Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

debug(调试)

debug 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

debug 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 55,679。

总安装 470周安装 20GitHub Stars 142下载 165核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:debug(调试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/thebushidocollective/han
仓库路径:skills/debug
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/thebushidocollective/han --skill debug
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/thebushidocollective/han --skill debug

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

debug 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 路径安装并使用。安装前需确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

建议结合来源仓库和原始 README 核验具体用法和功能边界。

来源仓库内路径:skills/debug

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/thebushidocollective/han --skill debug;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

debug 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/thebushidocollective/han --skill debug。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

debug 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

debug 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

debug 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

debug 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 470 次,近一周安装 20 次,下载 165 次,GitHub 142 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

debug 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
debug

调试 · 本页

470142接触敏感数据未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Debugging Skill

Systematic approaches to investigating and diagnosing bugs.

Core Principle

Understand before fixing. A proper diagnosis leads to a proper fix.

Name

han-core:debug - Investigate and diagnose issues without necessarily fixing them

Synopsis

/debug [arguments]

Debug vs Fix

Use /debug when:

  • Investigating an issue to understand it
  • Need to gather information before fixing
  • Want to identify root cause without implementing solution
  • Triaging to determine severity/priority
  • Research phase before fix

Use /fix when:

  • Ready to implement the solution
  • Debugging AND fixing in one go
  • Issue is understood, just needs fixing

The Scientific Method for Debugging

1. Observe

Gather all the facts:

  • What's the symptom? (What's happening that shouldn't?)
  • When does it happen? (Always, sometimes, specific conditions?)
  • Who's affected? (All users, some users, specific scenarios?)
  • Error messages? (Exact text, stack traces, error codes?)
  • Recent changes? (What changed before this started?)

Evidence to collect:

  • Error messages and stack traces
  • Application logs
  • User reports
  • Reproduction steps
  • Environment details (browser, OS, versions)
  • Network requests/responses
  • Database query logs

2. Form Hypothesis

Based on symptoms, what could cause this?

Common categories:

  • Logic error: Code does wrong thing
  • State management: State gets out of sync
  • Async/timing: Race condition, callback hell
  • Data issue: Unexpected input format
  • Integration: API change, service down
  • Environment: Config, permissions, network
  • Resource: Memory leak, connection pool exhausted

Prioritize hypotheses:

  1. Most likely causes first
  2. Easiest to test first (when equal likelihood)
  3. Most impactful if true

3. Test Hypothesis

Design experiment to prove/disprove:

  • Add logging to see values
  • Add breakpoints to pause execution
  • Modify input to isolate variable
  • Disable feature to rule out
  • Compare with working version

Keep notes:

**Hypothesis:** Database query timeout
**Test:** Add query timing logs
**Result:** Query completes in 50ms
**Conclusion:** Not the database

**Hypothesis:** Network latency
**Test:** Check network tab, add timing
**Result:** API call takes 5 seconds
**Conclusion:** Found the issue

4. Analyze Results

What did you learn?

  • Hypothesis confirmed or rejected?
  • New questions raised?
  • Unexpected findings?
  • Root cause identified?

5. Repeat or Conclude

If root cause found:

  • Document findings
  • Estimate impact
  • Plan fix

If not found:

  • Form new hypothesis
  • Repeat cycle

Debugging Strategies

Strategy 1: Add Logging

Most universally useful technique:

// Strategic console.log placement
function processOrder(order) {
  console.log('processOrder START:', { orderId: order.id })

  const items = order.items
  console.log('items:', items.length)

  const validated = validate(items)
  console.log('validation result:', validated)

  if (!validated.success) {
    console.log('validation failed:', validated.errors)
    throw new Error('Invalid order')
  }

  const total = calculateTotal(items)
  console.log('total calculated:', total)

  console.log('processOrder END')
  return total
}

Logging guidelines:

  • Log function entry/exit
  • Log branching decisions
  • Log external calls (API, database)
  • Log unexpected values
  • Include context (IDs, user info)

Strategy 2: Use Debugger

Interactive debugging:

// Browser
function buggyFunction(input) {
  debugger;  // Execution pauses here
  const result = transform(input)
  debugger;  // And here
  return result
}

// Node.js
node --inspect app.js
# Then open chrome://inspect in Chrome

Debugger features:

  • Step over (next line)
  • Step into (into function call)
  • Step out (back to caller)
  • Watch expressions
  • Call stack inspection
  • Variable inspection

Strategy 3: Binary Search

Isolate the problem area:

// 100 lines of code, bug somewhere

// Comment out lines 50-100
// Bug still happens? It's in lines 1-50

// Comment out lines 25-50
// Bug disappears? It's in lines 25-50

// Comment out lines 37-50
// Bug still happens? It's in lines 25-37

// Continue until isolated to specific lines

Strategy 4: Rubber Duck Debugging

Explain the problem out loud:

  1. "This function is supposed to calculate shipping cost"
  2. "It takes the weight and destination"
  3. "First it... wait, it's using price instead of weight!"
  4. *(Bug found)*

Why this works: Forces you to examine assumptions.

Strategy 5: Compare Working vs Broken

What's different?

Version comparison:

# Find which commit broke it
git bisect start
git bisect bad HEAD
git bisect good v1.0.0
# Git checks out middle commit
npm test
git bisect good/bad
# Repeat until found

Environment comparison:

  • Works locally but not production?
  • Works for some users but not others?
  • Worked yesterday but not today?

What changed?

Strategy 6: Simplify

Reduce to minimal reproduction:

// Complex case with bug
processUserOrderWithDiscountsAndShipping(user, cart, promo, address)

// Simplify inputs one at a time
processUserOrderWithDiscountsAndShipping(user, [], null, null)
// Still breaks? Not discount or address

processUserOrderWithDiscountsAndShipping(null, [], null, null)
// Works now? It's the user object

// What about the user object causes it?

Strategy 7: Check Assumptions

Question everything:

// Assumption: API returns array
const users = await api.getUsers()
users.forEach(...)  // Crashes

// Check assumption
console.log(typeof users)  // "undefined"
console.log(users)          // undefined

// Assumption was wrong!

Common wrong assumptions:

  • Function returns expected type
  • Variable is defined
  • Array is not empty
  • API will always respond
  • Async operation has completed
  • State is up to date

Debugging by Symptom

"Intermittent failure"

Likely causes:

  • Race condition (timing-dependent)
  • Data-dependent (certain inputs trigger it)
  • Resource leak (happens after N operations)
  • External service flakiness

Investigation:

  • Add extensive logging
  • Look for async operations
  • Check timing between operations
  • Look for shared state
  • Run many times to see pattern

"Works locally, fails in production"

Check differences:

  • Environment variables
  • Data (production has different/more data)
  • Network (CORS, SSL, proxies)
  • Dependencies (versions, OS)
  • Resources (memory, connections)

"Slow performance"

Don't guess - profile:

Frontend:

  • Chrome DevTools > Performance tab
  • Look for long tasks (> 50ms)
  • Check for layout thrashing
  • Look for memory leaks

Backend:

  • Add timing logs around operations
  • Check database query time (EXPLAIN ANALYZE)
  • Check external API call time
  • Profile with APM tool

"Memory leak"

Investigation:

// Take heap snapshot
// Do operation that leaks
// Take another heap snapshot
// Compare - what increased?

Common causes:

  • Event listeners not removed
  • Closures holding references
  • Global variables accumulating
  • Intervals not cleared
  • Cache growing unbounded

"Crash/Exception"

Read the stack trace:

Error: Cannot read property 'map' of undefined
    at processUsers (app.js:42:15)
    at handleRequest (app.js:23:3)
    at Server.<anonymous> (server.js:12:5)

Stack trace tells you:

  • Line 42: Where it crashed
  • Line 23: Where it was called from
  • Line 12: Origin of the request

Then:

  • Go to line 42
  • Check what's undefined
  • Trace back why it's undefined

"It works sometimes"

  • Race condition?
  • Timing issue?
  • Data-dependent?
  • Check for async issues

Common Bug Patterns

Null/Undefined

// Bug
function process(user) {
  return user.name.toUpperCase()  // Crashes if user is null
}

// Investigation
console.log('user:', user)  // undefined - why?
// Trace back to where user comes from

Off-by-One

// Bug
for (let i = 0; i <= array.length; i++) {  // <= instead of <
  process(array[i])  // Crashes on last iteration
}

// Investigation
console.log('i:', i, 'length:', array.length)
// Notice i === array.length causes array[i] === undefined

Async Timing

// Bug
let data
fetchData().then(result => {
  data = result
})
console.log(data)  // undefined - async not complete

// Investigation
console.log('1. Before fetch')
fetchData().then(result => {
  console.log('3. Got result')
  data = result
})
console.log('2. After fetch call')
// Output: 1, 2, 3 - async completes later

State Mutation

// Bug
function addItem(cart, item) {
  cart.items.push(item)  // Mutates input!
  return cart
}

const originalCart = { items: [] }
const newCart = addItem(originalCart, item)
// originalCart was modified - unexpected!

// Investigation
console.log('before:', originalCart)
const newCart = addItem(originalCart, item)
console.log('after:', originalCart)  // Changed!

Scope Issues

// Bug
for (var i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
  setTimeout(() => console.log(i), 100)
}
// Prints: 3, 3, 3 (expected 0, 1, 2)

// Investigation
// var is function-scoped, i is shared
// By time timeout fires, loop is done, i === 3

// Fix: Use let (block-scoped) or capture i

Investigation Report Format

## Investigation: [Issue description]

### Symptoms
[What's happening that's wrong?]

### Evidence
- Error message: [exact text]
- When it happens: [conditions]
- Frequency: [always/sometimes/rarely]
- Affected users: [all/some/specific group]

### Reproduction Steps
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Observe error]

### Investigation Timeline

**Hypothesis 1:** [What I thought might be wrong]
- Tested by: [What I did to test]
- Result: [What I found]
- Conclusion: [Ruled out / Confirmed]

**Hypothesis 2:** [Next theory]
- Tested by: [What I did]
- Result: [What I found]
- Conclusion: [Ruled out / Confirmed]

### Root Cause
[What's actually causing the issue]

**Evidence:**
- [Log showing the problem]
- [Stack trace pointing to source]
- [Data showing the pattern]

### Impact
- Severity: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
- Scope: [How many users/scenarios affected]
- Workaround: [Any temporary solutions]

### Next Steps
- [ ] [What should be done to fix]
- [ ] [Any additional investigation needed]
- [ ] [Related issues to check]

Debugging Tools

Browser Developer Tools

Console:

  • console.log() - Print values
  • console.table() - Display arrays/objects as table
  • console.trace() - Print stack trace
  • console.time() / console.timeEnd() - Measure duration

Debugger:

  • Set breakpoints
  • Step through code
  • Inspect variables
  • Watch expressions
  • Call stack

Network:

  • View all requests
  • See request/response headers and bodies
  • Measure timing
  • Replay requests

Performance:

  • Record profile
  • See function call tree
  • Identify bottlenecks
  • Check memory usage

Command Line Tools

# Search for text in files
grep -r "error" logs/

# Follow log file
tail -f logs/app.log

# Search with context
grep -B 5 -A 5 "ERROR" logs/app.log

# Check disk space
df -h

# Check memory
free -m

# Check running processes
ps aux | grep node

Database Debugging

-- PostgreSQL
EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = 'test@example.com';

-- Show slow queries
SELECT * FROM pg_stat_statements ORDER BY total_time DESC LIMIT 10;

-- Check table size
SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size('users'));

-- Check indexes
\d users

Debugging Checklist

Before Starting

  • Can reproduce the issue reliably?
  • Have error message or symptom description?
  • Know when it started happening?
  • Checked if recent changes related?
  • Checked logs for clues?

During Investigation

  • Formed clear hypothesis?
  • Testing hypothesis systematically?
  • Taking notes on findings?
  • Not making random changes hoping to fix?
  • Questioning assumptions?

After Finding Root Cause

  • Understand WHY it happens?
  • Can explain it to someone else?
  • Documented findings?
  • Estimated impact?
  • Identified proper fix?

Anti-Patterns

Random Code Changes

BAD: "Maybe if I change this... nope, try this... nope, try this..."
GOOD: "Hypothesis: X causes Y. Test: Change X. Result: Y still happens.
       Conclusion: X is not the cause."

Assuming Without Verifying

BAD: "The API must be returning valid data"
GOOD: "Let me log the API response to see what it actually returns"

Stopping at Symptoms

BAD: "The page is blank. Fixed by adding a null check."
GOOD: "The page is blank because user is null. User is null because
       authentication token expired. Root cause: token not being refreshed."

Debugging in Production

BAD: "Let me add console.log to production to see..."
GOOD: "Let me reproduce locally and debug there, or use proper logging"

No Reproduction Steps

BAD: "It crashed once, let me guess why"
GOOD: "Let me find reliable way to reproduce it first"

Examples

When the user says:

  • "Why is this page loading slowly?"
  • "Investigate this intermittent test failure"
  • "Figure out why users are seeing this error"
  • "Debug the memory leak in production"
  • "What's causing the database timeouts?"

Integration with Other Skills

  • Use proof-of-work skill to document evidence
  • Use test-driven-development skill to add regression test after fix
  • Use explain skill when explaining bug to others
  • Use boy-scout-rule skill while fixing (improve surrounding code)

Notes

  • Use TaskCreate to track investigation steps
  • Document findings even if not fixing immediately
  • Create minimal reproduction case
  • Consider using /fix once root cause is found
  • Add logging/metrics to prevent future issues

Remember

  1. Reproduce first - If you can't reproduce, you can't debug
  2. Gather evidence - Don't guess, look at data
  3. Form hypothesis - What do you think is wrong?
  4. Test systematically - Prove or disprove hypothesis
  5. Find root cause - Not just symptoms
  6. Document - Help future you and others

Debugging is detective work. Be methodical, not random.

平台分布

Codex

36.19%
按下载量换算60

Claude

32.32%
按下载量换算53

Cursor

17.51%
按下载量换算29

Gemini CLI

9.22%
按下载量换算15

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills