Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

test-validator(测试验证器)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

test-validator 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 62,001。

总安装 343周安装 14GitHub Stars 2下载 111核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-validator(测试验证器)
来源仓库:https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests
仓库路径:skills/test-validator
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill test-validator
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill test-validator

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于验证测试用例的正确性与执行结果的可靠性。适合检查断言逻辑、输入输出匹配或边界条件覆盖。使用时应确保测试数据真实反映业务场景,避免虚假通过。建议结合代码审查与人工复核,提升测试有效性。安装方式:通过 GitHub 仓库安装,支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。

来源仓库内路径:skills/test-validator

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill test-val…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test-validator 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/masanao-ohba/claude-manifests --skill test-validator。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test-validator 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test-validator 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

test-validator 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

test-validator 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 343 次,近一周安装 14 次,下载 111 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test-validator 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
test-validator

测试验证器 · 本页

3432需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

PHP Test Validator

A specialized skill for validating PHP test files in CakePHP projects, particularly focused on strict testing principles that ensure tests guarantee production code behavior.

Configuration

This skill reads project-specific test rules from:

  1. Project's CLAUDE.md - testing rules and constraints
  2. tests/README.md - Project test documentation (default)

Core Principle

Test code exists to guarantee the functionality of production code. Code that contradicts this purpose is prohibited.

All validation rules derive from this principle. Tests must:

  • Execute production code paths
  • Use production configuration
  • Verify actual behavior, not code structure

Derived Requirements

The core principle implies:

  1. Guarantee Traceability: Each guarantee item (保証対象) must correspond to a concrete branch or behavior in the @covers target method. Read the production code first; describe the code's actual behavior, not the test's intent.
  2. Assertion Distinguishability: When multiple code paths produce the same observable output (e.g., same redirect URL, same HTTP status), a single assertion on that output is insufficient. Additional verification (DB state, response body, side effects) is required to prove which path was exercised.

Core Validation Rules

1. Test Documentation Format

Default requirements:

  • @covers annotation specifying the target class/method
  • @group annotation for test categorization
  • Clear test method naming (test<Action><ExpectedBehavior>)

Example:

/**
 * @covers \App\Controller\UsersController::index
 * @group integration
 */
public function testIndexReturnsUserList(): void
{
    $this->get('/users');
    $this->assertResponseOk();
}

2. Configure::read() Usage Validation

Required Pattern:

  • Use Configure::read() for all configuration values
  • Never hardcode status values or flags
  • Include use Cake\Core\Configure; statement in fixtures

Check for violations:

// ❌ WRONG: Hardcoded value
$status = 5;

// ✅ CORRECT: Using Configure::read
$status = Configure::read('Application.Status.applying');

3. Prohibited Patterns Detection

All patterns violate the core principle. See tests/README.md for project-specific examples.

Critical Violations:

#CategoryPatternWhy Prohibited
1Conditionalif, ??, try-catch with assertionsResult depends on execution path
2Config OverrideConfigure::write()Test uses different config than production
3Missing @coversTest without @covers annotationCoverage target unknown
4Existence Checkmethod_exists(), class_exists()Tests code structure, not behavior
5PlaceholdermarkTestSkipped(), assertTrue(true)No actual verification
6PHPDoc ContentNOTE:, dates, impl notes in PHPDocSpec only, no implementation details
7Defensive Definitionif (!defined()) {define();}Masks production errors where constant is undefined
8Shallow AssertionOnly assertResponseOk() without business logic verificationTests HTTP status, not actual functionality
9Guarantee not traceable to @covers branchDescribes a concept the @covers target does not implementGuarantee must map to actual code branch
10Indistinguishable assertions for different code pathsSame observable output used to assert both success and error pathsAdditional verification required to distinguish paths
-Mock ProductionMock Components, Models, HelpersBusiness logic not tested
-Schema Override_initializeSchema in ModelDB schema diverges from migration
-Direct DatanewEntity() without FixtureTest data diverges from production

Rule 7 - Defensive Definition Details:

Test code should NOT protect against undefined constants, classes, or functions. If production code requires them, the test should fail when they're missing.

// ❌ WRONG: Defensive definition masks production errors
if (!defined('APP_VERSION')) {
    define('APP_VERSION', '1.0.0');
}

// ❌ WRONG: Defensive class existence check
if (!class_exists('SomeService')) {
    class SomeService { /* mock */ }
}

// ✅ CORRECT: Let the test fail if constant is undefined
// Production code should define APP_VERSION; test should verify it exists
$this->assertNotEmpty(APP_VERSION);

Rule 8 - Shallow Assertion Details:

assertResponseOk() only verifies HTTP 2xx status. It does NOT verify:

  • Response body content matches expected data
  • Database state changed correctly
  • Business rules were applied
// ❌ WRONG: Only checks HTTP status
public function testCreateUser(): void
{
    $this->post('/users', ['name' => 'John']);
    $this->assertResponseOk();  // Passes even if user wasn't created!
}

// ✅ CORRECT: Verify actual business outcome
public function testCreateUser(): void
{
    $this->post('/users', ['name' => 'John']);
    $this->assertResponseOk();

    // Verify database state
    $user = $this->Users->find()->where(['name' => 'John'])->first();
    $this->assertNotNull($user);
    $this->assertEquals('John', $user->name);

    // Or verify response content
    $this->assertResponseContains('User created successfully');
}

4. Production Code Verification

Check that test targets existing production code:

  • Controller file exists
  • Action method exists
  • Route is defined
  • URL pattern matches

5. Test Command Validation

Use the test command defined in the project's CLAUDE.md.

Validation rules:

  • Only use the test command specified in CLAUDE.md
  • Do NOT run test commands directly (e.g., composer test, vendor/bin/phpunit) unless specified
  • Check project instructions before executing tests

6. Specification Alignment Validation

Validates alignment between test documentation (README.md) and actual test code.

Alignment Checks:

  • Test function names match documentation
  • Implementation status markers are accurate
  • Test counts per category are correct
  • Consolidation notes are documented

Integrity Score:

Score = (Matching Functions / Total Functions in README) × 100

100:    Perfect alignment
90-99:  Minor discrepancies
70-89:  Moderate misalignment - fix before PR
0-69:   Critical misalignment - fix immediately

When to Run:

  • After test code is written or modified
  • Before creating PR or committing test changes
  • During quality review

Validation Process

When analyzing a test file:

  1. Load project rules - Read tests/README.md for project-specific prohibitions
  2. Parse PHPDoc blocks - Check for required annotations (@covers, @group, etc.)
  3. Scan for hardcoded values - Identify potential Configure::read violations
  4. Detect prohibited patterns - Check against core + project-specific patterns
  5. Verify production code - Confirm controller/action/route existence
  6. Check fixture compliance - Ensure proper fixture usage patterns
  7. Validate specification alignment - Compare README.md with actual test code

Output Format

Return validation results as:

✅ PASS: [Description of what passed]
❌ FAIL: [Description of violation]
   Line X: [Code snippet or issue]
   Fix: [Suggested correction]
⚠️ WARN: [Non-critical issue]

Examples

Example 1: Validating test documentation

// Input: Test method without proper documentation
public function testIndex(): void
{
    $this->get('/user/users');
    $this->assertResponseOk();
}

// Output:
❌ FAIL: Missing required PHPDoc documentation
   Line 1: testIndex() lacks @covers annotation
   Fix: Add PHPDoc with @covers specifying the target class/method

Example 2: Detecting Configure::write violation

// Input: Test with configuration override
public function testWithConfig(): void
{
    Configure::write('App.setting', 'test-value');
    // ...
}

// Output:
❌ FAIL: Prohibited pattern - Configure::write in test
   Line 3: Configure::write('App.setting', 'test-value')
   Fix: Use actual production configuration value with Configure::read()

Example 3: Conditional assertion violation

// Input: Test with conditional logic
public function testWithCondition(): void
{
    $result = $this->service->process();
    if ($result !== null) {
        $this->assertEquals($expected, $result);
    } else {
        $this->markTestSkipped('No data');
    }
}

// Output:
❌ FAIL: Prohibited pattern - Conditional assertion
   Line 4-8: if/else block with assertions
   Fix: Remove conditional; test should have deterministic expected outcome

Example 4: Existence check violation

// Input: Test checking code structure instead of behavior
public function testMethodExists(): void
{
    $this->assertTrue(method_exists($this->controller, 'index'));
}

// Output:
❌ FAIL: Prohibited pattern - Existence check
   Line 3: method_exists() tests code structure, not behavior
   Fix: Call the method and verify its actual output/behavior

Integration with CakePHP Projects

This skill is specifically designed for:

  • CakePHP 4.x/5.x projects
  • Multi-tenant database architectures
  • Projects following strict test principles
  • PHP 8.x codebases

Project Rules: tests/README.md and project CLAUDE.md

Usage Notes

  • Read tests/README.md first to load project-specific rules
  • Run validation before committing test files
  • Integrity score must be >= 90 for PR approval
  • All ERROR severity issues must be resolved before merge
  • Particularly important during PHP/CakePHP version upgrades

Used By Agents

  • quality-reviewer: Validates test code during code review
  • test-developer: Validates test quality during implementation
  • deliverable-evaluator: Gate-check before commit/PR

Related Skills

This skill supersedes test-spec-validator (now integrated):

  • Test code quality validation (PHPDoc, assertions, patterns)
  • README.md ↔ test code alignment validation

平台分布

Codex

36%
按下载量换算40

Claude

29.94%
按下载量换算33

Cursor

21.95%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

9.31%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills