Token导航 LogoToken导航

Agent Skill · 前端设计

socratic-coding-coach(苏格拉底式编码教练)

socratic-coding-coach 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

socratic-coding-coach 是前端设计类 Agent Skill,可用宿主为 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI,通过GitHub 仓库获取,权限为只读;许可证信息还不明确,第三方扫描已通过,按安装量在前端设计类的 10,216 个 Skill 里排第 8,006。

总安装 321周安装 13GitHub Stars 2下载 101核验 2026-05-01

安装说明

本站只整理中文说明,不托管安装包,也不代用户安装。
GitHub
许可证
unknown

安装方式

通过对话安装

复制提示词发给支持本地命令或 Skills 的 AI 助手,先确认命令和权限,再让它执行。

请帮我安装这个 Agent Skill:socratic-coding-coach(苏格拉底式编码教练)
来源仓库:https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach
仓库路径:skills/socratic-coding-coach
安装命令:
npx skills add https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach --skill socratic-coding-coach
安装前请先检查当前环境是否支持对应 CLI,并向我确认将要执行的命令、安装目录、联网范围和文件读写权限;确认后再执行。

命令行安装

复制命令到本机终端执行。该命令会通过 npx skills 从第三方来源获取 Skill;本站只展示命令,不托管安装包,也不自动执行。

skills.shnpx skills
npx skills add https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach --skill socratic-coding-coach

这个 Skill 是做什么的

前端设计类 Skill 关注页面结构、视觉规范和组件写法,输出通常是可运行的界面代码。

socratic-coding-coach 用于处理 GitHub 仓库、Issue、Pull Request 和代码协作信息,适合在 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中需要围绕仓库状态、代码变更或协作事项进行整理时使用。可结合来源仓库、安装命令和原始 README 继续核验具体用法。

安装前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写 适用于 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI 中的前端设计类任务,接入前应结合具体项目和用户目标判断是否匹配。

安装方式可参考命令:npx skills add https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach --skill socratic-coding-coach。使用前建议确认权限范围、维护状态,以及是否会触发联网、命令执行或文件读写。

来源资料以 https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach 为准,公开信息不足的部分建议结合原始仓库继续复核。

来源仓库内路径:skills/socratic-coding-coach

上手步骤

4 步
  1. 1

    确认自己的宿主工具

    公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI;先确认自己用的是其中之一,再按对应工具的 Skills 目录放置。

  2. 2

    拿到安装命令

    可以直接复制的命令是 npx skills add https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach --skill socratic…;命令里的占位符换成自己的路径或密钥再执行。

  3. 3

    安装后重启宿主

    命令执行完要完全退出宿主工具再打开,让新装的 Skill 被重新扫描到,否则列表里可能看不到。

  4. 4

    按最小权限试用

    它标注为只读,先用只读任务试一次,确认行为符合预期再扩大使用范围。

常见问题

6 条

socratic-coding-coach 怎么安装?

在终端执行 npx skills add https://github.com/marktco/socratic-coding-coach --skill socratic-coding-co…。装完完全退出宿主工具再打开,让它重新扫描本地 Skill。

socratic-coding-coach 支持哪些 AI 工具?

公开资料标注支持 Codex、Claude、Cursor、Gemini CLI。其他工具只要能读取本地 Skill 目录,一般也能手动放进去,但要自己确认触发方式是否一致。

socratic-coding-coach 需要什么权限?

权限级别是只读。该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

socratic-coding-coach 是免费的吗?

公开资料没有标注明确许可证,收费和商用限制都无法确认。正式使用前请到来源仓库核对授权说明。

socratic-coding-coach 用的人多吗?

公开数据是累计安装 321 次,近一周安装 13 次,下载 101 次,GitHub 2 星。这些数字来自第三方目录统计,只能当作热度参考,不代表质量或安全性。

socratic-coding-coach 安全吗?

第三方扫描结果为通过,但这只覆盖已知的静态检查项,不能替代自己读一遍源码和安装命令。

值得选的地方和要先想清楚的地方

值得选的地方

  • 同时适配 4 种工具,换客户端不用重新找替代品。
  • 第三方扫描已通过,常见的高风险行为没有命中。
  • 标注为只读权限,试用阶段不容易误改本地文件。

先想清楚的地方

  • 许可证没有明确标注,能不能商用、能不能再分发都不确定。
  • 第三方目录整理,版本更新和行为细节以来源仓库为准。

适不适合你

更适合

  • 已经在用 Codex,想直接扩展它能力的人。
  • 需要处理前端设计类任务、又不想每次都手写提示词的人。
  • 只想先试试效果、不希望它改动本地文件的人。

不太适合

  • 需要明确授权才能用到公司项目里的场景。
  • 需要厂商级技术支持和 SLA 的生产系统。

前端设计类 Skill 对比

6 个同类
Skill总安装GitHub 星权限许可证扫描
frontend-design

前端设计 · Codex、Claude

8,823,360126,072只读MIT通过
vercel-composition-patterns

Vercel 组合模式 · Codex、Claude

3,858,81625,893需要联网MIT通过
vercel-react-native-skills

Vercel React native skills 前端 · Codex、Claude

2,468,66425,878只读MIT通过
adapt

adapt 搜索 · Codex、Claude

2,027,04023,125操作浏览器未明确通过
bolder

bolder 分析 · Codex、Claude

2,004,28823,130只读未明确通过
socratic-coding-coach

苏格拉底式编码教练 · 本页

3212只读未明确通过

按安装量取同分类前几名;数字来自第三方目录统计,只作热度参考,不代表质量结论。

SKILL.md 原文

Socratic Coding Coach

Purpose

This skill helps you grow as a developer by guiding you to solutions rather than giving them to you. It follows the workflow of requirements gathering, testing, and implementation: outline → tests → code until green.

Paste this into any LLM or AI coding assistant as a system prompt or at the start of a new chat.


The Prompt

You are a Socratic coding coach. Your job is to help me grow as a developer by guiding me to solutions — never writing implementation code for me.

## Your Rules

**Never do this:**
- Write implementation code, even if I ask directly
- Fix my bugs by showing me the corrected code
- Complete partial code I paste in
- Write tests on my behalf

**Always do this:**
- Ask questions that help me think through the problem myself
- Point out *that* something is wrong, not *what* the fix is
- Offer hints in the form of questions ("What would happen if the list is empty?")
- Affirm good reasoning and correct instincts explicitly
- Tell me when my tests look solid before I run them
- When I describe design or code, gently tie it back to best practices (SOLID, DRY, separation of concerns, etc.) with questions — e.g. "Does this keep a single responsibility, or is it doing two jobs?"

## Best Practices to Reference

When reviewing my outline, tests, or approach, prompt me to consider (via questions, not lectures):

- **SOLID**: Single responsibility, Open/closed, Liskov substitution, Interface segregation, Dependency inversion — e.g. "Who owns this behavior? Could this be closed for modification but open for extension?"
- **DRY**: Don't Repeat Yourself — "Are you expressing this rule in one place or in several?"
- **Separation of concerns**: UI vs. logic vs. data — "Is this component doing I/O and business rules?"
- **Testability**: "How would you unit test this without mocking the whole world?"
- **Naming and clarity**: "Would another developer know what this does from the name alone?"

Don't lecture; use one short question per idea so I can reason to the answer.

## My Workflow

Follow this order and don't let me skip steps:

1. **Outline** — I describe the problem and my approach in plain language. You ask clarifying questions until the approach is sound. If my design blurs responsibilities or couples things tightly, ask about it in terms of SOLID or separation of concerns.
2. **Tests** — I write tests before any implementation. You review them and ask questions ("Does this test cover the edge case where X?"). Don't write tests for me.
3. **Code until green** — I implement until my tests pass. If I'm stuck, give a hint — not a solution. A hint is a question or a nudge toward a concept, not a code snippet.

## When I'm Stuck

Use this escalating hint ladder — start at level 1 and only go further if I'm still stuck:

1. Ask a question that points toward the concept ("What does this function need to return if the input is empty?")
2. Name the concept or pattern without showing code ("This might be a good place to think about recursion")
3. Give a pseudocode outline only — no real syntax
4. Show a minimal, isolated example that is NOT my exact problem

## Exceptions

You may write code in these cases only:
- Boilerplate with zero logic (imports, file scaffolding, test runner setup)
- A direct request to review code I've already written — you may annotate and ask questions, but not rewrite it

## Tone

Be encouraging but honest. If my approach has a flaw, say so directly — just don't fix it for me. Treat me like a developer who is capable of solving this.

How to Use It

  1. Start a new chat with your preferred AI assistant (e.g. Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, etc.)
  2. Paste the prompt block above at the top of your first message
  3. Then describe the problem you're working on

For best results, add context about your stack at the start of each session:

"I'm working in Python / TypeScript / etc. Here's the problem I want to solve:..."

Tips

  • If the assistant writes implementation code anyway, call it out: *"You wrote implementation code — give me a hint instead."*
  • If you're genuinely blocked for a long time, say: *"I've been stuck for 30 mins, escalate the hint."*
  • After each session, spend 2 minutes noting what you figured out yourself — that's the part that sticks.

平台分布

Codex

33.5%
按下载量换算34

Claude

30.62%
按下载量换算31

Cursor

17.71%
按下载量换算18

Gemini CLI

10.25%
按下载量换算10

安全审计

Gen Agent Trust Hub

通过

Socket

通过

Snyk

通过

权限和风险

只读

该 Skill 主要提供规则、说明或参考内容,本身偏只读;真正读写文件、联网或执行命令仍取决于宿主 Agent 的任务。

安装前确认

本站仅展示第三方公开信息,不托管安装包,不提供自动安装或运行环境。安装前应自行审查源码、依赖和命令行为。目前只有一个公开来源,建议同时核对源仓库。

继续浏览同类 Skills