Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 运维和基础设施

testing-chaos(测试混乱)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing-chaos 是运维和基础设施类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在运维和基础设施类的 2,449 个 Skill 里排第 1,423。

总安装 576周安装 24GitHub Stars 1下载 192核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-chaos(测试混乱)
来源仓库:https://github.com/wojons/skills
仓库路径:skills/testing-chaos
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-chaos
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-chaos

这个 Skill 是做什么的

运维和基础设施类 Skill 处理部署、监控、日志和云资源,多数需要较高的执行权限。

用于模拟系统故障场景下的容错与高可用能力。适合验证服务降级、重试机制和资源隔离效果。支持网络延迟、进程终止等典型混沌实验设计。需在受控环境中执行以避免对生产造成冲击。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

testing-chaos 属于运维和基础设施类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/testing-chaos

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-chaos;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

testing-chaos 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/skills --skill testing-chaos。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

testing-chaos 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing-chaos 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

testing-chaos 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

testing-chaos 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 576 次,近一周安装 24 次,下载 192 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing-chaos 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理运维和基础设施类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

运维和基础设施类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
brainstorming

头脑风暴 · Codex、Claude

3,148,776173,131操作浏览器MIT通过
copywriting

文案写作 · Codex、Claude

1,996,72425,583需要联网MIT通过
openclaw-secure-linux-cloud

OpenClaw secure linux cloud 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,853,08840接触敏感数据未明确未通过
xget

xget 命令行 · Codex、Claude

1,799,28040执行命令未明确未通过
requesting-code-review

代码审查请求 · Codex、Claude

1,590,144173,103权限未标注MIT通过
testing-chaos

测试混乱 · 本页

5761需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Chaos Testing

Run chaos engineering experiments to build resilient systems by intentionally injecting failures and observing system behavior.

When to use me

Use this skill when:

  • Building highly available and resilient systems
  • Testing failure recovery and auto-remediation
  • Validating disaster recovery plans
  • Ensuring graceful degradation under stress
  • Testing monitoring and alerting systems
  • Building confidence in production resilience
  • Preparing for unexpected failure scenarios

What I do

  • Failure injection experiments:

- Network latency and packet loss - Service dependency failures - Resource exhaustion (CPU, memory, disk) - Database connection failures - Third-party API outages

  • Resilience validation:

- Circuit breaker pattern testing - Retry and backoff strategy validation - Fallback and default behavior testing - Load shedding and rate limiting - Failover and redundancy testing

  • Coordination with other testing:

- Builds on performance and load testing - Complements disaster recovery testing - Informs reliability and availability testing - Validates monitoring and observability

  • Experiment design:

- Hypothesis-driven experimentation - Blast radius containment - Progressive fault injection - Automated experiment orchestration

Examples

# Chaos engineering tools
npm run test:chaos:start           # Start chaos experiments
npm run test:chaos:stop            # Stop all chaos experiments
npm run test:chaos:status          # Check experiment status

# Specific failure injections
npm run test:chaos:network         # Network failure injection
npm run test:chaos:service         # Service dependency failures
npm run test:chaos:resource        # Resource exhaustion
npm run test:chaos:database        # Database failures

# Integration with other tests
npm run test:performance -- --chaos # Performance under failure
npm run test:reliability -- --chaos # Reliability with faults

# Experiment scenarios
npm run test:chaos:scenario:api-outage      # API dependency outage
npm run test:chaos:scenario:db-failover     # Database failover
npm run test:chaos:scenario:latency-spike   # Network latency spike
npm run test:chaos:scenario:memory-leak     # Memory pressure

# Safety controls
npm run test:chaos:safety-check    # Pre-experiment safety check
npm run test:chaos:rollback        # Emergency rollback

Output format

Chaos Test Results:
──────────────────────────────
Experiment: Database Primary Node Failure
Hypothesis: System will failover to replica within 30 seconds
Blast Radius: Staging environment, canary deployment
Duration: 15 minutes

Experiment Execution:
  1. Baseline metrics collected
  2. Database primary node terminated (simulated)
  3. System behavior observed for 10 minutes
  4. Metrics compared to baseline

Results:
  ✅ Failover Time: 22 seconds (within 30s target)
  ✅ Data Consistency: No data loss detected
  ✅ User Impact: 15% error rate during failover (acceptable)
  ✅ Recovery: Automatic, no manual intervention required
  ✅ Monitoring: Alerts triggered within 45 seconds

System Behavior Under Failure:
  - API response time increased from 150ms to 850ms during failover
  - Error rate spiked to 15% for 45 seconds
  - Read-only operations continued uninterrupted
  - Write operations queued and retried successfully

Integration with Other Testing:
  - Performance testing: Established baseline for comparison
  - Reliability testing: Validated MTTR (Mean Time To Recovery)
  - Monitoring testing: Alert effectiveness verified
  - Disaster recovery: Automated failover confirmed

Safety Controls:
  - Automatic rollback on critical failure thresholds
  - Manual abort available throughout
  - Canary deployment limited impact
  - Post-experiment verification passed

Lessons Learned:
  1. Need to improve connection pooling during failover
  2. Alert thresholds should be adjusted for transient failures
  3. User-facing error messages during failover need improvement
  4. Database health checks could be more frequent

Recommendation:
  - System demonstrates good resilience to database failures
  - Implement suggested improvements from lessons learned
  - Schedule regular chaos experiments (monthly)
  - Expand blast radius gradually as confidence increases

Notes

  • Start with small, controlled experiments
  • Always have a rollback plan and automatic abort mechanisms
  • Test in staging before production
  • Document hypotheses and validate outcomes
  • Use feature flags to control chaos injection
  • Monitor system metrics closely during experiments
  • Learn from failures and improve system design
  • Chaos testing complements, doesn't replace, other testing
  • Consider business impact and schedule experiments appropriately
  • Build a culture of resilience, not just technical fixes

平台分布

Claude

34.44%
按下载量换算66

Codex

33.86%
按下载量换算65

Cursor

19.5%
按下载量换算37

Gemini CLI

9%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills