Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

thinking-model-selection(思维模型选择)

thinking-model-selection 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

thinking-model-selection 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 54,235。

总安装 514周安装 21GitHub Stars 46下载 166核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:thinking-model-selection(思维模型选择)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
仓库路径:skills/thinking-model-selection
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-model-selection
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-model-selection

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

思维模型选择用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,依据问题类型匹配合适认知工具。适用于教育辅导、管理咨询及创新工作坊中的结构化引导。输入问题特征后,输出推荐模型清单及其适用性与局限说明。

安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-model-selection 模型列表来源于公开资料,不保证时效性与权威性,需自行甄别。

来源仓库内路径:skills/thinking-model-selection

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinkin…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

thinking-model-selection 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills --skill thinking-model-se…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

thinking-model-selection 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

thinking-model-selection 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

thinking-model-selection 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

thinking-model-selection 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 514 次,近一周安装 21 次,下载 166 次,GitHub 46 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

thinking-model-selection 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
thinking-model-selection

思维模型选择 · 本页

51446只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Model Selection

Overview

Every mental model has a domain where it excels and domains where it fails. Model selection is the meta-skill of recognizing which model fits which problem. The expert doesn't just know many models—they know when to apply each one. Using the wrong model is often worse than using no model at all.

Core Principle: The map is not the territory. Choose the map that best serves your journey.

When to Use

  • Facing a new problem type
  • Current approach isn't working
  • Multiple stakeholders suggest different frameworks
  • Deciding how to structure analysis
  • Teaching others which tools to use
  • Building decision-making processes

Decision flow:

Facing a problem?
  → Have you identified the problem type? → no → CLASSIFY THE PROBLEM FIRST
  → Does your usual model fit? → no → CONSIDER ALTERNATIVES
  → Are you using a model by habit? → yes → QUESTION THE FIT

Problem-Model Matching

Step 1: Classify the Problem

## Problem Classification

Problem: [Describe the problem]

Problem dimensions:
| Dimension | Assessment |
|-----------|------------|
| Predictability | Can outcomes be predicted? [High/Medium/Low] |
| Complexity | How many interacting parts? [Simple/Complicated/Complex] |
| Time horizon | When do consequences matter? [Immediate/Short/Long] |
| Reversibility | Can decisions be undone? [Easily/With difficulty/Not at all] |
| Information | How much do you know? [Complete/Partial/Minimal] |
| Stakeholders | Who's affected? [Individual/Team/Organization/Society] |

Step 2: Match to Model Categories

## Model Category Matching

Based on classification, which category fits?

| Problem Type | Model Category | Examples |
|--------------|----------------|----------|
| Root cause unknown | Diagnostic models | 5 Whys, Scientific Method, Kepner-Tregoe |
| Decision under uncertainty | Probabilistic models | Bayesian, Expected Value, Regret Minimization |
| System behavior | Systems models | Feedback Loops, Leverage Points, Archetypes |
| Cognitive bias risk | Debiasing models | Pre-mortem, Red Team, Steel-manning |
| Resource allocation | Constraint models | Theory of Constraints, Opportunity Cost |
| Innovation/exploration | Generative models | First Principles, TRIZ, Effectuation |
| Domain classification | Meta models | Cynefin, Circle of Competence |

Step 3: Select Specific Model

## Model Selection

Category: [From Step 2]

Candidate models:
| Model | Fit Score | Strengths for This Problem | Weaknesses |
|-------|-----------|---------------------------|------------|
| [Model 1] | [1-5] | [Why it fits] | [Limitations] |
| [Model 2] | [1-5] | [Why it fits] | [Limitations] |
| [Model 3] | [1-5] | [Why it fits] | [Limitations] |

Selected model: [Choice]
Rationale: [Why this model for this problem]

Model Selection Matrix

By Problem Type

DIAGNOSTIC PROBLEMS (What's causing this?)
├── Known categories exist → Kepner-Tregoe (systematic analysis)
├── Need quick root cause → 5 Whys Plus (iterative drilling)
├── Hypothesis-driven → Scientific Method (test and falsify)
└── System-wide issue → Feedback Loops (find reinforcing patterns)

DECISION PROBLEMS (What should we do?)
├── High stakes, irreversible → Regret Minimization, Pre-mortem
├── Under uncertainty → Bayesian, Probabilistic Thinking
├── Resource constrained → Opportunity Cost, Theory of Constraints
├── Multiple options → Kepner-Tregoe (decision analysis)
└── Type 1 vs Type 2 → Reversibility Framework

UNDERSTANDING PROBLEMS (How does this work?)
├── Complex system → Systems Thinking, Feedback Loops
├── Human behavior → Jobs to be Done, Incentive Analysis
├── Organizational → Archetypes, Leverage Points
└── Competitive → Red Team, Game Theory

CREATIVE PROBLEMS (How might we...?)
├── Break assumptions → First Principles, TRIZ
├── Limited resources → Effectuation, Via Negativa
├── Technical contradiction → TRIZ
└── Unknown territory → Thought Experiments, Cynefin (probe)

EVALUATION PROBLEMS (Is this good?)
├── Arguments/proposals → Steel-manning, Red Team
├── Predictions → Probabilistic, Calibration
├── Longevity → Lindy Effect
├── Safety → Margin of Safety, Pre-mortem
└── Expertise fit → Circle of Competence

By Domain

## Domain-Model Mapping

| Domain | Primary Models | Why |
|--------|---------------|-----|
| Debugging | Scientific Method, 5 Whys | Hypothesis testing, root cause |
| Architecture | Systems Thinking, Leverage Points | Interconnections, intervention |
| Product | Jobs to be Done, Cynefin | User needs, complexity |
| Strategy | Red Team, Pre-mortem | Adversarial, risk |
| Performance | Theory of Constraints, Fermi | Bottlenecks, estimation |
| Decisions | Reversibility, Regret Minimization | Stakes assessment |
| Innovation | First Principles, TRIZ | Breakthrough thinking |
| Risk | Margin of Safety, Probabilistic | Uncertainty handling |

Model Failure Modes

Using the Wrong Model

## Model Mismatch Indicators

Signs you're using the wrong model:
- Analysis feels forced or awkward
- Key aspects don't fit the framework
- You're ignoring important factors
- Results don't match intuition consistently
- Stakeholders don't recognize the framing

Common mismatches:
| Situation | Wrong Model | Right Model |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|
| Complex adaptive system | Root cause analysis | Systems thinking |
| Simple process problem | Systems thinking | Checklist/SOP |
| Uncertain future | Detailed planning | Effectuation |
| Known domain | First principles | Best practices |
| Political problem | Technical analysis | Stakeholder mapping |

Model Overuse

## Model Overuse Patterns

"When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail"

Signs of overuse:
- You use the same model for every problem
- You haven't learned new models recently
- Problems that don't fit are "forced" into the model
- You dismiss problems that don't fit your model

Fix: Deliberately practice with unfamiliar models
     Ask: "What model would someone else use?"
     Rotate models intentionally

Model Selection Process

Quick Selection (< 2 minutes)

## Quick Model Selection

1. What type of problem? [Diagnostic/Decision/Understanding/Creative/Evaluation]
2. What's the constraint? [Time/Information/Stakes/Complexity]
3. What's the default model for this type?
4. Any reason NOT to use the default?
5. Proceed or reconsider

Default models by type:
- Diagnostic → 5 Whys Plus
- Decision → Reversibility check first
- Understanding → Systems Thinking
- Creative → First Principles
- Evaluation → Steel-manning

Deliberate Selection (> 5 minutes)

## Deliberate Model Selection

1. Characterize the problem fully
2. Identify 3-5 candidate models
3. Score each on fit
4. Consider combining models
5. Select and document rationale
6. Plan to reassess if model doesn't illuminate

Selection criteria:
| Criterion | Weight | Model A | Model B | Model C |
|-----------|--------|---------|---------|---------|
| Problem fit | 30% | | | |
| Available info | 20% | | | |
| Time to apply | 15% | | | |
| Stakeholder acceptance | 15% | | | |
| My competence with model | 20% | | | |

Model Selection Template

# Model Selection: [Problem]

## Problem Characterization
Type: [Diagnostic/Decision/Understanding/Creative/Evaluation]
Complexity: [Simple/Complicated/Complex/Chaotic]
Stakes: [Low/Medium/High]
Reversibility: [High/Medium/Low]
Information: [Complete/Partial/Minimal]

## Candidate Models
| Model | Fit | Strengths | Weaknesses |
|-------|-----|-----------|------------|
| | | | |

## Selected Model
Model: [Choice]
Rationale: [Why this model]

## Fallback
If selected model doesn't work: [Alternative]
Signs to switch: [Indicators]

## Application Plan
How I'll use this model:
1. [Step]
2. [Step]

Meta-Model Guidelines

When to Use Multiple Models

## Model Combination Triggers

Use multiple models when:
- Problem spans multiple types
- Single model leaves blind spots
- Stakes are very high
- Time allows deeper analysis

Combination patterns:
- Sequential: Use A to narrow, then B to decide
- Parallel: Use A and B independently, compare results
- Nested: Use A at macro level, B at micro level

When to Abandon a Model

## Model Exit Criteria

Stop using a model when:
- 15+ minutes with no insight
- Key facts don't fit the framework
- You're forcing the analysis
- Someone suggests a better fit

Don't stop just because:
- The answer is uncomfortable
- It requires more work
- Results disagree with intuition (investigate why)

Verification Checklist

  • Classified the problem type
  • Considered multiple candidate models
  • Checked for model-problem fit
  • Avoided using model out of habit
  • Have a fallback if model doesn't work
  • Can articulate why this model fits

Key Questions

  • "What type of problem is this really?"
  • "What model would an expert in this domain use?"
  • "Am I using this model because it fits, or because I know it?"
  • "What aspects of the problem does this model ignore?"
  • "What model would give a different answer?"
  • "When should I switch to a different model?"

Munger's Wisdom

"You've got to have models in your head. And you've got to array your experience—both vicarious and direct—on this latticework of models."

"You must know the big ideas in the big disciplines, and use them routinely—all of them, not just a few."

The power isn't in any single model—it's in having many models and knowing when each applies. A tool is only useful when matched to the task. The meta-skill of model selection multiplies the value of every model you know.

平台分布

Codex

36.28%
按下载量换算60

Claude

28.83%
按下载量换算48

Cursor

19.18%
按下载量换算32

Gemini CLI

10.7%
按下载量换算18

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills