Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
AI 工具权限需确认github未标认证来源可访问clear审计通过

verification-before-completion完成前的验证

Agent Skill

verification-before-completion 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

449

周安装

18

GitHub Stars

5

下载量

145
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

3

许可证

MIT

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:verification-before-completion(完成前的验证)
来源仓库:https://github.com/third774/dotfiles
仓库路径:skills/verification-before-completion
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/third774/dotfiles --skill verification-before-completion
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/third774/dotfiles --skill verification-before-completion

简介

完成前的验证用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue 和 Pull Request 信息。

  • 适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor 等宿主中围绕代码协作事项进行整理。
  • 通过 npx 安装并指定技能名称,可结合来源仓库继续核验用法。
  • 使用前需确认权限范围、维护状态及是否涉及网络或文件操作。
  • verification-before-completion 属于AI 工具类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Verification Before Completion

Core Principle: No completion claims without fresh verification evidence.

The Verification Gate

BEFORE any claim of success, completion, or satisfaction:

Copy this checklist and track your progress:

Verification Checklist:
- [ ] IDENTIFY: What command proves this claim?
- [ ] RUN: Execute the verification command (fresh, complete)
- [ ] READ: Check full output, exit code, failure counts
- [ ] VERIFY: Does output confirm the claim?
  - If NO → State actual status with evidence
  - If YES → State claim WITH evidence
  1. IDENTIFY - What command proves this claim?
  2. RUN - Execute the full verification command (fresh, complete)
  3. READ - Check full output, exit code, failure counts
  4. VERIFY - Does output confirm the claim?

- NO → State actual status with evidence - YES → State claim WITH evidence from step 2-3

Skip any step = invalid claim.

When This Applies

ALWAYS before:

  • Claiming "tests pass", "build succeeds", "linter clean", "bug fixed"
  • Expressing satisfaction ("Great!", "Done!", "Perfect!")
  • Using qualifiers ("should work", "probably fixed", "seems to")
  • Committing, creating PRs, marking tasks complete
  • Moving to next task or delegating work
  • ANY statement implying success or completion

Common Verification Requirements

ClaimRequired EvidenceNot Sufficient
Tests passyarn test output: 0 failuresPrevious run, "looks correct"
Build succeedsBuild command: exit 0Linter clean, "should work"
Bug fixedTest reproducing bug: now passesCode changed, assumed fix
Linter cleanLinter output: 0 errorsPartial check, spot test
Regression test worksRed→Green cycle verifiedTest passes once
Agent task completeVCS diff shows expected changesAgent reports "success"

Red Flags

Stop and verify if you're about to:

  • Use hedging language ("should", "probably", "seems to")
  • Express satisfaction before running verification
  • Trust agent/tool success reports without independent verification
  • Rely on partial checks or previous runs
  • Think "just this once" or "I'm confident it works"

Key Examples

Regression test (TDD Red-Green):

✅ Write test → Run (fail) → Fix code → Run (pass) → Revert fix → Run (MUST fail) → Restore → Run (pass)
❌ "I've written a regression test" (without verifying red-green cycle)

Build vs Linter:

✅ Run `npm run build` → See "exit 0" → Claim "build passes"
❌ Run linter → Claim "build will pass" (linter ≠ compiler)

Agent delegation:

✅ Agent reports success → Check `git diff` → Verify changes → Report actual state
❌ Trust agent's success message without verification

Why It Matters

Unverified claims break trust and ship broken code:

  • Undefined functions that crash production
  • Incomplete features missing requirements
  • Lost time on rework after false completion
  • Partner distrust: "I don't believe you"

Violating this skill violates core honesty requirements.

No Exceptions

Run the command. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

Evidence before assertions, always.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

04

需要参考平台分布和安装热度时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

补充不同宿主或平台的使用分布数据

能力 5

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

windsurf

28.69%
按下载量换算42

OpenCode

23.55%
按下载量换算34

Codex

19.55%
按下载量换算28

Claude Code

11.9%
按下载量换算17

Antigravity

7.4%
按下载量换算11

Gemini CLI

3.62%
按下载量换算5

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限需确认

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills