Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索external-servicegithub未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计提醒

ralphRalph 助手

Agent Skill

ralph 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

261,936

周安装

10,718

GitHub Stars

88

下载量

84,744
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:ralph(Ralph 助手)
来源仓库:https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template
仓库路径:skills/ralph
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill ralph
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill ralph

简介

通过苏格拉底式访谈和自主进化循环进行规范优先的人工智能开发,直到验证完成。

  • 在任何代码执行之前,通过引导式提问暴露隐藏的假设,将模糊的需求具体化为明确的规范(模糊度≤0.2)
  • Ralph 模式运行持续循环 — 访谈 → 种子 → 执行 → 评估 → 演化 — 直到通过验收标准或达到最大迭代次数,并在中断后基于检查点恢复
  • 三阶段验证门:机械(lint、测试、覆盖)、语义(验收标准对齐)和用于漂移检测的可选多模型共识
  • 包括五个横向思维角色(简化者、黑客、逆向者、研究员、架构师),以突破重复尝试失败时的停滞状态
  • 支持 Claude Code(本机钩子)、Codex CLI(bash 循环)、Gemini CLI(AfterAgent 钩子)和具有统一 ooo 的 OpenCode
  • 跨所有平台的命令语法

SKILL.md

ralph (Ouroboros) — Specification-First AI Development

Stop prompting. Start specifying. *"The beginning is the end, and the end is the beginning."* The serpent doesn't repeat — it evolves.

When to use this skill

  • Before writing any code — expose hidden assumptions with Socratic interviewing
  • Long-running tasks that need autonomous iteration until verified
  • Vague requirements — crystallize them into an immutable spec (Ambiguity ≤ 0.2)
  • Tasks requiring guaranteed completion — loop until verification passes
  • When stuck — 5 lateral thinking personas break through stagnation
  • Drift detection — measure how far execution has deviated from original spec

Core Architecture: The Loop

    Interview → Seed → Execute → Evaluate
        ↑                           ↓
        └──── Evolutionary Loop ────┘

Each cycle evolves, not repeats. Evaluation output feeds back as input for the next generation until the system converges.

Double Diamond

    ◇ Wonder          ◇ Design
   ╱  (diverge)      ╱  (diverge)
  ╱    explore      ╱    create
 ╱                 ╱
◆ ──────────── ◆ ──────────── ◆
 ╲                 ╲
  ╲    define       ╲    deliver
   ╲  (converge)     ╲  (converge)
    ◇ Ontology        ◇ Evaluation

The first diamond is Socratic: diverge into questions, converge into ontological clarity. The second diamond is pragmatic: diverge into design options, converge into verified delivery.


1. Commands (Full Reference)

CommandTrigger KeywordsWhat It Does
ooo interviewooo interview, interview me, clarify requirements, socratic questioningSocratic questioning → expose hidden assumptions
ooo seedooo seed, crystallize, generate seed, freeze requirementsCrystallize interview into immutable spec (Ambiguity ≤ 0.2)
ooo runooo run, execute seed, ouroboros runExecute via Double Diamond decomposition
ooo evaluateooo evaluate, 3-stage check, evaluate this, verify execution3-stage gate: Mechanical → Semantic → Multi-Model Consensus
ooo evolveooo evolve, evolutionary loop, iterate until convergedEvolutionary loop until ontology converges (similarity ≥ 0.95)
ooo unstuckooo unstuck, I'm stuck, think sideways, lateral thinking5 lateral thinking personas when stuck
ooo statusooo status, am I drifting?, drift check, session statusDrift detection + session tracking
ooo ralphooo ralph, ralph, don't stop, must complete, keep goingPersistent loop until verified — The boulder never stops
ooo setupooo setupRegister MCP server (one-time)
ooo helpooo helpFull reference

2. Interview → Specification Flow

Philosophy: From Wonder to Ontology

*Wonder → "How should I live?" → "What IS 'live'?" → Ontology* — Socrates
   Wonder                          Ontology
     💡                               🔬
"What do I want?"    →    "What IS the thing I want?"
"Build a task CLI"   →    "What IS a task? What IS priority?"
"Fix the auth bug"   →    "Is this the root cause, or a symptom?"

Step 1: Interview (expose hidden assumptions)

ooo interview "I want to build a task management CLI"

The Socratic Interviewer asks questions until Ambiguity ≤ 0.2.

Ambiguity formula:

Ambiguity = 1 − Σ(clarityᵢ × weightᵢ)

Greenfield: Goal(40%) + Constraint(30%) + Success(30%)
Brownfield: Goal(35%) + Constraint(25%) + Success(25%) + Context(15%)

Threshold: Ambiguity ≤ 0.2 → ready for Seed

Example scoring:

Goal:       0.9 × 0.4 = 0.36
Constraint: 0.8 × 0.3 = 0.24
Success:    0.7 × 0.3 = 0.21
                        ──────
Clarity             = 0.81
Ambiguity = 1 − 0.81 = 0.19 ≤ 0.2 → ✓ Ready for Seed

Step 2: Seed (crystallize into immutable spec)

ooo seed

Generates YAML specification:

goal: Build a CLI task management tool
constraints:
  - Python 3.14+
  - No external database
  - SQLite for persistence
acceptance_criteria:
  - Tasks can be created
  - Tasks can be listed
  - Tasks can be marked complete
ontology_schema:
  name: TaskManager
  fields:
    - name: tasks
      type: array
    - name: title
      type: string

Step 3: Run (execute via Double Diamond)

ooo run seed.yaml
ooo run  # uses seed from conversation context

Step 4: Evaluate (3-stage verification)

ooo evaluate <session_id>
StageCostWhat It Checks
Mechanical$0Lint, build, tests, coverage
SemanticStandardAC compliance, goal alignment, drift score
ConsensusFrontier (optional)Multi-model vote, majority ratio

Drift thresholds:

  • 0.0 – 0.15 — Excellent: on track
  • 0.15 – 0.30 — Acceptable: monitor closely
  • 0.30+ — Exceeded: course correction needed

3. Ralph — Persistent Loop Until Verified

ooo ralph "fix all failing tests"
/ouroboros:ralph "fix all failing tests"

"The boulder never stops." Each failure is data for the next attempt. Only complete success or max iterations stops it.

How Ralph Works

┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. EXECUTE (parallel)          │
│     Independent tasks           │
│     concurrent scheduling       │
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. VERIFY                      │
│     Check completion            │
│     Validate tests pass         │
│     Measure drift vs seed       │
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. LOOP (if failed)            │
│     Analyze failure             │
│     Fix identified issues       │
│     Repeat from step 1          │
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. PERSIST (checkpoint)        │
│     .omc/state/ralph-state.json │
│     Resume after interruption   │
└─────────────────────────────────┘

State File

Create .omc/state/ralph-state.json on start:

{
  "mode": "ralph",
  "session_id": "<uuid>",
  "request": "<user request>",
  "status": "running",
  "iteration": 0,
  "max_iterations": 10,
  "last_checkpoint": null,
  "verification_history": []
}

Loop Logic

while iteration < max_iterations:
    result = execute_parallel(request, context)
    verification = verify_result(result, acceptance_criteria)
    state.verification_history.append({
        "iteration": iteration,
        "passed": verification.passed,
        "score": verification.score,
        "timestamp": <now>
    })
    if verification.passed:
        save_checkpoint("complete")
        break
    iteration += 1
    save_checkpoint("iteration_{iteration}")

Progress Report Format

[Ralph Iteration 1/10]
Executing in parallel...

Verification: FAILED
Score: 0.65
Issues:
- 3 tests still failing
- Type errors in src/api.py

The boulder never stops. Continuing...

[Ralph Iteration 3/10]
Executing in parallel...

Verification: PASSED
Score: 1.0

Ralph COMPLETE
==============
Request: Fix all failing tests
Duration: 8m 32s
Iterations: 3

Verification History:
- Iteration 1: FAILED (0.65)
- Iteration 2: FAILED (0.85)
- Iteration 3: PASSED (1.0)

Cancellation

ActionCommand
Save checkpoint & exit/ouroboros:cancel
Force clear all state/ouroboros:cancel --force
Resume after interruptionooo ralph continue or ralph continue

4. Evolutionary Loop (Evolve)

ooo evolve "build a task management CLI"
ooo evolve "build a task management CLI" --no-execute  # ontology-only, fast mode

Flow

Gen 1: Interview → Seed(O₁) → Execute → Evaluate
Gen 2: Wonder → Reflect → Seed(O₂) → Execute → Evaluate
Gen 3: Wonder → Reflect → Seed(O₃) → Execute → Evaluate
...until ontology converges (similarity ≥ 0.95) or max 30 generations

Convergence Formula

Similarity = 0.5 × name_overlap + 0.3 × type_match + 0.2 × exact_match
Threshold: Similarity ≥ 0.95 → CONVERGED

Gen 1: {Task, Priority, Status}
Gen 2: {Task, Priority, Status, DueDate}  → similarity 0.78 → CONTINUE
Gen 3: {Task, Priority, Status, DueDate}  → similarity 1.00 → CONVERGED ✓

Stagnation Detection

SignalConditionMeaning
StagnationSimilarity ≥ 0.95 for 3 consecutive gensOntology has stabilized
OscillationGen N ≈ Gen N-2 (period-2 cycle)Stuck bouncing between two designs
Repetitive feedback≥ 70% question overlap across 3 gensWonder asking the same things
Hard cap30 generations reachedSafety valve

Ralph in Evolve Mode

Ralph Cycle 1: evolve_step(lineage, seed) → Gen 1 → action=CONTINUE
Ralph Cycle 2: evolve_step(lineage)       → Gen 2 → action=CONTINUE
Ralph Cycle 3: evolve_step(lineage)       → Gen 3 → action=CONVERGED ✓
                                                └── Ralph stops.
                                                    The ontology has stabilized.

Rewind

ooo evolve --status <lineage_id>          # check lineage status
ooo evolve --rewind <lineage_id> <gen_N>  # roll back to generation N

5. The Nine Minds (Agents)

Loaded on-demand — never preloaded:

AgentRoleCore Question
Socratic InterviewerQuestions-only. Never builds.*"What are you assuming?"*
OntologistFinds essence, not symptoms*"What IS this, really?"*
Seed ArchitectCrystallizes specs from dialogue*"Is this complete and unambiguous?"*
Evaluator3-stage verification*"Did we build the right thing?"*
ContrarianChallenges every assumption*"What if the opposite were true?"*
HackerFinds unconventional paths*"What constraints are actually real?"*
SimplifierRemoves complexity*"What's the simplest thing that could work?"*
ResearcherStops coding, starts investigating*"What evidence do we actually have?"*
ArchitectIdentifies structural causes*"If we started over, would we build it this way?"*

6. Unstuck — Lateral Thinking

When blocked after repeated failures, choose a persona:

ooo unstuck                 # auto-select based on situation
ooo unstuck simplifier      # cut scope to MVP — "Start with exactly 2 tables"
ooo unstuck hacker          # make it work first, elegance later
ooo unstuck contrarian      # challenge all assumptions
ooo unstuck researcher      # stop coding, find missing information
ooo unstuck architect       # restructure the approach entirely

When to use each:

  • Repeated similar failures → contrarian (challenge assumptions)
  • Too many options → simplifier (reduce scope)
  • Missing information → researcher (seek data)
  • Analysis paralysis → hacker (just make it work)
  • Structural issues → architect (redesign)

7. Platform Installation & Usage

Claude Code (Native Plugin — Full Mode)

# Install
claude plugin marketplace add Q00/ouroboros
claude plugin install ouroboros@ouroboros

# One-time setup
ooo setup

# Use
ooo interview "I want to build a task CLI"
ooo seed
ooo run
ooo evaluate <session_id>
ooo ralph "fix all failing tests"

All ooo commands work natively. Hooks auto-activate:

  • UserPromptSubmit → keyword-detector.mjs detects triggers
  • PostToolUse(Write|Edit) → drift-monitor.mjs tracks deviation
  • SessionStart → session initialization

Claude Code hooks.json (installed at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/hooks.json):

{
  "hooks": {
    "SessionStart": [{ "matcher": "*", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "node \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/session-start.mjs\"", "timeout": 5 }] }],
    "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "*", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "node \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/keyword-detector.mjs\"", "timeout": 5 }] }],
    "PostToolUse": [{ "matcher": "Write|Edit", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "node \"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/drift-monitor.mjs\"", "timeout": 3 }] }]
  }
}

Codex CLI (Adapted Mode — bash loop)

Codex CLI has no native AfterAgent hooks. Use the setup script to configure:

# Setup
bash <your-agent-skills>/ralph/scripts/setup-codex-hook.sh

# Restart Codex, then use:
/prompts:ralph              # load ralph loop context
/prompts:ouroboros          # load full ouroboros context

# Use ooo commands in conversation:
ooo interview "build a REST API"
ooo ralph "fix all TypeScript errors"

Codex ralph loop contract:

  1. Treat /ralph "<task>" [--completion-promise=TEXT] [--max-iterations=N] as a contract command
  2. Parse completion signal inside XML: <promise>VALUE</promise>
  3. If promise missing and iteration < max-iterations → continue immediately with same original command
  4. If promise found or max-iterations reached → finish with status report

Completion promise syntax:

<promise>DONE</promise>

Manual state management for Codex:

  • Create .omc/state/ralph-state.json at loop start
  • Update iteration counter each cycle
  • Set status: "complete" when promise found
  • Default completion promise: DONE | Default max iterations: 10

Gemini CLI (AfterAgent Hook Mode)

# Install via extensions
gemini extensions install https://github.com/Q00/ouroboros
# OR install skills-template
gemini extensions install https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template

Required in ~/.gemini/settings.json:

{
  "hooksConfig": { "enabled": true },
  "context": {
    "includeDirectories": ["~/.gemini/extensions/ralph"]
  }
}

AfterAgent hook for loop continuation (add to ~/.gemini/settings.json):

{
  "hooks": {
    "AfterAgent": [{
      "matcher": "*",
      "hooks": [{
        "type": "command",
        "command": "bash ~/.gemini/hooks/ralph-check.sh",
        "timeout": 10
      }]
    }]
  }
}

Run in sandbox + YOLO mode to prevent constant confirmation prompts:

gemini -s -y

Then use ooo commands directly:

ooo interview "build a task CLI"
ooo ralph "fix all tests"

⚠️ Gemini v0.30.0 bug: stop_hook_active always false in hook JSON. Workaround: check .omc/state/ralph-state.json directly instead of relying on the hook field.


8. Platform Support Matrix

PlatformNative SupportMechanismooo CommandsLoop
Claude Code✅ FullPlugin + hooksAll ooo commandsAuto via hooks
Codex CLI🔧 Adaptedbash + /prompts:ralphVia conversationManual state file
Gemini CLI✅ NativeAfterAgent hookAll ooo commandsAuto via hook
OpenCode✅ NativeSkills systemAll ooo commandsAuto via loop

9. Quick Reference

ActionCommand
Socratic interviewooo interview "topic"
Generate specooo seed
Execute specooo run [seed.yaml]
3-stage evaluateooo evaluate <session_id>
Evolve until convergedooo evolve "topic"
Persistent loopooo ralph "task"
Break stagnationooo unstuck [persona]
Check driftooo status [session_id]
First-time setupooo setup
Cancel/ouroboros:cancel
Force cancel + clear/ouroboros:cancel --force
Resumeooo ralph continue
Cancel (Gemini/Codex)/ralph:cancel

10. Installation

# Claude Code
claude plugin marketplace add Q00/ouroboros
claude plugin install ouroboros@ouroboros
ooo setup

# Codex CLI
bash <skills>/ralph/scripts/setup-codex-hook.sh

# Gemini CLI (extensions)
gemini extensions install https://github.com/Q00/ouroboros

# All platforms via skills-template
npx skills add https://github.com/supercent-io/skills-template --skill ralph

Source: Q00/ouroboros — MIT License

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

35%
按下载量换算29,660

Claude

30.75%
按下载量换算26,059

Cursor

19.11%
按下载量换算16,195

Gemini CLI

10.08%
按下载量换算8,542

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

可疑

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

external-service

该 Skill 可能调用第三方服务、云服务或外部模型 API,使用前需要确认账号、额度、数据发送范围和服务条款。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在 warning/failed 结果,不能写成本站确认安全。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills