- name
- thoughtproof
- description
- Epistemic verification for AI agent outputs. Use ThoughtProof to verify AI reasoning, detect blind spots, and build consensus across multiple model families. Triggers: when an agent needs a second opinion, audit trail for decisions, or epistemic consensus. Works with any LLM backend (BYOK). Commands: tp verify, tp deep, tp list, tp show.
ThoughtProof — Epistemic Verification Skill
Multi-agent verification protocol for AI decisions. Like a TÜV for AI reasoning.
How It Works
ThoughtProof runs your question through multiple independent AI agents (different model families), then a critic layer identifies blind spots, and a synthesizer produces a consensus with confidence scores.
Pipeline: Normalize → Generate (3+ models) → Critique (adversarial) → Evaluate → Synthesize
Prerequisites
pot-cliinstalled:npm install -g pot-cli- At least one API key (Anthropic, OpenAI, xAI, or Moonshot)
- More keys = more model diversity = better verification
Quick Start
Verify a claim or decision
tp verify "Should we use microservices or monolith for our MVP?"Chain context from previous verifications
tp verify --context last "What about scaling considerations?"Deep analysis with rotated roles
tp deep "Is this investment thesis sound?"Configuration
pot-cli reads config from ~/.potrc.json:
{
"generators": [
{ "provider": "xai", "model": "grok-4-1-fast" },
{ "provider": "moonshot", "model": "kimi-k2.5" },
{ "provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-sonnet-4-6" }
],
"critic": { "provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-opus-4-6" },
"synthesizer": { "provider": "anthropic", "model": "claude-opus-4-6" }
}Show current config: tp config
Model Diversity Requirement
ThoughtProof enforces ≥3 different model families for generators. This is core to the protocol — no single provider can verify itself.
Output
Each verification produces an Epistemic Block:
- Proposals from each generator (independent reasoning)
- Critique identifying blind spots, contradictions, and risks
- Synthesis with consensus score, confidence level, and dissent
- MDI (Model Diversity Index) — measures independence of reasoning
Blocks are stored locally as JSON and can be reviewed with tp list / tp show <n>.
Commands
| Command | Description |
|---|---|
tp verify <question> | Run full verification pipeline |
tp verify --context last | Chain from previous block |
tp deep <question> | Deep verify: multiple runs, rotated roles, meta-synthesis |
tp list | Show block history |
tp show <n> | Show a specific block |
tp config | Show current configuration |
Tiers
| Tier | Agents | Time | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light | 3 | ~30s | Quick sanity checks |
| Standard | 5-7 | ~3min | Business decisions |
| Deep | 7-12 | ~5min | High-stakes, regulatory |
When to Use ThoughtProof
- High-stakes decisions — investment, legal, medical, compliance
- Audit trail needed — regulatory, governance, due diligence
- Blind spot detection — when you suspect a single model is biased
- Cross-domain questions — where no single model is expert
When NOT to Use
- Simple factual lookups (Google it)
- Creative writing (subjective, no "correct" answer)
- Time-sensitive queries under 30 seconds
- Questions with trivially verifiable answers
Architecture Note
ThoughtProof is BYOK (Bring Your Own Key). Your API keys, your data, your models. Nothing routes through ThoughtProof servers. The skill is MIT-licensed; the consensus protocol is BSL-licensed.
References
references/block-format.md— Epistemic Block JSON schemareferences/consensus-protocol.md— How consensus is calculated