Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

tdd:write-tests(TDD 编写测试)

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。它适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免为了通过测试而改坏真实逻辑;涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。

tdd:write-tests 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 10,984。

总安装 11,856周安装 475GitHub Stars 891下载 3,838核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:tdd:write-tests(TDD 编写测试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit
仓库路径:skills/tdd:write-tests
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill tdd:write-tests
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill tdd:write-tests

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于辅助测试设计、自动化测试、用例整理和回归验证。适合让 Agent 编写单元测试、端到端测试、测试计划或根据失败日志定位问题。使用时需要确认项目测试框架、运行命令和夹具数据,避免改坏真实逻辑。涉及浏览器或外部服务时,应区分本地模拟、测试环境和生产环境。当前无额外底部简介,可参考来源仓库获取完整功能说明。

来源仓库内路径:skills/tdd:write-tests

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill tdd:w…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

tdd:write-tests 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/neolabhq/context-engineering-kit --skill tdd:write-tests。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

tdd:write-tests 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

tdd:write-tests 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

tdd:write-tests 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

tdd:write-tests 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 11,856 次,近一周安装 475 次,下载 3,838 次,GitHub 891 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

tdd:write-tests 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
tdd:write-tests

TDD 编写测试 · 本页

11,856891只读未明确未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Cover Local Changes with Tests

User Arguments

User can provide a what tests or modules to focus on:

$ARGUMENTS

If nothing is provided, focus on all changes in current git diff that not commited. If everything is commited, then will cover latest commit.

Context

After implementing new features or refactoring existing code, it's critical to ensure all business logic changes are covered by tests. This command orchestrates automated test creation for local changes using coverage analysis and specialized agents.

Goal

Achieve comprehensive test coverage for all critical business logic in local code changes.

Important Constraints

  • Focus on critical business logic - not every line needs 100% coverage
  • Preserve existing tests - only add new tests, don't modify existing ones
  • "Analyse complexity of changes" -

- if there 2 or more changed files, or one file with complex logic, then Do not write tests yourself - only orchestrate agents! - if there is only one changed file, and it's a simple change, then you can write tests yourself.

Workflow Steps

Preparation

  1. Read sadd skill if available

- If available, read the sadd skill to understand best practices for managing agents

  1. Discover test infrastructure

- Read @README.md and package.json (or equivalent project config) - Identify commands to run tests and coverage reports - Understand project structure and testing conventions

  1. Run all tests

- Execute full test suite to establish baseline

Analysis

Do steps 4-5 in parallel using haiku agents:

  1. Verify single test execution

- Choose any passing test file - Launch haiku agent with instructions to find proper command to run this only test file - Ask him to iterate until you can reliably run individual tests - After he complete try running a specific test file if it exists - This ensures agents can run tests in isolation

  1. Analyze local changes

- Run git status -u to identify all changed files (including untracked files) - If there no uncommited changes, then run git show --name-status to get the list of files that were changed in the latest commit. - Filter out non-code files (docs, configs, etc.) - Launch separate haikue agent per changed file to analyze file itself, and the complexity of the changes, and prepare short summary of it. - Extract list of files with actual logic changes

Test Writing

Simple Single File Flow

If there is only one changed file, and it's a simple change, then you can write tests yourself. Following this guidline:

  1. Read TDD skill for best practices on writing tests
  2. Read the target file {FILE_PATH} and understand the logic
  3. Review existing test files for patterns and style, if not exists then create it.
  4. Analyse which tests cases should be added to cover the changes.
  5. Create comprehensive tests for all identified cases
  6. Run the test command identified before.
  7. Iterate and fix any issues until all tests pass

Ensure tests are:

  • Clear and maintainable
  • Follow project conventions
  • Test behavior, not implementation
  • Cover edge cases and error paths
Multiple Files or Complex File Flow

If there are multiple changed files, or one file with complex logic, then you need to use specialized agents to cover the changes. Following this guidline:

  1. Launch code-review:test-coverage-reviewer agents (parallel) (Sonnet or Opus models)

- Launch one coverage-reviewer agent per changed file - Provide each agent with: - Context: What changed in this file (git diff) - Target: Which specific file to analyze - Resources: Read README and relevant documentation - Goal: Identify what test suites need to be added - Output: List of test cases needed for critical business logic - Collect all coverage review reports

  1. Launch developer agents for test file (parallel) (Sonnet or Opus models)

- Launch one developer agent per changed file that needs tests - Provide each agent with: - Context: Coverage review report for this file - Target: Which specific file to create tests for - Test cases: List from coverage-reviewer agent - Guidance: Read TDD skill (if available) for best practices on writing tests. - Resources: Read README and test examples - Command: How to run tests for this file - Goal: Create comprehensive tests for all identified cases - Constraint: Add new tests, don't modify existing logic (unless clearly broken)

  1. Verify coverage (iteration) (Sonnet or Opus models)

- Launch code-review:test-coverage-reviewer agents again per file - Provide: - Context: Original changes + new tests added - Goal: Verify all critical business logic is covered - Output: Confirmation or list of missing coverage

  1. Iterate if needed
  • If any files still lack coverage: Return to step 5
  • Launch new developer agents only for files with gaps
  • Provide specific instructions on what's still missing
  • Continue until all critical business logic is covered
  1. Final verification
  • Run full test suite to ensure all tests pass
  • Generate coverage report if available
  • Verify no regressions in existing tests

Success Criteria

  • All critical business logic in changed files has test coverage ✅
  • All tests pass (new and existing) ✅
  • Test quality verified by coverage-reviewer agents ✅

Agent Instructions Templates

Coverage Review Agent (Initial Analysis)

Analyze the file {FILE_PATH} for test coverage needs.

Context: This file was modified in local changes:
{GIT_DIFF_OUTPUT}

Your task:
1. Read the changed file and understand the business logic
2. Identify all critical code paths that need testing:
   - New functions/methods added
   - Modified business logic
   - Edge cases and error handling
   - Integration points
3. Review existing tests (if any) to avoid duplication
4. Create a list of test cases needed, prioritized by importance:
   - CRITICAL: Core business logic, data mutations
   - IMPORTANT: Error handling, validations
   - NICE_TO_HAVE: Edge cases, performance

Output format:
- List of test cases with descriptions
- Priority level for each
- Suggested test file location

Developer Agent (Test Creation)

Create tests for file {FILE_PATH} based on coverage analysis.

Coverage review identified these test cases:
{TEST_CASES_LIST}

Your task:
1. Read TDD skill (if available) for best practices on writing tests
2. Read @README.md for project context and testing conventions
3. Read the target file {FILE_PATH} and understand the logic
4. Review existing test files for patterns and style
5. Create comprehensive tests for all identified cases
6. Run the tests: {TEST_COMMAND}
7. Iterate until all tests pass
8. Ensure tests are:
   - Clear and maintainable
   - Follow project conventions
   - Test behavior, not implementation
   - Cover edge cases and error paths

Test command: {TEST_COMMAND}

Coverage Review Agent (Verification)

Verify test coverage for file {FILE_PATH}.

Context: Tests were added to cover local changes in this file.

Your task:
1. Read the changed file {FILE_PATH}
2. Read the new test file(s) created
3. Verify all critical business logic is covered:
   - All new functions have tests
   - All modified logic has tests
   - Edge cases are tested
   - Error handling is tested
4. Identify any gaps in coverage
5. Confirm test quality (clear, maintainable, follows TDD principles)

Output:
- PASS: All critical business logic is covered ✅
- GAPS: List specific missing test cases that need to be added

平台分布

Codex

36.81%
按下载量换算1,413

Claude

31.42%
按下载量换算1,206

Cursor

17.09%
按下载量换算656

Gemini CLI

8.45%
按下载量换算324

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills