Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

ticket-writer(售票员)

用于处理 Jira 项目、任务、缺陷、Sprint、负责人和状态流转。它适合让 Agent 辅助查询工单、汇总迭代进展、创建任务或整理需求和缺陷信息。使用时要确认项目权限、字段配置和工作流规则,不同团队的 Issue 类型、状态和必填字段可能不同;涉及批量改状态、改负责人或创建工单时,应先预览变更内容再执行。

ticket-writer 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 19,381。

总安装 275周安装 11GitHub Stars 16下载 89核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ticket-writer(售票员)
来源仓库:https://github.com/krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso
仓库路径:skills/ticket-writer
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso --skill ticket-writer
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso --skill ticket-writer

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于处理 Jira 项目、任务和缺陷流转。适合查询工单、汇总迭代进展或创建新任务。使用时需确认项目权限、字段配置和工作流规则。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso --skill ticket-writer 涉及批量改状态或负责人时应先预览变更内容。

来源仓库内路径:skills/ticket-writer

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso --skill ticket-wr…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

ticket-writer 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/krzysztofsurdy/code-virtuoso --skill ticket-writer。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

ticket-writer 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

ticket-writer 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

ticket-writer 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

ticket-writer 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 275 次,近一周安装 11 次,下载 89 次,GitHub 16 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

ticket-writer 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
ticket-writer

售票员 · 本页

27516只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Ticket Writer

Pick the right ticket type, then fill in only the fields that type demands. A story is not a bug; an epic is not an initiative. Each type has a distinct audience, scope, and definition of done -- mixing them produces vague, unactionable tickets that bloat backlogs.

Core Principles

PrincipleMeaning
Type drives structureThe type decides the required fields -- never use a single template for everything
Outcomes over outputsDescribe the change the work creates, not the activity performed
Small enough to finishStories and subtasks fit a sprint; epics fit a quarter; initiatives span multiple quarters
Testable acceptanceEvery story, subtask, and bug has acceptance criteria that a reviewer can verify
Context, not prosePrefer tables, lists, and labelled sections over paragraphs -- readers skim
One ask per ticketIf a ticket has two unrelated goals, split it

Type Hierarchy and Selection

Tickets form a hierarchy. Pick the highest level where the work still has a single, coherent purpose.

Initiative  (multi-quarter strategic outcome)
  Epic      (quarter-scale goal, one product area)
    Story   (sprint-scale user-visible value)
      Subtask  (implementation slice of a story)
    Bug     (defect against current behaviour)
    Issue   (anything else -- chore, spike, question)

When to Use Each Type

TypeAudienceScopeTypical DurationKey Question
InitiativeExecs, product leadershipCross-team strategic goal1-4 quartersWhat outcome do we want for the business or users?
EpicProduct, engineering, designSingle product area, multiple stories1 quarterWhat capability or experience are we delivering?
StoryDev team, QA, PMOne user-facing changeFits in a sprintAs a [user], what can I now do?
SubtaskOne developerTechnical slice of a storyHours to 1-2 daysWhat specific implementation step does this cover?
BugDev team, QAA deviation from intended behaviourFix-sizedWhat is broken, and how do I reproduce it?
IssueDev teamChore, spike, question, tech debt, docsVariableWhat needs attention that isn't user-facing work?

Type Decision Tree

  1. Is this a deviation from intended behaviour? -> Bug
  2. Is this a strategic goal spanning multiple teams or quarters? -> Initiative
  3. Is this a large body of work that needs to be broken down but belongs to one product area? -> Epic
  4. Is this user-visible value that fits in a sprint? -> Story
  5. Is this an implementation slice of an existing story? -> Subtask
  6. None of the above (chore, spike, investigation, tech debt, question)? -> Issue

Workflow

Phase 1: Type Selection

If the user provided a type as an argument, use it. Otherwise present a selectable menu (use AskUserQuestion or the platform's equivalent interactive prompt) listing the six types with their one-line descriptions from the table above. Never dump the full table as plain text -- keep the menu compact.

If the user's intent is clear from context (e.g., they said "write a bug report" or "create an epic for checkout redesign"), skip the menu and confirm the inferred type with a single yes/no prompt.

Phase 2: Load the Type-Specific Reference

Read the matching reference file for the selected type:

Each reference contains:

  • The required fields
  • The optional fields
  • A field-by-field questionnaire (questions, options, follow-ups)
  • The output template
  • Quality checks specific to that type

Phase 3: Run the Questionnaire

Ask only the questions the reference lists for the selected type. Follow these rules:

  1. Batch compatible questions (3-4 per prompt) when using an interactive menu tool. Use free-text prompts only when the answer is genuinely free-form (title, description, reproduction steps).
  2. Skip optional fields silently if the user says "skip" or leaves them blank -- do not add empty placeholders.
  3. Follow-up on ambiguous answers -- if the user says "it's slow", ask "slow compared to what, and by how much?"
  4. Never invent facts. If the user cannot provide environment info, reproduction steps, or metrics, leave those fields out and note the gap in a ## Open Questions section rather than fabricating values.

Phase 4: Assemble the Ticket

Use the type's output template. Apply these universal formatting rules:

  • Title: Imperative mood for stories/subtasks/issues ("Add password reset via email"), descriptive for bugs ("Payment confirmation email not sent after successful charge"), outcome-oriented for epics/initiatives ("Reduce checkout abandonment by 30%").
  • Body: Markdown with section headings. No emojis unless the user explicitly requests them.
  • Labels: Suggest labels based on type and content (e.g., bug, severity:high, area:checkout).
  • Links: Leave placeholders for parent epic / related tickets / PRs rather than inventing IDs.

Phase 5: Quality Check

Before showing the final output, run the checks listed in the type's reference file. Common failure modes to catch:

SymptomFix
Acceptance criteria describe implementation ("implement X service")Rewrite in terms of observable outcomes ("when user does X, system does Y")
Bug has no steps to reproduceMark as "Open Questions" and ask the user to provide them
Epic has no success metricAdd a metric or downgrade to a story
Story doesn't name a user ("we need to...")Rewrite with a concrete persona ("As a returning customer, I want...")
Initiative lists features instead of outcomesReframe key results as measurable changes, not shipped features
Subtask is larger than its parent storySplit the story or merge the subtasks

Phase 6: Deliver

Show the final ticket to the user in a code block so they can copy-paste it. Then offer:

  1. Edit a field
  2. Change the type (if the content no longer fits)
  3. Write a related ticket (e.g., a story under the epic just written)
  4. Done

Quick Reference: Field Matrix

Which fields are required (R), optional (O), or not used (-) per type.

FieldStorySubtaskIssueBugEpicInitiative
TitleRRRRRR
User personaR-OOOO
User story sentenceR-O-O-
Problem statementO-ORRR
Acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then)RRORO-
Steps to reproduce---R--
Expected / actual behaviour---R--
Environment---R--
Severity---R--
PriorityOOOROO
Scope / out of scopeO-O-RR
Success metrics----RR
Key results----OR
Objective----OR
Milestones----OR
Parent linkOROOO-
Child list----OO
Definition of doneRRORO-
Technical notesOOOOO-
EstimateOOOOO-
DependenciesOOOOOO

Integration with Other Skills

SituationRecommended Skill
Writing the PRD that the stories will flow fromproduct-manager
Designing the architecture behind an epicarchitect
Writing acceptance criteria and test plans for a storyqa-engineer
Planning sprints and setting sprint goalsscrum
Tracking initiatives as part of a delivery planproject-manager
Writing the commit and PR for a story once implementedpr-message-writer
Kicking off the ticket workflow after writingticket-workflow

Reference Files

ReferenceContents
story.mdUser story fields, INVEST checklist, Given/When/Then acceptance criteria, full template and example
subtask.mdSubtask fields, parent linkage rules, technical acceptance criteria, Definition of Done guidance
issue.mdGeneric issue template for chores, spikes, tech debt, questions, and docs tasks
bug.mdBug report fields, severity vs priority matrix, environment capture, reproduction rigor
epic.mdEpic fields, problem statement, success metrics, in/out of scope, milestones, child stories
initiative.mdInitiative fields, OKR alignment, objective and key results, outcome vs output, epic roll-up

平台分布

Codex

36.88%
按下载量换算33

Claude

29.32%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

17.96%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

9.79%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills