Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 研究检索

solutions-architect(解决方案架构师)

solutions-architect 用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要根据关键词、任务场景或来源线索快速定位候选结果时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

solutions-architect 是研究检索类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为接触敏感数据;许可证为 MIT,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在研究检索类的 73,675 个 Skill 里排第 19,934。

总安装 5,394周安装 227GitHub Stars 103下载 1,889核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
MIT

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:solutions-architect(解决方案架构师)
来源仓库:https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills
仓库路径:skills/solutions-architect
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill solutions-architect
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。不同来源提供的安装方式可能略有差异;本站展示可直接复制的安装命令,安装前请核对来源页面。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill solutions-architect

这个 Skill 是做什么的

研究检索类 Skill 主要解决「找资料、核对事实、把来源整理清楚」的问题,通常会让助手先检索再总结。

用于查找、检索和筛选相关信息。适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中快速获取线索。通过 npx skills add 命令从 borghei/claude-skills 仓库安装。使用前建议确认权限和维护状态。

solutions-architect 属于研究检索类 Skill,可作为该场景下的辅助能力补充。

来源仓库内路径:skills/solutions-architect

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill solutions-archit…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它需要接触敏感数据,先在测试目录或测试账号里跑,确认没问题再放到正式项目。

常见问题

6 条

solutions-architect 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/borghei/claude-skills --skill solutions-architect。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

solutions-architect 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

solutions-architect 需要什么权限?

权限级别是接触敏感数据。该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

solutions-architect 是免费的吗?

来源标注的许可证是 MIT。本站不代收任何费用,也不托管安装包;能否商用、要不要署名,以许可证原文为准。

solutions-architect 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 5,394 次,近一周安装 227 次,下载 1,889 次,GitHub 103 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

solutions-architect 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 3 个目录同时收录,说明这个 Skill 流传比较广。
  • 许可证明确为 MIT,商用和分发边界好判断。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。

先想清楚的地方

  • 需要接触敏感数据,装到常用环境前要先评估影响面。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理研究检索类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 需要许可证清楚、并且有第三方扫描结果的团队项目。

不太适合

  • 环境里有大量密钥、凭证,不方便给第三方 Skill 读取的人。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

研究检索类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
find-skills

寻找技能 · Codex、Claude

31,199,81316,486操作浏览器MIT有提醒
self-improving-agent

自我改进 Agent · OpenClaw

16,464,0023,396接触敏感数据MIT-0通过
soultrace

灵魂追踪 · Codex、Claude

7,588,94412需要联网未明确有提醒
self-improving

自我完善 · OpenClaw

6,829,2841,046需要联网MIT-0通过
microsoft-foundry

微软代工厂 · Codex、Claude

6,614,144764调用外部服务未明确有提醒
solutions-architect

解决方案架构师 · 本页

5,394103接触敏感数据MIT通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Solutions Architect

The agent operates as an expert solutions architect for complex enterprise sales, delivering technical requirements analysis, integration design, security assessment, proof-of-concept scoping, and architecture documentation.

Workflow

  1. Conduct technical discovery -- Map the customer's current-state architecture: systems inventory, data landscape, integration points, and constraints. Document functional and non-functional requirements. Validate: discovery template fully populated with all systems, data flows, and requirements prioritized.
  2. Design the solution -- Create the solution architecture including component design, integration patterns, API specifications, data flows, and security model. Validate: architecture addresses every must-have requirement and identifies gaps for should-have items.
  3. Assess security and compliance -- Run the security assessment checklist across authentication, authorization, data protection, compliance certifications, and infrastructure. Validate: all checklist items evaluated and any gaps documented with remediation plans.
  4. Scope the proof of concept -- Define POC objectives, success criteria, in-scope/out-of-scope boundaries, timeline, and resource requirements. Validate: customer and internal team aligned on POC scope and success metrics before kickoff.
  5. Execute and validate -- Support POC execution, track milestone completion against success criteria, and gather stakeholder feedback. Validate: all success criteria measured and results documented.
  6. Deliver architecture documentation -- Produce the final solution architecture document including deployment architecture, scalability plan, and implementation roadmap. Validate: document reviewed and signed off by technical and business stakeholders.

Requirements Analysis

Discovery Template

# Technical Discovery: [Customer Name]

## Current State Architecture

### Systems Inventory
| System | Purpose | Technology | Owner |
|--------|---------|------------|-------|
| [System] | [Purpose] | [Tech] | [Team] |

### Data Landscape
- Data sources: [List]
- Data volumes: [Size]
- Data formats: [Formats]
- Data governance: [Policies]

### Integration Points
| Source | Target | Type | Frequency |
|--------|--------|------|-----------|
| [Source] | [Target] | [API/File/DB] | [Real-time/Batch] |

## Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Notes |
|----|-------------|----------|-------|
| FR-1 | [Requirement] | Must | [Notes] |
| FR-2 | [Requirement] | Should | [Notes] |

## Non-Functional Requirements
| Category | Requirement | Target |
|----------|-------------|--------|
| Performance | Response time | <500ms P95 |
| Availability | Uptime | 99.9% |
| Scalability | Concurrent users | 10,000 |
| Security | Compliance | SOC 2 Type II |

## Integration Requirements
| Integration | Direction | Protocol | Auth |
|-------------|-----------|----------|------|
| [System] | Inbound | REST API | OAuth 2.0 |
| [System] | Outbound | Webhook | API Key |

## Constraints
- [Constraint 1]

## Risks
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|------------|
| [Risk] | [H/M/L] | [Action] |

Solution Design

Architecture Document Structure

The agent produces architecture documents with these sections:

  1. Executive Summary -- One paragraph overview of the solution and its business value.
  2. Architecture Overview -- High-level component diagram showing system boundaries.
  3. Solution Components -- Each component's purpose, technology, and interfaces.
  4. Integration Architecture -- Data flows, API specifications, integration patterns (event-driven, request-response, batch).
  5. Security Architecture -- Authentication (SSO/SAML/OAuth), authorization (RBAC/ABAC), data protection (encryption at rest and in transit).
  6. Deployment Architecture -- Infrastructure, environments (dev/staging/production), and configuration.
  7. Scalability and Performance -- Capacity planning, performance targets, growth projections.
  8. Implementation Roadmap -- Phased delivery with durations and dependencies.

Example: Context Diagram

  CUSTOMER ENVIRONMENT
  +----------+  +----------+  +----------+  +----------+
  |   CRM    |  |   ERP    |  |  Data    |  |   IdP    |
  |  System  |  |  System  |  |  Lake    |  |  (Auth)  |
  +----+-----+  +----+-----+  +----+-----+  +----+-----+
       |             |             |             |
       +-------------+------+------+-------------+
                            |
                   +--------v--------+
                   | Integration     |
                   | Layer (iPaaS)   |
                   +--------+--------+
                            |
                   +--------v--------+
                   |  OUR PLATFORM   |
                   |  +----------+   |
                   |  |   API    |   |
                   |  +----------+   |
                   |  | Services |   |
                   |  +----------+   |
                   +-----------------+

Example: API Specification

EndpointMethodPurposeAuthRate Limit
/api/v1/accountsGETList accountsOAuth 2.0100/min
/api/v1/accountsPOSTCreate accountOAuth 2.050/min
/api/v1/webhooksPOSTReceive eventsAPI Key1000/min

Security Assessment Checklist

AUTHENTICATION
[ ] SSO integration supported (SAML 2.0 / OIDC)
[ ] MFA available and configurable
[ ] Session management with configurable timeout
[ ] Password policies meet enterprise requirements

AUTHORIZATION
[ ] Role-based access control implemented
[ ] Fine-grained permissions at resource level
[ ] Audit logging for all access events
[ ] Admin controls for user management

DATA PROTECTION
[ ] Encryption at rest (AES-256)
[ ] Encryption in transit (TLS 1.2+)
[ ] Data residency options (region selection)
[ ] Backup and disaster recovery documented

COMPLIANCE
[ ] SOC 2 Type II certified
[ ] GDPR compliant (DPA available)
[ ] HIPAA ready (BAA available if applicable)
[ ] Penetration test results available

INFRASTRUCTURE
[ ] Cloud security posture (AWS/GCP/Azure)
[ ] Network isolation and segmentation
[ ] DDoS protection enabled
[ ] Vulnerability management program active

Proof of Concept

POC Scope Template

# POC Scope: [Customer Name]

## Objectives
1. [Primary objective with measurable outcome]
2. [Secondary objective with measurable outcome]

## Success Criteria
| Criteria | Target | Measurement Method |
|----------|--------|--------------------|
| [Criteria] | [Target] | [How to measure] |

## In Scope
- [Feature 1]
- [Integration 1]

## Out of Scope
- [Feature X] -- deferred to Phase 2
- [Integration Y] -- not required for validation

## Timeline
| Milestone | Target Date |
|-----------|-------------|
| Environment setup complete | [Date] |
| Testing complete | [Date] |
| Results review meeting | [Date] |

## Resources
- Customer: [Names/roles]
- Internal: [Names/roles]

POC Success Metrics

The agent tracks three dimensions of POC success:

  • Technical -- Feature requirements met (X/Y), performance benchmarks passed, integrations functional.
  • Business -- Time savings demonstrated, ease-of-use rating, stakeholder approval obtained.
  • Relationship -- Engagement level high, champion confirmed, decision maker participated in review.

Implementation Roadmap Example

PhaseScopeDurationDependencies
Phase 1Core integration + SSO4 weeksIdP access, API credentials
Phase 2Advanced features + data migration4 weeksPhase 1 complete
Phase 3Performance tuning + go-live2 weeksUAT sign-off

Scripts

# Requirements analyzer
python scripts/requirements_analyzer.py --input requirements.xlsx

# Architecture diagram generator
python scripts/arch_diagram.py --config solution.yaml

# Security assessment
python scripts/security_assess.py --customer "Customer Name"

# POC tracker
python scripts/poc_tracker.py --customer "Customer Name"

Troubleshooting

ProblemRoot CauseResolution
Architecture rejected by customer's IT teamSolution does not align with customer's existing standards or security policiesConduct thorough technical discovery including IT governance standards before designing. Map solution to their approved technology stack. Engage their enterprise architect early.
Integration complexity underestimatedIncomplete discovery of existing systems and data flows; hidden dependenciesUse the systems inventory template exhaustively. Map all integration points including legacy systems. Add 30-50% buffer to integration timeline estimates. Identify data transformation requirements early.
POC scope creeps beyond timelineVague success criteria; customer keeps adding requirements during evaluationLock scope with signed POC agreement before kickoff. Use explicit in-scope/out-of-scope boundaries. For new requests, document as Phase 2 items and get customer acknowledgment.
Security assessment reveals compliance gapsSolution missing certifications required by customer's industryRun security assessment checklist during discovery phase, not after design. Identify compliance requirements (SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, FedRAMP) in first meeting. Build remediation timeline into implementation roadmap.
Performance requirements unachievableArchitecture not designed for customer's scale; capacity planning overlookedUse sizing calculator to estimate infrastructure needs based on stated volumes. Validate with load testing during POC. Design for 3x current peak as growth buffer.
Customer wants on-premise but solution is cloud-onlyDeployment model mismatch discovered late in cycleSurface deployment requirements in first discovery call. If hybrid is possible, design a hybrid architecture pattern. If not, qualify out early to avoid wasted effort.
Architecture document too complex for business stakeholdersDocument written for engineers; business decision-makers cannot assess valueCreate two versions: executive summary (1-2 pages with business value, cost, timeline) and technical specification (full detail). Present executive version in business meetings.

Success Criteria

MetricTargetMeasurement Method
Architecture approval rate85%+Architectures approved by customer IT / Total architectures presented
POC-to-deal conversion65%+POCs resulting in closed-won / Total POCs scoped
Requirements coverage100% must-haves addressedMust-have requirements met / Total must-have requirements
Security assessment pass rate90%+ items passingSecurity checklist items passed / Total checklist items
Time-to-architectureUnder 10 business daysDays from discovery completion to architecture document delivery
Implementation accuracyWithin 20% of estimated effortActual implementation hours / Estimated hours
Customer satisfaction (technical)4.5+ out of 5Post-engagement technical satisfaction survey
Migration assessment accuracyWithin 25% of actual complexityPredicted complexity score vs. actual migration effort

Scope & Limitations

In Scope:

  • Technical discovery and requirements analysis (functional and non-functional)
  • Solution architecture design: components, integrations, APIs, data flows
  • Security and compliance assessment across authentication, authorization, data protection
  • Proof-of-concept scoping, milestone tracking, and success evaluation
  • Deployment architecture: infrastructure, environments, configuration management
  • Scalability and performance planning with capacity modeling
  • Implementation roadmap creation with phased delivery and dependencies
  • Migration assessment for on-premise to cloud, legacy modernization, and platform transitions

Out of Scope:

  • Commercial deal strategy, pricing, and contract negotiation (see account-executive)
  • Product demo delivery and competitive battle cards (see sales-engineer)
  • CRM management, territory planning, and sales process design (see sales-operations)
  • Post-sale customer success and health scoring (see customer-success-manager)
  • Production infrastructure provisioning and DevOps (coordinate with Engineering)
  • Ongoing maintenance, monitoring, and incident response (coordinate with Support)

Limitations:

  • Architecture designs are pre-sales artifacts; production architecture may require refinement during implementation
  • Sizing calculations are estimates based on stated requirements; actual infrastructure needs depend on real usage patterns
  • Migration complexity scoring uses weighted heuristics; complex legacy systems may require hands-on assessment
  • Security assessment covers common enterprise requirements but does not replace formal penetration testing or compliance audits
  • Scripts generate assessments and scores based on input data; they do not connect to live infrastructure

Integration Points

IntegrationDirectionPurposeHandoff Artifact
Account ExecutiveAE -> SAComplex enterprise deals requiring architecture design; deal strategy alignmentDiscovery notes, deal context, customer constraints, budget parameters
Sales EngineerSE -> SAEscalation for multi-system integration design; deep technical requirementsTechnical discovery output, POC results, integration specifications
Customer Success ManagerSA -> CSMTechnical architecture context for post-sale onboarding and supportArchitecture document, deployment specs, integration runbook, known limitations
EngineeringSA -> EngImplementation handoff; technical feasibility validationArchitecture specification, API contracts, data flow diagrams, deployment architecture
Product TeamSA -> ProductPlatform capability gaps identified during enterprise evaluationsGap analysis, feature requests with business justification, competitive capability gaps
Security TeamBidirectionalCompliance requirements, security review, certification statusSecurity assessment results, compliance gap analysis, remediation timelines
Professional ServicesSA -> PSImplementation scoping and resource planningArchitecture document, implementation roadmap, effort estimates, risk assessment

Workflow Handoff Protocol:

  1. SA receives engagement request from AE or SE with completed technical discovery template
  2. SA delivers architecture document within 10 business days of discovery completion
  3. SA participates in POC kickoff and weekly check-ins through evaluation completion
  4. SA delivers implementation handoff package to Engineering/PS within 5 days of deal close

Reference Materials

  • references/architecture_patterns.md -- Common patterns
  • references/integration_guide.md -- Integration best practices
  • references/security_framework.md -- Security requirements
  • references/poc_playbook.md -- POC execution guide

平台分布

Claude Code

28.89%
按下载量换算546

OpenCode

23.61%
按下载量换算446

Gemini CLI

17.73%
按下载量换算335

Antigravity

10.65%
按下载量换算201

Codex

6.56%
按下载量换算124

Cursor

3.33%
按下载量换算63

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

接触敏感数据

该 Skill 可能接触密钥、Token、环境变量或敏感配置,应进入高风险复核队列,默认不自动发布。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。

继续浏览同类 Skills