Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 开发

stakeholder-analysis(利益相关者分析)

stakeholder-analysis 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

stakeholder-analysis 是开发类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在开发类的 21,746 个 Skill 里排第 17,869。

总安装 374周安装 15GitHub Stars 61下载 121核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:stakeholder-analysis(利益相关者分析)
来源仓库:https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins
仓库路径:skills/stakeholder-analysis
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill stakeholder-analysis
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill stakeholder-analysis

这个 Skill 是做什么的

开发类 Skill 面向写代码、改代码和排查问题,一般会读写仓库文件,部分还会执行构建或测试命令。

stakeholder-analysis 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中围绕仓库状态或代码变更进行整理时使用。适用于开发场景,可辅助利益相关者分析和协作管理。

通过 npx skills add 命令从指定 GitHub 仓库安装,需结合原始 README 确认具体用法。安装前建议核实权限范围、维护状态,并注意是否涉及联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。适用宿主包括 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,接入前应确认版本、权限和运行环境要求。

来源仓库内路径:skills/stakeholder-analysis

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill s…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

stakeholder-analysis 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/melodic-software/claude-code-plugins --skill stakeholder…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

stakeholder-analysis 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

stakeholder-analysis 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

stakeholder-analysis 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

stakeholder-analysis 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 374 次,近一周安装 15 次,下载 121 次,GitHub 61 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

stakeholder-analysis 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理开发类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

开发类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
skill-vetter

技能审查员 · OpenClaw

8,779,018986操作浏览器MIT-0通过
ontology

本体论 · OpenClaw

6,636,960576只读MIT-0通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

6,631,872764接触敏感数据未明确通过
entra-app-registration

内部应用程序注册 · Codex、Claude

3,757,680201接触敏感数据未明确通过
nano-banana-pro

纳米香蕉专业版 · OpenClaw

3,526,898364接触敏感数据MIT-0有提醒
stakeholder-analysis

利益相关者分析 · 本页

37461只读MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Stakeholder Analysis

Identify, analyze, and plan engagement strategies for project and initiative stakeholders. Based on BABOK v3 Elicitation & Collaboration knowledge area.

What is Stakeholder Analysis?

Stakeholder analysis systematically identifies all parties affected by or able to affect an initiative, assesses their interests and influence, and develops engagement strategies.

Core Deliverables

DeliverablePurposeWhen to Create
Stakeholder RegisterComprehensive list of all stakeholdersProject initiation
Power/Interest MatrixPrioritize engagement approachAnalysis phase
RACI MatrixClarify roles and responsibilitiesPlanning phase
Communication PlanStructured engagement strategyPlanning phase

Workflow

Phase 1: Stakeholder Identification

Step 1: Brainstorm Categories

Systematically identify stakeholders by category:

CategoryExamplesQuestions to Ask
SponsorsExecutive sponsor, budget ownerWho funds this? Who can cancel it?
UsersEnd users, power users, administratorsWho uses the solution daily?
OperatorsIT ops, support teams, maintenanceWho keeps it running?
RegulatorsCompliance, legal, auditWho ensures we follow rules?
Affected PartiesOther departments, displaced rolesWho is impacted by changes?
Subject Matter ExpertsDomain experts, technical leadsWho has critical knowledge?
Decision MakersSteering committee, architectsWho approves decisions?
InfluencersOpinion leaders, union repsWho shapes perceptions?
Step 2: Create Stakeholder Register
## Stakeholder Register

| ID | Name/Role | Category | Organization | Contact | Notes |
|----|-----------|----------|--------------|---------|-------|
| S01 | Jane Smith | Sponsor | Executive | jane@... | Budget authority |
| S02 | IT Operations | Operator | IT | ... | 24/7 support team |
| S03 | Customer Service Reps | User | Customer Care | ... | 50+ daily users |
| S04 | Compliance Officer | Regulator | Legal | ... | GDPR requirements |

Phase 2: Stakeholder Analysis

Step 1: Assess Each Stakeholder

For each stakeholder, evaluate:

DimensionQuestionScale
PowerCan they stop or significantly impact the initiative?Low/Medium/High
InterestHow much do they care about the outcome?Low/Medium/High
AttitudeAre they supportive, neutral, or resistant?Supporter/Neutral/Resistor
InfluenceCan they sway other stakeholders?Low/Medium/High
Step 2: Create Power/Interest Matrix
                    HIGH INTEREST
                         │
    ┌────────────────────┼────────────────────┐
    │   KEEP SATISFIED   │   MANAGE CLOSELY   │
    │                    │                    │
    │   • Regular updates│   • Active partner │
    │   • Address issues │   • Key decisions  │
    │   • Prevent blocks │   • Regular 1:1s   │
HIGH├────────────────────┼────────────────────┤
POWER                    │                    │
    │   MONITOR          │   KEEP INFORMED    │
    │                    │                    │
    │   • Minimal effort │   • Regular comms  │
    │   • Watch for      │   • Address needs  │
    │     changes        │   • Build support  │
    └────────────────────┼────────────────────┘
                    LOW INTEREST
Step 3: Plot Stakeholders
## Power/Interest Analysis

### Manage Closely (High Power, High Interest)
| Stakeholder | Power | Interest | Strategy |
|-------------|-------|----------|----------|
| Executive Sponsor | High | High | Weekly 1:1, all major decisions |
| Product Owner | High | High | Daily stand-ups, backlog collaboration |

### Keep Satisfied (High Power, Low Interest)
| Stakeholder | Power | Interest | Strategy |
|-------------|-------|----------|----------|
| CTO | High | Low | Monthly summary, escalation path |
| Legal | High | Low | Involve on compliance matters only |

### Keep Informed (Low Power, High Interest)
| Stakeholder | Power | Interest | Strategy |
|-------------|-------|----------|----------|
| End Users | Low | High | User group updates, beta programs |
| Help Desk | Low | High | Training, knowledge base updates |

### Monitor (Low Power, Low Interest)
| Stakeholder | Power | Interest | Strategy |
|-------------|-------|----------|----------|
| Other Departments | Low | Low | General announcements only |

Phase 3: Responsibility Assignment (RACI)

Create RACI matrix for key decisions and deliverables:

LegendMeaningRule
R - ResponsibleDoes the workCan have multiple
A - AccountableFinal authorityMust be exactly one
C - ConsultedProvides inputBefore decision
I - InformedNotified of outcomeAfter decision
## RACI Matrix

| Decision/Deliverable | Sponsor | PO | Dev Lead | Users | Ops |
|---------------------|---------|-----|----------|-------|-----|
| Solution Requirements | I | A | R | C | C |
| Technical Architecture | I | C | A | - | C |
| User Acceptance | A | R | C | R | I |
| Go-Live Decision | A | R | C | I | R |
| Production Support | I | I | C | - | A |

Phase 4: Communication Planning

Step 1: Define Communication Needs

For each stakeholder group:

QuestionPurpose
What do they need to know?Content
When do they need it?Timing
How should we communicate?Channel
Who should communicate?Sender
What response do we expect?Feedback mechanism
Step 2: Create Communication Plan
## Communication Plan

| Stakeholder | Message | Frequency | Channel | Owner | Feedback |
|-------------|---------|-----------|---------|-------|----------|
| Executive Sponsor | Status, risks, decisions | Weekly | 1:1 meeting | PM | Discussion |
| Product Owner | Progress, blockers | Daily | Stand-up | Team Lead | Same day |
| End Users | Training, updates | Bi-weekly | Newsletter | Change Lead | Survey |
| IT Operations | Release plans | Sprint end | Email + meeting | Tech Lead | Sign-off |
| All Stakeholders | Major milestones | As needed | Email blast | PM | None |

Phase 5: Engagement Strategy

For challenging stakeholders (resistors, skeptics), develop targeted strategies:

Resistance Analysis
## Resistance Analysis

| Stakeholder | Current Attitude | Desired Attitude | Resistance Reason | Strategy |
|-------------|-----------------|------------------|-------------------|----------|
| Dept Manager | Resistor | Supporter | Fears job impact | Show how role evolves, not disappears |
| IT Architect | Skeptic | Neutral | Technical concerns | Deep-dive sessions, address concerns |
| Union Rep | Neutral | Supporter | Needs assurance | Early engagement, transparency |

Output Formats

Narrative Summary

## Stakeholder Analysis Summary

**Initiative:** [Name]
**Analyst:** [Name]
**Date:** [ISO date]

### Key Stakeholders

**Primary Sponsors:**
- [Name] - [Role] - [Key interest/concern]

**Critical Partners (Manage Closely):**
- [List with brief description]

### Risk Areas

1. **[Stakeholder]** - [Risk] - Mitigation: [Strategy]

### Recommendations

1. [Specific engagement recommendation]
2. [...]

Structured Data (YAML)

stakeholder_analysis:
  version: "1.0"
  initiative: "Customer Portal Redesign"
  date: "{ISO-8601-date}"
  analyst: "stakeholder-facilitator"

  stakeholders:
    - id: S01
      name: "Jane Smith"
      role: "VP Customer Experience"
      category: sponsor
      organization: "Customer Care"
      power: high
      interest: high
      attitude: supporter
      influence: high
      strategy: manage_closely
      communication:
        frequency: weekly
        channel: meeting
        owner: "Project Manager"
      concerns:
        - "Timeline for Q2 launch"
        - "Budget constraints"

    - id: S02
      name: "IT Operations Team"
      role: "Platform Support"
      category: operator
      organization: "IT"
      power: medium
      interest: high
      attitude: neutral
      influence: medium
      strategy: keep_informed
      communication:
        frequency: bi-weekly
        channel: email
        owner: "Tech Lead"
      concerns:
        - "Support load increase"
        - "Training requirements"

  raci:
    - deliverable: "Requirements Sign-off"
      responsible: ["Product Owner"]
      accountable: "VP Customer Experience"
      consulted: ["IT Architect", "Users"]
      informed: ["IT Operations"]

  communication_plan:
    - audience: "Executive Sponsor"
      content: "Status, risks, decisions needed"
      frequency: weekly
      channel: "1:1 Meeting"
      owner: "Project Manager"

Mermaid Diagrams

Power/Interest Quadrant:

quadrantChart
    title Stakeholder Power/Interest Matrix
    x-axis Low Interest --> High Interest
    y-axis Low Power --> High Power
    quadrant-1 Manage Closely
    quadrant-2 Keep Satisfied
    quadrant-3 Monitor
    quadrant-4 Keep Informed
    Executive Sponsor: [0.9, 0.95]
    Product Owner: [0.85, 0.8]
    CTO: [0.3, 0.85]
    End Users: [0.8, 0.3]
    IT Operations: [0.7, 0.5]
    Other Depts: [0.2, 0.2]

Multi-Persona Workshop Mode

For comprehensive stakeholder analysis, run a multi-persona workshop (similar to event storming):

Personas to Invoke:

PersonaPerspectiveContribution
executive-sponsor-personaStrategicBudget, timeline, success criteria
end-user-personaOperationalDaily usage, pain points, adoption
operations-personaSupportMaintenance, reliability, training
compliance-personaRegulatoryRules, audit, risk
devils-advocateCriticalRisks, overlooked stakeholders, conflicts

Orchestration:

  1. Launch all personas in parallel
  2. Each persona identifies stakeholders from their perspective
  3. Synthesize findings with provenance tracking
  4. Resolve conflicts and gaps

When to Use

ScenarioUse Stakeholder Analysis?
New project initiationYes - identify all affected parties
Change managementYes - plan adoption strategy
Requirements gatheringYes - ensure right people involved
Conflict resolutionYes - understand interests
Routine operationsNo - not needed for BAU

Common Mistakes

MistakeImpactPrevention
Missing hidden stakeholdersLate surprises, resistanceUse systematic categories
Ignoring resistorsProject failureDevelop engagement strategy
Static analysisOutdated understandingRevisit quarterly
Over-communicating to allInformation overloadTailor by quadrant

References

  • Load references/power-interest-matrix.md for matrix variations
  • Load references/raci-matrix.md for RACI guidance
  • See BABOK v3 Chapter 3 (Elicitation & Collaboration)

Related Skills

  • capability-mapping - Identify capability owners as stakeholders
  • journey-mapping - Understand user stakeholder needs
  • risk-analysis - Assess stakeholder-related risks
  • prioritization - Prioritize stakeholder engagement
  • decision-analysis - Stakeholder decision matrices
  • process-modeling - Identify domain stakeholders through process analysis

User-Facing Interface

When invoked directly by the user, this skill operates as follows.

Arguments

  • <initiative-description>: Description of the initiative, project, or change to analyze stakeholders for
  • --mode: Analysis mode (default: guided)

- full: Multi-persona simulation with diverse perspectives (~10K tokens) - quick: Rapid stakeholder identification (~3K tokens) - guided: Interactive stakeholder discovery (variable)

  • --output: Output artifacts (default: all)

- register: Stakeholder register only - matrix: Power/Interest matrix only - raci: RACI matrix only - all: All artifacts

  • --dir: Output directory (default: docs/analysis/)

Execution Workflow

  1. Parse Arguments - Extract initiative description, mode, and output format. If no description provided, ask the user what initiative to analyze.
  2. Execute Based on Mode:

- Full: Spawn the stakeholder-facilitator agent with persona agents (executive-sponsor, end-user, operations, compliance, devils-advocate) for comprehensive multi-perspective analysis. - Quick: Rapid identification using standard RACI-style groups with default engagement strategies. - Guided: Interactive discovery using AskUserQuestion for stakeholder group selection and analysis depth, then walk through category sweep, assessment, matrix placement, and additional artifacts.

  1. Generate Output - Produce stakeholder register, Power/Interest matrix (Mermaid quadrantChart), RACI matrix, communication plan, and resistance analysis.
  2. Save Results - Save to docs/analysis/stakeholder-analysis.md (or custom --dir).
  3. Suggest Follow-Ups - Recommend capability-mapping for ownership links, journey-mapping for stakeholder experiences, and change management planning for resistors.

Version History

  • v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release

平台分布

Antigravity

30.79%
按下载量换算37

trae

23.89%
按下载量换算29

windsurf

15.38%
按下载量换算19

Claude Code

13.26%
按下载量换算16

Codex

7.24%
按下载量换算9

Gemini CLI

3.41%
按下载量换算4

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills