Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures(测试勒索软件恢复程序)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为调用外部服务;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 63,891。

总安装 309周安装 13GitHub Stars 5,882下载 108核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures(测试勒索软件恢复程序)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills
仓库路径:skills/testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为通过测试而改坏真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

安装方式:github,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。

来源仓库内路径:skills/testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skil…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要调用外部服务,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills --skill testing-…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 需要什么权限?

权限级别是调用外部服务。该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 309 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 108 次,GitHub 5,882 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 5,882 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
testing-ransomware-recovery-procedures

测试勒索软件恢复程序 · 本页

3095,882调用外部服务未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testing Ransomware Recovery Procedures

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Validating that ransomware recovery plans actually work under realistic conditions
  • Measuring RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) against business requirements
  • Testing backup restore operations to confirm data integrity and completeness after simulated encryption
  • Conducting tabletop exercises or live recovery drills for ransomware scenarios
  • Auditing disaster recovery readiness as part of compliance or cyber insurance requirements

Do not use for active incident response during a live ransomware attack. Use dedicated IR playbooks instead.

Prerequisites

  • Isolated recovery test environment (air-gapped or network-segmented lab)
  • Access to backup infrastructure (Veeam, Commvault, Rubrik, AWS Backup, Azure Backup)
  • Documented RTO/RPO targets per application tier from business impact analysis
  • Backup copies available for restore testing (production replicas or test snapshots)
  • Recovery runbooks with step-by-step procedures for each critical system

Workflow

Step 1: Define Recovery Test Scope

Identify critical systems and their tiered recovery targets:

TierSystem TypeRTO TargetRPO TargetExample
Tier 1Mission-critical< 1 hour< 15 minActive Directory, core database
Tier 2Business-critical< 4 hours< 1 hourERP, email, CRM
Tier 3Business-operational< 24 hours< 4 hoursFile shares, internal apps
Tier 4Non-critical< 72 hours< 24 hoursDev/test, analytics

Step 2: Prepare Test Environment

# Verify isolated recovery network is segmented
# No routes to production should exist
ip route show | grep -v "192.168.100.0/24"  # recovery VLAN only

# Verify backup catalog is accessible
restic snapshots --repo s3:s3.amazonaws.com/backup-bucket --password-file /etc/restic/pw
# Or for Veeam:
# Get-VBRBackup | Where-Object {$_.JobType -eq "Backup"} | Select Name, LastPointCreationTime

Step 3: Execute Restore and Measure RTO

For each tiered system, measure the full recovery timeline:

  1. Detection to Decision - Time from simulated alert to restore decision
  2. Backup Locate - Time to identify and select the correct clean restore point
  3. Restore Execution - Time to restore data/VM/application from backup
  4. Validation - Time to verify data integrity and application functionality
  5. Service Restoration - Time until the system is fully operational
Recovery Timeline Measurement:
  T0: Incident declared (simulated ransomware detection)
  T1: Recovery team assembled and backup identified
  T2: Restore initiated from clean backup
  T3: Restore completed, integrity checks passed
  T4: Application validated and service restored

  Actual RTO = T4 - T0
  Actual RPO = T0 - backup_timestamp

Step 4: Validate Data Integrity Post-Restore

# Compare file counts between backup manifest and restored data
find /restored/data -type f | wc -l
# Compare against pre-backup manifest

# Verify database consistency after restore
pg_isready -h localhost -p 5432
psql -c "SELECT count(*) FROM critical_table;" -d restored_db

# Hash verification of critical files
sha256sum /restored/data/critical_config.xml
# Compare against known-good hash from backup manifest

Step 5: Test Credential Rotation and Security Hardening

After restore, validate that security controls are re-established:

  1. Rotate all service account passwords and API keys
  2. Verify MFA is enabled on all administrative accounts
  3. Confirm EDR/AV agents are running and reporting to management console
  4. Validate firewall rules block known C2 indicators
  5. Check that restored systems have latest security patches

Step 6: Document Results and Calculate Gap

Recovery Test Report:
  System: [Name]
  Tier: [1-4]
  RTO Target: [target]    Actual RTO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  RPO Target: [target]    Actual RPO: [measured]    Gap: [delta]
  Data Integrity: [PASS/FAIL]
  Application Validation: [PASS/FAIL]
  Security Controls Restored: [PASS/FAIL]

  Status: [MEETS TARGET / EXCEEDS TARGET / FAILS TARGET]
  Remediation Required: [description if FAILS]

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
RTORecovery Time Objective: maximum acceptable downtime for a system after a disaster
RPORecovery Point Objective: maximum acceptable data loss measured in time
WRTWork Recovery Time: time to verify system integrity after restore completes
MTDMaximum Tolerable Downtime: absolute limit before unacceptable business impact
Clean Restore PointA backup verified to be free of ransomware artifacts or encryption
Recovery SequencingThe order in which interdependent systems must be restored
Air-Gapped BackupBackup stored on media physically disconnected from the network

Tools & Systems

ToolPurpose
Veeam Backup & ReplicationVM and physical server backup and restore
CommvaultEnterprise data protection and recovery orchestration
RubrikCloud-native backup with ransomware recovery SLA
AWS BackupCentralized backup for AWS services
Azure BackupMicrosoft cloud backup with immutable vault
ResticOpen-source encrypted backup tool
VeleroKubernetes cluster backup and restore

Common Pitfalls

  • Not testing restores regularly: Backups that are never tested often fail when needed. Test quarterly at minimum.
  • Ignoring recovery sequencing: Restoring an application before its database dependency causes cascading failures.
  • Skipping credential rotation: Restored systems may contain compromised credentials that allow re-infection.
  • Using production network for testing: Recovery tests on production networks risk spreading simulated or real infections.
  • Measuring RTO without WRT: Restore completion is not recovery completion. Include validation and hardening time.
  • No immutable backups: If ransomware can encrypt or delete backups, recovery is impossible. Use air-gapped or immutable storage.

References

平台分布

Codex

36.79%
按下载量换算40

Claude

27.92%
按下载量换算30

Cursor

18.2%
按下载量换算20

Gemini CLI

9.66%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

调用外部服务

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills