Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

thinking-regret-minimization(思考后悔最小化)

thinking-regret-minimization 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

thinking-regret-minimization 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 55,572。

总安装 474周安装 19GitHub Stars 46下载 154核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:thinking-regret-minimization(思考后悔最小化)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
仓库路径:skills/thinking-regret-minimization
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-regret-minimization
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-regret-minimization

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

思考后悔最小化用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,平衡短期行动与长期遗憾风险。适合人生抉择、职业路径规划与重大投资决策支持。计算各选项在未来关键节点的潜在 regret 值,推荐稳健策略。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-regret-minimization 情感因素影响 regret 权重设定,需提供个性化参数调节接口。

来源仓库内路径:skills/thinking-regret-minimization

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinkin…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

thinking-regret-minimization 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-regret-m…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

thinking-regret-minimization 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

thinking-regret-minimization 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

thinking-regret-minimization 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

thinking-regret-minimization 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 474 次,近一周安装 19 次,下载 154 次,GitHub 46 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

thinking-regret-minimization 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
thinking-regret-minimization

思考后悔最小化 · 本页

47446权限未标注未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Regret Minimization Framework

Overview

Jeff Bezos developed the Regret Minimization Framework to make the decision to leave his Wall Street job and start Amazon. By projecting to age 80 and asking what you'd regret, you cut through short-term fears and focus on what truly matters long-term.

Core Principle: When you're 80, looking back on your life, what will you regret not trying? Minimize that regret.

When to Use

  • Career-defining decisions
  • Whether to pursue a risky opportunity
  • Staying safe vs. taking a leap
  • Decisions with fear of failure
  • When short-term costs obscure long-term value
  • Life-changing personal decisions
  • Entrepreneurial choices

Decision flow:

Facing a significant life/career decision?
  → Afraid of failure or short-term costs? → yes → APPLY REGRET MINIMIZATION
  → Unclear if risk is worth it? → yes → PROJECT TO 80-YEAR-OLD SELF
  → Need long-term perspective? → yes → ASK "WHAT WOULD I REGRET?"

The Framework

Step 1: Project to Age 80

Imagine yourself at age 80, looking back on your life:

I am 80 years old.
I am reflecting on my life and the decisions I made.
I want to minimize the number of regrets I have.

Step 2: Frame the Decision

State the choice clearly:

The decision: Should I leave my stable job to start a company?

Option A: Stay in stable job
- Known income, security, career progression
- Low risk, predictable outcomes

Option B: Start the company
- Uncertainty, potential failure
- Chance to build something meaningful
- Unknown outcomes

Step 3: Apply the Regret Test

For each option, ask: "Will I regret NOT doing this?"

At 80, will I regret:
- Not trying to start the company? → Likely YES
- Not staying in the stable job? → Likely NO

Bezos's insight: "I knew that when I was 80, I was not going to regret
having tried this. I was not going to regret trying to participate
in this thing called the Internet that I thought was going to be
a really big deal."

Step 4: Distinguish Regret Types

Regrets of Action: Things you did that went wrong

  • Usually fade over time
  • At least you tried
  • Provide learning

Regrets of Inaction: Things you never tried

  • Grow larger over time
  • "What if?" haunts you
  • No closure or learning

Research shows: Regrets of inaction are more painful and persistent than regrets of action.

Step 5: Make the Decision

Choose the path with minimum lifetime regret:

The calculus:
- If I try and fail: Temporary pain, but no regret for not trying
- If I don't try: Permanent "what if?" regret
- The expected regret of inaction > expected regret of action

Decision: Try.

Application Patterns

Career Decisions

## Regret Analysis: Take the startup job or stay at BigCorp?

At 80, looking back:
- Will I regret not taking the startup risk? → Likely YES
  "I wonder what could have been. I played it safe."
- Will I regret not staying at BigCorp? → Likely NO
  "I took a risk, it didn't work, but I learned and recovered."

Key insight: Career failures are recoverable. Unlived possibilities aren't.

Decision: Take the startup job.

Entrepreneurial Decisions

## Regret Analysis: Start the business now or wait until "ready"?

At 80, looking back:
- Will I regret not starting when I had the chance? → Likely YES
  "I waited for perfect conditions that never came."
- Will I regret starting before being fully ready? → Likely NO
  "I learned by doing. Even if it failed, I grew."

Key insight: "Ready" is often an illusion. Action creates readiness.

Decision: Start now.

Personal Decisions

## Regret Analysis: Relocate for the opportunity or stay near family?

At 80, looking back:
This is more nuanced—both paths have legitimate regret potential.

- Regret not relocating: "I passed up growth for comfort"
- Regret relocating: "I missed years with aging parents"

Key insight: When both paths have genuine regret potential,
the decision is about values, not just regret.

Process: Clarify which regret would be heavier for YOUR values.

Learning Decisions

## Regret Analysis: Pursue the degree/certification or focus on work?

At 80, looking back:
- Will I regret not getting the credential? → Maybe
  But: Will the credential matter in 40 years?
- Will I regret spending years on credential? → Maybe
  But: Education rarely creates lasting regret

Key insight: Educational regrets are rare;
            missed opportunities are common regrets.

Decision: Often favors learning, but depends on opportunity cost.

When Regret Minimization is Less Applicable

Reversible Decisions

If you can easily change course, regret minimization is overkill:

"Which framework should I learn first?"
This isn't a lifetime regret question—just pick one and learn.

Decisions Affecting Others

When others bear the consequences, pure regret minimization is selfish:

"Should I risk the company's future on my vision?"
Your regret isn't the only consideration—employees, investors matter.

When Both Options Have Equal Regret

Sometimes both paths lead to comparable regret:

"Career A or Career B?"
If both are good options, regret minimization won't differentiate.
Use other frameworks (values alignment, opportunity cost).

Combining with Other Frameworks

With Inversion

Inversion: "How would I guarantee regret?"
- Never take any risks
- Always choose safety
- Never pursue what excites me

Avoiding these → Minimizing regret

With Pre-Mortem

Pre-mortem: "It's age 80 and I deeply regret this choice. Why?"

This is essentially regret minimization through narrative.
Write the story of future regret to clarify present choices.

With Opportunity Cost

Opportunity cost of not trying:
- Direct: Lost potential upside
- Regret: Permanent "what if?"
- Learning: Missed growth opportunity

Full cost often favors action.

Regret Minimization Template

# Regret Minimization Analysis: [Decision]

## The Decision
[Clear statement of the choice]

## Option A: [Safe/Conservative Path]
Short-term: [Benefits and costs]
Long-term: [Likely trajectory]
At 80, regret for choosing A: [Assessment]
At 80, regret for NOT choosing A: [Assessment]

## Option B: [Risky/Bold Path]
Short-term: [Benefits and costs]
Long-term: [Likely trajectory]
At 80, regret for choosing B: [Assessment]
At 80, regret for NOT choosing B: [Assessment]

## Regret Comparison
| Scenario | Regret Level | Duration | Type |
|----------|--------------|----------|------|
| Choose A, works | Low | - | - |
| Choose A, miss B's upside | High | Permanent | Inaction |
| Choose B, works | Low | - | - |
| Choose B, fails | Medium | Temporary | Action |

## Key Insight
[What does the regret analysis reveal?]

## Decision
[Choice and reasoning]

Common Regret Patterns in Tech Careers

Things People Regret NOT Doing

  • Not taking the risk earlier
  • Not starting the side project
  • Not negotiating harder
  • Not leaving toxic situations sooner
  • Not speaking up when it mattered
  • Not investing in relationships
  • Not pursuing meaningful work over safe work

Things People Rarely Regret

  • Taking the risk (even if it failed)
  • Starting the company (even if it folded)
  • Making the leap (even if they had to leap back)
  • Speaking up (even if it was uncomfortable)
  • Trying something hard (even if they failed)

Verification Checklist

  • Projected to age 80 perspective
  • Identified regrets for each option
  • Distinguished action vs. inaction regrets
  • Considered whether regrets would grow or fade
  • Checked if decision is significant enough for this framework
  • Considered impact on others (not just self)
  • Made decision aligned with long-term perspective

Key Questions

  • "When I'm 80, will I regret not trying this?"
  • "Is this fear of failure or wisdom about risk?"
  • "Will this regret grow or fade over time?"
  • "What would my 80-year-old self tell me to do?"
  • "Am I optimizing for short-term comfort or long-term meaning?"
  • "Would I regret playing it safe?"

Bezos's Story

"I went to my boss and said I was going to start a company selling books on the Internet. He said, 'That's a great idea, but it would be a better idea for someone who didn't already have a good job.' So he convinced me to think about it for 48 hours."

"I thought about it and I used this framework, which I call a regret minimization framework. I projected myself to age 80, and I thought, 'When I'm 80, am I going to regret leaving Wall Street in the middle of the year and forgoing my bonus? No. Am I going to regret missing the beginning of the Internet? Yes.'"

"Once I thought about it that way, it was easy to make the decision."

The lesson: Short-term costs (bonus, security, status) fade. Long-term "what-ifs" don't. When in doubt, minimize lifetime regret by trying.

平台分布

Codex

35.62%
按下载量换算55

Claude

29.86%
按下载量换算46

Cursor

18.13%
按下载量换算28

Gemini CLI

9.11%
按下载量换算14

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills