Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

strategic-alignment(战略调整)

strategic-alignment 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 OpenClaw 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

strategic-alignment 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 OpenClaw,通过ClawHub获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT-0,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 12,759。

总安装 9,996周安装 425GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 3,502核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT-0
版本
2.1.1

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:strategic-alignment(战略调整)
来源仓库:https://github.com/alirezarezvani/strategic-alignment
安装命令:
openclaw skills install strategic-alignment
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 OpenClaw 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

ClawHubOpenClaw
openclaw skills install strategic-alignment

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

strategic-alignment 将公司战略分解至个人贡献者,识别执行断层并提供修复建议。适用于组织管理、绩效对齐或跨部门协作的战略落地支持场景。通过 OpenClaw 安装后输入战略文档与团队结构,自动生成对齐路线图。使用前需确保输入信息真实完整,避免因数据偏差导致建议失效。

建议结合季度复盘更新对齐模型,保持战略动态适应性。

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 openclaw skills install strategic-alignment;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

strategic-alignment 怎么安装?

在终端执行 openclaw skills install strategic-alignment。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

strategic-alignment 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 OpenClaw。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

strategic-alignment 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

strategic-alignment 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT-0。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

strategic-alignment 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 9,996 次,近一周安装 425 次,下载 3,502 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

strategic-alignment 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 专注 OpenClaw 一种宿主,触发方式和使用习惯不用来回切换。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT-0,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 OpenClaw,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
strategic-alignment

战略调整 · 本页

9,996—只读MIT-0通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

name
strategic-alignment
description
Cascades strategy from boardroom to individual contributor. Detects and fixes misalignment between company goals and team execution. Covers strategy articulation, cascade mapping, orphan goal detection, silo identification, communication gap analysis, and realignment protocols. Use when teams are pulling in different directions, OKRs don't connect, departments optimize locally at company expense, or when user mentions alignment, strategy cascade, silo, conflicting OKRs, or strategy communication.
license
MIT
metadata
version
1.0.0
author
Alireza Rezvani
category
c-level
domain
strategic-alignment
updated
2026-03-05
python-tools
alignment_checker.py
frameworks
alignment-playbook

Strategic Alignment Engine

Strategy fails at the cascade, not the boardroom. This skill detects misalignment before it becomes dysfunction and builds systems that keep strategy connected from CEO to individual contributor.

Keywords

strategic alignment, strategy cascade, OKR alignment, orphan OKRs, conflicting goals, silos, communication gap, department alignment, alignment checker, strategy articulation, cross-functional, goal cascade, misalignment, alignment score

Quick Start

python scripts/alignment_checker.py    # Check OKR alignment: orphans, conflicts, coverage gaps

Core Framework

The alignment problem: The further a goal gets from the strategy that created it, the less likely it reflects the original intent. This is the organizational telephone game. It happens at every stage. The question is how bad it is and how to fix it.

Step 1: Strategy Articulation Test

Before checking cascade, check the source. Ask five people from five different teams: "What is the company's most important strategic priority right now?"

Scoring:

  • All five give the same answer: ✅ Articulation is clear
  • 3–4 give similar answers: 🟡 Loose alignment — clarify and communicate
  • < 3 agree: 🔴 Strategy isn't clear enough to cascade. Fix this before fixing cascade.

Format test: The strategy should be statable in one sentence. If leadership needs a paragraph, teams won't internalize it.

  • ❌ "We focus on product-led growth while maintaining enterprise relationships and expanding our international presence and investing in platform capabilities"
  • ✅ "Win the mid-market healthcare segment in DACH before Series B"

Step 2: Cascade Mapping

Map the flow from company strategy → each level of the organization.

Company level:  OKR-1, OKR-2, OKR-3
    ↓
Dept level:     Sales OKRs, Eng OKRs, Product OKRs, CS OKRs
    ↓
Team level:     Team A OKRs, Team B OKRs...
    ↓
Individual:     Personal goals / rocks

For each goal at every level, ask:

  • Which company-level goal does this support?
  • If this goal is 100% achieved, how much does it move the company goal?
  • Is the connection direct or theoretical?

Step 3: Alignment Detection

Three failure patterns:

Orphan goals: Team or individual goals that don't connect to any company goal.

  • Symptom: "We've been working on this for a quarter and nobody above us seems to care"
  • Root cause: Goals set bottom-up or from last quarter's priorities without reconciling to current company OKRs
  • Fix: Connect or cut. Every goal needs a parent.

Conflicting goals: Two teams' goals, when both succeed, create a worse outcome.

  • Classic example: Sales commits to volume contracts (revenue), CS is measured on satisfaction scores. Sales closes bad-fit customers; CS scores tank.
  • Fix: Cross-functional OKR review before quarter begins. Shared metrics where teams interact.

Coverage gaps: Company has 3 OKRs. 5 teams support OKR-1, 2 support OKR-2, 0 support OKR-3.

  • Symptom: Company OKR-3 consistently misses; nobody owns it
  • Fix: Explicit ownership assignment. If no team owns a company OKR, it won't happen.

See scripts/alignment_checker.py for automated detection against your JSON-formatted OKRs.

Step 4: Silo Identification

Silos exist when teams optimize for local metrics at the expense of company metrics.

Silo signals:

  • A department consistently hits their goals while the company misses
  • Teams don't know what other teams are working on
  • "That's not our problem" is a common phrase
  • Escalations only flow up; coordination never flows sideways
  • Data isn't shared between teams that depend on each other

Silo root causes:

  1. Incentive misalignment: Teams rewarded for local metrics don't optimize for company metrics
  2. No shared goals: When teams share a goal, they coordinate. When they don't, they drift.
  3. No shared language: Engineering doesn't understand sales metrics; sales doesn't understand technical debt
  4. Geography or time zones: Silos accelerate when teams don't interact organically

Silo measurement:

  • How often do teams request something from each other vs. proceed independently?
  • How much time does it take to resolve a cross-functional issue?
  • Can a team member describe the current priorities of an adjacent team?

Step 5: Communication Gap Analysis

What the CEO says ≠ what teams hear. The gap grows with company size.

The message decay model:

  • CEO communicates strategy at all-hands → managers filter through their lens → teams receive modified version → individuals interpret further

Gap sources:

  • Ambiguity: Strategy stated at too high a level ("grow the business") lets each team fill in their own interpretation
  • Frequency: One all-hands per quarter isn't enough repetition to change behavior
  • Medium mismatch: Long written strategy doc for teams that respond to visual communication
  • Trust deficit: Teams don't believe the strategy is real ("we've heard this before")

Gap detection:

  • Run the Step 1 articulation test across all levels
  • Compare what leadership thinks they communicated vs. what teams say they heard
  • Survey: "What changed about how you work since the last strategy update?"

Step 6: Realignment Protocol

How to fix misalignment without calling it a "realignment" (which creates fear).

Step 6a: Don't start with what's wrong Starting with "here's our misalignment" creates defensiveness. Start with "here's where we're heading and I want to make sure we're connected."

Step 6b: Re-cascade in a workshop, not a memo Alignment workshops are more effective than documents. Get company-level OKR owners and department leads in a room. Map connections. Find gaps together.

Step 6c: Fix incentives before fixing goals If department heads are rewarded for local metrics that conflict with company goals, no amount of goal-setting fixes the problem. The incentive structure must change first.

Step 6d: Install a quarterly alignment check After fixing, prevent recurrence. See references/alignment-playbook.md for quarterly cadence.


Alignment Score

A quick health check. Score each area 0–10:

AreaQuestionScore
Strategy clarityCan 5 people from different teams state the strategy consistently?/10
Cascade completenessDo all team goals connect to company goals?/10
Conflict detectionHave cross-team OKR conflicts been reviewed and resolved?/10
CoverageDoes each company OKR have explicit team ownership?/10
CommunicationDo teams' behaviors reflect the strategy (not just their stated understanding)?/10

Total: __ / 50

ScoreStatus
45–50Excellent. Maintain the system.
35–44Good. Address specific weak areas.
20–34Misalignment is costing you. Immediate attention required.
< 20Strategic drift. Treat as crisis.

Key Questions for Alignment

  • "Ask your newest team member: what is the most important thing the company is trying to achieve right now?"
  • "Which company OKR does your team's top priority support? Can you trace the connection?"
  • "When Team A and Team B both hit their goals, does the company always win? Are there scenarios where they don't?"
  • "What changed in how your team works since the last strategy update?"
  • "Name a decision made last week that was influenced by the company strategy."

Red Flags

  • Teams consistently hit goals while company misses targets
  • Cross-functional projects take 3x longer than expected (coordination failure)
  • Strategy updated quarterly but team priorities don't change
  • "That's a leadership problem, not our problem" attitude at the team level
  • New initiatives announced without connecting them to existing OKRs
  • Department heads optimize for headcount or budget rather than company outcomes

Integration with Other C-Suite Roles

When...Work with...To...
New strategy is setCEO + COOCascade into quarterly rocks before announcing
OKR cycle startsCOORun cross-team conflict check before finalizing
Team consistently misses goalsCHRODiagnose: capability gap or alignment gap?
Silo identifiedCOODesign shared metrics or cross-functional OKRs
Post-M&ACEO + Culture ArchitectDetect strategy conflicts between merged entities

Detailed References

  • scripts/alignment_checker.py — Automated OKR alignment analysis (orphans, conflicts, coverage)
  • references/alignment-playbook.md — Cascade techniques, quarterly alignment check, common patterns

平台分布

OpenClaw

71.36%
按下载量换算2,499

安全审计

VirusTotal

通过

ClawScan

通过

Static analysis

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills