Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

think(think 搜索)

think 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

think 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 24,352。

总安装 4,039周安装 165GitHub Stars 23下载 1,294核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:think(think 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/johnlindquist/claude
仓库路径:skills/think
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/johnlindquist/claude --skill think
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/johnlindquist/claude --skill think

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合基于关键词快速定位候选结果。适用于任务场景中的线索匹配和信息聚合,支持多维度条件筛选。可结合原始 README 继续核验具体实现方式,灵活适配不同检索需求。安装前建议确认权限范围和项目维护状态,避免误触发网络请求。需注意是否涉及外部 API 调用或敏感数据访问,确保合规使用。

来源仓库内路径:skills/think

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/johnlindquist/claude --skill think;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

think 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/johnlindquist/claude --skill think。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

think 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

think 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

think 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

think 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 4,039 次,近一周安装 165 次,下载 1,294 次,GitHub 23 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

think 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
think

think 搜索 · 本页

4,03923需要联网MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Think - Structured Reasoning

Apply structured thinking frameworks to complex problems.

Prerequisites

Gemini CLI installed:

pip install google-generativeai
export GEMINI_API_KEY=your_api_key

CLI Reference

All commands use Gemini with structured prompts:

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Your prompt"

Thinking Operations

Deep Analysis

Multi-framework reasoning on complex problems:

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Analyze this problem using multiple thinking frameworks:

PROBLEM: [Your problem]

Apply these frameworks:
1. First Principles - Break down to fundamental truths
2. Systems Thinking - Map components and interactions
3. Inversion - What would make this fail?
4. Second-Order Effects - What happens after the obvious?

For each framework:
- Key insights
- Blind spots it reveals
- Actionable implications

Synthesize into a coherent recommendation."

Quick Think

Fast reasoning on simpler questions:

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Think through this question step by step:

[Your question]

Provide:
1. Initial reaction
2. Key considerations
3. Potential pitfalls
4. Recommended approach"

Challenge an Idea

Stress-test a proposal:

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Challenge this idea rigorously:

IDEA: [The idea to challenge]
CONTEXT: [Relevant context]

Apply these challenges:
1. Steel man the counterargument
2. Identify hidden assumptions
3. Find edge cases that break it
4. Consider who might disagree and why
5. What evidence would change your mind?

Conclude with: Should we proceed, modify, or abandon?"

Evaluate Options

Compare multiple choices:

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Evaluate these options for: [Decision question]

OPTIONS:
1. [Option A]
2. [Option B]
3. [Option C]

CRITERIA:
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]
- [Criterion 3]

For each option:
- Score against each criterion (1-5)
- Key advantages
- Key risks
- Hidden costs

Provide a clear recommendation with reasoning."

Thinking Frameworks

First Principles

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Apply first principles thinking to: [problem]

1. What do we know for certain? (facts, not assumptions)
2. What are we assuming? (challenge each)
3. What's the simplest explanation?
4. Build up from fundamentals"

Pre-Mortem

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Conduct a pre-mortem for: [project/decision]

Imagine this has completely failed. Working backward:
1. What went wrong?
2. What warning signs did we ignore?
3. What assumptions proved false?
4. What can we do NOW to prevent this?"

Opportunity Cost

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Analyze opportunity costs for: [decision]

If we choose this:
1. What are we NOT doing?
2. What resources are locked up?
3. What options are foreclosed?
4. What's the cost of reversing?"

Second-Order Effects

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Explore second-order effects of: [action/decision]

First-order effect: [The obvious outcome]

Now trace the chain:
- What does that cause?
- Who responds and how?
- What unintended consequences emerge?
- What feedback loops are created?"

Use Cases

Architecture Decisions

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Evaluate architecture options:

CONTEXT: Building a real-time collaborative editor

OPTIONS:
1. Operational Transform (OT)
2. CRDTs
3. Custom sync engine

CRITERIA:
- Correctness guarantees
- Performance at scale
- Implementation complexity
- Offline support

Provide detailed analysis and recommendation."

Code Design

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Think through this design decision:

PROBLEM: Where to put validation logic - in the controller, service, or model?

Consider:
- Separation of concerns
- Testability
- Maintainability
- Real-world examples
- What experienced developers prefer and why"

Debugging Strategy

gemini -m pro -o text -e "" "Help me think through debugging this issue:

SYMPTOM: [What's happening]
CONTEXT: [System description]
TRIED: [What you've already attempted]

1. What does this symptom tell us?
2. What's the most likely root cause?
3. What's the most costly root cause?
4. What's the quickest diagnostic test?
5. In what order should I investigate?"

Best Practices

  1. Be specific - Vague problems get vague analysis
  2. Provide context - Include constraints and requirements
  3. Request structure - Ask for frameworks, criteria, scores
  4. Challenge the output - Use follow-up questions
  5. Capture reasoning - Save good analyses for future reference

平台分布

Claude Code

27.27%
按下载量换算353

OpenCode

24.79%
按下载量换算321

Antigravity

18.32%
按下载量换算237

Gemini CLI

13.75%
按下载量换算178

windsurf

6.87%
按下载量换算89

trae

3.02%
按下载量换算39

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills