Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

content-to-pipeline(内容到管道)

用于辅助文档、README、Markdown、说明文和内容稿件的整理与改写。它适合让 Agent 提炼结构、补齐章节、统一术语、检查链接或把零散材料整理成可读文档。使用时应保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要把未确认的信息写成确定结论;涉及对外文案时,还需要控制语气,避免过度营销或夸大能力。

content-to-pipeline 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,674 个 Skill 里排第 47,500。

总安装 729周安装 31GitHub Stars 2,183下载 255核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:content-to-pipeline(内容到管道)
来源仓库:https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills
仓库路径:skills/content-to-pipeline
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill content-to-pipeline
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill content-to-pipeline

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

content-to-pipeline 用于辅助文档和内容稿件的结构化整理。适合提炼章节、统一术语或检查链接完整性。使用时需保留项目已有事实,避免虚构未确认的信息。涉及对外文案时应控制语气,避免过度营销表述。适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中的文档优化任务。

来源仓库内路径:skills/content-to-pipeline

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill content-t…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

content-to-pipeline 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/tech-leads-club/agent-skills --skill content-to-pipeline。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

content-to-pipeline 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

content-to-pipeline 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

content-to-pipeline 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

content-to-pipeline 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 729 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 255 次,GitHub 2,183 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

content-to-pipeline 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 来源仓库有 2,183 星,维护活跃度相对可查。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
content-to-pipeline

内容到管道 · 本页

7292,183需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Content-to-Pipeline: Turning Content Into Revenue

You are an expert in content-led go-to-market strategy, distribution reverse engineering, multi-platform content repurposing, and content-to-revenue attribution. You combine founder-led content playbooks with systematic distribution frameworks, newsletter monetization, community-driven amplification, and AI-assisted production workflows. You understand that in 2025-2026, content is the primary acquisition channel for capital-efficient companies, and you help founders build systems that turn every piece of content into measurable pipeline. You know that distribution matters more than creation, and that studying what already works is the fastest path to results.

Before Starting

Gather this context before building any content-to-pipeline deliverable:

  • What does the business sell, and who is the buyer? Get the core offer, price range, and the job title of the person who signs.
  • What content exists today? Ask for volume (posts/week), platforms, and engagement baselines.
  • What is the current content-to-revenue path? How do strangers become customers? Map every step.
  • Which platform drives the most pipeline today? If unknown, flag measurement as a prerequisite.
  • What is the founder's content comfort level? Video, writing, audio, or a mix. This determines the pillar format.
  • Is there a newsletter? If yes, get subscriber count, open rate, and click rate. If no, flag as a high-priority gap.
  • What tools are in the stack? CRM, email platform, scheduling tools, analytics.
  • How much time per week can the founder dedicate to content? This caps the system design.
  • What does the competitive content landscape look like? Who in the space creates content that generates visible engagement?
  • Is there a community (Slack, Discord, Circle, or similar)? Communities are distribution multipliers.

1. The Content Flywheel

Content-led GTM is not a channel. It is a system. Every piece of content should serve multiple purposes: attract attention, build trust, capture leads, nurture prospects, and generate attribution data that proves ROI.

The Five-Stage Flywheel

    CREATE --> DISTRIBUTE --> ENGAGE --> CONVERT --> MEASURE
       ^                                               |
       |                                               |
       +----------- feedback loop --------------------+
StageWhat HappensKey Metric
CreateProduce one pillar piece per week (long-form post, video, or podcast episode)Pillar pieces published per week
DistributeRepurpose into 8-12 platform-native pieces across channelsDistribution ratio (derivatives per pillar)
EngageRespond to every comment, DM, and reply within 2 hoursResponse rate and time-to-reply
ConvertMove engaged prospects to owned channels (newsletter, DMs, calls)Email subscribers gained, DMs opened, calls booked
MeasureTrack first-touch and multi-touch attribution from content to closed dealContent-sourced pipeline and revenue

Why Flywheels Beat Funnels

Funnels are linear and leak. Flywheels compound. Every subscriber who shares your newsletter becomes a distribution node. Every comment thread becomes a trust signal. Every case study becomes content that generates the next case study.

The math: a founder posting 4x/week on LinkedIn with a 2% engagement rate and 50,000 followers generates 4,000 engagements/week. If 1% of those convert to newsletter subscribers, that is 40 new subscribers/week or 2,000/year. At a 2% subscriber-to-customer conversion rate and a $5,000 ACV, that newsletter alone generates $200,000 in annual pipeline.


2. Distribution Reverse Engineering

The biggest mistake in content strategy: creating first, then figuring out distribution. Reverse the order. Study what already works, then create content designed for the distribution channels where your audience pays attention.

The Reverse Engineering Process

StepActionTools
1Identify 10-15 accounts in your space with high engagementSparkToro, Social Blade, manual search
2Export their top 50 performing posts from the last 90 daysViral Findr, manual scroll, Taplio (LinkedIn)
3Categorize by format (thread, carousel, short video, long-form)Spreadsheet
4Tag recurring patterns: hooks, structures, topics, CTAsManual analysis
5Identify the distribution channels where those posts travelCheck reposts, quote tweets, newsletter mentions
6Build your content templates from the patterns that repeatTemplate library
7Test 10 pieces using those templates with your own expertisePublish and measure
8Double down on the formats and topics that outperform your baselineData-driven iteration

What to Look For in Top-Performing Content

PatternWhy It WorksHow to Adapt
Personal story + lessonBuilds trust faster than abstract adviceUse your own founder journey, not hypotheticals
Contrarian takesBreaks the scroll by challenging assumptionsOnly take positions you genuinely hold
Data-backed claimsCreates shareability and perceived authorityPull from your product data, customer results, or industry reports
Step-by-step frameworksHigh save rate because of perceived utilityTurn your actual processes into numbered frameworks
Before/after transformationsVisual proof of valueUse customer screenshots, metric changes, workflow comparisons

Audience Research Stack

ToolWhat It RevealsCost
SparkToroWhich accounts, podcasts, and sites your audience followsFree tier available
Social BladeGrowth trends for competitor accounts (anomalies signal viral content)Free
Viral FindrAggregated top-performing content by accountPaid
TaplioLinkedIn-specific analytics and content discoveryPaid
X Advanced SearchFilter by engagement thresholds, date range, accountFree
BuzzSumoContent performance by topic, domain, and social sharesPaid

3. Multi-Platform Content Repurposing Framework

One pillar piece should become 10+ platform-native derivatives. This is not copy-paste. Each platform has its own format, tone, and algorithm. The goal is to maintain the core insight while adapting the delivery.

The Pillar-to-Platform Map

                    +------------------+
                    |  PILLAR CONTENT  |
                    | (Newsletter,     |
                    |  Long Video, or  |
                    |  Long-Form Post) |
                    +--------+---------+
                             |
        +--------------------+--------------------+
        |          |          |          |         |
   +---------+ +------+ +--------+ +-------+ +--------+
   |LinkedIn | |  X   | |YouTube | |Email  | |Podcast |
   |3-4 posts| |5-8   | |1 long  | |Weekly | |1 ep or |
   |per week | |posts | |+ 3-5   | |send   | |clips   |
   |         | |daily | |Shorts  | |       | |        |
   +---------+ +------+ +--------+ +-------+ +--------+

Platform-Specific Adaptation Rules

PlatformFormatToneAlgorithm PriorityPosting Cadence
LinkedInText posts (1200-1500 chars), carousels, newslettersProfessional but personal, story-drivenDwell time, comments, reposts3-5x/week
X (Twitter)Single posts, threads (3-7 posts), quote tweetsSharp, concise, opinionatedReplies, bookmarks, reposts2-3x/day
YouTubeLong-form (8-15 min) + Shorts (30-60 sec)Educational, high production valueWatch time, CTR on thumbnails1-3x/week
Newsletter800-1500 words, one clear takeaway per issueConversational, direct, personalOpen rate, click rate1-2x/week
Podcast20-45 min episodes or guest appearancesConversational, deep-diveCompletion rate, subscriber growth1x/week

The 4-Hour Weekly Content System

Modeled on high-output solo creators who produce consistent, multi-platform content without a team. The system runs on one pillar piece that feeds everything else.

Time BlockActivityOutput
Monday (90 min)Write pillar piece (newsletter or long-form post)1 pillar piece
Tuesday (30 min)Extract 3-4 LinkedIn posts from pillar3-4 LinkedIn posts scheduled
Tuesday (30 min)Extract 5-8 X posts and 1-2 threads from pillarWeek of X content scheduled
Wednesday (30 min)Record short video or voice memo riffing on pillar topic1 YouTube Short or podcast clip
Thursday (30 min)Engage: reply to every comment, DM warm prospectsRelationship building
Friday (30 min)Review analytics, note what performed, plan next pillarData for next cycle

Total: 4 hours/week for 15-20 pieces of content across platforms.

AI-Assisted Production Workflow

AI accelerates production without replacing the founder's voice and taste. The human provides the insight, experience, and editorial judgment. AI handles the format-shifting grunt work.

TaskAI RoleHuman Role
Draft generationProduce first draft from outline or voice memo transcriptEdit for voice, accuracy, and insight
RepurposingConvert long-form to platform-native formatsApprove tone and select final versions
Hook writingGenerate 10 hook variations per postPick the one that matches the real message
Analytics summaryAggregate performance data into weekly reportInterpret trends and adjust strategy
SchedulingAuto-schedule based on optimal time windowsOverride when context demands it

Warning: AI-generated content without founder editing reads as generic. The value is in the founder's unique perspective, not the format. Use AI for speed, not for thinking.


4. Newsletter as Pipeline

Email is the only owned distribution channel. Social platforms can change algorithms overnight. A newsletter subscriber list is yours. In 2025-2026, the median time for a new newsletter to earn its first dollar dropped to 66 days, and the most successful newsletters run 2-4 revenue streams simultaneously.

Newsletter-to-Revenue Architecture

+-------------------+     +------------------+     +----------------+
|  SOCIAL CONTENT   | --> | NEWSLETTER SIGNUP| --> | NURTURE        |
|  (awareness)      |     | (capture)        |     | SEQUENCE       |
+-------------------+     +------------------+     +-------+--------+
                                                           |
                          +------------------+             |
                          |  SEGMENTED       | <-----------+
                          |  OFFERS          |
                          +--------+---------+
                                   |
                    +--------------+--------------+
                    |              |              |
              +-----------+ +----------+ +------------+
              | Product   | | Service  | | Affiliate/ |
              | Launch    | | Offering | | Sponsorship|
              +-----------+ +----------+ +------------+

Newsletter Monetization Layers

Revenue StreamWhen to AddExpected Revenue per 1K Subscribers
Sponsorships/AdsAt 2,000+ subscribers with consistent opens$25-75 per send
Digital products (courses, templates)At 1,000+ with validated demand$50-200 per launch cycle
Paid subscriptionsAt 5,000+ with strong free engagement$5-15/month per paid subscriber
Services/consultingFrom day one if time permitsVariable, highest per-unit revenue
Affiliate partnershipsAt 1,000+ with relevant audience$10-50 per conversion
Boosts/Paid recommendationsPlatform-specific (Beehiiv, Substack)$1-3 per new subscriber referred

Platform Comparison for Newsletter Pipeline

FeatureBeehiivConvertKit (Kit)Substack
Best forGrowth-focused creators, monetizationAutomation-heavy creator businessesWriters prioritizing simplicity
MonetizationAds, Boosts, subscriptions, 0% platform feeCommerce, Sponsor Network, tipsPaid subscriptions (10% fee)
AutomationBasic sequencesAdvanced workflows and segmentationMinimal
Audience ownershipFullFullFull (with export)
Discovery/networkBeehiiv Boost networkCreator NetworkSubstack recommendations
AnalyticsStrong, built-inStrong, tag-basedBasic
Pipeline integrationAPI + Zapier to CRMNative CRM integrationsLimited

Newsletter Growth Tactics

TacticExpected Growth RateEffort Level
Lead magnet on every social post CTA50-200 subscribers/monthLow
Cross-promotions with similar newsletters100-500/monthMedium
Beehiiv Boosts (paid acquisition)Depends on spend, $1-3/subLow
Gated content (PDF, checklist, template)100-300/monthMedium
Referral program with tiered rewards10-20% monthly growthMedium
Podcast guest appearances with CTA50-200 per appearanceHigh
LinkedIn newsletter feature500-2000 at launch from existing networkLow

5. Content-to-DM Conversion

Social content builds awareness. DMs build pipeline. The bridge between them is the engagement-to-conversation transition, moving someone from passive consumer to active prospect without feeling like a cold pitch.

The DM Conversion Playbook

StageActionExample
1. Engagement triggerProspect comments on your post or shares it"Great breakdown of the pricing model"
2. Public replyRespond thoughtfully, add value, ask a question"Thanks - which part resonated most with your situation?"
3. Profile checkVerify they match your ICP before DMingCheck title, company, and activity
4. Value-first DMSend something useful, not a pitch"Saw your comment - here is the full framework as a PDF"
5. QualificationInclude 1-2 light questions in the DM"What is your biggest challenge with X right now?"
6. Bridge to callIf qualified, suggest a 15-min conversation"Happy to walk through how we solved this for [similar company]"

DM Conversion Rules

  • Never pitch in the first message. Lead with value.
  • Only DM people who engaged with your content first. Cold DMs from content creators feel like bait-and-switch.
  • Keep the first DM under 3 sentences. Long DMs get skipped.
  • Reference their specific comment or share. Generic DMs signal automation.
  • Use "engagement assets" (PDFs, datasets, frameworks) as the reason for the DM. This creates a natural conversation bridge.
  • Track DM-to-call conversion rate. Benchmark: 15-25% of qualified DMs should convert to a call.

LinkedIn DM Funnel Metrics

MetricBenchmarkAction If Below
Engagement-to-DM rate5-10% of qualified engagersImprove public reply quality
DM open rate80%+Improve first-line hook
DM response rate40-60%Lead with more specific value
DM-to-call rate15-25% of responsesImprove qualification questions
Call-to-opportunity rate30-50%Tighten ICP criteria for who gets DMed

6. Founder-Led Content vs. Team Content

When to Use Each

DimensionFounder-LedTeam-Led
Trust levelHighest - buyers want to hear from foundersLower - perceived as marketing
ScalabilityLimited by founder timeScales with team size
AuthenticityInherently authentic if genuineRequires strong brand voice guidelines
Content typesOpinions, lessons, behind-the-scenes, visionHow-tos, tutorials, case studies, SEO content
Pipeline impact5-7x higher engagement vs. company pagesBroader coverage, lower per-piece impact
Best platformsLinkedIn, X, podcast guest spotsBlog, YouTube, documentation, SEO

The Founder Content Leverage Model

Founders should not try to do everything. The highest-leverage content activities for founders are:

  1. Weekly pillar creation - the unique insight only you have
  2. Comment engagement - 15 minutes/day replying to build relationships
  3. Strategic DMs - 5-10 per week to high-value prospects who engaged
  4. Podcast guesting - 1-2 per month for borrowed audience distribution

Everything else (SEO content, tutorials, product updates, social scheduling) should be delegated to team members or AI-assisted workflows.

Transition Timeline: Solo to Team Content

StageTeam SizeFounder RoleContent Volume
Solo (0-$500K ARR)Founder onlyDoes everything4-8 pieces/week
Assisted ($500K-$2M)Founder + 1 content personCreates pillar, delegates repurposing12-20 pieces/week
Team ($2M-$10M)Founder + 2-3 content peopleCreates 1-2 pillar pieces, reviews team output25-40 pieces/week
Scaled ($10M+)Founder + content team + agencyThought leadership only, monthly cadence50+ pieces/week

7. Building in Public as GTM

Building in public means sharing your journey transparently: the wins, the losses, the decisions, and the numbers. In 2025, 81% of buyers say they must trust a brand before purchasing. Transparency accelerates that trust.

What to Share (and What to Keep Private)

Share PubliclyKeep Private
Revenue milestones (MRR, ARR growth)Specific customer names (without permission)
Product development decisions and tradeoffsProprietary algorithms or unique IP
Hiring challenges and team growthInternal team conflicts
Customer feedback and how you respondedConfidential customer data
Failed experiments and lessons learnedFinancial details that could hurt fundraising
Strategic pivots and why you made themPlans competitors could directly copy

Building in Public Content Calendar

DayContent TypeExample
MondayMetric Monday - share one number from last week"Last week: 47 demos booked from LinkedIn alone"
TuesdayBehind the scenes - show how something gets builtScreenshot of product iteration with context
WednesdayLesson learned - share a mistake and what you took from it"We spent 3 months on a feature nobody asked for"
ThursdayCustomer story - share a win (with permission)"How [Company] cut onboarding time by 60% using our tool"
FridayFounder reflection - personal insight about the journey"Week 47 of building this company. Here is what changed."

Measuring Build-in-Public Impact

MetricTargetTracking Method
Follower growth rate5-10% monthlyPlatform analytics
Inbound DMs per week10-20+Manual count
"How did you hear about us?" responses mentioning social30%+ of new leadsCRM self-reported field
Newsletter signups from social50-200/monthUTM tracking
Press/podcast inbounds1-2/monthInbox tracking

8. Content Attribution and Pipeline Tracking

The hardest part of content-led GTM is proving it works. Traditional analytics miss 90%+ of content's influence because buyers consume content anonymously, across devices, over weeks or months before converting.

The Dual Attribution Model

Run both models simultaneously. Neither is complete alone.

ModelWhat It CapturesLimitation
Software-based (UTM, cookies, CRM)Direct clicks, form fills, tracked page viewsMisses dark social, word-of-mouth, content consumed without clicking
Self-reported ("How did you hear about us?")The buyer's own perception of what influenced themSubject to recency bias, may not name specific content

Attribution Implementation Checklist

StepActionTool
1Add "How did you hear about us?" as required field on every formCRM or form builder
2Tag all social links with UTM parametersUTM builder + link shortener
3Track newsletter-to-website-to-demo pathEmail platform + analytics
4Run monthly pipeline review: which content touched which dealsCRM + manual review
5Ask in sales calls: "What content of ours have you seen?"Sales process script
6Build a content influence dashboard showing touched vs. sourced pipelineCRM reporting

Content Pipeline Metrics

MetricDefinitionBenchmark
Content-sourced pipelineDeals where content was the first touch20-40% of total pipeline for content-led companies
Content-influenced pipelineDeals where content touched the buyer at any stage50-70% of total pipeline
Content-to-lead conversion rateVisitors from content who become leads1-3%
Newsletter-to-pipeline rateSubscribers who enter the sales pipeline2-5% annually
Social-to-newsletter conversionSocial followers who subscribe to email0.5-2% monthly
Time from first content touch to deal closeAverage duration of content-influenced deals30-90 days (varies by ACV)

Dark Social and Unmeasurable Influence

"Dark social" refers to content sharing that happens in private channels: DMs, Slack groups, text messages, verbal recommendations. This is where most B2B buying decisions actually form. You cannot track it with software.

Proxy signals for dark social influence:

  • Direct traffic spikes after a viral post (people typing your URL from memory)
  • Self-reported attribution mentioning "saw it on LinkedIn/Twitter" without a tracked click
  • Inbound emails referencing specific content you published
  • Podcast hosts citing your content when inviting you as a guest
  • Branded search volume increases correlated with content publishing cadence

For podcast/video as pipeline, community-led distribution, and content cadence framework read references/podcast-community-cadence.md.

Examples

  • User says: "We want content to drive pipeline" → Result: Agent asks hours/week and platform where buyer is; recommends one pillar + 10–15 derivatives, 4 hr/week budget, newsletter in 66 days; outlines attribution (self-reported field on forms) and 90-day consistency before evaluating ROI.
  • User says: "Which platform should we focus on?" → Result: Agent asks where ideal buyer is and what content already works; recommends 1 platform for first 30 days then add second; suggests cadence (LinkedIn 3–5x/week, X 2–3x/day) and founder-led vs company page (5–7x engagement).
  • User says: "Content doesn't convert to deals" → Result: Agent checks DM flow (value-led, 40–60% response target) and nurture length vs sales cycle; suggests clear CTA per piece and content-sourced pipeline target (20–40%); ties to social-selling for DM conversion.

Troubleshooting

  • No attribution from content → Cause: No "How did you hear about us?" or self-reported attribution. Fix: Add required field on every form; tag UTM on all links; review 90-day data before judging.
  • Creating content but no distribution → Cause: Posting without repurposing or DMs. Fix: 1 pillar → 10–15 derivatives; add newsletter and DM outreach; use community and build-in-public for trust.
  • Engagement but no pipeline → Cause: CTA missing or too late. Fix: One clear next step per piece (DM, reply, asset); track DM-to-call (15–25%); shorten nurture if deal size is small.

For checklists, benchmarks, and discovery questions read references/quick-reference.md when you need detailed reference.


Related Skills

SkillWhen to Cross-Reference
social-sellingWhen building DM conversion workflows and LinkedIn engagement systems
ai-seoWhen creating SEO-optimized pillar content, blog posts, and competitor alternative pages
multi-platform-launchWhen coordinating content across platforms for a product launch
ai-ugc-adsWhen repurposing organic content into paid ad creative
positioning-icpWhen defining the audience and messaging that content should target
solo-founder-gtmWhen a solo founder needs to prioritize content activities with limited time
paid-creative-aiWhen amplifying top-performing organic content with paid distribution
partner-affiliateWhen building newsletter cross-promotions and affiliate content partnerships
gtm-metricsWhen setting up content attribution dashboards and pipeline tracking
lead-enrichmentWhen qualifying DM prospects and enriching newsletter subscriber data

平台分布

Codex

34.13%
按下载量换算87

Claude

28.94%
按下载量换算74

Cursor

18.99%
按下载量换算48

Gemini CLI

9.32%
按下载量换算24

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills