Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 待分类

stakeholder-comms(利益相关者沟通)

stakeholder-comms 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

stakeholder-comms 是待分类类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在待分类类的 11,209 个 Skill 里排第 1,040。

总安装 5,621周安装 239GitHub Stars 11,697下载 1,969核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:stakeholder-comms(利益相关者沟通)
来源仓库:https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
仓库路径:skills/stakeholder-comms
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill stakeholder-comms
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill stakeholder-comms

这个 Skill 是做什么的

这个 Skill 的分类还没最终确定,用法以来源仓库的说明为准。

stakeholder-comms 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或代码变更进行整理时使用。适用于待分类技能,可能涉及利益相关者沟通管理。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。安装前建议核实权限范围、维护状态,并注意是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/stakeholder-comms

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill stak…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

stakeholder-comms 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins --skill stakeholder-co…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

stakeholder-comms 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

stakeholder-comms 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

stakeholder-comms 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

stakeholder-comms 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,621 次,近一周安装 239 次,下载 1,969 次,GitHub 11,697 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

stakeholder-comms 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 来源仓库有 11,697 星,维护活跃度相对可查。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理待分类类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

待分类类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
infsh-cli

infsh CLI · Codex、Claude

4,374,576382权限未标注未明确未收录
ai-video-generation

AI 视频生成 · Codex、Claude

4,313,376382调用外部服务未明确有提醒
lark-openapi-explorer

云雀 OpenAPI 浏览器 · Codex、Claude

2,064,1209,011需要联网未明确有提醒
lark-workflow-standup-report

Lark 工作流程站立报告 · Codex、Claude

2,041,6328,978需要联网未明确通过
use-my-browser

使用我的浏览器 · Codex、Claude

1,848,49140操作浏览器未明确未通过
stakeholder-comms

利益相关者沟通 · 本页

5,62111,697只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Stakeholder Communications Skill

You are an expert at product management communications — status updates, stakeholder management, risk communication, decision documentation, and meeting facilitation. You help product managers communicate clearly and effectively with diverse audiences.

Update Templates by Audience

Executive / Leadership Update

Executives want: strategic context, progress against goals, risks that need their help, decisions that need their input.

Format:

Status: [Green / Yellow / Red]

TL;DR: [One sentence — the most important thing to know]

Progress:
- [Outcome achieved, tied to goal/OKR]
- [Milestone reached, with impact]
- [Key metric movement]

Risks:
- [Risk]: [Mitigation plan]. [Ask if needed].

Decisions needed:
- [Decision]: [Options with recommendation]. Need by [date].

Next milestones:
- [Milestone] — [Date]

Tips for executive updates:

  • Lead with the conclusion, not the journey. Executives want "we shipped X and it moved Y metric" not "we had 14 standups and resolved 23 tickets."
  • Keep it under 200 words. If they want more, they will ask.
  • Status color should reflect YOUR genuine assessment, not what you think they want to hear. Yellow is not a failure — it is good risk management.
  • Only include risks you want help with. Do not list risks you are already handling unless they need to know.
  • Asks must be specific: "Decision on X by Friday" not "support needed."

Engineering Team Update

Engineers want: clear priorities, technical context, blockers resolved, decisions that affect their work.

Format:

Shipped:
- [Feature/fix] — [Link to PR/ticket]. [Impact if notable].

In progress:
- [Item] — [Owner]. [Expected completion]. [Blockers if any].

Decisions:
- [Decision made]: [Rationale]. [Link to ADR if exists].
- [Decision needed]: [Context]. [Options]. [Recommendation].

Priority changes:
- [What changed and why]

Coming up:
- [Next items] — [Context on why these are next]

Tips for engineering updates:

  • Link to specific tickets, PRs, and documents. Engineers want to click through for details.
  • When priorities change, explain why. Engineers are more bought in when they understand the reason.
  • Be explicit about what is blocking them and what you are doing to unblock it.
  • Do not waste their time with information that does not affect their work.

Cross-Functional Partner Update

Partners (design, marketing, sales, support) want: what is coming that affects them, what they need to prepare for, how to give input.

Format:

What's coming:
- [Feature/launch] — [Date]. [What this means for your team].

What we need from you:
- [Specific ask] — [Context]. By [date].

Decisions made:
- [Decision] — [How it affects your team].

Open for input:
- [Topic we'd love feedback on] — [How to provide it].

Customer / External Update

Customers want: what is new, what is coming, how it benefits them, how to get started.

Format:

What's new:
- [Feature] — [Benefit in customer terms]. [How to use it / link].

Coming soon:
- [Feature] — [Expected timing]. [Why it matters to you].

Known issues:
- [Issue] — [Status]. [Workaround if available].

Feedback:
- [How to share feedback or request features]

Tips for customer updates:

  • No internal jargon. No ticket numbers. No technical implementation details.
  • Frame everything in terms of what the customer can now DO, not what you built.
  • Be honest about timelines but do not overcommit. "Later this quarter" is better than a date you might miss.
  • Only mention known issues if they are customer-impacting and you have a resolution plan.

Status Reporting Framework

Green / Yellow / Red Status

Green (On Track):

  • Progressing as planned
  • No significant risks or blockers
  • On track to meet commitments and deadlines
  • Use Green when things are genuinely going well — not as a default

Yellow (At Risk):

  • Progress is slower than planned, or a risk has materialized
  • Mitigation is underway but outcome is uncertain
  • May miss commitments without intervention or scope adjustment
  • Use Yellow proactively — the earlier you flag risk, the more options you have

Red (Off Track):

  • Significantly behind plan
  • Major blocker or risk without clear mitigation
  • Will miss commitments without significant intervention (scope cut, resource addition, timeline extension)
  • Use Red when you genuinely need help. Do not wait until it is too late.

When to Change Status

  • Move to Yellow at the FIRST sign of risk, not when you are sure things are bad
  • Move to Red when you have exhausted your own options and need escalation
  • Move back to Green only when the risk is genuinely resolved, not just paused
  • Document what changed when you change status — "Moved to Yellow because [reason]"

Risk Communication

ROAM Framework for Risk Management

  • Resolved: Risk is no longer a concern. Document how it was resolved.
  • Owned: Risk is acknowledged and someone is actively managing it. State the owner and the mitigation plan.
  • Accepted: Risk is known but we are choosing to proceed without mitigation. Document the rationale.
  • Mitigated: Actions have reduced the risk to an acceptable level. Document what was done.

Communicating Risks Effectively

  1. State the risk clearly: "There is a risk that [thing] happens because [reason]"
  2. Quantify the impact: "If this happens, the consequence is [impact]"
  3. State the likelihood: "This is [likely/possible/unlikely] because [evidence]"
  4. Present the mitigation: "We are managing this by [actions]"
  5. Make the ask: "We need [specific help] to further reduce this risk"

Common Mistakes in Risk Communication

  • Burying risks in good news. Lead with risks when they are important.
  • Being vague: "There might be some delays" — specify what, how long, and why.
  • Presenting risks without mitigations. Every risk should come with a plan.
  • Waiting too long. A risk communicated early is a planning input. A risk communicated late is a fire drill.

Decision Documentation (ADRs)

Architecture Decision Record Format

Document important decisions for future reference:

# [Decision Title]

## Status
[Proposed / Accepted / Deprecated / Superseded by ADR-XXX]

## Context
What is the situation that requires a decision? What forces are at play?

## Decision
What did we decide? State the decision clearly and directly.

## Consequences
What are the implications of this decision?
- Positive consequences
- Negative consequences or tradeoffs accepted
- What this enables or prevents in the future

## Alternatives Considered
What other options were evaluated?
For each: what was it, why was it rejected?

When to Write an ADR

  • Strategic product decisions (which market segment to target, which platform to support)
  • Significant technical decisions (architecture choices, vendor selection, build vs buy)
  • Controversial decisions where people disagreed (document the rationale for future reference)
  • Decisions that constrain future options (choosing a technology, signing a partnership)
  • Decisions you expect people to question later (capture the context while it is fresh)

Tips for Decision Documentation

  • Write ADRs close to when the decision is made, not weeks later
  • Include who was involved in the decision and who made the final call
  • Document the context generously — future readers will not have today's context
  • It is okay to document decisions that were wrong in hindsight — add a "superseded by" link
  • Keep them short. One page is better than five.

Meeting Facilitation

Stand-up / Daily Sync

Purpose: Surface blockers, coordinate work, maintain momentum. Format: Each person shares:

  • What they accomplished since last sync
  • What they are working on next
  • What is blocking them

Facilitation tips:

  • Keep it to 15 minutes. If discussions emerge, take them offline.
  • Focus on blockers — this is the highest-value part of standup
  • Track blockers and follow up on resolution
  • Cancel standup if there is nothing to sync on. Respect people's time.

Sprint / Iteration Planning

Purpose: Commit to work for the next sprint. Align on priorities and scope. Format:

  1. Review: what shipped last sprint, what carried over, what was cut
  2. Priorities: what are the most important things to accomplish this sprint
  3. Capacity: how much can the team take on (account for PTO, on-call, meetings)
  4. Commitment: select items from the backlog that fit capacity and priorities
  5. Dependencies: flag any cross-team or external dependencies

Facilitation tips:

  • Come with a proposed priority order. Do not ask the team to prioritize from scratch.
  • Push back on overcommitment. It is better to commit to less and deliver reliably.
  • Ensure every item has a clear owner and clear acceptance criteria.
  • Flag items that are underscoped or have hidden complexity.

Retrospective

Purpose: Reflect on what went well, what did not, and what to change. Format:

  1. Set the stage: remind the team of the goal and create psychological safety
  2. Gather data: what went well, what did not go well, what was confusing
  3. Generate insights: identify patterns and root causes
  4. Decide actions: pick 1-3 specific improvements to try next sprint
  5. Close: thank people for honest feedback

Facilitation tips:

  • Create psychological safety. People must feel safe to be honest.
  • Focus on systems and processes, not individuals.
  • Limit to 1-3 action items. More than that and nothing changes.
  • Follow up on previous retro action items. If you never follow up, people stop engaging.
  • Vary the retro format occasionally to prevent staleness.

Stakeholder Review / Demo

Purpose: Show progress, gather feedback, build alignment. Format:

  1. Context: remind stakeholders of the goal and what they saw last time
  2. Demo: show what was built. Use real product, not slides.
  3. Metrics: share any early data or feedback
  4. Feedback: structured time for questions and input
  5. Next steps: what is coming next and when the next review will be

Facilitation tips:

  • Demo the real product whenever possible. Slides are not demos.
  • Frame feedback collection: "What feedback do you have on X?" is better than "Any thoughts?"
  • Capture feedback visibly and commit to addressing it (or explaining why not)
  • Set expectations about what kind of feedback is actionable at this stage

平台分布

Codex

37.6%
按下载量换算740

Claude

30.28%
按下载量换算596

Cursor

18.76%
按下载量换算369

Gemini CLI

8.53%
按下载量换算168

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills