibrosis from repeated low-level inflammation. They also have different regulatory frameworks: acute toxicity is captured by LD50 and emergency protocols, while chronic toxicity requires long-term carcinogenicity and repeat-dose studies.

LOOK UP DON'T GUESS

  • Adverse outcome pathways for a chemical: query AOPWiki_list_aops and AOPWiki_get_aop; do not describe mechanisms from memory.
  • FAERS adverse event signals: retrieve from FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event and FAERS_calculate_disproportionality; never estimate PRR values.
  • FDA label warnings: call DailyMed_parse_adverse_reactions and related tools; do not state boxed warnings from memory.
  • CTD chemical-gene and chemical-disease associations: query CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions and CTD_get_chemical_diseases; do not infer gene targets without database evidence.

COMPUTE, DON'T DESCRIBE

When analysis requires computation (statistics, data processing, scoring, enrichment), write and run Python code via Bash. Don't describe what you would do — execute it and report actual results. Use ToolUniverse tools to retrieve data, then Python (pandas, scipy, statsmodels, matplotlib) to analyze it.

When to Use This Skill

Triggers:

  • "What are the toxicity mechanisms for [drug/chemical]?"
  • "Find adverse outcome pathways for [chemical]"
  • "What AOPs are relevant to [target/organ/effect]?"
  • "FAERS signal analysis for [drug]"
  • "Toxicogenomic profile for [chemical]"
  • "What is the mechanism of hepatotoxicity / cardiotoxicity / neurotoxicity for [drug]?"

Use Cases:

  1. AOP Tracing: Map chemical MIE through key events to apical outcome using AOPWiki
  2. Real-World Signal Detection: Quantify FAERS adverse event signals with PRR/ROR
  3. Label Safety Mining: Extract FDA boxed warnings, contraindications, nonclinical toxicology
  4. Toxicogenomics: Chemical-gene-disease associations from CTD
  5. Integrated Mechanism Report: Combine AOP pathway + real-world signals into unified narrative

KEY PRINCIPLES

  1. AOP-first thinking - Frame all toxicity in terms of MIE → Key Events → Adverse Outcome
  2. Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, update progressively
  3. Evidence grading mandatory - T1 (regulatory/clinical) through T4 (computational/AOP annotation)
  4. Distinguish mechanism from signal - AOPWiki = mechanism; FAERS = real-world signal
  5. Disambiguation first - Resolve drug/chemical identity before any queries
  6. English-first queries - Always use English names in tool calls

Evidence Grading

TierSymbolCriteria
T1[T1]FDA boxed warning, clinical trial toxicity finding, regulatory label
T2[T2]FAERS signal PRR > 2, AOP with high biological plausibility, CTD curated
T3[T3]CTD inferred association, AOP annotation with moderate plausibility
T4[T4]Text-mined CTD entry, early-stage AOP annotation

Workflow Overview

Chemical/Drug Query
|
+-- PHASE 0: Disambiguation
|   Resolve name -> identifiers (ChEMBL, PubChem CID, SMILES)
|
+-- PHASE 1: Adverse Outcome Pathway Mapping (AOPWiki)
|   List AOPs by keyword; retrieve key events, MIEs, and biological plausibility scores
|
+-- PHASE 2: Real-World Adverse Event Signals (FAERS)
|   Top reactions by drug; disproportionality (PRR); serious event filter
|
+-- PHASE 3: FDA Label Safety Mining
|   Boxed warnings, contraindications, nonclinical toxicology, adverse reactions
|
+-- PHASE 4: Toxicogenomics (CTD)
|   Chemical-gene interactions; chemical-disease associations
|
+-- SYNTHESIS: Integrated Toxicology Report
    AOP-linked mechanism + FAERS signal + CTD gene targets + Risk classification

Phase 0: Disambiguation

Objective: Establish compound identity before any database queries.

Tools:

  • PubChem_get_CID_by_compound_name (name: str) — get CID + SMILES
  • ChEMBL_search_drugs (query: str) — get ChEMBL ID and max phase

Capture: generic name, SMILES, PubChem CID, ChEMBL ID, drug class.


Phase 1: Adverse Outcome Pathway Mapping

Objective: Find AOPs relevant to the chemical's known or suspected toxicity mechanisms.

Tools

AOPWiki_list_aops:

  • Input: keyword (str) — e.g., organ ("liver", "kidney"), effect ("apoptosis", "inflammation"), or target ("AhR", "PPARalpha")
  • Output: List of AOP IDs, titles, and short descriptions
  • Use: Discovery scan to identify candidate AOPs

AOPWiki_get_aop:

  • Input: aop_id (int) — ID from list_aops result
  • Output: Full AOP details including MIE, key events (KEs), key event relationships (KERs), biological plausibility, and weight-of-evidence
  • Use: Retrieve mechanistic pathway details for selected AOPs

Workflow

  1. Query AOPWiki_list_aops with organ-level keyword (e.g., "hepatotoxicity", "nephrotoxicity")
  2. Query again with mechanism-level keyword (e.g., "oxidative stress", "mitochondria")
  3. Select top 3-5 most relevant AOPs by title relevance
  4. Call AOPWiki_get_aop for each selected AOP
  5. Extract: MIE (molecular initiating event), key events in order, apical adverse outcome, biological plausibility score

Decision Logic

  • AOP found: Extract full pathway; note plausibility level (high/moderate/low)
  • No direct AOP match: Try broader organ or mechanism terms; document as "no AOP directly mapped"
  • Multiple AOPs: Report all; highlight shared key events as high-confidence mechanisms

AOP Table Format

AOP IDTitleMIEApical OutcomePlausibility
123.........High

Phase 2: Real-World Adverse Event Signals (FAERS)

Objective: Quantify observed adverse events with statistical signal measures.

Tools

FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event:

  • Input: drug_name (str), limit (int, default 50)
  • Output: Top adverse reactions with counts
  • Note: param is drug_name not drug

FAERS_calculate_disproportionality:

  • Input: drug_name (str), reaction_meddra_pt (str)
  • Output: PRR, ROR, IC with confidence intervals

FAERS_filter_serious_events:

  • Input: drug_name (str), serious_type (str: "death", "hospitalization", "life-threatening")
  • Output: Serious event count and case details

FAERS_stratify_by_demographics:

  • Input: drug_name (str), reaction_meddra_pt (str)
  • Output: Age/sex breakdown for specific reaction

Workflow

  1. Get top 25 reactions via FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_event
  2. Filter to organ-system clusters matching the AOP outcomes from Phase 1
  3. Calculate PRR for top 10 reactions via FAERS_calculate_disproportionality
  4. Check serious events (deaths, hospitalizations) for highest-PRR reactions

Signal Thresholds

Signal StrengthPRRCase Count
Strong> 3.0>= 5
Moderate2.0-3.0>= 3
Weak1.5-2.0>= 3
None< 1.5any

Phase 3: FDA Label Safety Mining

Objective: Extract regulatory safety findings from approved drug labels.

Tools

  • DailyMed_parse_adverse_reactions (drug_name: str)
  • DailyMed_parse_contraindications (drug_name: str)
  • DailyMed_parse_clinical_pharmacology (drug_name: str)
  • DailyMed_parse_drug_interactions (drug_name: str)

Note: These tools apply to FDA-approved drugs only. Environmental chemicals will have no label data — document explicitly.

Workflow

  1. Extract adverse reactions and note which match FAERS signals
  2. Extract contraindications (highest evidence tier [T1])
  3. Note pharmacological mechanism from clinical pharmacology section

Phase 4: Toxicogenomics (CTD)

Objective: Map chemical-gene interactions and chemical-disease associations.

Tools

CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactions:

  • Input: input_terms (str) — chemical name or MeSH ID
  • Output: Gene targets with interaction type (increases/decreases expression)
  • Use: Find molecular targets mediating toxicity

CTD_get_chemical_diseases:

  • Input: input_terms (str) — chemical name or MeSH ID
  • Output: Disease associations with evidence type (curated/inferred)
  • Use: Find downstream disease endpoints

Workflow

  1. Query CTD with compound name; note curated (higher confidence) vs inferred entries
  2. Cross-reference gene targets with Phase 1 AOP key events
  3. Note which CTD disease endpoints match AOP apical outcomes

Synthesis: Integrated Toxicology Report

Structure:

# Toxicology Report: [Compound Name]
**Generated**: YYYY-MM-DD

## Executive Summary
Risk tier: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / INSUFFICIENT DATA
Key finding summary (2-3 sentences)

## 1. Compound Identity
(disambiguation table)

## 2. Adverse Outcome Pathways [T3-T4]
(AOP table; pathway diagrams in text form)

## 3. Real-World Adverse Event Signals [T1-T2]
(FAERS top reactions + PRR table + serious events)

## 4. FDA Label Safety [T1]
(boxed warnings, contraindications, adverse reactions)

## 5. Toxicogenomics [T2-T4]
(CTD gene targets + disease associations)

## 6. Mechanistic Integration
(How AOP key events map to observed FAERS signals and CTD gene targets)

## 7. Risk Classification
(Final tier with rationale)

## Data Gaps & Limitations
(Missing data, confidence caveats)

Risk Classification

TierCriteria
CRITICALFDA boxed warning OR FAERS PRR > 5 with deaths OR multiple T1 findings
HIGHFAERS PRR 3-5 serious events OR FDA warning (non-boxed) OR high-plausibility AOP
MEDIUMFAERS PRR 2-3 OR CTD curated associations OR moderate-plausibility AOP
LOWAll signals < PRR 2; no regulatory warnings; low-plausibility AOP only
INSUFFICIENT DATAFewer than 3 phases returned usable data

Fallback Chains

Primary ToolFallback 1Fallback 2
AOPWiki_list_aopsBroaden keywordSearch by organ system
FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_eventOpenFDA_search_drug_eventsLiterature search
DailyMed_parse_adverse_reactionsOpenFDA_search_drug_eventsFAERS serious events
CTD_get_chemical_diseasesCTD_get_chemical_gene_interactionsPubMed search

Tool Parameter Reference (Critical)

ToolWRONGCORRECT
FAERS_count_reactions_by_drug_eventdrugdrug_name
AOPWiki_list_aopsquerykeyword
CTD_get_chemical_gene_interactionschemicalinput_terms
CTD_get_chemical_diseaseschemicalinput_terms

Limitations

  • AOPWiki: AOPs are in development; many lack high plausibility scores
  • FAERS: Observational data; confounding by indication; underreporting bias
  • CTD: Inferred associations have high false-positive rate
  • DailyMed: FDA-approved drugs only; no environmental chemical coverage
  • Environmental chemicals: Primarily Phase 1 (AOP) + Phase 4 (CTD) data available

References

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.44%
按下载量换算129

Claude

28.23%
按下载量换算103

Cursor

20.85%
按下载量换算76

Gemini CLI

9.67%
按下载量换算35

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills