Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

supabase-audit-auth-users(Supabase 审核 auth users)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

supabase-audit-auth-users 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描有未通过项,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 27,430。

总安装 3,387周安装 144GitHub Stars 37下载 1,187核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:supabase-audit-auth-users(Supabase 审核 auth users)
来源仓库:https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills
仓库路径:skills/supabase-audit-auth-users
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-users
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-audit-auth-users

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

supabase-audit-auth-users 用于辅助安全审计与用户枚举风险排查,适合检测认证端点漏洞。可识别显式消息与时序攻击导致的用户信息泄露。通过 github 安装,使用 npx skills add 命令添加。需确认响应时间归一化与验证码实施建议。建议核实警报模式与监控配置细节。

来源仓库内路径:skills/supabase-audit-auth-users

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

supabase-audit-auth-users 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/yoanbernabeu/supabase-pentest-skills --skill supabase-au…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

supabase-audit-auth-users 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

supabase-audit-auth-users 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

supabase-audit-auth-users 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

supabase-audit-auth-users 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 3,387 次,近一周安装 144 次,下载 1,187 次,GitHub 37 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

supabase-audit-auth-users 安全吗?

第三方扫描有未通过项,风险较高。除非你确认过源码,否则不建议直接安装到常用环境。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方扫描存在提醒项或未通过项,需要人工逐条确认。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
supabase-audit-auth-users

Supabase 审核 auth users · 本页

3,38737需要联网未明确未通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

User Enumeration Audit

🔴 CRITICAL: PROGRESSIVE FILE UPDATES REQUIRED You MUST write to context files AS YOU GO, not just at the end. - Write to .sb-pentest-context.json IMMEDIATELY after each endpoint tested - Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log BEFORE and AFTER each test - DO NOT wait until the skill completes to update files - If the skill crashes or is interrupted, all prior findings must already be saved This is not optional. Failure to write progressively is a critical error.

This skill tests for user enumeration vulnerabilities in authentication flows.

When to Use This Skill

  • To check if user existence can be detected
  • To test login, signup, and recovery flows for information leakage
  • As part of authentication security audit
  • Before production deployment

Prerequisites

  • Supabase URL and anon key available
  • Auth endpoints accessible

What is User Enumeration?

User enumeration occurs when an application reveals whether a user account exists through:

VectorIndicator
Different error messages"User not found" vs "Wrong password"
Response timingFast for non-existent, slow for existing
Response codes404 vs 401
Signup response"Email already registered"

Why It Matters

RiskImpact
Targeted attacksAttackers know valid accounts
PhishingConfirm targets have accounts
Credential stuffingReduce attack scope
PrivacyReveal user presence

Tests Performed

EndpointTest Method
/auth/v1/signupTry registering existing email
/auth/v1/tokenTry login with various emails
/auth/v1/recoverTry password reset
/auth/v1/otpTry OTP for various emails

Usage

Basic Enumeration Test

Test for user enumeration vulnerabilities

Test Specific Endpoint

Test login endpoint for user enumeration

Output Format

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 USER ENUMERATION AUDIT
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

 Project: abc123def.supabase.co

 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 Signup Endpoint (/auth/v1/signup)
 ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

 Test: POST with known existing email
 Response for existing: "User already registered"
 Response for new email: User object returned

 Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE

 The response clearly indicates if an email is registered.

 Exploitation:

curl -X POST https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/signup \ -H "apikey: [anon-key]" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"email": "target@example.com", "password": "test123"}'

# If user exists: {"msg": "User already registered"} # If new user: User created or confirmation needed


───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Login Endpoint (/auth/v1/token) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Test: POST with different email scenarios

Existing email, wrong password: ├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"} ├── Time: 245ms └── Code: 400

Non-existing email: ├── Response: {"error": "Invalid login credentials"} ├── Time: 52ms ← Significantly faster! └── Code: 400

Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

Although the error message is the same, the response time is noticeably different: ├── Existing user: ~200-300ms (password hashing) └── Non-existing: ~50-100ms (no hash check)

Timing Attack PoC:

import requests import time

def check_user(email): start = time.time() requests.post( 'https://abc123def.supabase.co/auth/v1/token', params={'grant_type': 'password'}, json={'email': email, 'password': 'wrong'}, headers={'apikey': '[anon-key]'} ) elapsed = time.time() - start return elapsed > 0.15 # Threshold

exists = check_user('target@example.com')


───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Password Recovery (/auth/v1/recover) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Test: POST recovery request for different emails

Existing email: ├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"} ├── Time: 1250ms (email actually sent) └── Code: 200

Non-existing email: ├── Response: {"message": "Password recovery email sent"} ├── Time: 85ms ← Much faster (no email sent) └── Code: 200

Status: 🟠 P2 - ENUMERABLE VIA TIMING

Same message, but timing reveals existence. Existing users trigger actual email sending (~1s+).

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Magic Link / OTP (/auth/v1/otp) ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Test: Request OTP for different emails

Existing email: ├── Response: {"message": "OTP sent"} ├── Time: 1180ms └── Code: 200

Non-existing email: ├── Response: {"error": "User not found"} ├── Time: 95ms └── Code: 400

Status: 🔴 P1 - DIRECTLY ENUMERABLE

The error message explicitly states user doesn't exist.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Summary ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Endpoints Tested: 4 Enumerable: 4 (100%)

Vulnerability Severity: ├── 🔴 P1: OTP endpoint (explicit message) ├── 🟠 P2: Signup endpoint (explicit message) ├── 🟠 P2: Login endpoint (timing attack) └── 🟠 P2: Recovery endpoint (timing attack)

Overall User Enumeration Risk: HIGH

An attacker can determine if any email address has an account in your application.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────────── Mitigation Recommendations ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

1. CONSISTENT RESPONSES Return identical messages for all scenarios: "If an account exists, you will receive an email"
2. CONSISTENT TIMING Add artificial delay to normalize response times: `const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1000; // 1 second const start = Date.now(); //... perform auth operation... const elapsed = Date.now() - start; await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed))); return response;`
3. RATE LIMITING Already enabled: 3/hour per IP Consider per-email rate limiting too.
4. CAPTCHA Add CAPTCHA for repeated attempts:
  - After 3 failed logins
  - For password recovery
  - For signup
5. MONITORING Alert on enumeration patterns:
  - Many requests with different emails
  - Sequential email patterns (user1@, user2@,...)

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

Timing Analysis

The skill measures response times to detect timing-based enumeration:


Existing user: ├── Password hash verification: ~200-300ms ├── Email sending: ~1000-2000ms └── Database lookup: ~5-20ms

Non-existing user: ├── No hash verification: 0ms ├── No email sending: 0ms └── Database lookup: ~5-20ms (not found)

Threshold detection:

  • Difference > 100ms: Possible timing leak
  • Difference > 500ms: Definite timing leak

Context Output

{
  "user_enumeration": {
    "timestamp": "2025-01-31T13:30:00Z",
    "endpoints_tested": 4,
    "vulnerabilities": [
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
        "severity": "P1",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "OTP sent",
        "missing_response": "User not found"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/signup",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "explicit_message",
        "existing_response": "User already registered",
        "missing_response": "User created"
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 245,
        "missing_time_ms": 52
      },
      {
        "endpoint": "/auth/v1/recover",
        "severity": "P2",
        "type": "timing_attack",
        "existing_time_ms": 1250,
        "missing_time_ms": 85
      }
    ]
  }
}

Mitigation Code Examples

Consistent Response Time

// Edge Function with normalized timing
const MIN_RESPONSE_TIME = 1500; // 1.5 seconds

Deno.serve(async (req) => {
  const start = Date.now();

  try {
    // Perform actual auth operation
    const result = await handleAuth(req);

    // Normalize response time
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    return new Response(JSON.stringify(result));
  } catch (error) {
    // Same timing for errors
    const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r,
      Math.max(0, MIN_RESPONSE_TIME - elapsed)
    ));

    // Generic error message
    return new Response(JSON.stringify({
      message: "Check your email if you have an account"
    }));
  }
});

Generic Error Messages

// Don't reveal user existence
async function requestPasswordReset(email: string) {
  // Always return success message
  const response = {
    message: "If an account with that email exists, " +
             "you will receive a password reset link."
  };

  // Perform actual reset in background (don't await)
  supabase.auth.resetPasswordForEmail(email).catch(() => {});

  return response;
}

MANDATORY: Progressive Context File Updates

⚠️ This skill MUST update tracking files PROGRESSIVELY during execution, NOT just at the end.

Critical Rule: Write As You Go

DO NOT batch all writes at the end. Instead:

  1. Before testing each endpoint → Log the action to .sb-pentest-audit.log
  2. After each timing measurement → Immediately update .sb-pentest-context.json
  3. After each enumeration vector found → Log the finding immediately

This ensures that if the skill is interrupted, crashes, or times out, all findings up to that point are preserved.

Required Actions (Progressive)

  1. Update .sb-pentest-context.json with results: {"user_enumeration": {"timestamp": "...", "endpoints_tested": 4, "vulnerabilities": [...]}}
  2. Log to .sb-pentest-audit.log: [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [START] Testing user enumeration [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [FINDING] P1: OTP endpoint enumerable [TIMESTAMP] [supabase-audit-auth-users] [CONTEXT_UPDATED].sb-pentest-context.json updated
  3. If files don't exist, create them before writing.

FAILURE TO UPDATE CONTEXT FILES IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.

MANDATORY: Evidence Collection

📁 Evidence Directory: .sb-pentest-evidence/05-auth-audit/enumeration-tests/

Evidence Files to Create

FileContent
enumeration-tests/login-timing.jsonLogin endpoint timing analysis
enumeration-tests/recovery-timing.jsonRecovery endpoint timing
enumeration-tests/otp-enumeration.jsonOTP endpoint message analysis

Evidence Format

{
  "evidence_id": "AUTH-ENUM-001",
  "timestamp": "2025-01-31T11:00:00Z",
  "category": "auth-audit",
  "type": "user_enumeration",

  "tests": [
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/token",
      "test_type": "timing_attack",
      "severity": "P2",

      "existing_user_test": {
        "email": "[KNOWN_EXISTING]@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 245,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "nonexisting_user_test": {
        "email": "definitely-not-exists@example.com",
        "response_time_ms": 52,
        "response": {"error": "Invalid login credentials"}
      },

      "timing_difference_ms": 193,
      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Can determine if email has account via timing"
    },
    {
      "endpoint": "/auth/v1/otp",
      "test_type": "explicit_message",
      "severity": "P1",

      "existing_user_response": {"message": "OTP sent"},
      "nonexisting_user_response": {"error": "User not found"},

      "result": "ENUMERABLE",
      "impact": "Error message explicitly reveals user existence"
    }
  ],

  "curl_commands": [
    "# Timing test - existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"existing@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'",
    "# Timing test - non-existing user\ntime curl -X POST '$URL/auth/v1/token?grant_type=password' -H 'apikey: $ANON_KEY' -d '{\"email\": \"nonexistent@example.com\", \"password\": \"wrong\"}'"
  ]
}

Related Skills

  • supabase-audit-auth-config — Full auth configuration
  • supabase-audit-auth-signup — Signup flow testing
  • supabase-report — Include in final report

平台分布

Codex

34.25%
按下载量换算407

Claude

31.36%
按下载量换算372

Cursor

16.87%
按下载量换算200

Gemini CLI

8.47%
按下载量换算101

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

未通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

可疑

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。来源安全扫描存在提醒或未通过项,安装前请自行复核。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills