Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

investigate(调查)

investigate 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

investigate 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 21,023。

总安装 196周安装 8GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 63核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:investigate(调查)
来源仓库:https://github.com/timlai666/skills
仓库路径:skills/investigate
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill investigate
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill investigate

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。适合围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理。可结合来源仓库和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态及是否会触发联网或命令执行。涉及文件读写时应先明确输入输出范围。

investigate 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/investigate

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill investigate;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

investigate 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/timlai666/skills --skill investigate。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

investigate 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

investigate 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

investigate 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

investigate 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 196 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 63 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

investigate 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
investigate

调查 · 本页

196—需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Preamble (run first)

_BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo "unknown")
echo "BRANCH: $_BRANCH"
# Auto-activate freeze to prevent accidental changes during investigation
_FREEZE=$(cat ~/.mystack/freeze.txt 2>/dev/null || echo "none")
if [ "$_FREEZE" = "none" ]; then
  echo "." > ~/.mystack/freeze.txt
  echo "FREEZE_AUTO_ACTIVATED: edits locked to current directory during investigation"
fi

Note: Freeze is auto-activated during investigation to prevent accidentally "fixing" unrelated code. Run /stacksmith-safety off after investigation to remove.


Iron Law

No fix without understanding the root cause.

If you have attempted 3 different fixes and none worked: STOP and escalate. Do not guess a 4th fix. More attempts without new information just waste time and may make the system harder to understand.


Step 1??Understand the symptom

Ask if not clearly provided:

  • Exact symptom??error message verbatim, wrong output, crash, silent failure?
  • Reproduction??always, sometimes (what triggers it), or intermittent?
  • When did it start??after what change? Or has it always been this way?
  • Environment??local, staging, prod? All three?
  • What was tried??what has already been attempted?

Step 2??Form hypotheses

Based on the symptom, list 3?? possible root causes ranked by likelihood. For each, state the evidence that points to it:

H1 (most likely, ~60%): [hypothesis]
  Evidence: [why you think this]
  Rules out: [what would disprove it]

H2 (~25%): [hypothesis]
  Evidence: [why you think this]
  Rules out: [what would disprove it]

H3 (~10%): [hypothesis]
  Evidence: [why you think this]

H4 (~5%): [hypothesis]

Common hypothesis categories:

  • Wrong assumption about data (nil where non-nil expected, wrong type, wrong shape)
  • State/timing issue (race condition, stale cache, wrong ordering)
  • Config/environment mismatch (works local, fails staging)
  • External dependency changed (API, library version)
  • Regression from recent change (git log --oneline -10)

Step 3??Test hypotheses cheaply (observe before touching code)

For each hypothesis, design a minimal test that confirms or rules it out??without modifying code:

HypothesisTest methodCost
H1: value is nilAdd puts/console.log/print at boundaryTrivial
H2: race conditionLog timestamps of competing operationsTrivial
H3: config issuePrint ENV values at startupTrivial
H4: library bugPin version and reproduceLow

Run the cheapest tests first. Report results. Eliminate hypotheses.

# Check recent changes that might be relevant
git log --oneline -15
git log --since="7 days ago" --name-only --format="" | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -10

Step 4??Trace the data flow

Once narrowed to 1?? hypotheses, trace the exact path of the bad data:

[Request/Event enters at: ]
  ??[Layer 1] ??state here: [what you found]
  ??[Layer 2] ??state here: [what you found]
  ??[Where behavior diverges from expected] ??state here: [what you found]
  ??[Where the symptom manifests]

Identify the exact file:line where the wrong thing happens. This is the root cause.


Step 5??Fix (only after root cause confirmed)

Minimal fix??change only what's necessary to address the root cause, not the symptom.

Before writing the fix, state:

  • "Root cause: [exact description]"
  • "Fix: [what will change and why this addresses the root cause, not just the symptom]"
  • "Does not fix: [what this won't change]"
git add -p   # stage only the fix
git commit -m "fix: [root cause in plain English]\n\nInvestigation: [what was found and where]"

Write a regression test immediately after:

  • The test must fail before the fix and pass after
  • Tests the root cause, not the symptom
  • Commit: git commit -m "test: regression for [root cause]"

Step 6??Verify

Reproduce the original symptom after the fix. Confirm it's gone.

If the symptom persists: you may have fixed a symptom, not the root cause. Go back to Step 2 with updated hypotheses.


Step 7??Escalation (after 3 failed attempts)

If three different fixes have been tried and none resolved the symptom:

??ESCALATION ??3 attempts failed

Attempts:
1. [Fix 1] ??what changed ??result: [what happened]
2. [Fix 2] ??what changed ??result: [what happened]
3. [Fix 3] ??what changed ??result: [what happened]

Remaining hypotheses:
H?: [hypothesis] ??need to test: [what information/access/expertise is required]

Current best understanding:
The root cause is likely in [area], but I cannot verify without [specific missing info].

Recommended next step:
[Specific action: add more logging, check external service, get access to prod logs, pair with someone who knows the system]

STOP HERE. Do not attempt a 4th fix.


Log + unfreeze reminder

echo "{\"ts\":\"$(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ)\",\"skill\":\"investigate\",\"branch\":\"$(git branch --show-current 2>/dev/null || echo 'N/A')\",\"outcome\":\"success\",\"repo\":\"$(basename $(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null) 2>/dev/null || echo 'N/A')\"}" >> ~/.mystack/timeline.jsonl

After investigation completes: "Investigation complete. Auto-freeze is still active. Run /stacksmith-safety off to remove edit restrictions."

平台分布

Codex

32.38%
按下载量换算20

Claude

31.92%
按下载量换算20

Cursor

18.79%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.33%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills