Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

test-harness(测试工具)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

test-harness 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 7,512。

总安装 367周安装 15GitHub Stars 218下载 118核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-harness(测试工具)
来源仓库:https://github.com/mathews-tom/praxis-skills
仓库路径:skills/test-harness
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/mathews-tom/praxis-skills --skill test-harness
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/mathews-tom/praxis-skills --skill test-harness

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据日志定位问题。需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据后使用。test-harness 属于前端设计类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分模拟环境与生产环境。

安装方式:通过 npx 从指定 GitHub 仓库添加。

来源仓库内路径:skills/test-harness

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/mathews-tom/praxis-skills --skill test-harness;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test-harness 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/mathews-tom/praxis-skills --skill test-harness。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test-harness 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test-harness 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

test-harness 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

test-harness 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 367 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 118 次,GitHub 218 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test-harness 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
test-harness

测试工具 · 本页

367218需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Test Harness

Systematic test suite generation that transforms source code into comprehensive, runnable pytest files. Analyzes function signatures, dependency graphs, and complexity hotspots to produce tests covering happy paths, boundary conditions, error states, and async flows — with properly scoped fixtures and focused mocks.

Reference Files

FileContentsLoad When
references/pytest-patterns.mdFixture scopes, parametrize, marks, conftest layout, built-in fixturesAlways
references/mock-strategies.mdMock decision tree, patch boundaries, assertions, anti-patternsTarget has external dependencies
references/async-testing.mdpytest-asyncio modes, event loop fixtures, async mockingTarget contains async code
references/fixture-design.mdFactory fixtures, yield teardown, scope selection, compositionTest requires non-trivial setup
references/coverage-targets.mdThreshold table, branch vs line, pytest-cov config, exclusion patternsCoverage assessment requested

Prerequisites

  • pytest >= 7.0
  • Python >= 3.10
  • pytest-asyncio — required only when generating async tests
  • pytest-mock — optional, provides mocker fixture as alternative to unittest.mock

Workflow

Phase 1: Reconnaissance

Before writing a single test, build a model of the target code:

  1. Identify scope — What functions, classes, or modules need tests? If unspecified, check for recent modifications: git diff --name-only HEAD~5
  2. Read function signatures — Parameters, types, return types, defaults. Every parameter is a test dimension.
  3. Map dependencies — Which calls go to external systems (DB, API, filesystem, clock)? These are mock candidates.
  4. Detect complexity hotspots — Functions with high branch counts, deep nesting, or multiple return paths need more test cases.
  5. Check existing tests — If tests already exist, understand what they cover. Do not duplicate; extend.
  6. Read project conventions — Check CLAUDE.md, conftest.py, pytest.ini/pyproject.toml for fixtures, markers, and test organization patterns already in use.

Phase 2: Test Case Enumeration

For each function under test, enumerate cases across four categories:

CategoryWhat to TestExample
Happy pathExpected inputs produce expected outputsadd(2, 3) returns 5
BoundaryEdge values at limits of valid inputEmpty string, zero, max int, single element
ErrorInvalid inputs trigger proper exceptionsNone where str expected, negative index
StateState transitions produce correct side effectsObject moves from pending to active

For each case, note:

  • Input values (concrete, not abstract)
  • Expected output or exception
  • Required setup (fixtures)
  • Required mocks (external calls to suppress)

Parametrize cases that share the same test logic but differ only in input/output values.

Phase 3: Fixture Design

  1. Identify shared setup — If 3+ tests need the same object, extract a fixture.
  2. Select scope — Use the narrowest scope that avoids redundant setup: Scope Use When Example function Default. Each test gets fresh state Most unit tests class Tests within a class share expensive setup DB connection per test class module All tests in a file share setup Loaded config file session Entire test run shares setup Docker container startup
  3. Design teardown — Use yield fixtures when cleanup is needed. Never leave side effects (temp files, DB rows, monkey-patches) after a test.
  4. Identify conftest candidates — Fixtures used across multiple test files belong in conftest.py. Fixtures used in one file stay in that file.

Phase 4: Mock Strategy

  1. Decide what to mock — Mock external dependencies only:

- Network calls (API, database, message queues) - Filesystem operations (when testing logic, not I/O) - Time-dependent behavior (datetime.now, time.sleep) - Random/non-deterministic behavior

  1. Decide what NOT to mock — Never mock:

- The function under test - Pure functions called by the target (test them through the target) - Data structures and value objects

  1. Choose mock level — Patch at the import boundary of the module under test, not at the definition site. @patch('mymodule.requests.get'), not @patch('requests.get').
  2. Add mock assertions — Every mock should assert it was called with expected arguments and the expected number of times. Mocks without assertions are coverage holes.

Phase 5: Output

Generate the test file following this structure:

  1. Imports (pytest, mocks, target module)
  2. Constants and test data
  3. Fixtures (ordered by scope: session > module > class > function)
  4. Test classes or functions grouped by target function
  5. Parametrized tests where applicable

Output Format

# tests/test_{module}.py

import pytest
from unittest.mock import Mock, patch, MagicMock

from {module} import {target_function, TargetClass}

# ============================================================
# Fixtures
# ============================================================

@pytest.fixture
def valid_input():
    """Standard valid input for happy path tests."""
    return {concrete values}

@pytest.fixture
def mock_database():
    """Mock database connection."""
    with patch("{module}.db_connection") as mock_db:
        mock_db.query.return_value = [{expected data}]
        yield mock_db

# ============================================================
# {target_function} Tests
# ============================================================

class TestTargetFunction:
    """Tests for {target_function}."""

    def test_happy_path(self, valid_input):
        """Returns expected result for valid input."""
        result = target_function(valid_input)
        assert result == {expected}

    @pytest.mark.parametrize(
        "input_val, expected",
        [
            ({boundary_1}, {expected_1}),
            ({boundary_2}, {expected_2}),
            ({boundary_3}, {expected_3}),
        ],
        ids=["empty", "single", "maximum"],
    )
    def test_boundary_conditions(self, input_val, expected):
        """Handles boundary inputs correctly."""
        assert target_function(input_val) == expected

    def test_invalid_input_raises(self):
        """Raises TypeError for invalid input."""
        with pytest.raises(TypeError, match="expected str"):
            target_function(None)

    def test_external_call(self, mock_database):
        """Calls database with correct query."""
        target_function("lookup_key")
        mock_database.query.assert_called_once_with("SELECT * FROM t WHERE key = %s", ("lookup_key",))

Configuring Scope

ModeScopeDepthWhen to Use
quickSingle functionHappy path + 1 error caseRapid iteration, TDD red-green cycle
standardFile or classHappy + boundary + error + mocksDefault for most requests
comprehensiveModule or packageAll categories + async + parametrized matrixPre-release, critical path code

Calibration Rules

  1. Test isolation is non-negotiable. Every test must pass when run alone and in any order. No test may depend on the side effects of another test.
  2. Mock discipline. Mock external dependencies, not internal logic. Over-mocking produces tests that pass when the code is broken. Under-mocking produces tests that fail when the network is down.
  3. Concrete over abstract. Test data must be concrete values, not placeholders. "alice@example.com" not "test_email". 42 not "some_number". Concrete values catch type mismatches that abstract placeholders mask.
  4. One assertion focus per test. A test should verify one behavior. Multiple assertions are acceptable when they verify different aspects of the same behavior (e.g., return value AND side effect), but not when they verify unrelated behaviors.
  5. Parametrize, don't duplicate. If two tests differ only in input/output values, combine them with @pytest.mark.parametrize. Use ids for readable test names.
  6. Match project conventions. If the project uses conftest.py fixtures, class-based tests, or specific markers, follow those patterns. Do not introduce a conflicting test style.

Error Handling

ProblemResolution
Target function has no type hintsInfer types from usage patterns, default values, and docstrings. Note uncertainty in test docstring.
Target has deeply nested dependenciesMock at the nearest boundary to the function under test. Do not mock transitive dependencies individually.
No existing test infrastructure (no conftest, no pytest config)Generate a minimal conftest.py alongside the test file. Note the addition in output.
Target code is untestable (global state, hidden dependencies)Flag the design issue in the output. Generate tests for what is testable. Suggest refactoring to improve testability.
Async code detected but pytest-asyncio not installedNote the dependency requirement. Generate async test stubs with @pytest.mark.asyncio and instruct user to install.
Target module cannot be importedReport the import error. Do not generate tests for unimportable code.

When NOT to Generate Tests

Push back if:

  • The code is auto-generated (protobuf, OpenAPI client, ORM models) — test the generator or the schema, not the output
  • The request is for UI/E2E tests — this skill generates unit and integration tests only
  • The code has no clear behavior to test (pure configuration, constant definitions)
  • The user wants tests for third-party library code — test your usage of the library, not the library itself

平台分布

Codex

34.06%
按下载量换算40

Claude

27.31%
按下载量换算32

Cursor

20.36%
按下载量换算24

Gemini CLI

9.76%
按下载量换算12

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills