Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

supabase-audit-rpc(Supabase 审核 RPC)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

supabase-audit-rpc 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有提醒项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 26,214。

总安装 3,612周安装 152GitHub Stars 37下载 1,265核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:supabase-audit-rpc(Supabase 审核 RPC)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills
仓库路径:skills/supabase-audit-rpc
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-rpc
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-rpc

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于 Supabase RPC 函数的安全审计与漏洞检测。适合检查权限绕过、SQL注入及认证缺陷等高风险问题。通过自动化扫描识别 P0 级风险,输出修复建议清单。涉及生产数据或密钥时需确认最小权限与脱敏操作边界。supabase-audit-rpc 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/supabase-audit-rpc

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

supabase-audit-rpc 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-au…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

supabase-audit-rpc 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

supabase-audit-rpc 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

supabase-audit-rpc 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

supabase-audit-rpc 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,612 次,近一周安装 152 次,下载 1,265 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

supabase-audit-rpc 安全吗?

第三方扫描有提醒项,说明存在需要人工确认的行为。安装前请打开源码看清它读了什么、联网到哪里。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
supabase-audit-rpc

Supabase 审核 RPC · 本页

3,61237需要联网未明确有提醒

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

RPC Functions Audit

🔴 CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED You MUST write to context files AS YOU GO, not just at the end. - Write to .sb-pentest-context.json IMMEDIATELY after each function tested - Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log BEFORE and AFTER each function test - DO NOT wait until the skill completes to update files - If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.

This skill discovers and tests PostgreSQL functions exposed via Supabase's RPC endpoint.

When to Use This Skill

  • To discover exposed database functions
  • To test if functions bypass RLS
  • To check for SQL injection in function parameters
  • As part of comprehensive API security testing

Prerequisites

  • Supabase URL and anon key available
  • Tables audit completed (recommended)

Understanding Supabase RPC

Supabase exposes PostgreSQL functions via:

POST https://[project].supabase.co/rest/v1/rpc/[function_name]

Functions can:

  • ✅ Respect RLS (if using auth.uid() and proper security)
  • ❌ Bypass RLS (if SECURITY DEFINER without checks)
  • ❌ Execute arbitrary SQL (if poorly written)

Risk Levels for Functions

TypeRiskDescription
SECURITY INVOKERLowerRuns with caller's permissions
SECURITY DEFINERHigherRuns with definer's permissions
Accepts text/jsonHigherPotential for injection
Returns setofHigherCan return multiple rows

Usage

Basic RPC Audit

Audit RPC functions on my Supabase project

Test Specific Function

Test the get_user_data RPC function

Output Format

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 RPC FUNCTIONS AUDIT
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

 Project: abc123def.supabase.co
 Functions Found: 6

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Function Inventory
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 1. get_user_profile(user_id uuid)
    Security: INVOKER
    Returns: json
    Status: ✅ SAFE

    Analysis:
    ├── Uses auth.uid() for authorization
    ├── Returns only caller's own profile
    └── RLS is respected

 2. search_posts(query text)
    Security: INVOKER
    Returns: setof posts
    Status: ✅ SAFE

    Analysis:
    ├── Parameterized query (no injection)
    ├── RLS filters results
    └── Only returns published posts

 3. get_all_users()
    Security: DEFINER
    Returns: setof users
    Status: 🔴 P0 - RLS BYPASS

    Analysis:
    ├── SECURITY DEFINER runs as owner
    ├── No auth.uid() check inside function
    ├── Returns ALL users regardless of caller
    └── Bypasses RLS completely!

    Test Result:
    POST /rest/v1/rpc/get_all_users
    → Returns 1,247 user records with PII

    Immediate Fix:

-- Add authorization check CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION get_all_users() RETURNS setof users LANGUAGE sql SECURITY INVOKER -- Change to INVOKER AS $$ SELECT * FROM users WHERE auth.uid() = id; -- Add RLS-like check $$;


 4. admin_delete_user(target_id uuid)
    Security: DEFINER
    Returns: void
    Status: 🔴 P0 - CRITICAL VULNERABILITY

    Analysis:
    ├── SECURITY DEFINER with delete capability
    ├── No role check (anon can call!)
    ├── Can delete any user
    └── No audit trail

    Test Result:
    POST /rest/v1/rpc/admin_delete_user
    Body: {"target_id": "any-uuid"}
    → Function accessible to anon!

    Immediate Fix:

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION admin_delete_user(target_id uuid) RETURNS void LANGUAGE plpgsql SECURITY DEFINER AS $$ BEGIN -- Add role check IF NOT (SELECT is_admin FROM profiles WHERE id = auth.uid()) THEN RAISE EXCEPTION 'Unauthorized'; END IF;

DELETE FROM users WHERE id = target_id; END; $$;

-- Or better: restrict to authenticated only REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION admin_delete_user FROM anon;


 5. dynamic_query(table_name text, conditions text)
    Security: DEFINER
    Returns: json
    Status: 🔴 P0 - SQL INJECTION

    Analysis:
    ├── Accepts raw text parameters
    ├── Likely concatenates into query
    ├── SQL injection possible

    Test Result:
    POST /rest/v1/rpc/dynamic_query
    Body: {"table_name": "users; DROP TABLE users;--", "conditions": "1=1"}
    → Injection vector confirmed!

    Immediate Action:
    → DELETE THIS FUNCTION IMMEDIATELY

DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS dynamic_query;


    Never build queries from user input. Use parameterized queries.

 6. calculate_total(order_id uuid)
    Security: INVOKER
    Returns: numeric
    Status: ✅ SAFE

    Analysis:
    ├── UUID parameter (type-safe)
    ├── SECURITY INVOKER respects RLS
    └── Only accesses caller's orders

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Summary
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Total Functions: 6
 Safe: 3
 P0 Critical: 3
   ├── get_all_users (RLS bypass)
   ├── admin_delete_user (no auth check)
   └── dynamic_query (SQL injection)

 Priority Actions:
 1. DELETE dynamic_query function immediately
 2. Add auth checks to admin_delete_user
 3. Fix get_all_users to respect RLS

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Injection Testing

The skill tests for SQL injection in text/varchar parameters:

Safe (Parameterized)

-- ✅ Safe: uses parameter placeholder
CREATE FUNCTION search_posts(query text)
RETURNS setof posts
AS $$
  SELECT * FROM posts WHERE title ILIKE '%' || query || '%';
$$ LANGUAGE sql;

Vulnerable (Concatenation)

-- ❌ Vulnerable: dynamic SQL execution
CREATE FUNCTION dynamic_query(tbl text, cond text)
RETURNS json
AS $$
DECLARE result json;
BEGIN
  EXECUTE format('SELECT json_agg(t) FROM %I t WHERE %s', tbl, cond)
  INTO result;
  RETURN result;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;

Context Output

{
  "rpc_audit": {
    "timestamp": "2025-01-31T11:00:00Z",
    "functions_found": 6,
    "summary": {
      "safe": 3,
      "p0_critical": 3,
      "p1_high": 0
    },
    "findings": [
      {
        "function": "get_all_users",
        "severity": "P0",
        "issue": "RLS bypass via SECURITY DEFINER",
        "impact": "All user data accessible",
        "remediation": "Change to SECURITY INVOKER or add auth checks"
      },
      {
        "function": "dynamic_query",
        "severity": "P0",
        "issue": "SQL injection vulnerability",
        "impact": "Arbitrary SQL execution possible",
        "remediation": "Delete function, use parameterized queries"
      }
    ]
  }
}

Best Practices for RPC Functions

1. Prefer SECURITY INVOKER

CREATE FUNCTION my_function()
RETURNS ...
SECURITY INVOKER  -- Respects RLS
AS $$ ... $$;

2. Always Check auth.uid()

CREATE FUNCTION get_my_data()
RETURNS json
AS $$
  SELECT json_agg(d) FROM data d
  WHERE d.user_id = auth.uid();  -- Always filter by caller
$$ LANGUAGE sql SECURITY INVOKER;

3. Use REVOKE for Sensitive Functions

-- Remove anon access
REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION admin_function FROM anon;

-- Only authenticated users
GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION admin_function TO authenticated;

4. Avoid Text Parameters for Dynamic Queries

-- ❌ Bad
CREATE FUNCTION query(tbl text) ...

-- ✅ Good: use specific functions per table
CREATE FUNCTION get_users() ...
CREATE FUNCTION get_posts() ...

MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates

⚠️ This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.

Critical Rule: Write As You Go

DO NOT batch all writes at the end. Instead:

  1. Before testing each function → Log the action to .sb-pentest-audit.log
  2. After each function analyzed → Immediately update .sb-pentest-context.json
  3. After each vulnerability found → Log the finding immediately

This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.

Required Actions (Progressive)

  1. Update .sb-pentest-context.json with results: {"rpc_audit": {"timestamp": "...", "functions_found": 6, "summary": {"safe": 3, "p0_critical": 3}, "findings": [...]}}
  2. Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log: [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-rpc] [START] Auditing RPC functions [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-rpc] [FINDING] P0: dynamic_query has SQL injection [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-rpc] [CONTEXT_UPDATED].sb-pentest-context.json updated
  3. If files don't exist, create them before writing.

FAILURE TO UPDATE CONTEXT FILES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

MANDATORY: Evidence Collection

📁 Evidence Directory: .sb-pentest-evidence/03-api-audit/rpc-tests/

Evidence Files to Create

FileContent
function-list.jsonAll discovered RPC functions
vulnerable-functions/[name].jsonDetails for each vulnerable function

Evidence Format (Vulnerable Function)

{
  "evidence_id": "RPC-001",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-31T10:30:00Z",
  "category": "api-audit",
  "type": "rpc_vulnerability",
  "severity": "P0",

  "function": "get_all_users",

  "analysis": {
    "security_definer": true,
    "auth_check": false,
    "rls_bypass": true
  },

  "test": {
    "request": {
      "method": "POST",
      "url": "https://abc123def.supabase.co/rest/v1/rpc/get_all_users",
      "curl_command": "curl -X POST '$URL/rest/v1/rpc/get_all_users' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -H 'Content-Type: application/json'"
    },
    "response": {
      "status": 200,
      "rows_returned": 1247,
      "sample_data": "[REDACTED - contains user PII]"
    }
  },

  "impact": "Bypasses RLS, returns all 1,247 user records",
  "remediation": "Change to SECURITY INVOKER or add auth.uid() check"
}

Add to curl-commands.sh

# === RPC FUNCTION TESTS ===
# Test get_all_users function (P0 if accessible)
curl -X POST "$SUPABASE_URL/rest/v1/rpc/get_all_users" \
  -H "apikey: $ANON_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json"

# Test admin_delete_user function
curl -X POST "$SUPABASE_URL/rest/v1/rpc/admin_delete_user" \
  -H "apikey: $ANON_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"target_id": "test-uuid"}'

Related Skills

  • supabase-audit-tables-list — List exposed tables
  • supabase-audit-rls — Test RLS policies
  • supabase-audit-auth-users — User enumeration tests

平台分布

Codex

35.26%
按下载量换算446

Claude

29.61%
按下载量换算375

Cursor

19.54%
按下载量换算247

Gemini CLI

9.48%
按下载量换算120

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills