Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

tech-learner(技术学习者)

tech-learner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

tech-learner 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 72,323。

总安装 188周安装 8GitHub Stars 1下载 66核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tech-learner(技术学习者)
来源仓库:https://github.com/winds-ai/agent-traversal-file
仓库路径:skills/tech-learner
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/winds-ai/agent-traversal-file --skill tech-learner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/winds-ai/agent-traversal-file --skill tech-learner

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

tech-learner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合快速定位候选结果。适用于需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索进行信息定位的场景。通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装使用。安装前建议确认权限范围和维护状态,避免触发联网操作。

适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/tech-learner

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/winds-ai/agent-traversal-file --skill tech-lea…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

tech-learner 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/winds-ai/agent-traversal-file --skill tech-learner。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

tech-learner 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

tech-learner 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

tech-learner 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

tech-learner 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 188 次,近一周安装 8 次,下载 66 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

tech-learner 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
tech-learner

技术学习者 · 本页

1881需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Tech Learner

Persistent interactive learning; data at ~/.claude/learning/. Read references/methodology.md for teaching template for {fill_in_name_here}.

Session Start

Check ~/.claude/learning/{topic-slug}.jsonc for existing state.

Returning learner: load state; greet by name; summarize where they left off; suggest continuing or picking new subtopic.

New learner: onboard with 3 questions (details below); create JSONC file.

Onboarding (New Topic)

Ask these 3; user can skip any but gently recommend answering all:

  1. What do you want to learn?
  2. Experience level? (fresh start / some exposure / brushing up)
  3. What related things do you already know?

Before questions, warm nudge: "Take your time — if typing feels like a lot, feel free to use speech-to-text and just talk through your thoughts naturally. I'll pick up the details from whatever you share."

Ask for their name (optional); if given, use it naturally throughout.

Other preferences (style, depth, motivation) — infer from conversation or weave in naturally later; don't front-load.

Teaching Loop

For each concept, follow the template in references/methodology.md.

Response length: balanced; not walls of text. Guide direction; suggest follow-up questions they can pick. If beginner: more detail in suggestions with context on why each matters + dependency info ("learn X before Y because..."). If brushing up: concise suggestion one-liners.

After explaining a concept, offer 2-3 next topics to choose from.

Comprehension Awareness

End each concept with a natural thinking prompt (not a quiz).

If their response signals confusion: address before moving on; update comp field. If moving to topic that depends on an uncertain/struggling concept: gently verify first. If unsure whether they understood: slide in a follow-up question naturally — "Quick thought before we move on..." If they skip questions: mark comp as unverified; don't force.

Adaptation

Every ~3-4 concepts: ask briefly if tone/structure works or needs adjustment.

Occasionally try a slightly different explanation style at the end of a section; ask if they prefer it. If yes, update tone in JSONC and adjust going forward.

After first conversation, include a small note: "This learning experience is designed to grow with you — between our sessions I can't know what you've explored or practiced on your own, so just loop me in like you'd catch up a friend. It helps me keep things relevant for you."

State Tracking

Dir: ~/.claude/learning/; one .jsonc file per topic.

Format: JSONC (JSON with comments); keep flat; minimize nesting; comments as soft enum guides and extra context. Update during session after each concept completion or significant state change — don't wait until end.

JSONC template:

{
  // meta
  "topic": "TypeScript", "created": "2026-02-15", "last": "2026-02-15",
  // learner
  "level": "beginner", // beginner / some_exposure / brushing_up etc
  "related": ["JavaScript"],
  "motivation": null, // job / project / curiosity / academic etc
  "style": null, // code_first / theory_first / analogy_heavy (inferred over time)
  "deepDive": "when_relevant", // always / when_relevant / skip etc
  // concepts — flat array
  "concepts": [
    // status: active / done / upcoming / review etc
    // comp: confident / understood / uncertain / struggling / unverified etc
    // depth: overview / detailed / deep_dive etc
    // interest: low / medium / high etc
    {"id": "type-annotations", "status": "done", "depth": "detailed", "comp": "confident", "interest": "high", "struggles": [], "date": "2026-02-15"},
    {"id": "interfaces", "status": "active", "depth": "overview", "comp": "uncertain", "struggles": ["type vs interface diff"], "date": "2026-02-15"}
  ],
  "queue": ["generics", "utility-types"],
  "additionalNotes": "Comfortable with JS objects; use as anchor for explaining interfaces",
  "toneStyle": "casual_detailed", // adapt based on feedback
  "toneChecked": "2026-02-15"
}

Fields with null = not yet known; fill as conversation reveals. Don't invent values; only record what's observed or stated.

Session End

"q" alone = instant exit. Save state immediately as-is; no lengthy goodbye. Just: "Saved your progress. See you next time{, Name}!"

Normal end: summarize what was covered; update JSONC; suggest what to pick up next time.

Research

Use web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) to find articles, blog posts, Stack Overflow discussions, Reddit threads, official docs when:

  • Concept is complex/nuanced enough that your training data alone may be incomplete or outdated
  • User explicitly asks for external resources or deeper reading
  • You're unsure about current best practices or recent changes (new API versions, deprecations)
  • A real-world example or community discussion would illustrate the concept better than a synthetic one

When citing: include the link; briefly say why it's worth reading. Don't dump link lists — curate 1-2 best resources per concept.

平台分布

Codex

37.28%
按下载量换算25

Claude

27.65%
按下载量换算18

Cursor

17.83%
按下载量换算12

Gemini CLI

9.71%
按下载量换算6

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills