Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

story(story 搜索)

story 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

story 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证为 MIT,暂无第三方扫描结果,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 46,597。

总安装 774周安装 31GitHub Stars 公开资料未说明下载 250核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:story(story 搜索)
来源仓库:https://github.com/duc01226/easyplatform
仓库路径:skills/story
安装命令:
npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "story"
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

AgentSkills.tonpx skills
npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "story"

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

story 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位内容。支持根据关键词或任务场景筛选候选结果,提升信息获取效率。通过 npx 命令从 GitHub 仓库安装,需参考原始 README 了解细节。安装前应检查权限、维护状态及是否涉及网络或系统调用。

story 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/story

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "story";命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

story 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add duc01226/easyplatform --skill "story"。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

story 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

story 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

story 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

story 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 774 次,近一周安装 31 次,下载 250 次。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

story 安全吗?

没有查到第三方扫描结果,安全性无法从公开资料判断,安装前请自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。

先想清楚的地方

  • 没有第三方扫描结果,安全性只能靠自己读源码判断。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 要求有安全扫描结论才肯安装的团队。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
story

story 搜索 · 本页

774—需要联网MIT未收录

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

User Story Creation

Break Product Backlog Items into implementable user stories using vertical slicing and SPIDR patterns.


When to Use

  • PBI ready for story breakdown
  • Feature needs vertical slicing
  • Creating sprint-ready work items
  • Story too large (effort >8)

Quick Reference

Workflow

  1. Read PBI artifact and acceptance criteria
  2. Load domain context (if BravoSUITE module detected)
  3. Identify vertical slices (end-to-end functionality)
  4. Apply SPIDR splitting if stories too large
  5. Apply INVEST criteria to each story
  6. Create user stories with GIVEN/WHEN/THEN (min 3 scenarios)
  7. Save to team-artifacts/pbis/stories/
  8. Validate stories (MANDATORY) - Interview user to confirm slicing, acceptance criteria, and effort
  9. Suggest next: /test-spec or /design-spec

Output

  • Path: team-artifacts/pbis/stories/{YYMMDD}-us-{pbi-slug}.md
  • Format: Single file with all stories (use ## headers per story)

BravoSUITE Domain Context Loading

When slicing domain-related PBIs, automatically load business context.

Step 1: Detect Module

From PBI frontmatter:

  1. Check module field
  2. If missing, detect from keywords:

- bravoTALENTS: candidate, job, interview, recruitment, CV, applicant - bravoGROWTH: goal, kudos, performance, check-in, timesheet - bravoSURVEYS: survey, question, response, distribution - bravoINSIGHTS: dashboard, report, analytics

Step 2: Load Feature Context

Glob("docs/business-features/{module}/detailed-features/*.md")
  1. Read module README (first 200 lines)
  2. Identify related feature from related_features list
  3. Extract existing business rules (BR-{MOD}-XXX)
  4. Note entity names from feature docs

Step 3: Apply Domain Vocabulary

ModuleCorrect TermAvoid
bravoTALENTSCandidateApplicant
bravoTALENTSJobApplicationApplication
bravoGROWTHGoalObjective
bravoGROWTHEmployeeUser, Staff
bravoSURVEYSSurveyForm, Questionnaire

Step 4: Include in Story

## Domain Context

**Module:** {detected module}
**Feature:** {related feature}
**Entities:** {Entity1}, {Entity2}
**Business Rules:** BR-{MOD}-XXX (from feature docs)

INVEST Criteria

CriterionDefinitionValidation Question
IndependentNo dependencies on other storiesCan this be developed in any order?
NegotiableDetails can changeIs the "how" open for discussion?
ValuableDelivers user valueDoes user get observable benefit?
EstimableCan estimate effortCan team size this?
SmallCompletable in sprintEffort ≤8? (prefer ≤5)
TestableClear acceptance criteriaCan we write pass/fail tests?

SPIDR Splitting Checklist

When to apply: Story effort >8 MUST split. Effort >5 SHOULD split.

PatternQuestionSplit Strategy
SpikeUnknown complexity?Create research spike first, then stories
PathsMultiple workflow branches?One story per path/choice
InterfacesMultiple UIs or APIs?One story per interface
DataMultiple data formats/types?One story per data variation
RulesMultiple business rules?One story per rule variation

Splitting Examples

Paths: "User can pay by card OR PayPal" → Story A: Card payment, Story B: PayPal payment

Data: "Import CSV, Excel, JSON" → Story A: CSV import, Story B: Excel import, Story C: JSON import

Rules: "Different approval flows by amount" → Story A: <$1000 auto-approve, Story B: >$1000 manager approval

Size Validation

Effort 1-5:  ✅ Good size
Effort 6-8:  ⚠️ Consider splitting (apply SPIDR)
Effort >8:   ❌ MUST split (apply SPIDR, repeat until ≤8)

Scenario Templates

Minimum 3 scenarios per story:

1. Happy Path (Positive)

Scenario: User successfully {completes action}
  Given {user has required permissions/state}
  And {required data exists}
  When user {performs valid action}
  Then {primary expected outcome}
  And {secondary verification if needed}

2. Edge Case (Boundary)

Scenario: System handles {boundary condition}
  Given {edge state: empty list, max items, zero value}
  When user {attempts action at boundary}
  Then {appropriate handling: pagination, warning, default}

3. Error Case (Negative)

Scenario: System prevents {invalid action}
  Given {precondition}
  When user {provides invalid input OR unauthorized action}
  Then error message "{specific error message}"
  And {system remains in valid state}
  And {no partial changes saved}

Additional Scenario Types

Security: Unauthorized access attempt Performance: Response time under load Concurrency: Simultaneous user actions Integration: External service unavailable


Story Artifact Template

---
id: US-{YYMMDD}-{NNN}
parent_pbi: "{PBI-ID}"
title: "{Brief story title}"
persona: "{User persona}"
priority: P1 | P2 | P3
effort: 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8
status: draft | ready | in_progress | done
module: "{bravoTALENTS | bravoGROWTH | bravoSURVEYS | bravoINSIGHTS}"
---

# User Stories for {PBI Title}

## Story 1: {Title}

**As a** {user role}
**I want** {goal}
**So that** {benefit}

### Acceptance Criteria

#### Scenario 1: {Happy path title}

Given {context} When {action} Then {outcome}


#### Scenario 2: {Edge case title}

Given {edge state} When {action} Then {handling}


#### Scenario 3: {Error case title}

Given {context} When {invalid action} Then error "{message}"


---

## Story 2: {Title}

{Repeat structure...}

---

## Out of Scope

- {Explicitly excluded items}

## Dependencies

- **Upstream:** {What must be done first}
- **Downstream:** {What depends on this}

## Domain Context

**Module:** {module} **Related Feature:** {feature doc path} **Entities:** {Entity1}, {Entity2} **Business Rules:** {BR-XXX references}

## Technical Notes

- {Implementation hints if needed}

## Validation Summary

**Validated:** {date}

### Confirmed

- {decision}: {user choice}

### Action Items

- {follow-up if any}

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

Anti-PatternProblemCorrect Approach
Horizontal slicing"Backend story" + "Frontend story" = delays valueVertical slice: thin end-to-end functionality
Single scenarioMissing edge/error casesMinimum 3 scenarios: happy, edge, error
Vague criteria"Fast", "user-friendly" untestableQuantify: "< 200ms", "≤ 3 clicks"
Solution-speak"Use Redis cache" constrains teamOutcome: "Results return within 200ms"
Effort >8Won't fit sprint, hard to estimateApply SPIDR, split until ≤8
No error scenarioMissing negative test coverageAlways include invalid input handling
Generic persona"As a user" too vagueSpecific: "As a hiring manager"

Quality Checklist

Before completing user stories:

  • [ ] Each story follows "As a... I want... So that..." format
  • [ ] SPIDR splitting applied (effort ≤8, prefer ≤5)
  • [ ] At least 3 scenarios per story: happy, edge, error
  • [ ] All scenarios use GIVEN/WHEN/THEN format
  • [ ] Effort estimated in Fibonacci (1, 2, 3, 5, 8)
  • [ ] Stories independent (can develop in any order)
  • [ ] Out of scope explicitly listed
  • [ ] Dependencies identified (upstream/downstream)
  • [ ] Parent PBI linked in frontmatter
  • [ ] Domain vocabulary used correctly (if BravoSUITE)
  • [ ] Validation interview completed

Validation Step (MANDATORY)

After creating user stories, validate with user.

Question Categories

CategoryExample Question
Slicing"Are the story slices independent enough?"
Size"Any story >8 effort that needs further splitting?"
Scenarios"Any acceptance criteria missing for edge cases?"
Dependencies"Are there hidden dependencies between stories?"
Scope"Should anything be explicitly excluded?"

Process

  1. Generate 2-4 questions focused on slicing quality, scenarios, and dependencies
  2. Use AskUserQuestion tool to interview
  3. Document in story artifact under ## Validation Summary
  4. Update stories based on answers (split if needed)

This step is NOT optional.


Related

TypeReference
Role Skillbusiness-analyst
Command/story
Input/refine output (PBI)
Next Steps/test-spec, /design-spec, /prioritize

Triggers

Activates on: story, user story, user stories, slice, slicing, split story, breakdown


Task Management Protocol: - Always plan and break work into many small todo tasks - Always add a final review todo task to verify work quality and identify fixes/enhancements

平台分布

Claude Code

30.18%
按下载量换算75

windsurf

21.79%
按下载量换算54

OpenCode

19.27%
按下载量换算48

Codex

12.87%
按下载量换算32

Antigravity

7.71%
按下载量换算19

Gemini CLI

3.47%
按下载量换算9

安全审计

暂无安全审计结果可展示。

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills