Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

test%3atriage(测试%3 分类)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

test%3atriage 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 46,597。

总安装 774周安装 31GitHub Stars 44下载 250核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:test%3atriage(测试%3 分类)
来源仓库:https://github.com/antithesishq/antithesis-skills
仓库路径:skills/test%3Atriage
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/antithesishq/antithesis-skills --skill test:triage
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/antithesishq/antithesis-skills --skill test:triage

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

test%3Atriage 用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试和用例整理。适合编写单元测试、端到端测试或根据失败日志定位问题。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装并使用。使用时需确认测试框架、运行命令,并区分模拟环境与生产环境。

test%3atriage 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/test%3Atriage

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/antithesishq/antithesis-skills --skill test:tr…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

test%3atriage 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/antithesishq/antithesis-skills --skill test:triage。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

test%3atriage 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

test%3atriage 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

test%3atriage 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

test%3atriage 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 774 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 250 次,GitHub 44 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

test%3atriage 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
test%3atriage

测试%3 分类 · 本页

77444接触敏感数据未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Test: Antithesis Triage Skill

End-to-end test harness for the antithesis-triage skill. Spawn sub-agents that perform real triage operations, then review their work for issues.

The top-level agent MUST NOT use the antithesis-triage skill directly. All triage operations happen inside sub-agents. The top-level agent only orchestrates and reviews.

Prerequisites

Before starting, verify the same prerequisites the triage skill requires:

which snouty && which agent-browser && which jq

Also confirm ANTITHESIS_TENANT is set:

echo "$ANTITHESIS_TENANT"

If any prerequisite is missing, stop and report which ones are unavailable.

Phase 1: Discover Runs

Spawn a general-purpose sub-agent with the Agent tool. Provide these instructions, replacing {{TENANT}} with the actual value of the $ANTITHESIS_TENANT environment variable and {{TRIAGE_SKILL}} with the absolute path to antithesis-triage/SKILL.md in this repository:

Read the skill file at {{TRIAGE_SKILL}} and follow its instructions to list
recent runs for the tenant "{{TENANT}}". Follow the "Summarize recent runs"
workflow.

Fetch recent complete and incomplete runs separately by using the status filter:

  `window.__antithesisTriage.runs.getRecentRuns({status: 'Completed'})`
  `window.__antithesisTriage.runs.getRecentRuns({status: 'Incomplete'})`

Return the COMPLETE results from both calls in JSON, including for each run:
  - name
  - status (completed/in-progress/error)
  - findings counts by category (new, ongoing, resolved, rare)
  - triage URL (or null if unavailable)
  - utilization info

Wait for this sub-agent to finish before proceeding.

If the sub-agent did not return triage URLs abort.

Phase 2: Select Test Targets

Read the sub-agent output. From the run listing, select two runs:

  1. Completed run with findings — Status is completed, has at least one finding in any category (new, ongoing, resolved, rare), and has a non-null triageUrl. Prefer runs with new or ongoing findings.
  2. Incomplete or no-findings run — Either a run still in progress (null triageUrl) OR a completed run with zero findings across all categories. Pick an incomplete run that finished in less than 15 minutes to maximize the chance that it's a setup incomplete run.

Rules for missing targets:

  • If no completed-with-findings run exists, skip Phase 3a and note this in the final report.
  • If no incomplete/no-findings run exists, skip Phase 3b and note this.
  • If no runs exist at all, report that and stop.

Phase 3: Triage Selected Runs

Spawn sub-agents in parallel for each available target. Do NOT instruct sub-agents to report verbosely or tell them they are being tested — this changes their behavior. The orchestrator will read their raw session traces directly in Phase 4.

Phase 3a: Completed run with findings

Spawn a general-purpose sub-agent with these instructions (substitute the actual triage URL and {{TRIAGE_SKILL}} with the absolute path to antithesis-triage/SKILL.md in this repository):

Read the skill file at {{TRIAGE_SKILL}} and follow its instructions to triage
the Antithesis report at {{TRIAGE_URL}}. Investigate the logs of failing
property most likely to be a SUT bug. Pick any failing property if you aren't
sure. Do NOT explore or analyze any local source code repositories — only use
the report and downloaded logs to perform your triage.

Phase 3b: Incomplete or no-findings run

Spawn a general-purpose sub-agent with these instructions (substitute the actual URL and {{TRIAGE_SKILL}} with the absolute path to antithesis-triage/SKILL.md in this repository):

Read the skill file at {{TRIAGE_SKILL}} and follow its instructions to triage
the Antithesis run at {{TARGET_URL}}.

Wait for both sub-agents to complete.

Phase 4: Review and Report

Understanding the skill protocol

Before auditing the sub-agent traces, read the triage skill and its references so you can distinguish correct behavior from violations:

  1. Read antithesis-triage/SKILL.md — the main skill protocol
  2. Read antithesis-triage/references/error-reports.md — the error-report workflow (setup errors, runtime errors, how to download inline logs)
  3. Read antithesis-triage/references/logs.md — log analysis guidance
  4. Read antithesis-triage/references/properties.md — property triage workflow

Use these as the ground truth when evaluating compliance. If a sub-agent does something that looks unusual, check whether the skill documents it before flagging it as an issue.

Reading sub-agent session traces

The Agent tool returns an agentId for each sub-agent (visible in the result as agentId: <id>). Use the current session's ID and each agentId to read the raw JSONL session traces:

~/.claude/projects/<project-dir>/<session-id>/subagents/agent-<agentId>.jsonl

To find the current session directory:

ls -td ~/.claude/projects/*/$(basename $(ls -t ~/.claude/projects/*/*.jsonl | head -1 | xargs dirname))/ 2>/dev/null | head -1

Or more reliably, look for the most recently modified session directory that contains a subagents/ folder.

Extract all Bash tool calls from each sub-agent trace to see every command and its output:

jq -c 'select(.type == "assistant") | .message.content[]?
  | select(.type == "tool_use" and .name == "Bash") | .input.command' \
  <trace-file>.jsonl

Extract tool results to see command outputs:

jq -c 'select(.type == "user") | .message.content[]?
  | select(.type == "tool_result") | {tool_use_id, content: .content[:500]}' \
  <trace-file>.jsonl

This gives you the complete record of what each sub-agent did — every navigation, every runtime injection, every eval call, every error — without relying on their summaries.

What to look for

Scan the raw traces for issues in these categories:

Bugs — things that are broken:

  • Runtime method failures (unexpected errors from window.__antithesisTriage.*)
  • Navigation breakage (wrong page, redirect loops, auth failures)
  • JavaScript errors or missing methods
  • Data extraction failures (empty results when data exists, malformed JSON)
  • Script failures (download-logs.sh, process-logs.py)

Compliance violations — the sub-agent did not follow the skill protocol:

  • Missing runtime injection after navigation
  • Missing --session-name antithesis for cookie persistence
  • Missing networkidle wait before injecting the runtime
  • Missing waitForReady() before querying page data
  • Forgot to close browser session when done
  • Ran agent-browser calls in parallel

Inefficiencies — things that work but waste time or tokens:

  • Steps that required multiple retries (especially >2 retries for the same operation)
  • Unnecessary repeated navigations or runtime re-injections
  • Excessive screenshot-based debugging when eval methods exist
  • Commands that consistently fail before succeeding (indicates unclear instructions)

Output Format

Produce a concise report focused on actionable issues only. Do not include sections about what went well, generic suggestions, or broad recommendations. The goal is clear signal on breakage and inefficiency.

Test Summary

  • Tenant tested
  • Runs selected (names, status, findings counts)
  • Sub-agents spawned (include agentIds)
  • Any skipped phases and why

Issues

For each issue found, include:

  • Severity: Bug / Compliance / Inefficiency
  • Phase: Which phase the issue occurred in
  • Description: What happened
  • Evidence: Exact commands and outputs from the session trace (quote directly)
  • Fix: Concrete change to make (file + what to change)

Sort by severity (bugs first, then compliance, then inefficiency).

If no issues are found, report "No issues found" — do not pad the report.

平台分布

Codex

34.7%
按下载量换算87

Claude

32.06%
按下载量换算80

Cursor

17.24%
按下载量换算43

Gemini CLI

9.23%
按下载量换算23

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills