Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
开发操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

test-behavior-not-implementation测试行为而不是实现

Agent Skill

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

总安装

188

周安装

8

GitHub Stars

公开资料未说明

下载量

66
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-behavior-not-implementation(测试行为而不是实现)
来源仓库:https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/test-behavior-not-implementation
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills --skill test-behavior-not-implementation
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/b4r7x/agent-skills --skill test-behavior-not-implementation

简介

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。

  • 适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。
  • 需确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据后使用。
  • 涉及浏览器或外部服务时应区分本地模拟与生产环境。
  • test-behavior-not-implementation 属于开发类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

SKILL.md

Testing Trophy

Testing philosophy for React and TypeScript projects. Based on Kent C. Dodds' Testing Trophy and TkDodo's testing principles.

Testing Trophy Priorities

From most to least valuable:

  1. Integration tests — test multiple units working together (highest confidence per effort)
  2. Unit tests — test individual functions in isolation
  3. End-to-end tests — test full user flows (highest confidence, highest cost)
  4. Static analysis — TypeScript, ESLint (cheapest, catches typos and type errors)
"The more your tests resemble the way your software is used, the more confidence they can give you." — Kent C. Dodds

Core Principles

1. Test behavior, not implementation

Tests MUST assert on what users see or experience — rendered output, fired events, returned values from public API. If a test would break when you refactor internals without changing behavior, it's testing implementation.

Do NOT assert on:

  • Internal state values
  • Private function calls
  • Component instance methods
  • Hook return internals that consumers don't use
  • How many times a function was called (unless that IS the behavior)

2. Write fewer, longer tests

One test covering a complete user flow is better than five tests each checking one micro-step. Act like a user — users don't stop after clicking one button.

3. Use accessible queries (correct priority)

getByRole > getByLabelText > getByPlaceholderText > getByText > getByDisplayValue > getByAltText > getByTitle > getByTestId

Only use getByTestId when no accessible query works.

4. Don't test third-party code

If a behavior is owned by a library (React, a UI library, a hook library), don't re-test it through your component. Trust the library's tests.

5. Avoid unnecessary mocking

Mocks create a parallel reality where tests pass but production breaks. Only mock at system boundaries:

  • Network requests (fetch, API calls)
  • Timers (setTimeout, setInterval)
  • Browser APIs not available in test env (IntersectionObserver, ResizeObserver, canvas)

NEVER mock internal modules just to isolate units. Import the real module.

6. One test per behavior

"Clicking submit with valid data shows success" and "clicking submit with valid data calls the API" are testing the same behavior from two angles — merge them. Users experience one thing, test one thing.

TkDodo's Principles

Don't test what the framework already tests

React guarantees that useState works. Don't write tests proving it. Your utility library guarantees hotkey matching — don't re-test that matching through every consumer.

Redundant tests are worse than no tests

Every test is code you maintain. A test that duplicates another test's coverage adds maintenance cost with zero confidence gain. When implementation changes, you fix N tests instead of 1.

Test the contract, not the wiring

A hook's contract: "given these inputs, produce these outputs/effects." How it wires state, refs, and effects internally is not the contract.

Implementation detail detector

If a test name contains "should call" followed by an internal function name, it's probably testing implementation.

Decision Tree

For every test case, ask:

Is this testing behavior a user/consumer would notice?
  |-- Yes -> Is there another test covering the same behavior?
  |     |-- Yes -> Merge or remove the weaker one
  |     |-- No  -> Keep as-is
  |-- No  -> Is it testing an internal/implementation detail?
        |-- Yes -> Remove or rewrite to test the observable behavior instead
        |-- Not sure -> Would this test break on a refactor that doesn't
                        change behavior?
                         |-- Yes -> It's implementation-detail testing. Remove.
                         |-- No  -> Keep

Mocking Discipline

  • NEVER use vi.mock() or jest.mock() for internal modules. Import the real module.
  • If the real implementation works in the test environment, use it.
  • When mocking is justified (e.g., ResizeObserver in jsdom), mock the minimum — don't mock the entire module when you only need one function.
  • Legitimate mock targets: fetch/network, fs (filesystem), timers, canvas, IntersectionObserver, ResizeObserver.

Test Structure Rules

  • Prefer userEvent over fireEventuserEvent simulates real browser behavior
  • No overengineered setup/teardown — beforeEach should only contain truly shared setup (timer mocking, observer polyfills)
  • No unnecessary wrapper components — render components directly unless they require a provider
  • Test names describe behavior, not implementation:

- Bad: "should call setState with new value" - Good: "updates the display when user types"

  • No snapshot tests unless testing serialization output
  • Colocate tests with source: stamp-card.test.tsx next to stamp-card.tsx

Anti-Patterns Checklist

When reviewing or auditing tests, check for:

  • Duplicate test cases — two tests covering the same behavior through different assertions
  • Re-testing upstream behavior — behavior already tested in its own test file
  • Assertions on internal state — hook return values that consumers don't use directly
  • Assertions on call counttoHaveBeenCalledTimes(1) when count isn't the contract
  • Spying on internal methodsvi.spyOn on functions that aren't public API
  • Mocking internal modulesvi.mock() for modules that work in test env
  • Overengineered setupbeforeEach doing what each test does anyway
  • Missing error/edge cases — empty input, null/undefined, boundary values, cleanup on unmount
  • Missing accessibility assertions — ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation, focus management

What NOT to Test

  • Pure type files, constants, or re-export index files
  • Thin wrappers that delegate to tested functions
  • Pure styling wrappers with no logic (CVA variants, styled-components with no conditionals)
  • Framework behavior (useState works, useEffect fires on mount)

The goal is fewer, better tests — not more tests.

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35.66%
按下载量换算24

Claude

27.56%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

19.51%
按下载量换算13

Gemini CLI

8.97%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills