Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

test-and-break(测试和打破)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

test-and-break 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 64,068。

总安装 306周安装 13GitHub Stars 228下载 107核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test-and-break(测试和打破)
来源仓库:https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow
仓库路径:skills/test-and-break
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill test-and-break
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill test-and-break

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

test-and-break 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和用例整理。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。使用时需确认测试框架、运行命令,并区分模拟环境与生产环境。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/test-and-break

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill test-and-…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test-and-break 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/rohunj/claude-build-workflow --skill test-and-break。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test-and-break 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test-and-break 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

test-and-break 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

test-and-break 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 306 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 107 次,GitHub 228 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test-and-break 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
test-and-break

测试和打破 · 本页

306228操作浏览器MIT有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Test and Break

Systematically test a deployed application by going through user flows, trying edge cases, and attempting to break things. Outputs structured bug reports that can be converted to user stories for autonomous fixing.


Prerequisites

  • agent-browser installed (npm install -g agent-browser && agent-browser install)
  • App deployed to a URL (staging/preview)
  • Basic understanding of what the app should do (read the PRD)

The Job

  1. Read the PRD to understand what the app should do
  2. Open the deployed app in agent-browser
  3. Go through each major user flow
  4. Try to break things at each step
  5. Document all bugs and issues found
  6. Output structured bug reports

Testing Process

Step 1: Understand the App

Read tasks/prd.md and tasks/architecture.md to understand:

  • What user flows exist
  • What the app should do
  • What the expected behavior is

Step 2: Open the App

agent-browser open [DEPLOYMENT_URL]
agent-browser snapshot -i

Step 3: Test Each User Flow

For each major feature/flow in the PRD:

A. Happy Path Testing
  1. Go through the flow as a normal user would
  2. Verify each step works as expected
  3. Check that success states appear correctly
B. Edge Case Testing

Try these at each input/interaction point:

Input Edge Cases:

  • Empty inputs (submit with nothing)
  • Very long text (500+ characters)
  • Special characters (<script>alert('xss')</script>, '; DROP TABLE users;--)
  • Unicode/emojis (🎉, 中文, العربية)
  • Negative numbers where positive expected
  • Zero where non-zero expected
  • Future dates, past dates, invalid dates
  • Invalid email formats
  • Spaces only
  • Leading/trailing whitespace

Interaction Edge Cases:

  • Double-click buttons rapidly
  • Click back button during operations
  • Refresh page mid-flow
  • Open same page in multiple tabs
  • Submit form twice quickly

State Edge Cases:

  • Log out mid-operation (if auth exists)
  • Let session expire
  • Navigate directly to URLs that require prior steps
  • Use browser back/forward buttons

Visual/UX Issues:

  • Check mobile responsiveness (resize browser)
  • Look for overlapping elements
  • Check loading states exist
  • Verify error messages are helpful
  • Look for console errors

Step 4: Document Each Bug

For each issue found, document:

## BUG-XXX: [Short descriptive title]

**Severity:** Critical | High | Medium | Low
**Type:** Functional | UI/UX | Security | Performance | Accessibility

**Steps to Reproduce:**
1. Go to [URL]
2. Do [action]
3. Enter [input]
4. Click [button]

**Expected Behavior:**
[What should happen]

**Actual Behavior:**
[What actually happens]

**Screenshot:** [if applicable]

**Console Errors:** [if any]

**Notes:** [any additional context]

Severity Guidelines

SeverityDefinitionExamples
CriticalApp broken, data loss, security issueCrash, XSS vulnerability, data not saving
HighMajor feature broken, bad UXCan't complete main flow, confusing errors
MediumFeature works but has issuesMinor validation missing, UI glitches
LowPolish/minor issuesTypos, slight misalignment, minor UX

Output Format

Save bug report to tasks/bug-report-[date].md:

# Bug Report: [App Name]
**Tested:** [Date]
**URL:** [Deployment URL]
**Tester:** Claude (Automated)

## Summary
- Total bugs found: X
- Critical: X
- High: X
- Medium: X
- Low: X

## Critical Bugs
[List critical bugs first]

## High Priority Bugs
[List high bugs]

## Medium Priority Bugs
[List medium bugs]

## Low Priority Bugs
[List low bugs]

## Positive Findings
[List things that worked well - important for context]

## Recommendations
[Overall suggestions for improvement]

Converting Bugs to User Stories

After generating the bug report, convert each bug to a user story format:

{
  "id": "BUG-001",
  "title": "Fix: [Bug title]",
  "description": "As a user, I expect [expected behavior] but currently [actual behavior].",
  "acceptanceCriteria": [
    "Specific fix criterion 1",
    "Specific fix criterion 2",
    "Regression test: [original bug steps] no longer reproduces",
    "Typecheck passes"
  ],
  "priority": 1,
  "passes": false,
  "notes": "Original bug: [reference]"
}

Priority mapping:

  • Critical bugs → priority 1-2
  • High bugs → priority 3-5
  • Medium bugs → priority 6-10
  • Low bugs → priority 11+

Integration with Ralph

After generating bug stories, they can be:

  1. Added to existing prd.json - Append bug fixes to current project
  2. Create new prd.json - Start a bug-fix-only Ralph run

To add to existing prd.json:

# Read current max priority
MAX_PRIORITY=$(cat prd.json | jq '[.userStories[].priority] | max')

# Add bug stories starting after max priority
# (Claude should do this programmatically)

Example Testing Session

# 1. Open the app
agent-browser open https://my-app-staging.vercel.app

# 2. Take initial snapshot
agent-browser snapshot -i

# 3. Test login flow
agent-browser fill @e1 "test@example.com"
agent-browser fill @e2 "password123"
agent-browser click @e3
agent-browser wait --load networkidle
agent-browser snapshot -i

# 4. Try to break it
agent-browser fill @e1 ""  # empty email
agent-browser click @e3    # submit anyway
agent-browser snapshot -i  # check error handling

# 5. Try XSS
agent-browser fill @e1 "<script>alert('xss')</script>"
agent-browser snapshot -i

# Continue testing other flows...

Checklist

Before finishing testing:

  • Tested all user flows from PRD
  • Tried empty inputs on all forms
  • Tried special characters/XSS on all inputs
  • Checked mobile responsiveness
  • Looked for console errors
  • Verified error messages are helpful
  • Documented all bugs with reproduction steps
  • Assigned severity to each bug
  • Saved bug report to tasks/bug-report-[date].md

平台分布

Claude Code

27.08%
按下载量换算29

OpenCode

25.86%
按下载量换算28

Codex

18.9%
按下载量换算20

Antigravity

13.66%
按下载量换算15

Gemini CLI

7.53%
按下载量换算8

windsurf

4.06%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。

继续浏览同类 Skills