Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

testing-blocks(测试块)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

testing-blocks 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 9,346。

总安装 2,752周安装 117GitHub Stars 55下载 964核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:testing-blocks(测试块)
来源仓库:https://github.com/adobe/skills
仓库路径:skills/testing-blocks
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/adobe/skills --skill testing-blocks
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/adobe/skills --skill testing-blocks

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于模块化组织和管理测试相关功能组件。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适合构建可复用的测试工具链和辅助脚本。支持快速搭建测试环境和初始化基础结构。需根据具体项目选择合适的技术栈和依赖项。

testing-blocks 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/testing-blocks

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/adobe/skills --skill testing-blocks;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

testing-blocks 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/adobe/skills --skill testing-blocks。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

testing-blocks 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

testing-blocks 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

testing-blocks 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

testing-blocks 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,752 次,近一周安装 117 次,下载 964 次,GitHub 55 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

testing-blocks 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
testing-blocks

测试块 · 本页

2,75255操作浏览器未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testing Blocks

This skill guides you through testing code changes in AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Testing follows a value-versus-cost philosophy: create and maintain tests when the value they bring exceeds the cost of creation and maintenance.

CRITICAL: Browser validation is MANDATORY. You cannot complete this skill without providing proof of functional testing in a real browser environment.

Related Skills

  • content-driven-development: Test content created during CDD serves as the basis for testing
  • building-blocks: Invokes this skill during Step 5 for comprehensive testing
  • block-collection-and-party: May provide reference test patterns from similar blocks

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill:

  • ✅ After implementing or modifying blocks
  • ✅ After changes to core scripts (scripts.js, delayed.js, aem.js)
  • ✅ After style changes (styles.css, lazy-styles.css)
  • ✅ After configuration changes that affect functionality
  • ✅ Before opening any pull request with code changes

This skill is typically invoked by the building-blocks skill during Step 5 (Test Implementation).

Testing Workflow

Track your progress:

  • Step 1: Run linting and fix issues
  • Step 2: Perform browser validation (MANDATORY)
  • Step 3: Determine if unit tests are needed (optional)
  • Step 4: Run existing tests and verify they pass

Step 1: Run Linting

Run linting first to catch code quality issues:

npm run lint

If linting fails:

npm run lint:fix

Manually fix remaining issues that auto-fix couldn't handle.

Success criteria:

  • ✅ Linting passes with no errors
  • ✅ Code follows project standards

Mark complete when: npm run lint passes with no errors


Step 2: Browser Validation (MANDATORY)

CRITICAL: You must test in a real browser and provide proof.

What to Test

Load test content URL(s) in browser and validate:

  • ✅ Block/functionality renders correctly
  • ✅ Responsive behavior (mobile, tablet, desktop viewports)
  • ✅ No console errors
  • ✅ Visual appearance matches requirements/acceptance criteria
  • ✅ Interactive behavior works (if applicable)
  • ✅ All variants render correctly (if applicable)

How to Test

Choose the method that makes most sense given your available tools:

Option 1: Browser/Playwright MCP (Recommended)

If you have MCP browser or Playwright tools available, use them directly:

  • Navigate to test content URL
  • Take accessibility snapshots to inspect rendered content (preferred for interaction)
  • Take screenshots at different viewports for visual validation

- Consider both full-page screenshots and element-specific screenshots of the block being tested

  • Interact with elements as needed
  • Most efficient for agents with tool access

Option 2: Playwright automation

Write one (or more) temporary test scripts to validate functionality with playwright and capture snapshots/screenshots for inspection and validation.

// test-my-block.js (temporary - don't commit)
import { chromium } from 'playwright';

async function test() {
  const browser = await chromium.launch({ headless: false });
  const page = await browser.newPage();

  // Navigate and wait for block
  await page.goto('http://localhost:3000/path/to/test');
  await page.waitForSelector('.my-block');

  // Inspect accessibility tree (useful for validating structure)
  const accessibilityTree = await page.accessibility.snapshot();
  console.log('Accessibility tree:', JSON.stringify(accessibilityTree, null, 2));

  // Optionally save to file for easier analysis
  await require('fs').promises.writeFile(
    'accessibility-tree.json',
    JSON.stringify(accessibilityTree, null, 2)
  );

  // Test viewports and take screenshots
  await page.setViewportSize({ width: 375, height: 667 });
  await page.screenshot({ path: 'mobile.png', fullPage: true });
  await page.locator('.my-block').screenshot({ path: 'mobile-block.png' });

  await page.setViewportSize({ width: 768, height: 1024 });
  await page.screenshot({ path: 'tablet.png', fullPage: true });
  await page.locator('.my-block').screenshot({ path: 'tablet-block.png' });

  await page.setViewportSize({ width: 1200, height: 800 });
  await page.screenshot({ path: 'desktop.png', fullPage: true });
  await page.locator('.my-block').screenshot({ path: 'desktop-block.png' });

  // Check for console errors
  page.on('console', msg => console.log('Browser:', msg.text()));

  await browser.close();
}

test().catch(console.error);

Run: node test-my-block.js then delete the script and analyze the resulting artifacts.

Option 3: Manual browser testing

Use a standard web browser with dev tools:

  1. Navigate to test content: http://localhost:3000/path/to/test/content
  2. Use browser dev tools responsive mode to test viewports:

- Mobile: <600px (e.g., 375px) - Tablet: 600-900px (e.g., 768px) - Desktop: >900px (e.g., 1200px)

  1. Check console for errors at each viewport
  2. Take screenshots as proof (browser screenshot tool or dev tools)

Validation Against Acceptance Criteria

If acceptance criteria provided (from CDD Step 2):

  • Review each criterion
  • Test specific scenarios mentioned
  • Verify all criteria are met

If design/mockup screenshots provided:

  • Compare implementation to design
  • Verify visual alignment
  • Note any intentional deviations

Proof of Testing

You must provide:

  • ✅ Screenshots of test content in browser (at least one viewport)
  • ✅ Confirmation no console errors
  • ✅ Confirmation acceptance criteria met (if provided)

Success criteria:

  • ✅ All test content loads and renders correctly
  • ✅ Responsive behavior validated across viewports
  • ✅ No console errors
  • ✅ Screenshots captured as proof
  • ✅ Acceptance criteria validated (if provided)

Mark complete when: Browser testing complete with screenshots as proof


Step 3: Unit Tests (Optional)

Determine if unit tests are needed for this change.

Write unit tests when:

  • ✅ Logic-heavy functions (calculations, transformations)
  • ✅ Utility functions used across multiple blocks
  • ✅ Data processing or API integrations
  • ✅ Complex business logic

Skip unit tests when:

  • ❌ Simple DOM manipulation
  • ❌ CSS-only changes
  • ❌ Straightforward decoration logic
  • ❌ Changes easily validated in browser

For guidance on what to test: See resources/testing-philosophy.md

If unit tests needed:

# Verify test setup (see resources/vitest-setup.md if not configured)
npm test

# Write test for utility function
# test/utils/my-utility.test.js
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest';
import { myUtility } from '../../scripts/utils/my-utility.js';

describe('myUtility', () => {
  it('should transform input correctly', () => {
    expect(myUtility('input')).toBe('OUTPUT');
  });
});

For detailed unit testing guidance: See resources/unit-testing.md

Success criteria:

  • ✅ Unit tests written for logic-heavy code
  • ✅ Tests pass: npm test
  • ✅ OR determined unit tests not needed

Mark complete when: Unit tests written and passing, or determined not needed


Step 4: Run Existing Tests

Verify your changes don't break existing functionality:

npm test

If tests fail:

  1. Read error message carefully
  2. Run single test to isolate: npm test -- path/to/test.js
  3. Fix code or update test if expectations changed
  4. Re-run full test suite

Success criteria:

  • ✅ All existing tests pass
  • ✅ No regressions introduced

Mark complete when: npm test passes with no failures

Troubleshooting

For detailed troubleshooting guide, see resources/troubleshooting.md.

Common issues:

Tests fail

  • Read error message carefully
  • Run single test: npm test -- path/to/test.js
  • Fix code or update test

Linting fails

  • Run npm run lint:fix
  • Manually fix remaining issues

Browser tests fail

  • Verify dev server running: aem up --html-folder drafts
  • Check test content exists in drafts/tmp/
  • Verify URL uses /tmp/ path: http://localhost:3000/drafts/tmp/my-block
  • Add waits: await page.waitForSelector('.block')

Resources

  • Unit Testing: resources/unit-testing.md - Complete guide to writing and maintaining unit tests
  • Troubleshooting: resources/troubleshooting.md - Solutions to common testing issues
  • Vitest Setup: resources/vitest-setup.md - One-time configuration guide
  • Testing Philosophy: resources/testing-philosophy.md - Guide on what and how to test

Integration with Building Blocks Skill

The building-blocks skill invokes this skill during Step 5 (Test Implementation).

Inputs received from building-blocks:

  • Block name being tested
  • Test content URL(s) (from CDD Step 4)
  • Any variants that need testing
  • Screenshots of existing implementation/design/mockup to verify against (if provided)
  • Acceptance criteria to verify (from CDD Step 2)

Expected outputs to return to building-blocks:

  • ✅ Confirmation all testing steps complete
  • ✅ Screenshots from browser testing as proof
  • ✅ Confirmation linting passes
  • ✅ Confirmation tests pass
  • ✅ Any issues discovered and resolved

平台分布

Codex

36.8%
按下载量换算355

Claude

28.37%
按下载量换算273

Cursor

19.51%
按下载量换算188

Gemini CLI

8.29%
按下载量换算80

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills