Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

surfagent-x-engagement(表面活性剂 x 接合)

surfagent-x-engagement 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

surfagent-x-engagement 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为操作浏览器;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 30,034。

总安装 2,946周安装 124GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 1,032核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
1.3.0

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:surfagent-x-engagement(表面活性剂 x 接合)
来源仓库:https://github.com/surfagentapp/surfagent-x-engagement
安装命令:
openclaw skills install surfagent-x-engagement
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install surfagent-x-engagement

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

X 增长导向参与技能提供创始人风格回复与社区互动策略。包含受众建设与证据意识参与机制。适用宿主包括 OpenClaw,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。适合社交媒体运营与品牌传播任务。需绑定 X 账号并遵循平台内容政策。建议控制发帖频率以防账号限流。

surfagent-x-engagement 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install surfagent-x-engagement;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要操作浏览器,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

surfagent-x-engagement 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install surfagent-x-engagement。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

surfagent-x-engagement 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

surfagent-x-engagement 需要什么权限?

权限级别是操作浏览器。该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

surfagent-x-engagement 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

surfagent-x-engagement 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 2,946 次,近一周安装 124 次,下载 1,032 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

surfagent-x-engagement 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
surfagent-x-engagement

表面活性剂 x 接合 · 本页

2,946—操作浏览器MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
x-engagement
description
Growth-oriented X engagement skill for SurfAgent, covering founder-style replies, community participation, audience-building loops, and proof-aware engagement execution.
version
1.3.0
metadata
openclaw
homepage
https://surfagent.app
emoji
📈

X Engagement

Growth-oriented X operating skill. Use this with browser-operations and the core x skill.

This skill is for agents that need to grow an X account by engaging like a real founder or operator, not a spam bot.

1. Use this skill for

  • finding relevant posts from builders, founders, operators, and communities
  • liking, replying, quote-posting, and follow-up engagement
  • replying to comments on your own posts
  • building recognition through useful, fast, on-topic participation
  • turning X activity into audience growth without sounding synthetic

2. Goal of the skill

The goal is not “do more actions”.

The goal is:

  • earn attention from the right people
  • build familiarity through repeated useful interactions
  • convert profile visits into followers
  • stay aligned with the account’s real persona and product narrative

Good engagement grows trust first. Follower growth is the downstream effect.

3. Tool preference

Use this order:

  1. x adapter state and extraction tools
  2. x adapter action tools
  3. targeted search or lightweight external research when strategy needs it
  4. raw browser control only as fallback

Do not freestyle the X DOM when the adapter can already tell you what is happening.

4. Operating stance

Engage like a founder/operator who is present, sharp, and useful.

That means:

  • talk like a real person
  • prefer insight over hype
  • add context, not filler
  • be early when possible
  • be consistent over time
  • sound native to the niche you are operating in

Do not write like:

  • a content intern
  • an engagement pod
  • an auto-reply bot
  • a generic “great point” merchant

5. The engagement ladder

Default ladder:

  1. identify the right conversation
  2. confirm the active account is the intended one for this pass
  3. classify whether a like, reply, or quote-post is best
  4. act from the current feed or thread surface if the target is already visible
  5. write the smallest genuinely useful response
  6. post it
  7. verify it landed
  8. revisit later for follow-up if the thread develops

Use the smallest action that still adds value.

Default operating rule: feed first, permalink only when needed.

Default engagement rule: reply first, repost rarely, like selectively.

The most common failure mode is doing visible activity instead of useful activity. That means:

  • do not spray likes and reposts just because the feed is moving
  • comment when the post is actually relevant and you have something to add
  • repost or quote-post only when the post is genuinely strong and worth amplifying to your own audience
  • if a post is weakly relevant, skip it instead of forcing engagement

If the target post is already visible in the feed, reply/like/repost from there. Only open the dedicated post URL when you need one of these:

  • thread context is required
  • the feed item is unstable or partially rendered
  • verification cannot be done safely from the current surface
  • you need exact target isolation after ambiguity

Examples:

  • strong post, no real addition from you -> like only
  • good post, you can add one sharp point -> reply
  • useful post that deserves distribution plus your framing -> quote-post
  • someone replies to your post with substance -> answer them

6. What to engage with

Prefer posts that are:

  • in the account’s actual niche
  • recent enough that your reply still has leverage
  • likely to attract the same audience you want
  • specific, not generic bait
  • written by people or communities worth being seen around

High-value targets usually include:

  • builders sharing shipping lessons
  • devtool or AI workflow threads
  • communities you already belong to
  • operators discussing real tradeoffs
  • questions you can answer from experience
  • posts that create room for a concrete second-order insight

Prioritise posts that overlap with the narrative you want to own. For SurfAgent-style founder engagement, that usually means:

  • browser automation in the real world
  • agent reliability and recovery
  • memory, state, and orchestration
  • workflow tooling for builders
  • lessons from shipping, debugging, and dogfooding

If you are running multiple X accounts, pick the account first.

  • founder/company-adjacent account = trust, product framing, business narrative
  • operator/agent account = sharper technical takes, experiments, dogfooding, support distribution

Do not start engaging until the active account is verified.

Avoid spending time on:

  • culture-war sludge
  • huge viral threads where your reply adds nothing
  • low-signal bait posts
  • arguments that drain attention without building reputation
  • random posts that are adjacent to AI but not useful for your actual audience

7. What good replies look like

Strong replies usually do one of these:

  • sharpen the original point
  • add an implementation detail
  • name the hidden failure mode
  • share a compact lesson from experience
  • connect the post to a broader pattern
  • offer a concrete example

Good reply traits:

  • short
  • specific
  • legible
  • relevant to the original post
  • sounds like it came from someone who actually does the work

Weak replies:

  • “great point”
  • “this is huge”
  • obvious restatements
  • fake enthusiasm with no payload
  • long self-promotional pivots

8. Founder-account rules

When operating a founder or product account:

  • stay close to the product’s worldview
  • reinforce the narrative through replies, not just top-level posts
  • make the account feel present in the community
  • do not turn every interaction into a pitch

A good founder reply often teaches first and sells indirectly.

If the account is for a browser automation product, useful recurring themes might include:

  • state and recovery
  • brittle automation failure modes
  • persistent browser context
  • real-world auth/session problems
  • why demos differ from production reality

Founder engagement rules learned from dogfooding

These are not optional niceties. They are operating rules.

  • Do not comment on the same account over and over in one pass.
  • Default to max 1 substantive comment per account per pass.
  • If one account dominates the feed, do not farm them for easy replies. Move on and diversify.
  • Prefer being seen across a cluster of relevant builders/operators instead of camping one person’s timeline.
  • Likes are supporting signals, not the main event.
  • Reposts are endorsements. Treat them like endorsements.
  • Quote-post only when you have real framing to add for your own audience.

A bad founder pass looks like:

  • multiple comments on the same account
  • random likes on loosely related posts
  • reposting just to seem active

A good founder pass looks like:

  • 3 to 5 thoughtful replies across different relevant accounts
  • maybe 1 repost or quote-post if something is genuinely bullish
  • a clean pattern someone could notice and respect

9. Replying to your own comments and mentions

When someone replies to you:

  1. classify whether they are asking, agreeing, challenging, or adding detail
  2. respond fastest to thoughtful technical or operator comments
  3. keep the thread alive if there is real substance
  4. end cleanly when the exchange is complete

Do not ignore good replies if growth is the goal.

Fast, thoughtful second-hop replies are often where trust gets built.

10. Search and discovery loop

When the feed is weak, do not doomscroll.

Use a deliberate loop:

  1. scan the live feed first for already-visible high-signal targets
  2. if the feed is weak, search by niche terms, communities, or account clusters
  3. inspect recent posts
  4. choose a small number of promising threads
  5. engage where you have real angle
  6. move on

This beats waiting for the perfect post to fall into the timeline.

For community participation:

  • verify the active account before joining or posting
  • prefer communities that are tightly aligned with the account's real niche
  • confirm the community audience selector before typing
  • verify the new post appears in the community feed after submit

Per-pass selection rules

Before replying, quickly check:

  • is this post in the exact lane we want to be known for?
  • can I add a real operator/build lesson?
  • have I already replied to this account in this pass?
  • is a repost actually deserved, or am I just trying to look busy?

If the answer to the last question is "I’m just trying to look busy", skip it.

11. Proof rules

Do not claim engagement success unless you verify:

  • the correct account acted
  • the correct target post was identified on the current surface
  • the intended like/reply/quote action executed
  • the resulting liked state or visible reply is present

For replies, the minimum proof is:

  • composer held the intended text before submit
  • submit action executed
  • reply text is visible in the feed, thread, or post context afterward

Do not confuse "more deterministic" with "better". Reopening the same permalink over and over is worse than acting from a stable live feed item when the target is already visible.

12. Safety and quality rules

Never:

  • mass-reply just to farm impressions
  • fake expertise
  • manufacture personal stories
  • bait outrage for reach
  • copy/paste the same reply shape everywhere
  • turn every exchange into a promo for your product

If uncertain whether you add value, do less.

13. Minimal X growth checklist

Before finishing an engagement pass, confirm:

  • right account
  • right niche/context
  • right target threads
  • each reply adds actual value
  • actions were verified
  • no extra tabs were left behind
  • feed-first behavior was used unless there was a real reason to open a permalink

14. Suggested daily operating rhythm

A healthy rhythm usually looks like:

  • 10-15 minutes scanning for strong target conversations
  • 3-8 high-quality engagements
  • fast responses to meaningful replies on your own posts
  • one or two moments of deeper follow-up where a thread is worth compounding

Consistency beats volume.

15. Founder posting from your own feed

Do not only live in replies. A founder account should also post from its own feed so people know what it is building, learning, and shipping.

Good founder posts usually come from one of these buckets:

  • what we shipped today
  • what broke and what we learned fixing it
  • a product insight from dogfooding
  • a sharper take on a pattern seen in the market
  • a before/after improvement in the workflow
  • a lightweight build-in-public update with proof

For SurfAgent-style posting, strong recurring themes include:

  • building browser-aware agents that survive real sessions
  • why memory alone is not enough without state + recovery
  • what dogfooding exposed in the X/browser workflow
  • real examples of brittle automation versus stable operator loops
  • what got improved today in the product or skill stack

Founder post rules

  • post what is real, recent, and earned
  • prefer concrete build notes over vague inspiration
  • one sharp lesson beats a rambling thread
  • screenshots, short demos, or concrete proof help when available
  • do not fake momentum; show actual progress
  • do not turn every post into a launch post

Simple founder posting cadence

A practical daily cadence is:

  1. make 3 to 5 thoughtful replies across different relevant accounts
  2. publish 1 post from your own feed if there is something real to say
  3. reply back to meaningful responses on your own post
  4. carry the strongest theme into tomorrow’s engagements

Examples of good founder-feed posts

  • "Dogfooding SurfAgent on X today surfaced a dumb failure mode: agents were reopening the same post and spraying tabs. Fixed it by reusing the active X tab and staying feed-first."
  • "Most agent failures people blame on the model are really state failures: expired auth, broken context, bad recovery, poisoned browser state."
  • "Built today: tighter X engagement rules for SurfAgent. One comment per account per pass, reply-first, reposts only when truly earned. Feels way more human already."

16. Browser discipline for engagement passes

During a live X session:

  • keep one healthy X tab by default
  • keep one intended active account per pass unless the task explicitly requires a switch
  • reuse the current feed or thread tab for adjacent actions
  • do not open the same post repeatedly unless the current tab is genuinely poisoned
  • if a fresh tab is required, hand off cleanly and close the stale one afterward
  • tab sprawl is a bug, not a harmless side effect

If account identity, community audience, or composer state is ambiguous, take a screenshot or visual snapshot early instead of pretending extraction is enough.

17. Relationship to other docs

Use alongside:

  • browser-operations for browser discipline
  • x for route-aware X workflows and proof rules
  • SurfAgent core skill for managed-browser operating rules

平台分布

OpenClaw

91.12%
按下载量换算940

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills