Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

supplychain(supplychain 分析)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

supplychain 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为权限未标注;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 2,972。

总安装 1,693周安装 72GitHub Stars 1下载 593核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:supplychain(supplychain 分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure
仓库路径:skills/supplychain
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Supplychain
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Supplychain

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

supplychain 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。适合梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或生成安全复核清单,支持供应链安全场景。可分析鉴权逻辑和依赖关系,但不能把工具输出直接当作最终结论。涉及密钥、令牌或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限和操作边界。

需结合脱敏方式和权限控制,避免对实际系统造成影响。

来源仓库内路径:skills/supplychain

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    权限没有明确标注,第一次使用时只给一个无关紧要的任务,观察它到底读了哪些文件和网络。

常见问题

6 条

supplychain 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/robdtaylor/personal-ai-infrastructure --skill Supplychai…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

supplychain 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

supplychain 需要什么权限?

权限级别没有明确标注。第一次使用时建议只给无关紧要的任务,观察它实际读写了哪些内容。

supplychain 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

supplychain 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 1,693 次,近一周安装 72 次,下载 593 次,GitHub 1 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

supplychain 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
supplychain

supplychain 分析 · 本页

1,6931权限未标注MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Supply Chain Management - Automotive Manufacturing

When to Activate This Skill

  • "Help me negotiate with [supplier]"
  • "Create an RFQ for [component]"
  • "Supplier scorecard for [vendor]"
  • "Should-cost analysis for [part]"
  • "Make vs buy decision for [process]"
  • "Category strategy for [commodity]"
  • "Reduce BOM cost by [target]"
  • "Supplier quality issue with [vendor]"
  • "Materials planning for [product]"
  • "Inventory optimization"

Strategic Framework

The Supply Chain Value Hierarchy

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. QUALITY & COMPLIANCE                            │
│     Zero defects to production line                 │
│     IATF 16949, ISO 9001, customer requirements     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  2. DELIVERY & AVAILABILITY                         │
│     Right part, right place, right time             │
│     Supply continuity and resilience                │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  3. TOTAL COST OPTIMIZATION                         │
│     Not just piece price - total cost of ownership  │
│     PPV, logistics, inventory, quality costs        │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Critical Rule: Never compromise quality or delivery for cost. A cheap part that stops the line costs far more than the savings.


Executive-Level Competencies

Strategic Purchasing

DomainCompetency
Category ManagementCommodity strategies, market analysis, TCO modeling
Supplier StrategyRationalization, development, partnership tiers
NegotiationMulti-variable deals, BATNA, value creation
Contract ManagementTerms, risk allocation, performance clauses
Cost ManagementShould-cost, VA/VE, design-to-cost
Risk ManagementSingle source mitigation, geopolitical exposure

Materials Management

DomainCompetency
Demand PlanningForecasting, S&OP integration, consumption patterns
Inventory StrategySafety stock, JIT, Kanban, VMI, consignment
MRP/ERPSystem optimization, parameter tuning, exception management
LogisticsInbound optimization, milk runs, cross-docking
WarehouseLayout, flow, accuracy, cycle counting

Supplier Quality

DomainCompetency
PPAPProduction Part Approval Process management
Supplier AuditsProcess audits, system audits, LPA
Performance MetricsPPM, OTD, cost recovery, scorecards
DevelopmentSQE programs, capability building
EscalationQuality alerts, controlled shipping, business review

Key Metrics & KPIs

Executive Dashboard

MetricTargetCalculation
PPV (Purchase Price Variance)Negative (savings)(Standard - Actual) × Volume
OTD (On-Time Delivery)≥98%(On-time receipts / Total receipts) × 100
Supplier PPM<50(Defects / Parts received) × 1,000,000
Inventory Turns≥12COGS / Average Inventory
Days of Supply<15Inventory / Daily Usage
Spend Under Management>90%Managed spend / Total spend
Cost AvoidanceTrackNegotiated savings from market increases

Operational Metrics

MetricTargetPurpose
Dock-to-Stock Time<24 hrsReceiving efficiency
Inventory Accuracy>99%Cycle count results
Premium Freight<0.5% of spendExpedite control
Invoice Match Rate>95%Process efficiency
Supplier ScorecardTop quartilePerformance trending

Supplier Management

Supplier Tiering Strategy

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  STRATEGIC PARTNERS (Tier 1)                        │
│  • Joint development, shared roadmaps              │
│  • Long-term agreements (3-5 years)                │
│  • Executive relationship management               │
│  • Collaborative cost reduction                    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  PREFERRED SUPPLIERS (Tier 2)                       │
│  • Proven performance, competitive pricing         │
│  • Medium-term agreements (1-3 years)              │
│  • Regular business reviews                        │
│  • Standard cost reduction expectations            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  APPROVED SUPPLIERS (Tier 3)                        │
│  • Qualified but transactional                     │
│  • Spot buy or competitive bid                     │
│  • Annual review                                   │
│  • Performance-based retention                     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                        ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  PROBATION / EXIT (Tier 4)                          │
│  • Performance issues, quality concerns            │
│  • Controlled shipping or new business hold        │
│  • Active exit planning                            │
│  • Seek alternatives                               │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Supplier Scorecard Framework

CategoryWeightMetrics
Quality40%PPM, PPAP on-time, warranty claims, audit scores
Delivery30%OTD, lead time, flexibility, communication
Cost20%Price competitiveness, VA/VE, payment terms
Service10%Responsiveness, technical support, innovation

Cost Management Strategies

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

PIECE PRICE
    + Tooling (amortized)
    + Logistics (freight, handling, duties)
    + Inventory carrying cost
    + Quality costs (inspection, sorting, returns)
    + Administrative costs (POs, invoices, management)
    + Risk premium (single source, geopolitical)
    ─────────────────────────────
    = TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP

Cost Reduction Levers

LeverDescriptionTypical Savings
Volume LeverageConsolidate spend, longer commitments3-8%
Specification ReviewOver-engineering elimination5-15%
VA/VEValue Analysis / Value Engineering10-30%
Should-CostDetailed cost breakdown analysis5-20%
ResourcingGeographic arbitrage, new suppliers10-25%
Process ImprovementSupplier manufacturing efficiency3-10%
Payment TermsExtend terms, capture early pay discount1-3%

Should-Cost Model Components

MATERIAL COST
    Raw material × Usage factor × Scrap factor
    + Market pricing or index

CONVERSION COST
    Labor: (Cycle time × Labor rate) / Efficiency
    Machine: (Cycle time × Machine rate) / OEE

OVERHEAD
    SG&A: % of conversion
    Profit: % margin (typically 5-15%)

LOGISTICS
    Packaging + Freight + Duties

Negotiation Framework

Preparation Checklist

  • BATNA - Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement
  • ZOPA - Zone of Possible Agreement
  • Supplier economics - Their costs, margins, pressures
  • Market conditions - Supply/demand, commodity trends
  • Leverage points - Volume, specification, competition
  • Walk-away point - Clear bottom line
  • Value creation opportunities - Win-win possibilities

Multi-Variable Negotiation

Don't negotiate price alone. Trade across multiple variables:

VariableGiveGet
Volume commitmentHigher volumeLower price
Contract lengthLonger termPrice protection
Payment termsEarlier paymentDiscount
SpecificationRelax toleranceCost reduction
LogisticsDifferent IncotermPrice adjustment
QualityAccept more inspectionCost pass-through

BATNA Development

Always have alternatives:

  1. Identify backup suppliers (at least 2)
  2. Understand switching costs and timeline
  3. Maintain relationships with alternatives
  4. Document qualification status
  5. Never reveal desperation

IATF 16949 Supplier Requirements

Supplier Quality Management System

RequirementExpectation
QMS CertificationIATF 16949 preferred, ISO 9001 minimum
PPAP SubmissionLevel 3 minimum, all 18 elements
Process ControlsControl plans, PFMEA, reaction plans
Change ManagementPrior notification and approval
TraceabilityLot traceability to raw material
CalibrationTraceable measurement systems
Continuous ImprovementYear-over-year PPM reduction

Supplier Development Program

Stage Gate Approach:


Risk Management

Supply Risk Categories

Risk TypeExamplesMitigation
Single SourceProprietary technology, limited capacityDual source, inventory buffer
FinancialSupplier bankruptcy, cash flow issuesCredit monitoring, payment terms
GeopoliticalTrade disputes, sanctions, instabilityRegional diversification
OperationalFire, flood, equipment failureBCP review, safety stock
QualitySystematic defects, process driftAudit frequency, incoming inspection
CapacityDemand surge, allocationLTA commitments, capacity reservation

Risk Assessment Matrix

ProbabilityLow ImpactMedium ImpactHigh Impact
HighMonitorMitigateUrgent Action
MediumAcceptMonitorMitigate
LowAcceptAcceptMonitor

Materials Planning

Inventory Strategy by Part Type

Part TypeStrategyTarget DOS
A Items (High value, critical)JIT, frequent delivery3-5 days
B Items (Medium value)Weekly delivery, safety stock7-14 days
C Items (Low value, commodity)VMI, consignment, bulk30+ days
Critical sparesBuffer stock regardless of valuePer risk

Safety Stock Calculation

Safety Stock = Z × σ × √(LT + Review Period)

Where:
Z = Service level factor (95% = 1.65, 99% = 2.33)
σ = Demand standard deviation
LT = Lead time in periods

MRP Best Practices

  • Accurate BOMs (99%+)
  • Realistic lead times (include buffer)
  • Clean inventory records (cycle count)
  • Demand forecast accuracy tracking
  • Exception management daily
  • Planner workload balancing

Templates Available

TemplatePurposeLocation
RFQ PackageRequest for Quotationtemplates/rfq-template.md
Supplier ScorecardPerformance trackingtemplates/scorecard.md
Should-Cost ModelCost breakdowntemplates/should-cost.md
Negotiation PrepDeal preparationtemplates/negotiation-prep.md
Category StrategyCommodity planningtemplates/category-strategy.md
Supplier AuditAssessment checklisttemplates/supplier-audit.md

Integration Points

With A3CriticalThinking

  • Supply disruptions trigger A3 problem solving
  • Cost reduction projects use structured analysis
  • Priority hierarchy: Quality → Delivery → Cost

With AutomotiveManufacturing

  • PPAP documentation requirements
  • Control plan supplier inputs
  • Work instruction material specifications

With HoshinKanri

  • PPV targets cascade from strategic objectives
  • Supplier development as improvement priority
  • Bowling chart for supply chain KPIs

Key Principles

  1. Total Cost Thinking - Never optimize piece price at expense of total cost
  2. Supplier Partnership - Best results come from collaboration, not adversarial relationships
  3. Risk-Adjusted Decisions - Factor in supply continuity, not just price
  4. Data-Driven Negotiation - Use should-cost and market intelligence
  5. Continuous Improvement - Year-over-year cost and quality improvement
  6. Strategic Alignment - Supply chain supports business objectives
  7. Ethical Conduct - Fair dealing, no kickbacks, transparent process

Extended Context

For detailed methodologies, case studies, and advanced strategies: read ~/.claude/skills/SupplyChain/CLAUDE.md

For templates: ls ~/.claude/skills/SupplyChain/templates/

Workflow Routing

User RequestWorkflowOutput
"Negotiate with supplier X"Negotiation FrameworkBATNA analysis, multi-variable strategy
"Create RFQ for [part]"RFQ PackageStructured RFQ document using template
"Supplier scorecard for [vendor]"Scorecard FrameworkWeighted performance assessment
"Should-cost analysis for [part]"Should-Cost ModelCost breakdown by material/conversion/overhead
"Make vs buy for [process]"Make vs Buy FrameworkDecision matrix with recommendation
"Category strategy for [commodity]"Category ManagementSpend analysis, tiering, sourcing strategy
"Reduce BOM cost"Cost Reduction LeversPrioritized list of cost reduction opportunities
"Supplier quality issue"Supplier Development / 8DEscalation path, containment, corrective action
"Materials planning / inventory"Materials PlanningABC analysis, safety stock, replenishment strategy
"Risk assessment for supply base"Risk ManagementRisk matrix, mitigation actions

Examples

Supplier negotiation prep:

"Help me prepare for a negotiation with our casting supplier who wants a 10% price increase" → Provides BATNA development, should-cost comparison, multi-variable trade strategy, and walk-away point.

Total Cost of Ownership analysis:

"We found a cheaper supplier in Eastern Europe — should we switch?" → Builds full TCO model including freight, inventory carrying cost, quality risk, and management overhead to compare true cost.

Supplier development plan:

"Our key machining supplier is at 800 PPM and 90% OTD — what do we do?" → Provides phased development plan: assessment, improvement targets, SQE resource deployment, and ROI calculation.

平台分布

Claude Code

25.65%
按下载量换算152

Gemini CLI

24.83%
按下载量换算147

Cursor

17.97%
按下载量换算107

OpenCode

11.72%
按下载量换算69

Antigravity

7.35%
按下载量换算44

windsurf

3.63%
按下载量换算22

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

权限未标注

当前来源未能明确判断权限范围,默认进入异常复核队列。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills