Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

static-site-security(静态站点安全)

用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查。它适合让 Agent 梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险、分析鉴权逻辑或生成安全复核清单。使用时不能把工具输出直接当最终结论,涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。

static-site-security 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 20,060。

总安装 242周安装 10GitHub Stars 7下载 79核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:static-site-security(静态站点安全)
来源仓库:https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor
仓库路径:skills/static-site-security
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill static-site-security
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill static-site-security

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

static-site-security 用于辅助安全审计、权限检查、凭据风险、认证流程和常见漏洞排查,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中梳理敏感配置、检查依赖风险或分析鉴权逻辑。

它不能把工具输出直接当最终结论;涉及密钥、令牌、用户数据或生产系统时,应先确认最小权限、脱敏方式和操作边界。安装方式:github,命令为 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill static-site-security。

当前分类为开发,适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。使用时需注意保留项目已有事实、命令和路径,不要将未确认信息写成确定结论。

来源仓库内路径:skills/static-site-security

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill static-site-sec…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

static-site-security 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/hack23/riksdagsmonitor --skill static-site-security。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

static-site-security 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

static-site-security 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

static-site-security 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

static-site-security 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 242 次,近一周安装 10 次,下载 79 次,GitHub 7 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

static-site-security 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
static-site-security

静态站点安全 · 本页

2427接触敏感数据未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Static Site Security Skill

🔴 AI FIRST Quality Principle

Apply the AI FIRST principle: never accept first-pass quality. Minimum 2 iterations. Read all output, improve every section. No shortcuts.

Purpose

Comprehensive security practices for static websites, leveraging their inherent security advantages while addressing remaining risks.

Security Advantages of Static Sites

Eliminated Attack Vectors

✅ No SQL Injection: No database to inject into ✅ No Server-Side XSS: No server-side rendering ✅ No CSRF: No state management or forms processing ✅ No Session Hijacking: No sessions to hijack ✅ No Remote Code Execution: No server-side code ✅ No File Upload Vulnerabilities: No upload functionality ✅ No Authentication Bypass: No authentication system

Reduced Attack Surface

Traditional Web App Attack Surface:
- Web server vulnerabilities
- Application code vulnerabilities
- Database vulnerabilities
- Server OS vulnerabilities
- Third-party libraries
- Session management
- File system access
- Network services

Static Site Attack Surface:
- CDN security (GitHub Pages)
- DNS hijacking
- Content integrity
- Dependency vulnerabilities (minimal)

Transport Layer Security

HTTPS Configuration

✅ Required:
- HTTPS-only (TLS 1.3)
- Automatic HTTPS redirect
- Valid SSL/TLS certificate
- Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS)

For GitHub Pages:
- Enforced HTTPS in repository settings
- Automatic Let's Encrypt certificates
- TLS 1.3 support by default

Security Headers

Essential headers for static sites:

Content-Security-Policy:
  default-src 'self';
  script-src 'self';
  style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' fonts.googleapis.com;
  font-src 'self' fonts.gstatic.com;
  img-src 'self' data:;
  connect-src 'self';
  frame-ancestors 'none';

Strict-Transport-Security:
  max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

X-Content-Type-Options:
  nosniff

X-Frame-Options:
  DENY

Referrer-Policy:
  strict-origin-when-cross-origin

Permissions-Policy:
  geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()

Content Security

Subresource Integrity (SRI)

<!-- ✅ Good: SRI for stable, versioned external resources -->
<script
  src="https://cdn.example.com/script.v1.2.3.js"
  integrity="sha384-..."
  crossorigin="anonymous"
></script>

<!-- ⚠️ Google Fonts: dynamic content, SRI not reliable unless you self-host -->
<!-- Either self-host the font CSS with SRI, or omit SRI for the dynamic URL: -->
<link
  rel="stylesheet"
  href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter"
  crossorigin="anonymous"
>

<!-- ❌ Bad: No integrity check on a static, versioned asset -->
<script src="https://cdn.example.com/script.v1.2.3.js"></script>

Dependency Management

✅ Best practices:
1. Minimize external dependencies
2. Use trusted CDNs only (Google Fonts, etc.)
3. Implement SRI for CDN resources
4. Regular dependency scanning
5. Prefer self-hosted over CDN when possible
6. Document all external dependencies

HTML Injection Prevention

<!-- Even static sites can have issues if using templates -->

<!-- ❌ Bad: Unsafe data in HTML -->
<div>{{ userData }}</div>

<!-- ✅ Good: Escaped/sanitized -->
<div>{{ userData | escape }}</div>

<!-- ✅ Best: Static content only -->
<div>Hardcoded safe content</div>

Access Control Security

GitHub Repository Security

✅ Required access controls:
- MFA enabled for all contributors
- SSH keys with passphrase
- GPG commit signing required
- Branch protection on main/master
- Required pull request reviews
- Status checks must pass
- Restrict who can push
- Restrict force pushes

GitHub Pages Security

✅ Configuration:
- Enforce HTTPS enabled
- Source branch restricted (main only)
- Custom domain with DNSSEC (optional)
- Repository visibility: Public (for open source)

Secrets Management

✅ Never commit:
- API keys
- Passwords
- Private keys
- OAuth tokens
- Any credentials

✅ Use instead:
- GitHub Secrets for CI/CD
- Environment variables
- Secure credential stores
- GitHub Apps (not PATs when possible)

CDN and Hosting Security

GitHub Pages Security Model

✅ GitHub provides:
- Global CDN with DDoS protection
- Automatic TLS certificates
- High availability (99.9% SLA)
- Infrastructure security
- Regular security updates

⚠️ User responsibilities:
- Content security
- Access control
- Dependency management
- Security monitoring

DNS Security

✅ Best practices:
- Use DNSSEC if supported
- CAA records for certificate authority
- Monitor DNS for hijacking
- Use reputable DNS provider

Example CAA record:
example.com. CAA 0 issue "letsencrypt.org"

Monitoring and Detection

Security Monitoring

✅ Implement monitoring for:
- GitHub security alerts
- Dependabot vulnerability alerts
- Secret scanning alerts
- Code scanning (CodeQL) alerts
- Unusual access patterns
- Repository changes
- Workflow failures

Audit Logging

✅ Enable and review:
- GitHub audit log (organization)
- GitHub Actions logs
- Commit history (immutable)
- Access logs (GitHub provides)
- Security event logs

Alerting Strategy

Critical alerts (immediate response):
- Secret exposure detected
- Unauthorized access attempt
- Critical vulnerability found
- Security workflow failure

Warning alerts (24h response):
- Dependency with high severity CVE
- Failed security checks
- Unusual activity patterns

Info alerts (weekly review):
- New dependencies added
- Configuration changes
- Access changes

Incident Response

Detection

1. Automated alerts (Dependabot, CodeQL, secret scanning)
2. Manual monitoring (code reviews, security audits)
3. External reports (responsible disclosure)
4. GitHub security advisories

Containment

Immediate actions:
1. Disable GitHub Pages if compromised
2. Revoke exposed credentials
3. Block malicious IP addresses (if applicable)
4. Revert to last known good state

Recovery

Steps:
1. Identify root cause
2. Fix vulnerability
3. Test fix thoroughly
4. Deploy patched version
5. Verify security restored
6. Monitor for recurrence

Post-Incident

Actions:
1. Document incident timeline
2. Update THREAT_MODEL.md
3. Update SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md
4. Improve detection capabilities
5. Share lessons learned
6. Update incident response procedures

Deployment Security

CI/CD Security

# Security-hardened deployment workflow
name: Deploy

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

permissions:
  contents: read  # Least privilege

jobs:
  deploy:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest

    steps:
      - uses: step-security/harden-runner@SHA
        with:
          egress-policy: audit

      - uses: actions/checkout@SHA

      - name: Security Scan
        run: |
          # HTML validation
          htmlhint *.html

          # Link check
          linkinator . --recurse

          # Dependency check
          npm audit

      - name: Deploy
        if: success()
        run: echo "Deploy to GitHub Pages"

Rollback Procedures

✅ Ensure capability to:
1. Revert to previous commit (git revert)
2. Redeploy last known good version
3. Disable site temporarily if needed
4. Restore from backup if necessary

RTO (Recovery Time Objective): < 15 minutes
RPO (Recovery Point Objective): Last commit

Security Testing

Pre-Deployment Tests

Automated tests:
- HTML validation (HTMLHint)
- Link checking (linkinator)
- Dependency scanning (Dependabot)
- Secret scanning (GitHub)
- Code scanning (CodeQL)

Manual tests:
- Security header verification
- HTTPS enforcement check
- Content review
- Access control verification

Security Audit Checklist

Monthly audit:
- [ ] Review GitHub security alerts
- [ ] Check for exposed secrets
- [ ] Verify HTTPS enforcement
- [ ] Test security headers
- [ ] Review access controls
- [ ] Update dependencies
- [ ] Review commit history
- [ ] Test rollback procedures

Quarterly audit:
- [ ] Full threat model review
- [ ] Penetration testing (if applicable)
- [ ] Security architecture review
- [ ] Incident response drill
- [ ] Third-party security assessment

Remember

  • Leverage Static Advantages: No server-side code = no server-side vulnerabilities
  • Transport Security: Always HTTPS with strong headers
  • Minimize Dependencies: Each dependency is potential risk
  • Monitor Continuously: Automated scanning catches issues early
  • Access Control: Protect the source, protect the site
  • Plan for Incidents: Detection, response, recovery procedures
  • Document Everything: Security decisions and configurations

References

平台分布

Codex

38.99%
按下载量换算31

Claude

29.23%
按下载量换算23

Cursor

20.87%
按下载量换算16

Gemini CLI

8.86%
按下载量换算7

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills