Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

stories(stories 命令行)

stories 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

stories 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为需要联网;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 9,185。

总安装 233周安装 10GitHub Stars 35下载 82核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:stories(stories 命令行)
来源仓库:https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills
仓库路径:skills/stories
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill stories
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill stories

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

stories 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息。它适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。安装命令:npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill stories

来源仓库内路径:skills/stories

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill stories;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要需要联网,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

stories 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/kazdenc/builder-skills --skill stories。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

stories 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

stories 需要什么权限?

权限级别是需要联网。该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

stories 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

stories 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 233 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 82 次,GitHub 35 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

stories 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
stories

stories 命令行 · 本页

23335需要联网未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Job Stories & User Stories

Translate requirements into stories that a team can pick up and build. Prefer job stories over user stories — situations are more actionable than personas.

Why Job Stories Over User Stories

User stories anchor on a persona: "As a project manager..." But the same person behaves differently depending on context. A project manager at 9am triaging is doing a different job than at 3pm reporting to stakeholders.

Job stories anchor on the situation, which is what actually drives behavior.

FormatExampleStrength
Job story: When [situation], I want to [motivation], so I can [outcome]When I'm reviewing pull requests before standup, I want to see which ones block other work, so I can prioritize reviews that unblock the teamCaptures context that shapes the solution
User story: As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]As a tech lead, I want to see PR priorities, so that I can review efficientlyVague on when/why this matters

Use user stories if the team is already fluent in them. Don't fight process for its own sake. But write the situation into the description either way.

Writing Good Stories

A good story is independent, negotiable, valuable, estimable, small, and testable (INVEST).

GoodBadWhy it's bad
When I'm halfway through a form and get interrupted, I want my progress saved, so I can resume without re-entering dataThe system should auto-save formsNo situation, no outcome, not testable
When I receive a notification about a price drop, I want to see the item and the new price inline, so I can decide to buy without opening the appAs a user, I want push notificationsToo vague, no context, no clear done state
When I'm comparing two plans side by side, I want differences highlighted, so I can spot what matters without reading every lineBuild a comparison table with highlightingThat's a solution, not a story

Breaking Large Stories Down

If a story takes more than 3 days to build, it's too big. Split by:

  • Workflow step — "When I start..." vs "When I'm halfway through..." vs "When I finish..."
  • Data variation — Handle the common case first, edge cases as separate stories
  • Platform — Mobile vs desktop if the experience genuinely differs
  • User maturity — First-time vs returning vs power user

Don't split by technical layer (frontend/backend/database). Stories should deliver visible user value.

Writing Acceptance Criteria

Every story needs acceptance criteria in Given/When/Then format. These are the contract between product and engineering.

Story: When I'm reviewing PRs before standup, I want to see which ones
       block other work, so I can prioritize unblocking reviews.

Acceptance Criteria:

  Given I have PRs assigned to me for review
  When I open the review queue
  Then PRs that block other PRs or deployments appear at the top

  Given a PR has been waiting for review for more than 24 hours
  When I view my review queue
  Then it is flagged with a time-waiting indicator

  Given no PRs are assigned to me
  When I open the review queue
  Then I see an empty state with a message (not a blank screen)

Rules for acceptance criteria:

  • One behavior per Given/When/Then block. Don't chain multiple outcomes.
  • Include the sad path. What happens when there's no data, an error, or unexpected input?
  • Stay observable. "The system processes it quickly" is not observable. "The results appear within 2 seconds" is.
  • Skip implementation. "The API returns a 200" is an engineering test, not acceptance criteria.

Sizing Guidance

SizeSignalAction
< 1 dayMight be a task, not a storyCombine with related work or keep as-is if it delivers standalone value
1-3 daysRight-sizedShip it
3-5 daysBorderlineLook for a natural split point
> 5 daysToo bigSplit by workflow step or data variation

Sizing is for the whole slice — design, build, test. Not just coding time.

Output Format

Deliver stories as a numbered list. Group them by workflow stage or theme. Each story gets:

  1. Story statement (job story format)
  2. Acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then)
  3. Size estimate (S/M/L or day count)
  4. Dependencies (other stories that must ship first, if any)

平台分布

Codex

35.92%
按下载量换算29

Claude

31.69%
按下载量换算26

Cursor

17.5%
按下载量换算14

Gemini CLI

9.94%
按下载量换算8

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

需要联网

该 Skill 可能需要联网访问来源站点、仓库或外部 API;具体网络访问范围需要结合源码和 README 复核。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills