Token导航 LogoToken导航TokenDH.com
研究检索操作浏览器github未标认证来源可访问许可证需确认审计通过

systematic-debugging系统调试

Agent Skill

systematic-debugging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

总安装

539

周安装

22

GitHub Stars

206

下载量

172
CodexClaudeCursorGemini CLI

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明和来源信息,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。

GitHub

来源数

2

许可证

unknown

最后核验

2026-05-01

来源状态

来源可访问

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:systematic-debugging(系统调试)
来源仓库:https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills
仓库路径:skills/systematic-debugging
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills --skill systematic-debugging
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/spencerpauly/awesome-cursor-skills --skill systematic-debugging

简介

systematic-debugging 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速定位候选结果。

  • 适用于基于关键词或任务场景的信息检索需求。
  • 可通过安装命令或访问原始 README 核验具体用法。
  • 安装前需确认是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写操作。
  • 建议评估项目维护状态后再决定是否集成。

SKILL.md

Systematic Debugging

Debug methodically instead of randomly changing code.

The Process

1. Reproduce

Before anything else, reproduce the bug reliably:

  • Get the exact steps to trigger the issue
  • Note the expected vs actual behavior
  • Confirm it happens consistently (not intermittent)
  • Record the environment (OS, Node version, browser, etc.)

If you can't reproduce it, you can't fix it. Ask for more details.

2. Isolate

Narrow down where the bug lives:

Binary search the codebase:

  • Comment out half the system → does the bug persist?
  • If yes, the bug is in the remaining half → repeat
  • If no, the bug is in the commented-out half → repeat

Git bisect:

git bisect start
git bisect bad          # current commit is broken
git bisect good <sha>   # this commit was working
# Git checks out the midpoint — test it
git bisect good         # or git bisect bad
# Repeat until it finds the first bad commit
git bisect reset        # when done

Isolate by layer:

  • Is it frontend or backend? (Check network tab)
  • Is it the database? (Query directly)
  • Is it the API? (curl the endpoint)
  • Is it the component? (Render it in isolation)

3. Hypothesize

Form a specific, testable hypothesis:

  • "The bug is caused by X because Y"
  • Not "something is wrong with the data"
  • Good: "The userId is null because the auth middleware doesn't run on this route"

4. Test the Hypothesis

Write the smallest possible test that proves/disproves your hypothesis:

  • Add a console.log or breakpoint at the suspected location
  • Check the value of the suspected variable
  • If your hypothesis is wrong, go back to step 3 with new information
  • If it's right, you've found the bug

5. Fix and Verify

  • Apply the minimal fix
  • Verify the original reproduction steps no longer trigger the bug
  • Check for regressions — did the fix break anything else?
  • Write a test that would have caught this bug

Debugging Tools

ScenarioTool
"It worked before"git bisect
"I don't know where this runs"Add logging at entry/exit of suspect functions
"The data looks wrong"Inspect at each transformation step
"It only fails in production"Compare env vars, check logs, try to reproduce with prod data locally
"It's intermittent"Look for race conditions, timing issues, or uninitialized state
"The error message is useless"Search the codebase for where that error is thrown

Common Bug Patterns

  • Off-by-one: Array indices, pagination, date ranges
  • Null/undefined: Missing optional chaining, uninitialized state
  • Race condition: Async operations completing in unexpected order
  • Stale closure: React useEffect/useCallback capturing old values
  • Type coercion: == vs ===, string vs number comparisons
  • Missing await: Forgetting await on async functions
  • Environment mismatch: Works locally, fails in CI/prod due to different env vars or versions

Rules

  • Never guess — always verify with evidence
  • Fix the root cause, not the symptom
  • If you've spent 15 minutes without progress, step back and re-isolate
  • Document what you tried so you don't repeat failed approaches

适合场景

01

用户想查找某类 Agent Skill 时

02

需要根据任务场景推荐可安装能力包时

03

需要对比不同来源的安装命令和来源信息时

能力概览

能力 1

按任务关键词查找相关 Skills

能力 2

展示可复制的安装命令

能力 3

保留来源站点、仓库和原始说明,方便继续核验

能力 4

展示第三方安全扫描或审计结果

安装后应在对应宿主中按原始 README 的触发条件使用;具体调用方式请以来源页面和 README 为准。

平台分布

Codex

33.03%
按下载量换算57

Claude

30.13%
按下载量换算52

Cursor

17.52%
按下载量换算30

Gemini CLI

9.92%
按下载量换算17

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

操作浏览器

该 Skill 可能涉及浏览器控制能力,使用时可能读取或操作网页内容,需要在受控环境中确认权限边界。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。当前只有一个来源,正式发布前建议补源仓库或其他目录站核验。

来源信息

继续浏览同类 Skills