Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
前端设计external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

architecture-design建筑设计

Agent Skill

用于围绕 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request、分支、提交和代码协作流程提供辅助能力。它适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更、辅助创建或检查协作事项,并把仓库中的信息转成可执行的下一步。使用时需要区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及创建 PR、修改 Issue、推送分支或访问私有仓库时,应确认 token 权限、目标仓库范围和用户授权。

总安装

306

周安装

13

GitHub Stars

162

下载量

107
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:architecture-design(建筑设计)
来源仓库:https://github.com/thomast1906/github-copilot-agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/architecture-design
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/thomast1906/github-copilot-agent-skills --skill architecture-design
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/thomast1906/github-copilot-agent-skills --skill architecture-design

简介

建筑设计用于围绕 GitHub 仓库和协作流程提供辅助能力。

  • 适合让 Agent 查询项目状态、整理变更或检查协作事项。
  • 使用时需区分只读查询和写入操作;涉及 PR 或私有仓库时应确认 token 权限。
  • 安装前建议检查权限范围和是否会触发网络或文件操作。
  • architecture-design 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Architecture Design Skill

Design comprehensive Azure architectures and produce HLD documentation following Well-Architected Framework and Cloud Adoption Framework best practices.

When to Use

  • Design new Azure solutions from requirements
  • Create High-Level Design (HLD) documentation
  • Select Azure services and architectural patterns
  • Plan cloud migrations or modernization
  • Produce architecture decision records

Design Process

1. Gather Requirements

Ask clarifying questions about:

  • Workload type: Web app, API, data processing, IoT, AI/ML
  • Scale: User count, data volume, geographic distribution
  • Performance: Response time, throughput, latency SLAs
  • Availability: Uptime requirements (e.g., 99.9%, 99.99%)
  • Security: Data classification, compliance (HIPAA, GDPR, PCI-DSS)
  • Budget: Monthly/annual cost constraints
  • Timeline: Deployment deadlines, phasing needs

2. Select Azure Services

Service Selection Priority: PaaS > Containers > IaaS

Refer to references.md for detailed guidance on:

  • Compute options (App Service, Functions, AKS, Container Apps, VMs)
  • Data storage (Azure SQL, Cosmos DB, PostgreSQL, Blob Storage)
  • Messaging (Service Bus, Event Hubs, Event Grid, Storage Queues)
  • Networking (Front Door, Application Gateway, Load Balancer)

Key Decision Criteria:

  • Match service capabilities to requirements
  • Consider team expertise and operational overhead
  • Evaluate cost vs. feature trade-offs
  • Prioritize managed services to reduce operations

3. Design Architecture

Apply patterns based on requirements:

N-Tier (Traditional):

  • When: Standard web apps, proven patterns, team familiarity
  • Structure: Frontend → Load Balancer → App Tier → Database
  • Services: App Service, Azure SQL, Application Gateway, Redis Cache

Microservices:

  • When: Loosely coupled services, independent scaling, polyglot needs
  • Structure: API Gateway → Services → Message Bus → Databases
  • Services: API Management, AKS/Container Apps, Service Bus, Cosmos DB

Event-Driven:

  • When: Asynchronous processing, reactive systems, decoupled components
  • Structure: Event Sources → Event Hub/Grid → Functions/Logic Apps → Storage
  • Services: Event Hubs, Azure Functions, Cosmos DB, Service Bus

Serverless:

  • When: Sporadic workloads, event processing, cost-sensitive scenarios
  • Structure: HTTP/Timer/Queue Triggers → Functions → Storage/Database
  • Services: Azure Functions, Logic Apps, Cosmos DB, Blob Storage

4. Apply Well-Architected Framework

Address all five pillars (detailed checklists in waf-assessment skill):

Reliability:

  • Availability Zones for production
  • Multi-region for mission-critical (99.99%+)
  • Health checks and auto-healing
  • Backup strategy with RPO/RTO defined

Security:

  • Managed identities (no credentials in code)
  • Private endpoints for PaaS services
  • HTTPS only with TLS 1.2+
  • Network security groups (least privilege)
  • Azure Key Vault for secrets
  • Azure AD authentication and RBAC

Cost Optimization:

  • Right-size resources (start small, scale up)
  • Auto-scaling policies
  • Reserved instances for predictable workloads
  • Storage tiers (Hot/Cool/Archive)
  • Cost monitoring and alerts

Operational Excellence:

  • Infrastructure as Code (Bicep or Terraform)
  • CI/CD pipelines
  • Application Insights + Log Analytics
  • Alerts for critical scenarios
  • Automated deployment and rollback

Performance Efficiency:

  • CDN for static content
  • Caching strategy (Redis, CDN)
  • Asynchronous processing
  • Appropriate compute SKUs
  • Auto-scaling rules

5. Create Naming Convention

Follow Cloud Adoption Framework:

{resource-type}-{workload}-{environment}-{region}-{instance}

Examples:
- rg-ecommerce-prod-eastus-001
- app-ecommerce-prod-eastus-001
- sql-ecommerce-prod-eastus-001
- kv-ecommerce-prod-eastus
- func-orderproc-prod-eastus-001

Standard Tags:

Environment: Production | Staging | Development | Test
Owner: teamname@company.com
CostCenter: IT-12345
Project: ProjectName
BusinessUnit: Sales | Marketing | Engineering
Criticality: Critical | High | Medium | Low
DataClassification: Public | Internal | Confidential | Restricted

6. Estimate Costs

Invoke the azure-pricing skill to retrieve live retail pricing. Never estimate costs from memory.

The azure-pricing skill will:

  • Call azure-mcp/pricing (pricing_get) per billable resource SKU and region
  • Return a three-column table: Pay-as-you-go | 1-year Reserved | 3-year Reserved
  • Identify top reserved instance / savings plan candidates
Confirm all service SKUs in step 3 before requesting pricing — the tool requires a specific SKU or service name.

Structure the cost output by category:

  • Compute (App Service, Functions, VMs, AKS nodes)
  • Data (SQL, Cosmos DB, Storage)
  • Networking (Front Door, App Gateway, Firewall, Bandwidth)
  • Monitoring (Application Insights, Log Analytics)

High-Level Design Output Format

Generate comprehensive HLD documents with these sections:

1. Executive Summary

  • Solution overview (2-3 paragraphs)
  • Key benefits and business value
  • High-level cost estimate
  • Timeline and deployment approach

2. Requirements Summary

  • Functional requirements (bullet points)
  • Non-functional requirements (performance, availability, security)
  • Constraints and assumptions

3. Architecture Overview

  • Architecture diagram description (components and connections)
  • Design pattern used (N-tier, microservices, event-driven, serverless)
  • Rationale for architectural approach

4. Component Design

For each component:

  • Service Name: Azure service selected
  • SKU/Tier: Specific pricing tier (e.g., App Service P2v3, Azure SQL S2)
  • Purpose: Role in the architecture
  • Configuration: Key settings (regions, zones, instances, capacity)
  • Naming: Following CAF convention (rg-app-prod-eastus-001)

5. Networking Design

  • Virtual Network configuration (address spaces)
  • Subnets and network security groups
  • Private endpoints and service endpoints
  • Ingress/egress patterns (load balancers, gateways)
  • DNS configuration

6. Security Design

  • Authentication and authorization (Azure AD, Managed Identity)
  • Secrets management (Key Vault)
  • Encryption (at-rest and in-transit)
  • Network security (NSGs, firewalls, WAF)
  • Compliance requirements

7. Data Design

  • Database schema approach
  • Data flow between components
  • Backup and recovery strategy (RPO/RTO)
  • Data retention policies
  • Disaster recovery approach

8. Monitoring and Operations

  • Application Insights configuration
  • Log Analytics workspace
  • Key metrics to monitor
  • Alert definitions and thresholds
  • Dashboard recommendations

9. Deployment Strategy

  • Infrastructure as Code approach (Bicep or Terraform)
  • CI/CD pipeline design
  • Environment strategy (dev, staging, prod)
  • Deployment sequence and dependencies
  • Rollback procedure

10. Cost Breakdown

  • Invoke the azure-pricing skill to retrieve live retail prices per service SKU and target region
  • Monthly cost per service and annual projection
  • Side-by-side table: Pay-as-you-go | 1-year Reserved | 3-year Reserved
  • Cost optimization recommendations (right-sizing, spot/preemptible nodes, storage tiers)
  • Top reserved instance / savings plan candidates with estimated monthly saving

11. Well-Architected Assessment

  • Brief evaluation against each WAF pillar
  • Key strengths of the design
  • Areas for future improvement

12. Risks and Mitigations

  • Identified technical risks
  • Mitigation strategies
  • Dependencies and assumptions

13. Next Steps

  • Immediate actions (Phase 1)
  • Short-term improvements (Phase 2)
  • Long-term roadmap (Phase 3)

Example HLD Snippet

# High-Level Design: E-Commerce Web Platform

## 1. Executive Summary

This HLD describes a scalable e-commerce platform on Azure supporting up to 100K concurrent users
with 99.95% availability. The solution uses proven PaaS services with multi-region capabilities,
comprehensive security controls, and cost-optimized infrastructure.

**Key Benefits:**
- Global reach with Azure Front Door CDN
- Auto-scaling for traffic spikes (Black Friday, holidays)
- PCI-DSS compliant payment processing
- **Estimated cost**: see Section 10 — priced live via the `azure-pricing` skill per SKU and target region

**Timeline:** 8-week implementation with phased rollout

## 3. Architecture Overview

**Pattern:** N-Tier with asynchronous order processing

**Components:**

Azure Front Door (Global CDN + WAF) └─ Application Gateway (Regional WAF + LB) ├─ App Service (Web Frontend - 3 instances, P2v3) ├─ App Service (API Backend - 3 instances, P2v3) ├─ Azure Functions (Order Processor, Premium) ├─ Azure SQL Database (S2 DTU, 50GB) ├─ Redis Cache (Basic C1, 1GB) └─ Blob Storage (Hot tier, product images)

**Rationale:** N-tier provides proven scalability, PaaS reduces operational overhead,
Functions handle asynchronous order processing, Azure SQL provides ACID guarantees.

## 4. Component Design

**Frontend Web App**
- Service: Azure App Service (Linux)
- SKU: P2v3 (2 vCores, 8GB RAM)
- Instances: 3 (Availability Zones 1, 2, 3)
- Auto-scale: 3-10 instances based on CPU > 70%
- Naming: app-ecommerce-web-prod-eastus-001
- Purpose: Serves customer-facing website

[Continue with all components...]

Tips for Great HLDs

Be Specific: Use exact service names and SKUs (not "database" but "Azure SQL Database S2 DTU") Show Trade-offs: Explain why you chose service X over Y Include Diagrams: Describe architecture visually with clear component relationships Live Pricing: Invoke the azure-pricing skill for every cost section — never guess prices from memory; always pass the target region and currency (e.g. GBP for UK workloads) Cost-Aware: Always provide cost estimates and optimization opportunities Security First: Address authentication, authorization, encryption, network security WAF Alignment: Reference specific WAF principles in design decisions Naming Standards: Use CAF conventions consistently Implementation-Ready: Provide enough detail for IaC generation

Avoid: Vague terms, missing costs, ignoring security, skipping WAF, incomplete components, no rationale

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

37.51%
按下载量换算40

Claude

27.73%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

18.11%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

8.66%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills