Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

tech-debt-scanner(科技债务扫描仪)

tech-debt-scanner 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

tech-debt-scanner 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 37,787。

总安装 1,670周安装 71GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 585核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.0.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tech-debt-scanner(科技债务扫描仪)
来源仓库:https://github.com/charlie-morrison/tech-debt-scanner
安装命令:
openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

扫描代码库中的 TODO/FIXME 注释与弃用 API,识别复杂度热点与测试缺失。适用于技术债务发现与重构优先级排序场景。输出包含问题类型、位置与修复建议的清单。安装命令:openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner;需指定扫描目录与语言类型。

注意:涉及私有仓库时应确认 token 权限与访问范围。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

tech-debt-scanner 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install tech-debt-scanner。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

tech-debt-scanner 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

tech-debt-scanner 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

tech-debt-scanner 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

tech-debt-scanner 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,670 次,近一周安装 71 次,下载 585 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

tech-debt-scanner 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
tech-debt-scanner

科技债务扫描仪 · 本页

1,670—需要联网MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
tech-debt-scanner
description
Scan codebases for technical debt — TODO/FIXME comments, deprecated APIs, complexity hotspots, outdated patterns, missing tests, large files — then prioritize with AI reasoning and generate remediation plans.

Tech Debt Scanner

Find, categorize, and prioritize technical debt in any codebase. Produces an actionable report with effort estimates, risk scores, and remediation suggestions — not just a list of problems.

Use when: "scan for tech debt", "find code smells", "audit code quality", "what should we refactor first", "technical debt report", or before sprint planning to identify cleanup candidates.

Commands

1. scan — Full Tech Debt Audit

Run all detectors and produce a prioritized report.

Step 1: Detect TODO/FIXME/HACK Comments
# Find all debt markers with context
rg -n "TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX|TEMP|WORKAROUND|DEPRECATED|NOCOMMIT" \
  --type-not binary \
  -g '!node_modules' -g '!vendor' -g '!dist' -g '!build' -g '!.git' \
  --stats 2>&1

Categorize each hit:

  • TODO: Feature incomplete — low risk, track in backlog
  • FIXME: Known bug — medium risk, prioritize
  • HACK/WORKAROUND: Fragile code — high risk, refactor soon
  • DEPRECATED: API sunset — high risk if external dependency
  • NOCOMMIT: Should never have been merged — critical

Count totals per category. Flag any older than 6 months (check git blame):

# Age of oldest TODO/FIXME (sample first 10)
rg -l "TODO|FIXME|HACK" -g '!node_modules' -g '!vendor' | head -10 | while read f; do
  echo "=== $f ==="
  git log -1 --format="%ai %an" -- "$f" 2>/dev/null
done
Step 2: Detect Complexity Hotspots
# Largest source files (often the most complex)
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" -o -name "*.rs" -o -name "*.java" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/vendor/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' -not -path '*/.git/*' \
  -exec wc -l {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -rn | head -20

# Functions with high nesting (proxy for cyclomatic complexity)
rg -n "^\s{12,}(if|for|while|switch|case|catch)" \
  --type-not binary \
  -g '!node_modules' -g '!vendor' -g '!dist' \
  --stats 2>&1 | tail -5

Flag files >500 lines as candidates for splitting. Flag functions with >4 levels of nesting as complexity hotspots.

Step 3: Detect Outdated Patterns
# JavaScript/TypeScript: var usage (should be let/const)
rg -c "^\s*var\s+" -g '*.{js,ts,jsx,tsx}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null | sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# JavaScript: callback hell (nested callbacks)
rg -c "function\s*\(" -g '*.{js,ts}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null | sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# Python: old-style string formatting
rg -c '% ["\'(]' -g '*.py' -g '!vendor' 2>/dev/null | sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# Python: bare except
rg -n "except:" -g '*.py' -g '!vendor' 2>/dev/null

# Deprecated React patterns
rg -n "componentWillMount|componentWillReceiveProps|componentWillUpdate|React\.createClass|mixins\s*:" \
  -g '*.{jsx,tsx,js,ts}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null
Step 4: Detect Missing or Weak Tests
# Test file ratio
SRC_COUNT=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.go" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/vendor/*' -not -path '*/test*' -not -path '*/__test*' \
  -not -path '*/*.test.*' -not -path '*/*.spec.*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | wc -l)
TEST_COUNT=$(find . -type f \( -name "*.test.*" -o -name "*.spec.*" -o -name "test_*" -o -name "*_test.*" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' | wc -l)
echo "Source files: $SRC_COUNT, Test files: $TEST_COUNT, Ratio: $(echo "scale=1; $TEST_COUNT * 100 / ($SRC_COUNT + 1)" | bc)%"

# Source files with no corresponding test
find . -type f -name "*.ts" -not -name "*.test.*" -not -name "*.spec.*" \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | while read f; do
  BASE=$(basename "$f" .ts)
  if ! find . -type f \( -name "${BASE}.test.ts" -o -name "${BASE}.spec.ts" -o -name "test_${BASE}*" \) \
    -not -path '*/node_modules/*' 2>/dev/null | grep -q .; then
    echo "NO TEST: $f"
  fi
done | head -20
Step 5: Detect Dependency Issues
# Node.js: outdated dependencies
npm outdated 2>/dev/null || true
# Check for deprecated packages in package.json
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | python3 -c "
import json, sys
try:
    d = json.load(sys.stdin)
    deps = {**d.get('dependencies',{}), **d.get('devDependencies',{})}
    deprecated = ['request', 'node-uuid', 'nomnom', 'optimist', 'jade', 'istanbul', 'coffee-script', 'bower', 'grunt']
    for pkg in deprecated:
        if pkg in deps:
            print(f'DEPRECATED: {pkg}@{deps[pkg]}')
except: pass
"

# Python: check requirements age
cat requirements.txt 2>/dev/null | head -30
pip list --outdated 2>/dev/null | head -20

# Go: check go.sum for old versions
cat go.sum 2>/dev/null | wc -l
Step 6: Detect Code Duplication Indicators
# Find suspiciously similar file names (copy-paste indicators)
find . -type f -name "*.ts" -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' | \
  xargs -I{} basename {} | sort | uniq -d

# Find repeated import patterns (same large import block = shared code candidate)
rg -c "^import" -g '*.{ts,js,tsx,jsx}' -g '!node_modules' 2>/dev/null | \
  sort -t: -k2 -rn | head -10

# Find files with very similar line counts (heuristic for copies)
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" \) \
  -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/dist/*' \
  -exec wc -l {} + 2>/dev/null | sort -n | awk '{print $1}' | uniq -d | head -5
Step 7: Generate Report

Analyze all findings with AI reasoning. For each debt item, assess:

  • Risk: How likely is this to cause bugs, outages, or slow development?
  • Effort: T-shirt size (XS/S/M/L/XL) to fix
  • Impact: What improves when fixed? (velocity, reliability, onboarding, security)

Produce a prioritized report:

# Tech Debt Report — [project name]
Generated: [date]

## Summary
- Total debt items: N
- Critical (fix now): N
- High (next sprint): N
- Medium (backlog): N
- Low (opportunistic): N

## Critical Items
1. [item] — Risk: critical | Effort: S | Impact: ...
   **Why:** [AI reasoning about the risk]
   **Fix:** [specific remediation steps]

## High Priority Items
...

## Metrics
- TODO/FIXME count: N (N are >6 months old)
- Test coverage ratio: N%
- Files >500 lines: N
- Deprecated dependencies: N
- Code duplication indicators: N hotspots

2. hotspots — Complexity Hotspot Map

Run Steps 2 and 6 only. Output the top 10 files that are:

  • Largest by line count
  • Most frequently changed (git churn)
  • Most complex (deep nesting)
# Git churn — most frequently modified files in last 90 days
git log --since="90 days ago" --name-only --pretty=format: 2>/dev/null | \
  grep -v '^$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn | head -20

Cross-reference size × churn × nesting to find the "burning" hotspots — large, complex files that change often are the highest-ROI refactoring targets.

3. todos — TODO/FIXME Audit

Run Step 1 only. Group by file, show git blame age for each, flag ancient ones.

Output format:

[CRITICAL] path/to/file.ts:42 — HACK: workaround for API bug (author, 2024-03-15)
[MEDIUM]   path/to/file.ts:87 — TODO: add validation (author, 2025-11-02)
[LOW]      path/to/other.py:12 — TODO: optimize later (author, 2026-04-01)

4. deps — Dependency Health

Run Step 5 only. Show:

  • Outdated packages with how far behind they are (major/minor/patch)
  • Known deprecated packages
  • Packages with known vulnerabilities (npm audit / pip-audit if available)

5. tests — Test Coverage Gaps

Run Step 4 only. List source files without corresponding tests, sorted by:

  1. Size (larger untested files = higher risk)
  2. Git churn (frequently changed untested files = highest risk)

Output Formats

  • text (default): Human-readable report with sections and bullet points
  • json: Machine-readable for CI/CD integration, structured as {summary, items: [{category, severity, file, line, message, effort, fix}]}
  • markdown: Formatted report suitable for PR comments or wiki pages

CI Integration

Exit codes:

  • 0: No critical or high debt items
  • 1: Critical items found (fail the build)
  • 2: High items exceed threshold

Use with --max-critical 0 --max-high 10 to set thresholds.

Notes

  • Adapts detectors to the project's language (auto-detected from file extensions and config files)
  • Git history required for churn and age analysis — works without git but reports are less useful
  • Does not execute code or install dependencies — static analysis only
  • Large monorepos: pass a subdirectory to scope the scan

平台分布

OpenClaw

87.49%
按下载量换算512

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills