Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

test-behavior-not-implementation(测试行为而不是实现)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

test-behavior-not-implementation 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 21,446。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-behavior-not-implementation(测试行为而不是实现)
来源仓库:https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/test-behavior-not-implementation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills --skill test-behavior-not-implementation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills --skill test-behavior-not-implementation

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据后使用。涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分本地模拟与生产环境。test-behavior-not-implementation 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/test-behavior-not-implementation

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills --skill test-behavior-not-i…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test-behavior-not-implementation 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills --skill test-behavior-not-implementat…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test-behavior-not-implementation 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test-behavior-not-implementation 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

test-behavior-not-implementation 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

test-behavior-not-implementation 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test-behavior-not-implementation 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
test-behavior-not-implementation

测试行为而不是实现 · 本页

188—操作浏览器未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Testing Trophy

Testing philosophy for React and TypeScript projects. Based on Kent C. Dodds' Testing Trophy and TkDodo's testing principles.

Testing Trophy Priorities

From most to least valuable:

  1. Integration tests — test multiple units working together (highest confidence per effort)
  2. Unit tests — test individual functions in isolation
  3. End-to-end tests — test full user flows (highest confidence, highest cost)
  4. Static analysis — TypeScript, ESLint (cheapest, catches typos and type errors)
"The more your tests resemble the way your software is used, the more confidence they can give you." — Kent C. Dodds

Core Principles

1. Test behavior, not implementation

Tests MUST assert on what users see or experience — rendered output, fired events, returned values from public API. If a test would break when you refactor internals without changing behavior, it's testing implementation.

Do NOT assert on:

  • Internal state values
  • Private function calls
  • Component instance methods
  • Hook return internals that consumers don't use
  • How many times a function was called (unless that IS the behavior)

2. Write fewer, longer tests

One test covering a complete user flow is better than five tests each checking one micro-step. Act like a user — users don't stop after clicking one button.

3. Use accessible queries (correct priority)

getByRole > getByLabelText > getByPlaceholderText > getByText > getByDisplayValue > getByAltText > getByTitle > getByTestId

Only use getByTestId when no accessible query works.

4. Don't test third-party code

If a behavior is owned by a library (React, a UI library, a hook library), don't re-test it through your component. Trust the library's tests.

5. Avoid unnecessary mocking

Mocks create a parallel reality where tests pass but production breaks. Only mock at system boundaries:

  • Network requests (fetch, API calls)
  • Timers (setTimeout, setInterval)
  • Browser APIs not available in test env (IntersectionObserver, ResizeObserver, canvas)

NEVER mock internal modules just to isolate units. Import the real module.

6. One test per behavior

"Clicking submit with valid data shows success" and "clicking submit with valid data calls the API" are testing the same behavior from two angles — merge them. Users experience one thing, test one thing.

TkDodo's Principles

Don't test what the framework already tests

React guarantees that useState works. Don't write tests proving it. Your utility library guarantees hotkey matching — don't re-test that matching through every consumer.

Redundant tests are worse than no tests

Every test is code you maintain. A test that duplicates another test's coverage adds maintenance cost with zero confidence gain. When implementation changes, you fix N tests instead of 1.

Test the contract, not the wiring

A hook's contract: "given these inputs, produce these outputs/effects." How it wires state, refs, and effects internally is not the contract.

Implementation detail detector

If a test name contains "should call" followed by an internal function name, it's probably testing implementation.

Decision Tree

For every test case, ask:

Is this testing behavior a user/consumer would notice?
  |-- Yes -> Is there another test covering the same behavior?
  |     |-- Yes -> Merge or remove the weaker one
  |     |-- No  -> Keep as-is
  |-- No  -> Is it testing an internal/implementation detail?
        |-- Yes -> Remove or rewrite to test the observable behavior instead
        |-- Not sure -> Would this test break on a refactor that doesn't
                        change behavior?
                         |-- Yes -> It's implementation-detail testing. Remove.
                         |-- No  -> Keep

Mocking Discipline

  • NEVER use vi.mock() or jest.mock() for internal modules. Import the real module.
  • If the real implementation works in the test environment, use it.
  • When mocking is justified (e.g., ResizeObserver in jsdom), mock the minimum — don't mock the entire module when you only need one function.
  • Legitimate mock targets: fetch/network, fs (filesystem), timers, canvas, IntersectionObserver, ResizeObserver.

Test Structure Rules

  • Prefer userEvent over fireEvent — userEvent simulates real browser behavior
  • No overengineered setup/teardown — beforeEach should only contain truly shared setup (timer mocking, observer polyfills)
  • No unnecessary wrapper components — render components directly unless they require a provider
  • Test names describe behavior, not implementation:

- Bad: "should call setState with new value" - Good: "updates the display when user types"

  • No snapshot tests unless testing serialization output
  • Colocate tests with source: stamp-card.test.tsx next to stamp-card.tsx

Anti-Patterns Checklist

When reviewing or auditing tests, check for:

  • Duplicate test cases — two tests covering the same behavior through different assertions
  • Re-testing upstream behavior — behavior already tested in its own test file
  • Assertions on internal state — hook return values that consumers don't use directly
  • Assertions on call count — toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) when count isn't the contract
  • Spying on internal methods — vi.spyOn on functions that aren't public API
  • Mocking internal modules — vi.mock() for modules that work in test env
  • Overengineered setup — beforeEach doing what each test does anyway
  • Missing error/edge cases — empty input, null/undefined, boundary values, cleanup on unmount
  • Missing accessibility assertions — ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, focus management

What NOT to Test

  • Pure type files, constants, or re-export index files
  • Thin wrappers that delegate to tested functions
  • Pure styling wrappers with no logic (CVA variants, styled-components with no conditionals)
  • Framework behavior (useState works, useEffect fires on mount)

The goal is fewer, better tests — not more tests.

平台分布

Codex

35.66%
按下载量换算24

Claude

27.56%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

19.51%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.97%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills